
Having a ball
At a demonstration of NZ cooking earlier in the RWC tournament, where Anton Oliver stole the show as a volunteer, there were some of the Gilbert balls being used at this RWC tournament. Going back many (many) decades to the days of my youth I couldn’t resist grabbing one and shaping up to pass to my startled wife. What I noticed about the ball is that they are much pointer, more plum shaped, than the balls used in tests and RWC tournaments in the past.
I asked a professional rugby player about this. He told me the pointed ball went much further when punted accurately than the more soccer-round type of ball. It also bounced more erratically. I noticed that Nick Evans for the All Blacks and Chris Latham for the Wallabies are kicking this 2007 ball huge distances. But Daniel Vickerman and Chris Jack have dropped passes they would usually snaffle with easy. And the goal-kickers, unless they hit the (smaller?) sweet spot accurately. Stirling Mortlock and Stephen Jones both missed relatively easy shots at goals in the Australia-Wales game.
I was talking to one of the Wallabies management recently and we talked about the balls. He made the interesting point that they favoured the Springboks because their game was essentially to smash into rucks and mauls (generally illegally), to win the lineouts with the marvellous Victor Matfield, for Percy Montgomery to kick all the penalties and then to force penalties and the occasional try (with Bryan Habana’s chasing) by continually kicking the ball.
A couple of good Rugby jokes
Along with Mick Cleary and Paul Ackford of The Daily Telegraph (UK), I really enjoy the writing of Chris Hewitt in The Independent. Chris looks like an old-fashioned Fleet Street reptile. He slightly roly-poly, has a wicked sense of humour and is the full bottle on all the rugby gossip.
Unlike some (read Stephen Jones) he has some respect for rugby in Australia and New Zealand, and some real insight into why these countries are world-leaders in the game, on and off the field. In his write-up of the Tonga-Samoa game, Chris was at his insightful and witty best. Writing about the Samoan flanker Ulia Ulia, he said, ‘Ulia Uli, a Samoan flanker so good they named him twice…’ And on Hale T-Pole’s yellow card, he wrote: ‘T-Pole did not last the game: he was sent off for a stiff-armed tackle on the Samoan lock Leo Lafaiali’i. You might say that Lafaiali’i was T-Pole-axed …’
Say it isn’t so, IRB
L’Equipe, the main daily sporting newspaper in France, is usually very well-informed. I was concerned when I read a short item some days ago to the effect that the RWC 2011 tournament will have two divisions, one of 16 teams for the William Webb Ellis trophy, and a second division “reservee aux equippes les plus faibles’ (reserved for weaker teams) which will be named La Couple Vernon Pugh.
Vernon Pugh, who he? Vernon Pugh QC (as he liked to be called) was the first full-time, paid president of the IRB. He died in harness in 2003. He remained an official of the Welsh Rugby Union, while leading the IRB. He was hostile to rugby success of Australia and NZ and once threatened to stop SANZAR referees from managing the game to allow open, running rugby. According to L’Equipe, Pugh came up with the idea of the two-tier RWC tournament.
I have two objections to the L’Equipe news. First, Vernon Pugh was such a partisan Welsh supporter, even as the president of the IRB (see how Welsh the opening ceremony at Cardiff the 1999 RWC tournament was), that it is an insult to the other major rugby nations he was hostile to to enshrine his name in a RWC tournament. Second, the notion of a 16-team RWC tournament, rather than a 20-team tournament, should be strongly resisted by the rugby community.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
The Crowd Says (9) | Page 1 of Comments
Have Your Say
- Explore:

fudge said | September 19th 2007 @ 6:59pm | Report comment
Spiro, just can’t help yourself when it comes to the Springboks, hey.
At least the Wallabies and their management can watch them from the stands during the final when they smash into the rucks, steal the lineout balls from the All Blacks and score the occasional try to lift Bill after 80 minutes. Sigh.
Ben from Pretoria said | September 21st 2007 @ 6:23pm | Report comment
Spiro, I am a admirer of your work but I have to agree that you love directing cheap shots at the Springboks.
The Boks hit the rucks and mauls hard but very legal and until proven otherwise it will stay only your opinion.
What do you think of the Judicial Official from Aus that tried to have Schalk Burger banned for 4 games and was later unmasked as basically incompetent?
Spiro Zavos said | September 21st 2007 @ 9:33pm | Report comment
Ok Ben, point made. I’ll lay off bagging the Springboks. Within their camp, and among many experts I’ve talked to, they are increasingly being seen as the possible winners of the 2007 RWC tournament. One of the things that could help them (and this is written before the France-Ireland match) is that their half of the finals looks to give them an easy ride to the Paris final, whereas the other half of the finals could see Australia, France and New Zealand fighting out a place in the final.
fudge said | September 21st 2007 @ 9:45pm | Report comment
Spiro – regarding the “other half of the finals” – with Aussie in there, surely that must be of great help to France and New Zealand and should provide one of them with an easy ride to the Paris finals.
ulysses said | September 22nd 2007 @ 1:30pm | Report comment
Spiro is right. If Argentina get up over Ireland (v good chance) then look at the most likely runs to the final:
South Africa have to beat Wales and then Argentina/Scotland. Virtual certainties.
New Zealand have to beat France then Australia !
Australia have England (assuming Samoa/Tonga don’t beat them up) then NZ/France.
So if the ABs can beat France, Australia and SA in 3 consecutive games, they will richly deserve to be world champs! That is a big ask under huge pressure. And that’s after not a single tough game in the pool as well…..
NZ deserve to be favourites, but gee I would be a little nervous if I was a Kiwi!
And a final note – the travesty is the France/NZ quarter-final will be played in …. Cardiff ! That helps the ABs I guess. But what a joke – France will be asking how the hell they have given up home ground in their own World Cup!
Swifty said | September 22nd 2007 @ 9:25pm | Report comment
Hey Fudge,
As I write this its 52 minutes into the Tonga v South Africa match and its 10 all. IS THIS THE GREAT SOUTH AFRICAN TEAM YOU’VE BEEN MOUTHING OFF ABOUT????!!!!?????
fudge said | September 22nd 2007 @ 11:08pm | Report comment
No swifty mate, it’s the second Bok team that beat the Tongans with a bonus point. Not much else required in tournament play, buddy.
Wasn’t pretty, but a better effort than Wales and aussie combined last weekend. All you need now is for some incompetent aussie official to site a Bok or two. Sounds familiar?
There’s few things that tells you more about an individual than his use of grammar, especially excessive use of capitals and punctuation. Grow up son and go beat your monkey, swifty.
As for the Boks – we’ll see the mighty ABs in the finals, like it should be. What a game that’ll be.
Swifty said | September 23rd 2007 @ 2:00am | Report comment
With respect to a great site I’ll not get too personal and appologise for baiting you but fudge mate the only thing you’ll uncover about me is that I don’t share your blind faith that this Bok team is that fantastic. I think they have a great chance of making the final – given the draw I’d be surprised if they didn’t but that doesn’t mean they are that good – only that they are better than the northern hemisphere teams and Argentina.
I honestly can’ see the Boks laying a hand on New Zealand and I reckon their midfield won’t trouble the Aussies too much. Percy’s general kicking today was terrible and Latho will lap that stuff up. I’d also have to question Jake White’s planning to risk so much on the Tonga game. Maybe he took Eddie Jones’ opinion on the matter. I’d say South African overconfidence might be hampering the Bok world cup bid. But that’s just an opinion.
fudge said | September 23rd 2007 @ 3:22am | Report comment
Apologies accepted Swifty, but to quote the great Big Lebowski “Well, that’s like your opinion, man”
Anyway, I agree that the Boks did not cover themselves in glory against Tonga, but still believe they’re a quality side which should go through to the final. No blind faith here, but the aussies have nothing on the Springboks, a pity that their paths may not cross in this tournament. Connely should have put more faith in the aussie youth, some wonderful talent there.
One last thing – it is common believe in the Republic that this will be our final serious attempt to bring Bill back home, come next year politics will be the victor and some stringent quotes will ensure the demise of the Springbok. Talk is anyway that the Springbok emblem will be replaced by a Protea.
Lets look forward to some quality rugby and quit the tit-for-that. All the best for tomorrow’s game.