<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Memo to the NRL: ban the &#8216;prowler&#8217; tackle, now</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/03/19/memo-to-the-nrl-ban-the-prowler-tackle-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/03/19/memo-to-the-nrl-ban-the-prowler-tackle-now/</link>
	<description>Your Sports Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:27:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Bigmac</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/03/19/memo-to-the-nrl-ban-the-prowler-tackle-now/comment-page-2/#comment-42626</link>
		<dc:creator>Bigmac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 09:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/03/19/memo-to-the-nrl-ban-the-prowler-tackle-now/#comment-42626</guid>
		<description>I know I will be lynched for suggesting this, but what if we take a stance similar to that of the AFL, it may help...

In the AFL, a &quot;bump&quot; is allowed unless it is high or in the back. Allow shoulder charges, but only from the side or front.

A happy medium I think...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know I will be lynched for suggesting this, but what if we take a stance similar to that of the AFL, it may help&#8230;</p>
<p>In the AFL, a &#8220;bump&#8221; is allowed unless it is high or in the back. Allow shoulder charges, but only from the side or front.</p>
<p>A happy medium I think&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/03/19/memo-to-the-nrl-ban-the-prowler-tackle-now/comment-page-2/#comment-34764</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 17:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/03/19/memo-to-the-nrl-ban-the-prowler-tackle-now/#comment-34764</guid>
		<description>All

I&#039;m currently out of the country and have been for a while. I am astounded by the defense of the tackle. That is vicious, gutless cowardice. 

Spiro is right - this is bound to get someone seriously injured. Steve Kayliss; RL has no ownership on toughness, buddy. It&#039;s time to get real yourself - have a think about our servicemen o/s and then ask yourself what courage means. That&#039;s the BENCHMARK, mate, not RL. 

You make this ridiculous dichotomous choice between keeping RL &#039;tough&#039;, and going home and sticking one&#039;s head in the oven. With this kind of analysis, is it any wonder that the mums and dads out there are shaking their heads in disgust? RL commentators such as yourself are out of touch to the point of embarrassment. Reading you, Steve, is a jarring experience. Ian Noble points out that RL should be aware of the international audience, rather than the violent sycophants frothing for blood in Sydney. 

Verbally head-butting us with claims that we are cowards if we don&#039;t agree with you is a bully&#039;s game, and sorry to tell you mate, but that exercise has lost its power. We don&#039;t like what we see. If you don&#039;t appreciate the sentiment, than RL will diminish at a rapid rate. 

Have we stepped into the 14th century?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All</p>
<p>I&#8217;m currently out of the country and have been for a while. I am astounded by the defense of the tackle. That is vicious, gutless cowardice. </p>
<p>Spiro is right &#8211; this is bound to get someone seriously injured. Steve Kayliss; RL has no ownership on toughness, buddy. It&#8217;s time to get real yourself &#8211; have a think about our servicemen o/s and then ask yourself what courage means. That&#8217;s the BENCHMARK, mate, not RL. </p>
<p>You make this ridiculous dichotomous choice between keeping RL &#8216;tough&#8217;, and going home and sticking one&#8217;s head in the oven. With this kind of analysis, is it any wonder that the mums and dads out there are shaking their heads in disgust? RL commentators such as yourself are out of touch to the point of embarrassment. Reading you, Steve, is a jarring experience. Ian Noble points out that RL should be aware of the international audience, rather than the violent sycophants frothing for blood in Sydney. </p>
<p>Verbally head-butting us with claims that we are cowards if we don&#8217;t agree with you is a bully&#8217;s game, and sorry to tell you mate, but that exercise has lost its power. We don&#8217;t like what we see. If you don&#8217;t appreciate the sentiment, than RL will diminish at a rapid rate. </p>
<p>Have we stepped into the 14th century?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swifty</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/03/19/memo-to-the-nrl-ban-the-prowler-tackle-now/comment-page-2/#comment-34755</link>
		<dc:creator>swifty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/03/19/memo-to-the-nrl-ban-the-prowler-tackle-now/#comment-34755</guid>
		<description>JimC,
yeah that looked like a real contest for possession to me.  that is if the definition of &#039;contest for possession&#039; has changed.  that was a cheapshot as cheap as they come. they happen in all contact sports but don&#039;t confuse a cheapshot with a contest for possession.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JimC,<br />
yeah that looked like a real contest for possession to me.  that is if the definition of &#8216;contest for possession&#8217; has changed.  that was a cheapshot as cheap as they come. they happen in all contact sports but don&#8217;t confuse a cheapshot with a contest for possession.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Coorey</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/03/19/memo-to-the-nrl-ban-the-prowler-tackle-now/comment-page-2/#comment-33955</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Coorey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 09:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/03/19/memo-to-the-nrl-ban-the-prowler-tackle-now/#comment-33955</guid>
		<description>If I want to see a shoulder charge, I&#039;ll watch Ice Hockey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I want to see a shoulder charge, I&#8217;ll watch Ice Hockey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shahsan</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/03/19/memo-to-the-nrl-ban-the-prowler-tackle-now/comment-page-2/#comment-33859</link>
		<dc:creator>Shahsan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 23:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/03/19/memo-to-the-nrl-ban-the-prowler-tackle-now/#comment-33859</guid>
		<description>Yes, a contest for possesion where you belt the ball carrier to kingdom come but cannot actually contest the very thing you wish to possess. Sounds pretty insane to me. Why not just strip the ball off the carrier? Why is that not allowed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, a contest for possesion where you belt the ball carrier to kingdom come but cannot actually contest the very thing you wish to possess. Sounds pretty insane to me. Why not just strip the ball off the carrier? Why is that not allowed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimC</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/03/19/memo-to-the-nrl-ban-the-prowler-tackle-now/comment-page-2/#comment-33776</link>
		<dc:creator>JimC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/03/19/memo-to-the-nrl-ban-the-prowler-tackle-now/#comment-33776</guid>
		<description>Shasan - You answered your own question.

Aggressive defence is designed to prevent the opposition gaining ground and to dislodge the ball or encourage a fumble. A fact conveniently forgotten when union fans trot out the ridiculous canard that rugby league has no &quot;contest for possesion.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shasan &#8211; You answered your own question.</p>
<p>Aggressive defence is designed to prevent the opposition gaining ground and to dislodge the ball or encourage a fumble. A fact conveniently forgotten when union fans trot out the ridiculous canard that rugby league has no &#8220;contest for possesion.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mudskipper</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/03/19/memo-to-the-nrl-ban-the-prowler-tackle-now/comment-page-2/#comment-33768</link>
		<dc:creator>mudskipper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 08:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/03/19/memo-to-the-nrl-ban-the-prowler-tackle-now/#comment-33768</guid>
		<description>&quot;...2008 NRL Centenary premiership season&quot;, these are the key words and within minutes we see the thuggery of what the sport has become. …I have worked with Craig Wing on a sponsor event in support of the NRL, he is a good young guy... I hope he heals quickly and get back to South Sydney team who are now becoming a landmark club with the vision of the new owners.... The tackle rules in the NRL are questionable and neither looks after the players, the game or the fans...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;2008 NRL Centenary premiership season&#8221;, these are the key words and within minutes we see the thuggery of what the sport has become. …I have worked with Craig Wing on a sponsor event in support of the NRL, he is a good young guy&#8230; I hope he heals quickly and get back to South Sydney team who are now becoming a landmark club with the vision of the new owners&#8230;. The tackle rules in the NRL are questionable and neither looks after the players, the game or the fans&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shahsan</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/03/19/memo-to-the-nrl-ban-the-prowler-tackle-now/comment-page-2/#comment-33751</link>
		<dc:creator>Shahsan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 06:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/03/19/memo-to-the-nrl-ban-the-prowler-tackle-now/#comment-33751</guid>
		<description>Can someone explain to me the point of that third man entering the fray? In union, you drive into rucks and mauls in order to gain ground or to prevent the opposition doing the same. Another aim to is to contest the ball. I don&#039;t see the point of it in league. In fact, the way i see it, the only reason league players hit harder is because there is no other way to win possession ie knock the ball carrier into tomorrow and he coughs up the ball.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can someone explain to me the point of that third man entering the fray? In union, you drive into rucks and mauls in order to gain ground or to prevent the opposition doing the same. Another aim to is to contest the ball. I don&#8217;t see the point of it in league. In fact, the way i see it, the only reason league players hit harder is because there is no other way to win possession ie knock the ball carrier into tomorrow and he coughs up the ball.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cosmos forever</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/03/19/memo-to-the-nrl-ban-the-prowler-tackle-now/comment-page-2/#comment-33750</link>
		<dc:creator>cosmos forever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 05:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/03/19/memo-to-the-nrl-ban-the-prowler-tackle-now/#comment-33750</guid>
		<description>Shouldercharge against a player one on one - fantastic

Shoulderscharge against a player already being held static by two others - cowardice</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shouldercharge against a player one on one &#8211; fantastic</p>
<p>Shoulderscharge against a player already being held static by two others &#8211; cowardice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Link</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/03/19/memo-to-the-nrl-ban-the-prowler-tackle-now/comment-page-1/#comment-33749</link>
		<dc:creator>The Link</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 05:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/03/19/memo-to-the-nrl-ban-the-prowler-tackle-now/#comment-33749</guid>
		<description>Spiro, Craig Wing said it himself that he&#039;s a fan of the shoulder charge, so please no baby out with the League bathwater here. Actually the shoulder charge is also reasonably prevelant in AFL, albeit in a different way, with little talk of it being dangerous there to my knowledge. 

Its a great part of the game, think of the theatre of Harragon v Carrol and in recent times SBW v anyone not in a Dogs jersey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spiro, Craig Wing said it himself that he&#8217;s a fan of the shoulder charge, so please no baby out with the League bathwater here. Actually the shoulder charge is also reasonably prevelant in AFL, albeit in a different way, with little talk of it being dangerous there to my knowledge. </p>
<p>Its a great part of the game, think of the theatre of Harragon v Carrol and in recent times SBW v anyone not in a Dogs jersey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NickF</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/03/19/memo-to-the-nrl-ban-the-prowler-tackle-now/comment-page-1/#comment-33722</link>
		<dc:creator>NickF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 02:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/03/19/memo-to-the-nrl-ban-the-prowler-tackle-now/#comment-33722</guid>
		<description>I am disgustedby the performance of the NRL. They clear Brown of the charge and then take the moral high ground and the get on their pulpit and &quot;put clubs on notice that a repeat of the vicious shoulder charge will not be tolerated&quot;.
Surely they can take this to the judiciary and judge it on &quot;intent&quot;, as I feel there was intent to injure not tackle in this case. I don&#039;t think we need to ban the shoulder charge. When used in a proper way, head on and below the neck is OK. But if the  ref sees a tackle he doesn&#039;t like he can always put the tackler on report, and the judiciary should have the courage to see foul play for what it is and suspend players for this kind of action.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am disgustedby the performance of the NRL. They clear Brown of the charge and then take the moral high ground and the get on their pulpit and &#8220;put clubs on notice that a repeat of the vicious shoulder charge will not be tolerated&#8221;.<br />
Surely they can take this to the judiciary and judge it on &#8220;intent&#8221;, as I feel there was intent to injure not tackle in this case. I don&#8217;t think we need to ban the shoulder charge. When used in a proper way, head on and below the neck is OK. But if the  ref sees a tackle he doesn&#8217;t like he can always put the tackler on report, and the judiciary should have the courage to see foul play for what it is and suspend players for this kind of action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Noble</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/03/19/memo-to-the-nrl-ban-the-prowler-tackle-now/comment-page-1/#comment-33684</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Noble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 01:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/03/19/memo-to-the-nrl-ban-the-prowler-tackle-now/#comment-33684</guid>
		<description>Spiro

In recent games of league I have seen, I have not witnessed such a blantant case of dangerous play. I blame the officials , in that a late shoulder charge with no intent of tackling properly but with the sole intent of injuring the player is dangerous play. As in all games players should respect their fellow players and if in the NRL it is considered the norm, then it spoils the game as a spectacle. 

If the fans in OZ crave for cheap shots then perhaps they would better off watching wrestling, otherwise League will turn into a game of cheap shots and thuggery. It is not the laws but the approach by coaches to the game and if a coach particularly incites players to go out with the intent of physically damaging a particular player, he should be held to account. 
Of course, the star players will always be targeted and they will be prepared for a rough ride but cheap shots are cowardly and reflect poorly on the NRL.

If it continues through to RLWC2008 and in the games v NZ and England it could be a big turnoff for many who want to see a spectacular tournament of hard freeflowing rugby without thuggery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spiro</p>
<p>In recent games of league I have seen, I have not witnessed such a blantant case of dangerous play. I blame the officials , in that a late shoulder charge with no intent of tackling properly but with the sole intent of injuring the player is dangerous play. As in all games players should respect their fellow players and if in the NRL it is considered the norm, then it spoils the game as a spectacle. </p>
<p>If the fans in OZ crave for cheap shots then perhaps they would better off watching wrestling, otherwise League will turn into a game of cheap shots and thuggery. It is not the laws but the approach by coaches to the game and if a coach particularly incites players to go out with the intent of physically damaging a particular player, he should be held to account.<br />
Of course, the star players will always be targeted and they will be prepared for a rough ride but cheap shots are cowardly and reflect poorly on the NRL.</p>
<p>If it continues through to RLWC2008 and in the games v NZ and England it could be a big turnoff for many who want to see a spectacular tournament of hard freeflowing rugby without thuggery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/03/19/memo-to-the-nrl-ban-the-prowler-tackle-now/comment-page-1/#comment-33674</link>
		<dc:creator>eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 00:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/03/19/memo-to-the-nrl-ban-the-prowler-tackle-now/#comment-33674</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve got them going Spiro. Browns charge was legal as the rules stand, but that type of charge clearly should be banned, and it appears the NRL have done so. Why has it taken 100 years?
To blame coaches for seeking an advantage is ridiculous. That is their job. Tape training sessions? As if a club would stand for that! What a minefield.
The pro-activism should come from the NRL, looking at the game and the implications of laws and the playing trends, and adjusting the laws accordingly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve got them going Spiro. Browns charge was legal as the rules stand, but that type of charge clearly should be banned, and it appears the NRL have done so. Why has it taken 100 years?<br />
To blame coaches for seeking an advantage is ridiculous. That is their job. Tape training sessions? As if a club would stand for that! What a minefield.<br />
The pro-activism should come from the NRL, looking at the game and the implications of laws and the playing trends, and adjusting the laws accordingly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cosmos forever</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/03/19/memo-to-the-nrl-ban-the-prowler-tackle-now/comment-page-1/#comment-33663</link>
		<dc:creator>cosmos forever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 23:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/03/19/memo-to-the-nrl-ban-the-prowler-tackle-now/#comment-33663</guid>
		<description>Just through on the wires that the NRL has clamped down (and in a sensible way I might add).

Shoulder charges on players already being contained by a tackler will be deemed to be dangerous (or at least citeable so that a review and punishment can take place).

People still get the shoulder charges but just not on players already wrapped up by tacklers.

Seems like a pretty good outcome to me.

Good point about Taylor Sheek. I was actually just drafting a Roar of the Crowd about the role of coaches in this.

Rugby League players rarely do anything that they haven&#039;t been trained in or instructed to do. The days of natural talent or violence expressing themselves are pretty much gone (aside from the rare cases of a Bowman or Slater for the talent and our old friend Morely on the violence side!).

That means that all of these growwlers, prowlers, grapples etc are devised, taught to players and built into game plans by - wait for it - coaches.

Simple solution. If incidents occur from a particular camp - fine or suspend the coach.  I guarantee the tactics would disapear overnight if a coach was help responsible.

Seems to me at the moment a bunch of pretty smart blokes (coaching staff) tell a pretty dumb bloke (player) what to do and it is the dumb bloke who is held responsible.

Shift the responsibility (except for clear individual behaviour) and the game will follow.

Along this line - I always wondered why, when the grapple was in the firing line in 2006, that the NRL didn&#039;t just tape training sessions and then call in every coach who sponsored and oversaw wresting training. Why not just go to the source instead of waiting for something terrible to happen on the field.

They call it Proactive Compliance in an organisation I used to work for ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just through on the wires that the NRL has clamped down (and in a sensible way I might add).</p>
<p>Shoulder charges on players already being contained by a tackler will be deemed to be dangerous (or at least citeable so that a review and punishment can take place).</p>
<p>People still get the shoulder charges but just not on players already wrapped up by tacklers.</p>
<p>Seems like a pretty good outcome to me.</p>
<p>Good point about Taylor Sheek. I was actually just drafting a Roar of the Crowd about the role of coaches in this.</p>
<p>Rugby League players rarely do anything that they haven&#8217;t been trained in or instructed to do. The days of natural talent or violence expressing themselves are pretty much gone (aside from the rare cases of a Bowman or Slater for the talent and our old friend Morely on the violence side!).</p>
<p>That means that all of these growwlers, prowlers, grapples etc are devised, taught to players and built into game plans by &#8211; wait for it &#8211; coaches.</p>
<p>Simple solution. If incidents occur from a particular camp &#8211; fine or suspend the coach.  I guarantee the tactics would disapear overnight if a coach was help responsible.</p>
<p>Seems to me at the moment a bunch of pretty smart blokes (coaching staff) tell a pretty dumb bloke (player) what to do and it is the dumb bloke who is held responsible.</p>
<p>Shift the responsibility (except for clear individual behaviour) and the game will follow.</p>
<p>Along this line &#8211; I always wondered why, when the grapple was in the firing line in 2006, that the NRL didn&#8217;t just tape training sessions and then call in every coach who sponsored and oversaw wresting training. Why not just go to the source instead of waiting for something terrible to happen on the field.</p>
<p>They call it Proactive Compliance in an organisation I used to work for <img src='http://cdn0.theroar.com.au/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Kaless</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/03/19/memo-to-the-nrl-ban-the-prowler-tackle-now/comment-page-1/#comment-33653</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Kaless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/03/19/memo-to-the-nrl-ban-the-prowler-tackle-now/#comment-33653</guid>
		<description>Spiro,

With talk like that you&#039;ll be voted off the island.

Heather McCartney-Mills has made more sense of late.

Rugby League is a tough game, but that should hardly be breaking news to anyone. Riley Brown was lucky, he exposed a loophole which was cynically exploited, but t will soon be closed and the shoulder charge will remain a thing of beauty from which the great pain comes to the commentators vocal cords when he exclaims &quot;WHOAHHHH!&quot;

It would be outlawing the ruck because of stomping.

The NRL facing criminal charges? It already has thanks to Jarrod McCracken, but every sport the same and when it happens regularly we may as well all go home, turn the oven on full blast and end it all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spiro,</p>
<p>With talk like that you&#8217;ll be voted off the island.</p>
<p>Heather McCartney-Mills has made more sense of late.</p>
<p>Rugby League is a tough game, but that should hardly be breaking news to anyone. Riley Brown was lucky, he exposed a loophole which was cynically exploited, but t will soon be closed and the shoulder charge will remain a thing of beauty from which the great pain comes to the commentators vocal cords when he exclaims &#8220;WHOAHHHH!&#8221;</p>
<p>It would be outlawing the ruck because of stomping.</p>
<p>The NRL facing criminal charges? It already has thanks to Jarrod McCracken, but every sport the same and when it happens regularly we may as well all go home, turn the oven on full blast and end it all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sheek</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/03/19/memo-to-the-nrl-ban-the-prowler-tackle-now/comment-page-1/#comment-33648</link>
		<dc:creator>sheek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/03/19/memo-to-the-nrl-ban-the-prowler-tackle-now/#comment-33648</guid>
		<description>Souths coach Jason Taylor took the moral high ground, arguing parents won&#039;t want their kids playing rugby league, if injuries like that sustained to Craig Wing are accepted from &quot;normal&quot; tackles.

However, I can&#039;t recall Taylor&#039;s reaction last year when one of his forwards belted Braith Anasta without any apparent provocation.

The NRL like to promote their code as the toughest of all. I wonder if the NRL will still think this way, when most of the leading players who pull people through the gate, sponsorship, TV, etc are out injured through over-vigorous, sometimes blatantly late &amp; deliberate  tackles.

The NRL appear to leading through public opinion at the moment, which demonstrates poor leadership, &amp; an unwillingness to make the tough calls. Sure, listen to public opinion, but be willing to put player safety first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Souths coach Jason Taylor took the moral high ground, arguing parents won&#8217;t want their kids playing rugby league, if injuries like that sustained to Craig Wing are accepted from &#8220;normal&#8221; tackles.</p>
<p>However, I can&#8217;t recall Taylor&#8217;s reaction last year when one of his forwards belted Braith Anasta without any apparent provocation.</p>
<p>The NRL like to promote their code as the toughest of all. I wonder if the NRL will still think this way, when most of the leading players who pull people through the gate, sponsorship, TV, etc are out injured through over-vigorous, sometimes blatantly late &amp; deliberate  tackles.</p>
<p>The NRL appear to leading through public opinion at the moment, which demonstrates poor leadership, &amp; an unwillingness to make the tough calls. Sure, listen to public opinion, but be willing to put player safety first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Boar</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/03/19/memo-to-the-nrl-ban-the-prowler-tackle-now/comment-page-1/#comment-33638</link>
		<dc:creator>The Boar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 20:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/03/19/memo-to-the-nrl-ban-the-prowler-tackle-now/#comment-33638</guid>
		<description>Get real Spiros. One tackle in 100 years does not define a game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get real Spiros. One tackle in 100 years does not define a game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matty p</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/03/19/memo-to-the-nrl-ban-the-prowler-tackle-now/comment-page-1/#comment-33628</link>
		<dc:creator>matty p</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 16:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/03/19/memo-to-the-nrl-ban-the-prowler-tackle-now/#comment-33628</guid>
		<description>Spiro, that was a disgraceful act, but I think shoulder charges are a defining point of league.  They are accepted as part of the one on one nature of the game - and that&#039;s where they are appropriate.  Not as cowardly charges on an immobile player.  So, why not let the first contact be a should charge, but then any other defenders joining the tackle must not use a shoulder charge?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spiro, that was a disgraceful act, but I think shoulder charges are a defining point of league.  They are accepted as part of the one on one nature of the game &#8211; and that&#8217;s where they are appropriate.  Not as cowardly charges on an immobile player.  So, why not let the first contact be a should charge, but then any other defenders joining the tackle must not use a shoulder charge?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Answer</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/03/19/memo-to-the-nrl-ban-the-prowler-tackle-now/comment-page-1/#comment-33623</link>
		<dc:creator>The Answer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 16:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/03/19/memo-to-the-nrl-ban-the-prowler-tackle-now/#comment-33623</guid>
		<description>Ban the shoulder charge? Let&#039;s not lose our heads here.

The &quot;prowler&quot; tackle is a cheap shot, but it is very different to a standard shoulder charge.

I can think of very few injuries that come from honest run of the mill shoulder charges. What is more the crowd and the players love them.

The only real problem is when they go wrong, players can leave a big hole in the defensive line. So you carry them out at your own risk.

Don&#039;t go throwing the baby out with the bath water.

S.O.S - Save Our Shoulder charges!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ban the shoulder charge? Let&#8217;s not lose our heads here.</p>
<p>The &#8220;prowler&#8221; tackle is a cheap shot, but it is very different to a standard shoulder charge.</p>
<p>I can think of very few injuries that come from honest run of the mill shoulder charges. What is more the crowd and the players love them.</p>
<p>The only real problem is when they go wrong, players can leave a big hole in the defensive line. So you carry them out at your own risk.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t go throwing the baby out with the bath water.</p>
<p>S.O.S &#8211; Save Our Shoulder charges!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 909/913 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn1.theroar.com.au

Served from: www.theroar.com.au @ 2012-02-11 05:03:49 -->
