NZ rugby exhumed after World Cup failure
By Daniel Gilhooly, 18 Apr 2008 Daniel Gilhooly is a Roar Pro
Results from the autopsy of New Zealand’s Rugby World Cup failure are in at last. The result? No heads will roll.
Henry defends All Blacks attitudes in Cardiff
More rugby
Previews for all the weekend’s Super 14 matches
Waratahs realise they’re far from home and dry
Gits-less Force to prove they’re no one-man band
A 47-page independent review today found a range of decisions and actions in the 18 months leading up to the 2007 tournament contributed to New Zealand’s galling 20-18 quarter-final loss to France in Cardiff last October.
The corpse was exhumed in the form of a $NZ130,000 ($A110,000) review prepared by Auckland lawyer Mike Heron and Sparc (Sport and Recreation New Zealand) official Don Tricker.
It focused most critically on the “over emphasis” placed on the four-yearly tournament by the New Zealand Rugby Union (NZRU) which had, in turn, erred by agreeing to coach Graham Henry’s controversial conditioning program.
That program was found to have impacted negatively on all levels of the game and on the very players it was designed to improve when they were removed from the first half of the Super 14.
In its most damning assessment, the review found that the players were left lacking in “quality game time” before they played France.
“The All Blacks were effectively in pre-season mode playing in a world-class competition with and against match-hardened players,” the report said.
“Their match fitness and skill levels were not at the required level … the contact component of the conditioning programme was too little too late – there was too much training completed against static opponents.”
NZRU chairman Jock Hobbs and Henry today agreed mistakes had been made, but nobody will pay the price for the All Blacks’ failure.
Henry was voted unanimously back into his job by the board in December, followed by most of his support staff.
Hobbs said the review had shown nothing to suggest Henry’s reappointment was premature.
“Graham was subject to a detailed performance review and then a contestable appointment process,” he said.
“He had to prove he was the best person for the job. He did.
“But I’m sure Graham has learned through this process. It’s not business as usual, there will be some changes.
“He and the All Blacks management will be better for it.”
Hobbs said “collectively we all are” accountable, with his board having approved the conditioning program.
Forty-one players, coaches, officials and stakeholders were interviewed as part of the review.
“It’s not about finding fault or a royal commission or a witch hunt,” Hobbs said.
“It is a review for learnings and improvement, clearly we made mistakes and we acknowledge that.
“We are very sorry we failed at Cardiff and the disappointment and frustration this has caused our supporters.”
Logistically it wasn’t possible to leave the All Blacks’ coaching position open until the review was completed, he added.
Henry accepted the report’s criticism of the conditioning program, particularly its impact on the whole of New Zealand rugby in 2007.
“I underestimated that impact, quite frankly,” Henry said.
“Obviously that’s a mistake – how it was implemented and when it was implemented.”
Other contributing factors to the Cardiff collapse were the All Blacks’ poor standard of opposition in Test matches earlier in the season and in World Cup pool play.
The review also found there were too many fulltime staff in All Blacks management, something the players had already voiced strong concern about.
Ita also found factors outside the team’s control were important, including the performance of English referee Wayne Barnes and his touch judges, which “had a significant adverse impact on the All Blacks”.
© AAP 2012Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
The Crowd Says (3) | Page 1 of Comments
Have Your Say
- Explore:

Spiro Zavos said | April 18th 2008 @ 12:07pm | Report comment
The NZRU could have saved itself the $130,000 and just read what the journalists and the public were saying after the 2007 RWC quarter-final. When things go wrong, as they did for the Wallabies in their quarter final, everything seems to go wrong. The referee by refusing to give a penalty to the All Blacks in the last 45 minutes despite the obvious illegal play of French forwards playing the rucked ball continually on the ground inside their 22 certainly had an effect. The decision not to go for a dropped goal, until late in the game, was also a mistake. There was the obvious forward pass OKed by the linesman Jonathan Kaplan. There was a bizarre yellow-carding of Macalister, and the injuries to Daniel Carter and Jerry Collins.
The review identified these as difficulties. But all the winning teams face similar difficulties in their run-up to winning a RWC. In 1991 the Wallabies had a try scored against them, putting them behind for the first time in the match, in the last 4 four minutes of their quarter-final against Ireland. The Springboks had to pull off a fantastic tackle over the try line to stop Fiji going ahead in their quarter final in the 2007 RWC with about 10 minutes of play left.
The real reasons for the failure is too many officials around the players (a bit like Bob Dwyer’s failed RWC campaign in 1995): the conditioning program that meant that the players had only 12 games in the season (NZ plsyers thrive on plenty of rugby): and the refusal of Graham Henry to play (or pick) a number one squad in the Tri Nations and then play it during the RWC tournament, as the Springboks did.
As I say, you don’t have to spend $130,000 to discover all this. At the time the journalists were making all these points. Most of us, for instance, could not understand why Henry didn’t play his number one squad in the last game of the pool round.
Sam Taulelei said | April 18th 2008 @ 12:30pm | Report comment
Hear, hear Spiro but I’m well over this now. Time to move on and learn and not forget otherwise we will be resigned to repeat the mistakes of the past.
jools-usa said | April 21st 2008 @ 10:34am | Report comment
Just hope the naysaying necrophiliacs dumping on NZ won’t make them change their
approach to the game.Win or lose they entertain, they threaten, & they back themselves.
I’ll take them anytime over the miserable game played up north.
Life is too short…………..
Jools-USA