Expansion is the AFL’s best bet for success
By Roar Insight, 21 Feb 2008 Roar Insight is a Roar Rookie
I’ll start this blog by stating what I hope is obvious. You’re here at The Roar because, hopefully, you’ve found this isn’t a place to pull punches.
We’re talking AFL and it’s my job to cut through the spin cycle. I have no agenda, except for doing what I believe is in the best interests of the game and its fans, and for keeping the game’s bean counters and scribes accountable.
I have only agreed to do this column on the proviso that I can call it how I see it, even if the boss doesn’t like it. We’re going to have some fun with this blog because the entire game – not just the administrative body – is a protected species.
Fans, unfortunately, are kept at arm’s length and have no choice but to follow the agenda of News Ltd, Fairfax or the Australian Football League. A rough deal, I reckon.
But if you’re worried this will be a pessimistic, strictly off-field whinge-fest, don’t worry, we’ll discuss Chris Judd’s hamstring soon. Sounds good? Great. So, let’s get the AFL part of The Roar sizzling with discussion.
In the past few days, there’s been an explosion of talk about two new teams joining the AFL. First thing to realise is this: there is no magic number. If Melbourne could support 15 teams, they would. If they could support only five, well, there would only be that many teams. Fitzroy and South Melbourne have been unfortunate but necessary casualties of the system.
So when some faux moral crusader comes waltzing in off the long run – I’m backing Trevor Grant or Ron Reed – to say an 18-team league would destroy the competition, I’d advise you to look elsewhere (how that pair went out of their way to attack harmless soccer fans recently made for an alarming heads up on their disdain for new things). Professional sports teams are a matter of supply and demand, not magic numbers.
I’ll say it here and now: the Gold Coast market will prove an absolute winner, hands down. Western Sydney, while a much tougher market, is an essential step if the AFL wants to make the step from ‘bigger than its rivals’ to the nation’s ‘national sport’. But it is not as ready as the Gold Coast.
The Coast can’t be ignored any longer. But while interest in the code is already there, an uprooted club won’t work. Queenslanders, even those close enough to hurl a cane toad to Tweed Heads, can’t get enough of their home-grown teams and heroes.
For whatever reason, AFL football draws a crowd. The Brisbane Lions draw comparable attendances to the NRL’s biggest club, the Brisbane Broncos. The Swans are nearly twice as big as any NRL team in Sydney. But the lesson from these experiences is that while the code eventually tends to shine through, building a solid base is an essential pre-cursor to building a team, unless you want to lose as much money as Geoffrey Edelsten or Christopher Skase.
If the AFL moves hard and fast to upgrade Carrara appropriately, and keeps pouring in the cash to supplement the development and promotion of the game in the region as it has done for the past decade, then I do believe the Gold Coast Sharks/Suns/Stingrays will become a strong, viable club in less than ten years from now.
This isn’t to say build it and they will come, because the AFL’s tentacles have dangled deep into South-east Queensland for some time. Now the whole state seems to be catching on – just look at the 2006 draft, where eight of first 32 picks came from the sunshine state, with 11 players picked overall. The game is spreading and it would be negligent to deny the people the team they want.
Don’t buy this saturated market rubbish. Melbourne’s market is ‘saturated’, apparently. Yet the Kangaroos will sign up more members in 2007 than any NRL club, and will probably end up turning over a strong profit (albeit only after being threatened with relocation). If 3.7 million Melburnians can support 10 AFL clubs, powerful NRL and A-League franchises and even two NBL teams, I think half-a-million Coasties can handle one NRL club, one AFL club, and probably the Gold Coast Galaxy over summer as well.
The tag ‘Boomtown Australia’ doesn’t guarantee success in itself, but it reflects the fact that within five years, the Gold Coast will become an important cultural, financial and residential hub, with sporting desires quickly being shaped. They need an AFL team to grow up with.
Now to Sydney. That gosh darn mess of a city; five wholly different identities crammed into a basin which stretches from the mountains to the ocean. They already have a team, and while they’ve put a respectable amount of work into the west, the Swans are the team of the eastern and northern suburbs. That is their market.
West of Strathfield, they don’t mind the Swans, but love either the Eels or Panthers. They have their own identity, and don’t think of themselves as being Sydneysiders. They are ‘westies’.
Unlike Melbourne, Sydney is dreadfully difficult to navigate, and is divided by battlelines of beaches and bridges. Thus, folks tend to mix in their own areas, and each region gets stigmatised accordingly – northies are snobby old money, easties are filthy rich and plastic, southies are rednecks, westies are bogans and inner westies are alternative hippies.
Nobody really gets along, although the east and north are kind of amicable, and they are comfortable sharing a love of the Swans, Waratahs and the SCG Members’ pavilion.
Out west, they have a hunger for sport. Working class sport. Rugby League is their game, but the AFL monster is bit like the drilling machine from the final Matrix movie; wherever Australians live, they will be found by the AFL.
Already kids are emerging from Sydney ‘Aussie rules’ clubs (that expression should be outlawed); the product of long overdue investments north of the Riverina. They are well behind what’s happening in ‘SEQ’, however, and the open-mindedness of Gold Coast residents and the pre-existing infrastructure and investment means they are ready to roll.
But Western Sydney cannot be ignored. The market is too big. I’m not sure the AFL can get a team to operate there just yet, but within three years of the Sharks (or whatever name they get), a team representing the two-thirds of Australia’s biggest city should be in the AFL.
Expansion now is not as necessary as it was in 1987, and it may not be as challenging or rewarding. But for the sake of a truly national competition, and for respect from two of Australia’s most important markets, the AFL must work on that Gold Coast team now, and keep drilling to reach those westies.
–
Don’t forget to join The Roar’s AFL tipping comp.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
- Explore:

Al said | February 21st 2008 @ 1:17pm | Report comment
um…ok
Your knowledge of Sydney seems to be at the same level as those people who dismiss AFL as a sport for those black clothed, tram riding, umbrella carrying Mexicans. See I can make broad inaccurate generalisations with no basis in fact too!!!
Michael C said | February 21st 2008 @ 2:45pm | Report comment
Interesting quotes from the Fairfax REalfooty article from Parramatta boss Denis Fitzgerald.
(http://www.realfooty.com.au/news/news/the-battle-for-western-sydney-has-just-begun/2008/02/16/1202760668933.html?page=2)
Parramatta boss Denis Fitzgerald called for the NRL to consider expansion of its own, with a Sydney team moving to the NSW Central Coast and New Zealand fielding a second team.
On the possibility of AFL luring western Sydney juniors away from league, Fitzgerald said: “There’s already plenty of AFL in western Sydney, north-western Sydney, south-western Sydney – I don’t think it’ll make too much of a difference, to be honest.
“There’s already a lot of junior AFL fields and competitions. From a Sydney point of view, the Swans have doing well for a few years now so AFL has already been trying to make inroads. I can’t see rugby league changing from being the No.1 code. You can’t say always, but I can’t see it happening for at least 10 years.”
——
I reckon there’s a bit of storm in a tea cup. Sure, kids might get a greater level of choice – however, if there’s one lesson EVERYONE should learn from WAGGA is that kids that grow up exposed to the greater variety of codes quite often end up the greater players of the code they finally choose. It can actually be win-win. As with the Wellington Hurricanes Super 14s learning to play AFL for a practice match against an amateur Wellington AFL team. There are many benefits for rugby kids to play a couple of seasons of Aust Footy.
Cricket has an very real interest to ensure that there are dedicated ovals that are available for cricket over summer and footy in winter – rather than just pegging out an oval across the soccer/rugby fields.
What will be seen is just another reason for better standard and a better availability of sporting facilities in West Sydney – it can only be good. It’s all win wn….well, at grass roots level.
However, the AFL team itself.
Already, the AFL via their direct revenue grant the clubs about $6.5m annually to effectively cover total player payments. Getting a paid for squad is not the issue. All the rest comes down to the club and it’s off-field support and structures. NOrth Melb in recent years has been getting up to $9.5m annually. So, an extra $3m in various ways. Some of that I gather included the underwritten ‘promotional’ games at Cararra. So – how much would the AFL have to spend each year about the TPP payment for a new West Sydney franchise? Really hard to say. If it starts out as members based – well, that alone is an ‘un-Sydney’ concept. But – if people are willing to sign up and take ownership – then who really knows. The obvious selling point is that you can have you Eels, or Panthers or Tigers, but, you can all unite to support the Westies FC. (and so the AFL needs to get in before the FFA – and there’s only so wide a window there, the FFA know they need to expand beyond NSW state borders first – otherwise, they really would just be the NSW invitational soccer association. And so, they will target the Gold Coast – that’s fine for the AFL, they have got good foundations there and QLD is ahead of NSW in footy respects – the AFL should be fine medium/long term there. And so, the FFA, a little short on funds and still locked into a 7 yr $120m TV rights deal that shields even the Socceroos from FTA are left not quite sure how grand plans they can afford to make for the short/medium time frame. The AFL are much more able to plan and develop West Sydney – and this isn’t an overnight whim – and so, the market is actually dictating that the AFL MUST jump in now or forever hold their peace. The last time Sydney was in a position to favour the ‘indigenous’ game, about 100 years ago, the forces of Aust Footy were thwarted – - now, hopefully , a more modern and self-confident Australian, a nation able to say ‘sorry’, might actually be able to properly embrace it’s own game – - – and thus give the world even more reason to look ‘down under’ and realise that we are a different people worth visiting.
oikee said | February 21st 2008 @ 4:46pm | Report comment
Mr C you are exactly right its a storm in a tiny teacup, look i have just said on daves blog, aussie rules is a country game, nothing more, league union and soccer are world games, even league has struggled in this area, but with the world cup this year it will get more coverage throughout the world, soccer(football) rides the back of being a world game, so they have no problems growing, and they will, rugby needs to compete with league and always have done better, but we are now into a new century and league is firing on all guns. By this i mean they now have world challenge and australia day cup, england is growing super league into france and wales, now, think about a.f.l they are trying to get bigger in oz. Can you see where i am going, they not only have to compete with all other codes here, but now they are going to get flogged by world cup challenges by the other codes, by this i mean every four years there will be one codes world cup, I think a.f.l is good to have, like every other sport, but the others have 100 years world experience and devolopment on aussie rules, sorry facts.
Michael C said | February 22nd 2008 @ 11:30am | Report comment
oikee -
NOt a tiny teacup to the tea leaves, sugar granules and the like that inhabit that tea cup.
What I write below isn’t trying to be a ‘put down’, please, persist, it’s more a perspective of ‘sorry facts’
btw – RL international – that’s a bit over the top isn’t it. The recent efforts of the Kiwis, how many games did they actually score in? And their coach was pretty scathing of their mercenary attitude of not wanting to be there.
In reality, the Kangaroos games are a long last to the Wallabies and Socceroos. And likewise the RLWC is a long way behind the RUWC, ICCWC, and especially the FIFA WC.
Heck, who’s coming, Fiji (struggle to afford to come and also sustain home competition), TOnga and Samoa, and PNG. Y’know – the power house nations.
Look – for a non-international code – by comparison – the 3rd AFL International cup is being held this year. At this stage 14 teams are effectively confirmed of the ‘real potential attendees’. And note – NO expats, no eligibility via grandparents or parents country of birth.
And attending will be : US, Canada, Ireland, NZ, Britain (Scotland and Wales included – NOT split out to boost numbers), PNG, Sth Africa, Samoa, Denmark, Finland, Sweden, Japan, Israel/Palestine and China.
Doubtful are Spain, Tonga and Nauru (previous attendees) – where, the cost to attend can be prohibitive.
Countries like Germany early on indicated that the funds are better focused on local development.
In reality, Estonia, one of the affiliate nations – the RUgby League there isn’t much different to the AFL in – say – Austria. Even say Germany, listed as about 80 registered players in 2006. WEll, gee, there’s about 5-6 German Aust Footy teams. And they play an annual tri-series against Denmark and Sweden.
What I’m trying to point out, is that outside of most notably England and Australia, Rugby League is not much better the Aust Footy around the world.
The sooner it just merges with Union the better.
The sad thing is that some NSW and QLD expats overseas might be so anti Aust Footy that they try to portray Rugby League as ‘Australian Footy’….poor buggers overseas have no hope to understand what’s what.
But look – relative to sorry facts:
consider the NRL. Over reliance on gaming revenue. Vulnerable clubs to volatility of pokies tax rates and new anti pokies senator due to take up residence in the house mid year – along with perhaps balance of power.
Stuff all club membership.
Feeble heartland attendance – in fact, consider AFL last year 7 mill to 176 games plus 9 finals. NRL jumping up and down about breaking the 3 m barrier. Except, of course, there were an extra 24 games played. So, sure as heck the numbers would want to have gone up.
NRL – facing salaries pressures BECAUSE both it AND Union are INternational.
And facing incursion from the FFA in practicall all the ‘regional’ outposts that the NRL is so reliant upon. Best crowds come the further away from Sydney (except in Melb of course).
There’s no known Vic players in the NRL (maybe the National Youth League will create a pathway, or, maybe it’ll follow the ARC as a single year expensive excercise).
Look – I don’t think many AFL folk care about the AFL NOT being international. Every 4 years – look – the RLWC, if not held in Australia especially – will be lost in amongst RUWC, Bledisloe, Tri-Nations, Soccer WC & qualifiers, Asian Champions and so on.
Where the AFL has strength is that 22 rounds are NOT interrupted by loss of players to SoO duties (we killed that off ourselves) and/or international duties and/or bought out by overseas clubs such as Fred or Matt King. This is the flip side of the apparent sorry fact of not being professionally international – is that A. the talent pool isn’t exposed by the national team getting thumped or it’s ‘world’ ranking slipping, B. club competition is king.
Remember, there are over half a million club members who are happy that to sign up – and – I reckon part of the reason other codes don’t have the same level of membership (apart from private ownership) is that the club comp is 2nd or 3rd tier to the International and or interstate competition. And that therefore reduces the value proposition at the club level.
anyway, sorry facts or otherwise – really, there’s not much room for facts in the irrational and emotive world of sports – - – you should know that!!!!
Westy said | February 22nd 2008 @ 11:39am | Report comment
Michael c….You perform much better and your argument s more cogent when you stick to AFL being the premier Provincial/ national code in Australia. Really Michael lay of the Inernational aspects of AFL. IT is marketing nonsense and weakens your other more credible arguments.
Michael C said | February 22nd 2008 @ 12:28pm | Report comment
Sorry Westy -
to succinct.
Rugby League isn’t ‘great’ because of it’s international presence – and in fact, because it IS marketed as a “World Cup” , RL makes itself a laughing stock.
AFL is ‘great’ presently because it DOES NOT have a real international presence (the fact that it isn’t necessarily that far of RL’s international spread is ironic).
What the future dictates as a flaw or an asset, I’m not sure, but, for now, what to one person is a fundamental flaw – is, to another person the beauty of the game.
Now – that isn’t just a structural admin thing either, that transcends onto the field. The way in some cases people view each game on the paddock. There’s no perfect game – just popularity contests.
(btw – I don’t paint the Aust Footy o-s as anything other than rank amatuers having a kick – but, reality, most of the RL international presence is no more than that, but, they try to market it differently – - – the AFL itself o-s is a different story – but I’m not talking about exhibition games conducted in Dubai and any marketing spin real or imagined around that)
oikee said | February 22nd 2008 @ 5:16pm | Report comment
I was not looking for a fight with you mr.c i was only stating facts, this last comment you have about your game and international presence, is it being broadcast around the world, as in the other games like football and union, and league, i never mentioned how many countries played league, and i know germany has not got a huge presence, you dont need to convince me, as for your three countries, ireland wales and scotland and england, 4 they are their own countries that make up the brithish isles, dont know what you are trying to get at there, lets get down to bussiness, its all about making money, and if you try to argue otherwise then i dont know what your taking,
You talk about 3 million following league, that is 3 million paying guests , your 7 million is half that because you doulble up, yes thats right, in melbourne everyone can get to the games, not so for league, we are spread out across the country, and when we have a 10,000 attendance at a game, we have a half million or so watching the game, this is the big bikkies,
Now i know you wont watch this world cup in oz, but hey, thats ok, your loss, those who follow our game, and the list is growing, as you know because we have got the figures to prove it as you have told us, yes we cheer when we achieve things, league is a struggle, thats a part of it we like, goes with our culture,
those who watch it will see how far league has improved over the years, and the best ever games have been at previous world cups, that you would not have a clue about because you dont follow league, and i bet your that pigheaded that you dont even follow the storm, and they are playing there guts out for you lot down there, thats there reward from you lot. Knock them and everyone elses games,
Just hope the football grows that much in melbourne and you have trouble competeing with them, i have said this all along, you are ethnic domanated down there, so football(soccer) is a natural, and other states dont stop your code from expanding, but you lot resist everything, and this will catch up with what your future holds, nothing you can do about, jump up and down, or at least learn to, then you might be able to take something away from this post. thanks, for nothing.
P.S go the storm. World Club Challenge is on 1st march saturday morning 6 am melbourne time, do your self a favour and watch the match, there your team.
spiro zavos said | February 23rd 2008 @ 10:04am | Report comment
Up to the 1980s sports historians used to talk about the Barassi Line of Australian sport. The line was the borderline between Victoria and NSW, and ran on to the border line with South Australia, NSW, Queensland and the Northern Territory. Inside the NSW and Queensland borders the rugby codes, league (mainly) and union, predominated. To the south and west of NSW Queensland was AFL territory.
The Barassi Line was a sort of Maignot Line for the football codes until the AFL allowed a team, the Swans, to be started in Sydney. This lead to an AFL team in Brisbane, and league and union sides setting up teams in the AFL territories behind the Barassi Line.
The further expansion plans announced by the AFL into Western Sydney and into the Gold Coast are merely part of the original invasion launched with the creation of the Swans.
In penetrating the south and west of the Barassi Line, league and union have had some success. The Western Force, despite its poor record of off-the-field behaviour looks likes being a successful franchise. Perhaps West Australians are inured to bad behaviour by players following the Ben Cousins saga. The Melbourne Storm are a premiership-winning side, with a coach Craig Bellamy, who is the new Wayne Bennett of the code.
The main difficulty for leaque and union in making even more successful breaches of the Barassi Line is the fact that the media and the monied establishment in AFL territory behave disgracefully towards the northern codes. Matches are not covered. TV attention is meagre. This despite the fact that at the Telstra Dome the Wallabies-Lions test drew the biggest crowd ever there. And when a huge crowd turned up for the first Wallaby-All Blacks test at the MCG, it was noticeable that the members area was empty.
By contrast, the Swans and the Brisbane Lions get huge media coverage in the Sydney and Brisbane media.
Until this protectionist media system changes south of the Barassi Line, those of us living north of the Barassi Line will resent the high-handedness of the AFL officials dumping their game on us, demanding media time and space, while forcing the opposite reaction from their own sporting media.
The ‘story’ of the AFL push into Sydney’s western suburbs has been sold as an attack on the rugby league heartland by the AFL spin doctors. In my view, it is more a reaction to the spread of football which will in time over-run AFL as Australia’s national football code, in the same way as gorse takes over a native pasture once it takes off.
oikee said | February 23rd 2008 @ 10:32am | Report comment
Spiro, like your comments, but league has dealt with this negative attutude for one hundred years, you only have to look at the code in england and france to see what we were up against, but we have survived and propered, and melbourne is the same towards other codes, no worries here, they are trying to protect there game, same as everyone else protects theirs, ireland will protect there game, aussie rules are getting there backs up, so now south africa is in there sights, good luck there, zulus fly high?
League is growing, even germany has started a nines tournament this year, england has finally trugged off the biase it has to deal with the media for the last hundred years, all this and france is slowly growing into a world force again, before the war and after they were world champions, league is moving forward at rapid growth worldwide,
a.f.l well, its a aussie game nothing more, they talk about there world cup, nobody cares, only expats, they have to much money to burn, once soccer 10 folds them what they going to do? get soccer to build there grounds bigger so they can play, please, the world wants cosy, all sports with small cosy grounds with cover will win, its a no brainer.
Westy said | February 23rd 2008 @ 3:10pm | Report comment
Spiro as someone who enjoys the battle for possession in rugby and beating or tackling man on man skills of rugbyleague I am to be honest sometimes saddened by the failure to understand the obviuos shared common heritage and shared skills.I can enjoy AFL but always acknowledge if it was not for the success of the breakaway Rugby League ccode in Sydney a rugby code tied to amateurism would have found it very difficult to cope with the Victorian professional game from 1908 until it itself turned praofessional.I understand Rugby fighting to keep League and even organised touch football out of private schools to protect its base but personally feel very uncomfortable when those same schools cuddle up and even open up to the middle class push of the AFL in Sydney. Sadly attitudes about league are too entrenched but from personal experience I can take them to a Western Bulldogs/ or Collingwood where every second word is f this and spitting off the field and a good fight are par for the course. There is still more than a residual connection between League and union and despite the fact there can be a healthy dose of defensive reverse classism by league I still have some fears that if league was to ever falter some in Rugby would not be as welcoming as i would like nor for that matter have any real infrastructure to deal with it, THis is not only a perception but a reality Rugby must address.