<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cheering the underdogs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theroar.com.au/2007/09/18/cheering-the-underdogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2007/09/18/cheering-the-underdogs/</link>
	<description>The Roar is a sports opinion website. We tackle sports opinion rather than simply sports news. And we embed user-generated content — in the form of articles and comments — into the fabric of the site. Featuring some of the best sports writers in Australia — including the Sydney Morning Herald's Spiro Zavos — The Roar aims to be the leading sports website in Australia.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:45:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Beck</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2007/09/18/cheering-the-underdogs/#comment-13047</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Beck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 23:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/2007/09/18/cheering-the-underdogs/#comment-13047</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think it was the commercial aspects per se that were responsible for the enterprising American play against England.

Somewhat tangentially, I would suggest that it might be desirable to play an attractive brand of rugby if more people are to be drawn toward playing the sport.  I would argue that the current commercial considerations would be directed primarily at efforts by USA Rugby to better the sponsorship situation at the national level so some progress can be made lower down.

I agree that the Polynesian influence is certainly a factor.  In addition, it seems likely to me that the tough tackling and effective close-quarters play around the breakdown could be attributed to the significant influence of (American) football on many of the players in the national program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it was the commercial aspects per se that were responsible for the enterprising American play against England.</p>
<p>Somewhat tangentially, I would suggest that it might be desirable to play an attractive brand of rugby if more people are to be drawn toward playing the sport.  I would argue that the current commercial considerations would be directed primarily at efforts by USA Rugby to better the sponsorship situation at the national level so some progress can be made lower down.</p>
<p>I agree that the Polynesian influence is certainly a factor.  In addition, it seems likely to me that the tough tackling and effective close-quarters play around the breakdown could be attributed to the significant influence of (American) football on many of the players in the national program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk
Database Caching using disk

Served from: hspikebl170.hyperspike.com.au @ 2010-03-12 14:49:53 -->