
In the post John Eales era there have been few players that Australia have relied more upon to deliver them success than Stephen Larkham.
He has defined the way Australia play for the best part of a decade and for long periods of his career he set the standard internationally for fly half play. For a player who has influenced the outcome of so many games during his career it was tragic to see him retire without touching a ball after the ‘Miracle at Marseilles’.
To look back on Larkham’s career is to look back on the rise and fall of the Wallabies at the turn of the millennium. If rugby indeed is played in cycles then Larkham’s career spanned a full one. From the depths of the 1997 defeat to Argentina to the highs of the 1999 World Cup and the first series defeat of the Lions in 2001, Larkham helped guide the Wallabies rise and fought to hold off the regrettable fall that resulted in the notoriously poor tour of the northern hemisphere in 2005.
A superb playmaker who always attacked the advantage line, Larkham perfectly fitted the bill as the fly half to orchestrate new coach, MacQueen’s multiphase game play. A rugged and willing defender, Larkham was also the right man to step up to John Muggleton’s disciplined defensive structure. This defence famously held against all comers in the world cup bar the United States as the Wallabies marched on to victory and Muggleton’s work is credited with starting the world wide improvement in this area of the game.
The first game of the 2000 Bledisloe Cup saw perhaps the best game of Larkham’s career. Having conceded 3 tries in the space of 7 minutes the Wallabies could have been expected to take in the shock that filled their supporters at the ground and in bars and lounge rooms around the world. Instead Larkham got down to business. With the first good ball the Wallabies had seen the fly half made a gap in the defence where there wasn’t one. Whatever the All Blacks could throw at them, Larkham refused to lose his head or concede an early defeat. As a playmaker this defiance was inspiring.
Replays show there was only the slightest of misalignments in the All Black’s defensive line as Larkham loped towards them. With little more than a feint show of the ball and a shift of his shoulders he was passed the first line of defence and the game was alive. The play combined the two great traits that became synonymous with Larkham’s game; the ghosting run described above and the long flat pass, this time perfectly fed to a young Stirling Mortlock who raced away to finish the move with a try.
That game, won at the death by a Jonah Lomu try, remains the best of the professional era and was arguably the last of its kind at an international level – when attack outweighed defence – before England made ten man rugby successful again. The 2001 Lions tour was the turning point for world rugby as phase play slowly gave way to the forward based game. Critical to the success of the British and Irish team was negating Larkham’s attacking threats. They set about achieving this with an aggressive attitude and a series of late challenges, memorably delivered through the elbow of Scott Quinnell, that took a heavy blow on Larkham and largely succeeded in taking him out of the series. Parallels were drawn with the bodyline tactics of yesteryear as attacking flair was sacrificed at the altar of success at all costs. Fortunately for Australia these tactics failed but the die was cast.
At this point in Larkham’s career, with his importance to the success of his team so obviously acknowledged by the northern hemisphere teams, Australian rugby began its slow downward spiral. The departure of MacQueen and many of the team’s stalwarts was not well managed and nowhere was this more obvious than in the forwards. As the world rugby landscape changed Australia stood still, tenaciously clinging to the multiphase game plan as their opposition became bigger and stronger at the set piece.
The criticality of Larkham’s role was further exasperated by Australia’s relatively small playing pool and lack of competition. By comparison, New Zealand, during the course of Larkham’s career, based teams around three vastly different world class fly halves; Carlos Spencer, Andrew Mehrtens and Daniel Carter. Snapping at the heals of these All Black greats were very competitive challengers like Tony Brown, Luke McAllister and Nick Evans amongst others. Larkham’s nearest competitor was the solid and reliable Elton Flatley, a player whose style was better adapted to the field position game preferred by England’s Clive Woodward and Flatley’s first Queensland Coach, John Connolly.
As the trophies left the cabinet and the Wallabies lost their competitive edge Larkham slowly began to show that the years of wear and tear were taking their toll. The ghosting runs and cross-field passes were still their but they had lost their edge. Unfortunately, as his forward pack’s strength receded the tiring playmaker found himself under increasing pressure with less time to work the ball and no momentum to roll back the defensive line.
Australian selectors foolishly positioned themselves between a rock and hard place. With a forward pack that were struggling to win possession it became more and more important that Larkham take the field to lead the backs but with Larkham always taking the field it allowed no opportunity for a successor to be trialled and a competitive environment at fly half to be established. The result was inevitable.
The import of outside backs from rugby league did little to alter the downfall and was the equivalent of treating cancer with a handful of smarties. Bad ball became worse until finally, against Wales and England in 2005, the trickle was dammed completely and the Wallabies were humbled by teams with vastly inferior backlines but, more importantly, with vastly superior forward packs.
The embarrassment of that tour prompted the events that led to the appointment of Connolly as Australian coach. This had the surprising flow on effect, given the Queenslander’s stated aim of focusing on the forwards, of reinvigorating Larkham’s rugby career.
Connolly’s policy of creating competition for every jersey was to a large degree compromised by the pressure he felt to succeed at the world cup. The subject of much criticism, Connolly was however very successful in reigniting the careers of some of Australia’s older generation who had become too comfortable in their selections. Larkham and his long time partner in the halves, George Gregan, were perhaps the two Wallabies who benefited most from this competition within the team and both players went into the world cup deserving their selection on form and no longer just on reputation.
Entering his last world cup Larkham looked to have risen for one last glorious push. A victory over clear favourites New Zealand earlier in the year gave Australia hope but such hopes rested on one qualification; “we can win” the punters said, “but only if Larkham’s fit”. The surprising rise of Berrick Barnes during the campaign, so happily received by the Wallabies and their supporters, feels in some strange way an inadequate substitute for the opportunity of seeing one of our greatest and most influential Wallabies leave the international stage without being able to play his last hand.
Like the departure of Ian Healy from cricket’s international arena, Larkham’s exit leaves us with an empty feeling and has robbed his many fans of the opportunity to acknowledge his contribution to Australian rugby in a fitting manner. Not in a tickertape parade of victory or even the bested efforts of a hard fought defeat will we remember his last moments in the green and gold but as a mere onlooker like the rest of us.
As clichéd and over hyped as it may be, I will always remember Larkham for ‘that’ drop kick. Like Shane Warne’s ‘Gatting Ball’, Larkham’s field goal against South Africa in the 1999 rugby world cup will remain forever tied to any memories of his career. Although not representative of what made him the great player he was, it was the play that made him.
From then on he was and will always remain a great Wallaby.
The Roar’s photo gallery of Stephen ‘Bernie’ Larkham




—
Enjoy this article? We encourage you to send it to a few friends and spread the word.
Recommend this story.
We're hiring. Find out more.
- Explore:

October 29th 2007 @ 2:35pm
sheek said | October 29th 2007 @ 2:35pm | Report comment
Very wisely spoken Spiro.
October 29th 2007 @ 3:07pm
Richard said | October 29th 2007 @ 3:07pm | Report comment
Yes, good information Spiro, it counts for a bit more than some of these contributors’ hazy memories.
I thought a couple of Larkham’s great assets were his ability to accelerate and change direction without apparently doing anything obvious, and his extraordinary ability to fire long passes using mainly his fingers and wrists. Consequently, he could maintain good pace right up to the defenders faces, and defenders never knew if he was going to throw a pop pass or a long pass until it left his hands, and he didn’t put his running off balance by big arm swings. Contrast that with the leaguie style of propping and passing (“shovelling it on” seems to be the commentators cliche of choice), or Sam Norton-Knight who does a 180 degree swing of his arms to pass long. Pity Sam plays under a coach who wouldn’t have noticed that…or noticed him at all!
The issue of retirements is difficult. Of course the players want to stay in the game as long as possible, but gee, the administrators, especially from NSW have made some blunders cutting Matt Burke, Nathan Grey, Scott Staniforth and others, and replaced them with the ilk of the loyal Sam Harris.
October 29th 2007 @ 3:57pm
Glenn Condell said | October 29th 2007 @ 3:57pm | Report comment
‘Can someone who remembers please describe Larkham the fullback, in terms of how good he was at #15 when Macqueen implemented the switch, as well as how good he might have been had the switch never taken place?’
It’s hazy (sorry Richard) but my memory is of a rather hot/cold fullback, epitomised by a very early Test at Murrayfield, where he had a first half shocker, then came out and scored two of the freakiest individual tries you’ll see to get us home. He beat abobut 7 players for one of them. The Scot coach (can’t recall if it was Telfer or Geech) waxed lyrical at the time about his evasive skills. When he was recently mooted to go to Edinburgh, Gregor Townsend said some very nice things about him in the local press; basically that he is the template of how a modern flyhalf should play. Perhaps all the respect in Scotland was one reason he was keen to head over there. He actually started as a halfback, and first met Gregan after outpointing him in a junior game.
‘Great players change the nature and perception of their positions’
Larkham broke the mould, with Macqueen’s help. Opposition defensive coaches earned their keep preparing for games against the Wallabies, and attack coaches too would have gleaned a lot from him.
‘and his extraordinary ability to fire long passes using mainly his fingers and wrists.’
I’ve always thought him the best passer I’ve seen in union, with only Johns and perhaps Lewis in league to compare. I admit to occasionally longing to see him get front foot ball from a dominant pack and a fast-passing halfback, neither of which he had the luxury of very often in a long career. Imagine what he could have done with some of the ball Wilko got the other week. Imagine him operating outside Farr-Jones, let alone Hipwell and Catchpole. I saw him lead the Brumbies to a rout over NSW this year in Canberra and it was a pleasure to see that loping run and glorious passing one last time. And I’m a Tah supporter.
All the best Bernie; if the Beales and Coopers and Barneses contribute half as much as you have to Australian rugby and give half as much pleasure to it’s supporters, they’ll have gone pretty well.
October 29th 2007 @ 4:13pm
andrew said | October 29th 2007 @ 4:13pm | Report comment
Well done from me too Garth – Larkham has been one of Australia’s finest players and one of the greatest outside halves I’ve seen. I don’t know who was the best and it doesn’t matter but he is there with Mark Ella, Michael Lynagh and the great Welsh outside half factory; Phil Bennet, Jonathan Davies and the legendary Barry John.
The greatest contribution you could make in your retirement Bernie is to teach Australia’s backs how to pass the ball better.It is a continuing mystery to me why in the professional era some basic skills like passing have if anything declined almost everywhere.
October 29th 2007 @ 5:31pm
Stu said | October 29th 2007 @ 5:31pm | Report comment
Don’t forget Bernie’s heart!
Melbourne 1998 in the first test against the AB’s – Steve Larkham did something i have never seen at the international level – he charged down a Mehrtens goal kick. That is only one of the many awesome things he achieved in his 101 tests. But it wasn’t always the big things, it was the little things that made him such a sublime exponent and definer of his position.
To my mind he has been without doubt he has been the most influential wallaby players since the game went professional. We never deserved to make 2003 final – if he had not been taken out early in that game, we may well have won.
The guy was a freak.
October 29th 2007 @ 6:42pm
sheek said | October 29th 2007 @ 6:42pm | Report comment
Spiro’s stats were illuminating. But as they say – there are “stats, damned stats & lies”. Or more appropriately, stats can be read & interpreted in many different ways. The following info was derived from ‘sporting-heroes.net/rugby-heroes’, if anyone is interested in perusing same.
Larkham’s career is divided into 3 x 4 year cycles: 1996-99, 2000-03, 2004-07. The breakdown is as follows:
Span P W D L W% NZP W% SAP W%
96-99 30 22 1 7 73.33 6 50.00 5 40.00
00-03 35 22 1 12 62.86 9 55.56 8 62.83
04-07 37 24 1 12 64.86 7 29.86 10 50.00
Total 102 68 3 31 66.67 22 45.45 23 52.17
Larkham’s most successful era was 1996-99, when he was surrounded by many great other players. Interestingly, his win ratio for era 2004-07 is slightly better than 2000-03, which surprised me, considering the falloff in the Wallabies’ overall standards. His performance against the All Blacks fell off, while he remained steady against the Boks.
Ella played 25 tests 1980-84, for 13 wins, a draw & 11 losses. His win ratio was 52%. He played the All Blacks 10 times for 4 wins & a win ratio of 40%. Ella only played behind a dominant pack in 1984. Also, goalkicking was inconsistent for the Wallabies 1980-84. Ella never played against the Boks.
How much does an individual influence his team? How much is an individual constrained by the quality of players around him? Ultimately, who we prefer is a matter of highly subjective taste.
One thing we can all agree on – Larkham & Ella are two of the greatest flyhalfs Australian rugby has been blessed to call its own.
October 30th 2007 @ 12:14am
jools-usa said | October 30th 2007 @ 12:14am | Report comment
It has been a pleasure to watch & savour Larkham (& Gregan) these past years.
Worth getting up in the wee hours to tape games (never could work the timer), and to relish the “real” rugby
he and the W’s offered.
When you think of his slight build in todays era of “beefcake”, he never hesitated to find gaps AND tackled with abandon.
That’s a great, great athlete.
God bless you Bernie, and thanks.
Jools-USA:
October 30th 2007 @ 12:19am
ohtani's jacket said | October 30th 2007 @ 12:19am | Report comment
As a Kiwi, when I first saw Larkham play first five, I thought he was the most unorthodox first five I had ever seen. I didn’t really think it would work. Well, the next five years were worse than all of our World Cup exits combined… I’ll never forget that pass to Kefu in 2001 as long as I live. If he comes to Japan, hopefully I’ll get to see him at a club game.
October 30th 2007 @ 4:36am
Stu said | October 30th 2007 @ 4:36am | Report comment
Hey Sheek
Thanks for your analysis but think that you probably should remove his first 12 or so test from your equation as in 96/97 he was a peripherel player and played a number of outside back positions. Best start from 98-2000 etc when he first played 10.
October 30th 2007 @ 4:43am
spiro zavos said | October 30th 2007 @ 4:43am | Report comment
Sheek’s statistics are revealing. This is outstanding analysis and extremely helpful in assessing Stephen Larkham’s career as a Wallaby.
They show what a dominant five-eighths Stephen Larkham was most of the time, and how dominant Mark Ella would have been with a decent pack. The 1984 Wallaby Grand Slam, with Ella scoring a try in every test, an unprecedented achievement, showed just how good an attacking player he was. He was also, like Larkham, a strong defender.
I saw Mark Ella cocme out of retirement and play for Randwick against Bath, then the top Englis club side. His opposing five-eighth was Barnes, then England’s five-eighth at the height of his powers, and now a television commentator. Despite being out of condition Ella totally outplayed Barnes and steered Randwick to a victory.
Two great five-eights, one the classical passing and occasional running player (Ella) and the other an aggressive running player who attacked the advantage line either forcing the tackle (or missed tackle) and pulling the line through to run on to a variety of gorgeously weighted passes.
Great Australian five-eights tended to come about every decade-plus or so: Dr John Solomon/Phil Hawthorn, Mark Ella/Michael Lynagh/ and Stephen Larkham. Who is the next Wallaby magician?