<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twenty20 cricket &#8211; 6 tactics for winning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theroar.com.au/2007/12/17/twenty20-cricket-6-tactics-for-winning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2007/12/17/twenty20-cricket-6-tactics-for-winning/</link>
	<description>Your Sports Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:00:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Republican</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2007/12/17/twenty20-cricket-6-tactics-for-winning/comment-page-2/#comment-214131</link>
		<dc:creator>Republican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 02:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/2007/12/17/twenty20-cricket-6-tactics-for-winning/#comment-214131</guid>
		<description>Good analogy Spiros. 

T20 is bawdy enertainment compared to the real Mc Coy, yet it also poses the biggest single threat to the game of Cricket ever encountered with it&#039;s growing influential lure of the almighty $.  

The newer generations have not the patience, appreciation of history or subtley to ensure Test Crickets future, which is destined to become little more than that games quirky equivalent of Royal Tennis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good analogy Spiros. </p>
<p>T20 is bawdy enertainment compared to the real Mc Coy, yet it also poses the biggest single threat to the game of Cricket ever encountered with it&#8217;s growing influential lure of the almighty $.  </p>
<p>The newer generations have not the patience, appreciation of history or subtley to ensure Test Crickets future, which is destined to become little more than that games quirky equivalent of Royal Tennis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2007/12/17/twenty20-cricket-6-tactics-for-winning/comment-page-1/#comment-197718</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 20:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/2007/12/17/twenty20-cricket-6-tactics-for-winning/#comment-197718</guid>
		<description>Interesting article and good comments - cheers.

I would add that in Twenty20 partnerships are critical for the batting side. With only 20 overs it becomes extremely difficult to win if you lose too many wickets, and consequently you have too many new batsmen come to the crease. The onus needs to be on the players who are already there in the middle - once they hit form - to stay there.

I agree with poster above who says batsmen can have too much running through their mind. They just need to work towards that overal target of 160-180. Sometimes they bat as if the target is infinity!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article and good comments &#8211; cheers.</p>
<p>I would add that in Twenty20 partnerships are critical for the batting side. With only 20 overs it becomes extremely difficult to win if you lose too many wickets, and consequently you have too many new batsmen come to the crease. The onus needs to be on the players who are already there in the middle &#8211; once they hit form &#8211; to stay there.</p>
<p>I agree with poster above who says batsmen can have too much running through their mind. They just need to work towards that overal target of 160-180. Sometimes they bat as if the target is infinity!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul.bertelle</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2007/12/17/twenty20-cricket-6-tactics-for-winning/comment-page-1/#comment-117915</link>
		<dc:creator>paul.bertelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 02:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/2007/12/17/twenty20-cricket-6-tactics-for-winning/#comment-117915</guid>
		<description>It is a fallacy to think that Twenty20 cricket is a &#039;slogathon&#039;. It is more like speed chess. The biggest mistake that batsmen make when coming to the crease is that they over complicate their game. Some batsmen have to many things running through their head. Also many batsmen make the mistake of trying to hit the cover of the ball and get themselves out. My tactics for winning in a Twenty20 is:

1) Win the toss and bowl first. It is much easier to pace yourself (team) when you know exactly what the necessary run-rates are. You can then break down the chase into 4 over periods. 

2) Have 2 front line quick bowlers, 1 specialist spinner, and have batsmen who can bowl medium pace or part-time spin. It is very hard to bowl a side out in 20 overs. It is more important to slow the run-rate down. The more bowlers you have you can put it on the spot makes it easier to set fields to stop the runs. Also having medium pace and slow bowlers makes it harder to hit &#039;maximums&#039; because the batsmen must make the pace of the ball. It is to easy for very quick bowlers to get edges that go to the boundary or hit off line with wides etc.

3) Have sweepers to stop the boundaries. 

4) Have a balanced side with a few big-hitter (specialist) and batsmen who are quick between the wickets with a solid technique. It is a must in this form of the game to score singles of every ball. Partnerships &amp; steady run-rates are the key to building a good platform to blast off in the last 5 overs. 

5) It is important to stay still at the crease. The people who play the best shots are those who stay still. Moving all around the crease before the ball is bowled (backing away to leg, or moving to the off-side) is not recommended. Changing your position in the crease, or walking down the wicket is the best option when putting bowlers off their lines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a fallacy to think that Twenty20 cricket is a &#8216;slogathon&#8217;. It is more like speed chess. The biggest mistake that batsmen make when coming to the crease is that they over complicate their game. Some batsmen have to many things running through their head. Also many batsmen make the mistake of trying to hit the cover of the ball and get themselves out. My tactics for winning in a Twenty20 is:</p>
<p>1) Win the toss and bowl first. It is much easier to pace yourself (team) when you know exactly what the necessary run-rates are. You can then break down the chase into 4 over periods. </p>
<p>2) Have 2 front line quick bowlers, 1 specialist spinner, and have batsmen who can bowl medium pace or part-time spin. It is very hard to bowl a side out in 20 overs. It is more important to slow the run-rate down. The more bowlers you have you can put it on the spot makes it easier to set fields to stop the runs. Also having medium pace and slow bowlers makes it harder to hit &#8216;maximums&#8217; because the batsmen must make the pace of the ball. It is to easy for very quick bowlers to get edges that go to the boundary or hit off line with wides etc.</p>
<p>3) Have sweepers to stop the boundaries. </p>
<p>4) Have a balanced side with a few big-hitter (specialist) and batsmen who are quick between the wickets with a solid technique. It is a must in this form of the game to score singles of every ball. Partnerships &amp; steady run-rates are the key to building a good platform to blast off in the last 5 overs. </p>
<p>5) It is important to stay still at the crease. The people who play the best shots are those who stay still. Moving all around the crease before the ball is bowled (backing away to leg, or moving to the off-side) is not recommended. Changing your position in the crease, or walking down the wicket is the best option when putting bowlers off their lines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wambi_Bretto</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2007/12/17/twenty20-cricket-6-tactics-for-winning/comment-page-1/#comment-109967</link>
		<dc:creator>Wambi_Bretto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 12:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/2007/12/17/twenty20-cricket-6-tactics-for-winning/#comment-109967</guid>
		<description>Spiro...... Really mate, stick to rugby - Your off the mark If I was to apply your idea to rugby, then all we would have is backs because they run faster than the fat blokes - And then we all now what sort of game we would have. Cricket needs bowlers, batters and the occasional streaker to be a real spectacle.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spiro&#8230;&#8230; Really mate, stick to rugby &#8211; Your off the mark If I was to apply your idea to rugby, then all we would have is backs because they run faster than the fat blokes &#8211; And then we all now what sort of game we would have. Cricket needs bowlers, batters and the occasional streaker to be a real spectacle&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John - Rarotonga</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2007/12/17/twenty20-cricket-6-tactics-for-winning/comment-page-1/#comment-87354</link>
		<dc:creator>John - Rarotonga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 23:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/2007/12/17/twenty20-cricket-6-tactics-for-winning/#comment-87354</guid>
		<description>excellent article but shouldn&#039;t it be 7 tactics?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>excellent article but shouldn&#8217;t it be 7 tactics?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Doherty</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2007/12/17/twenty20-cricket-6-tactics-for-winning/comment-page-1/#comment-49521</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Doherty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/2007/12/17/twenty20-cricket-6-tactics-for-winning/#comment-49521</guid>
		<description>Great Article!
Like in all forms of the cricket runs on the board is the utmost importance. Singles are probably the most important thing.
If a team can hit 2 boundaries at least in an over and four singles, thats at least 12 runs and done consistently should have you near the 180/200 mark.
Having your symonds, Oram, Glichrist like players in your lineup are important but balance with you punchy single getters shouldn&#039;t be overlooked, because as proved by the run drought at the end of the IPL there will be periods where the bowlers get it right and boundries become hard and hitting those singles are important. Because with the bowlers only having a short time to bowl it won&#039;t be long until you can face someone you can get a hold off and catch up the runs with a big over or so.
Pace seems to be the way to go with our bowling, evidenced by our perth 20-20, with your part timers coming in with a change of pace.
Victorias win over tasmania (i think) where hodge bowled himself and hussey to really slow the tigers down and then got on top of them and won the final is evidence that your slower bowlers can be match winners too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Article!<br />
Like in all forms of the cricket runs on the board is the utmost importance. Singles are probably the most important thing.<br />
If a team can hit 2 boundaries at least in an over and four singles, thats at least 12 runs and done consistently should have you near the 180/200 mark.<br />
Having your symonds, Oram, Glichrist like players in your lineup are important but balance with you punchy single getters shouldn&#8217;t be overlooked, because as proved by the run drought at the end of the IPL there will be periods where the bowlers get it right and boundries become hard and hitting those singles are important. Because with the bowlers only having a short time to bowl it won&#8217;t be long until you can face someone you can get a hold off and catch up the runs with a big over or so.<br />
Pace seems to be the way to go with our bowling, evidenced by our perth 20-20, with your part timers coming in with a change of pace.<br />
Victorias win over tasmania (i think) where hodge bowled himself and hussey to really slow the tigers down and then got on top of them and won the final is evidence that your slower bowlers can be match winners too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Russell</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2007/12/17/twenty20-cricket-6-tactics-for-winning/comment-page-1/#comment-20985</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 00:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/2007/12/17/twenty20-cricket-6-tactics-for-winning/#comment-20985</guid>
		<description>Spiro, I agree particularly with the point about being able to hit sixes. This calls into question the naming of M Clarke as Australian captain, as of all current Australian batsmen, he has the least capacity to clear the boundary. Indeed, just look at his dismissal in Perth: attempting to hit a 6 off Vettori, he was caught at long-on. Those who have followed his one-day career will have seen him dismissed many other times in this exact some way. Given this, one has to wonder whether Clarke should even be in Australia&#039;s T20I side, let alone be captain of it. (And don&#039;t get me wrong, I think Clarke is a fabulously entertaining player with singular talent.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spiro, I agree particularly with the point about being able to hit sixes. This calls into question the naming of M Clarke as Australian captain, as of all current Australian batsmen, he has the least capacity to clear the boundary. Indeed, just look at his dismissal in Perth: attempting to hit a 6 off Vettori, he was caught at long-on. Those who have followed his one-day career will have seen him dismissed many other times in this exact some way. Given this, one has to wonder whether Clarke should even be in Australia&#8217;s T20I side, let alone be captain of it. (And don&#8217;t get me wrong, I think Clarke is a fabulously entertaining player with singular talent.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greg</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2007/12/17/twenty20-cricket-6-tactics-for-winning/comment-page-1/#comment-20747</link>
		<dc:creator>greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 07:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/2007/12/17/twenty20-cricket-6-tactics-for-winning/#comment-20747</guid>
		<description>Great article Spiro
I think you need at least three, probably four frontline bowlers because as Reg said, you have to rely on your top order to get the job done. I don&#039;t think there is any need for a designated batter at seven or eight because of the length of the game, if you get down to that position and still need to rely on a full-time batter then you are probably going to lose anyway due to the flow of runs being lost early on by losing wickets. As we briefly saw in Perth, part-time bowlers like Symmo are sparodic at best when it comes to Twenty20 form and should only be used very sparingly. The four full-time bowlers will get the job done with one all-rounder (maybe a Hogg-type) picking up the remaining overs. Selecting guys like Watson, Johnson and Lee as your front line pace attack will still give you waggle at the tail-end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article Spiro<br />
I think you need at least three, probably four frontline bowlers because as Reg said, you have to rely on your top order to get the job done. I don&#8217;t think there is any need for a designated batter at seven or eight because of the length of the game, if you get down to that position and still need to rely on a full-time batter then you are probably going to lose anyway due to the flow of runs being lost early on by losing wickets. As we briefly saw in Perth, part-time bowlers like Symmo are sparodic at best when it comes to Twenty20 form and should only be used very sparingly. The four full-time bowlers will get the job done with one all-rounder (maybe a Hogg-type) picking up the remaining overs. Selecting guys like Watson, Johnson and Lee as your front line pace attack will still give you waggle at the tail-end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew McCormack</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2007/12/17/twenty20-cricket-6-tactics-for-winning/comment-page-1/#comment-20729</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew McCormack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 03:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/2007/12/17/twenty20-cricket-6-tactics-for-winning/#comment-20729</guid>
		<description>interesting tactics and they all make perfect sense,

On point #6 I agree about the importance of six hitters in a Twenty20 team however the ability to fluently knock the ball into the right places and take ones should not be looked over.  If you look at the amount of singles scored by teams in one-day games- generally the team with the most amount wins.  Singles are the things that keeps an innings ticking over, boundaries alone aren&#039;t  the answer.  Obviously hitting every ball to the rope or over it isn&#039;t possible, the runs that come in between the boundaries I would say are just as important.  Hence why the Aussies were looking for plenty of ones early doors to get their innings underway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting tactics and they all make perfect sense,</p>
<p>On point #6 I agree about the importance of six hitters in a Twenty20 team however the ability to fluently knock the ball into the right places and take ones should not be looked over.  If you look at the amount of singles scored by teams in one-day games- generally the team with the most amount wins.  Singles are the things that keeps an innings ticking over, boundaries alone aren&#8217;t  the answer.  Obviously hitting every ball to the rope or over it isn&#8217;t possible, the runs that come in between the boundaries I would say are just as important.  Hence why the Aussies were looking for plenty of ones early doors to get their innings underway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stoffy</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2007/12/17/twenty20-cricket-6-tactics-for-winning/comment-page-1/#comment-20695</link>
		<dc:creator>Stoffy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 20:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/2007/12/17/twenty20-cricket-6-tactics-for-winning/#comment-20695</guid>
		<description>Top read spiro

My piece of advice would be to pick 8 genuine batsman, leaving a three-man pace attack. Yes you will only get 12 overs out of them but i believe thats all you need. The change of pace and veritety is the best to take wickets and even part time bowlers would appear hard to hit. Michael Clarke can bowl his orthodox and maintain a steady line and length. Thats four bowlers, and people like a symo to role over a handful of his offies and mediums (i know medium pace is not great in twenty20 but he can use his change of pace and spin to his advantage). There we go 20 overs are covered with the likes of Watto and Noffke also avaliable for a throw down and a big hit with the bat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Top read spiro</p>
<p>My piece of advice would be to pick 8 genuine batsman, leaving a three-man pace attack. Yes you will only get 12 overs out of them but i believe thats all you need. The change of pace and veritety is the best to take wickets and even part time bowlers would appear hard to hit. Michael Clarke can bowl his orthodox and maintain a steady line and length. Thats four bowlers, and people like a symo to role over a handful of his offies and mediums (i know medium pace is not great in twenty20 but he can use his change of pace and spin to his advantage). There we go 20 overs are covered with the likes of Watto and Noffke also avaliable for a throw down and a big hit with the bat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reg</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2007/12/17/twenty20-cricket-6-tactics-for-winning/comment-page-1/#comment-20689</link>
		<dc:creator>Reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 19:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/2007/12/17/twenty20-cricket-6-tactics-for-winning/#comment-20689</guid>
		<description>With regards point 2, I think the balance the Aussies had v the kiwis was fantastic. 5 legitimate strike bowlers.  With only 20 overs you really need to be able to back your top order to bat for that long (only 20 overs), therefore stacking your lower order with legitimate bowlers (not part timers like Symonds, Hopes etc) puts the pressure on the opposition, with absolutely no respite during their innings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With regards point 2, I think the balance the Aussies had v the kiwis was fantastic. 5 legitimate strike bowlers.  With only 20 overs you really need to be able to back your top order to bat for that long (only 20 overs), therefore stacking your lower order with legitimate bowlers (not part timers like Symonds, Hopes etc) puts the pressure on the opposition, with absolutely no respite during their innings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 745/749 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn1.theroar.com.au

Served from: www.theroar.com.au @ 2012-02-11 07:03:04 -->
