My good friend Pino Paonessa, who runs the excellent East Sydney cafe Latteria with his brother Tommy and mate Vito, is a typical football tragic with a difference: he holds an FFA coaching licence.
During the week he was invited out to the lecture room at Football NSW’s Valentine Park headquarters at Parklea to hear a review of the recently convened FFA National Coaching Conference held at Homebush.
An impressive array of talent had been assembled for the two-day pow wow: Jurgen Klinsmann, Jean-Michel Benezet, Erich Rutemöller and Josef Venglos, among others.
It was a nice gesture by Football NSW to invite the mums and dads of Australian coaching out west and put on this free night for those who couldn’t afford – or weren’t invited – to Homebush.
However Pino, who coaches under-15s Bankstown Sports Strikers, didn’t come away from the evening particularly impressed with the philosophies espoused by this football think-tank. It was all stats and figures, he told me. Eugenics sort of stuff: height, weight, leap, ability to cover X amount of metres in ten seconds, blah blah blah.
Football today, he was told, was all about set play, rigid structure, and crossing the ball; a lot of goals were scored early in games when teams weren’t properly “organised”.
But Pino wasn’t having any of it.
What about Argentina? He said. What about Lionel Messi? The guy was the size of Tattoo from Fantasy Island and played the game by running straight at players.
His football was about finesse, about dribbling, about unlocking with skill the elaborate codes that master coaches had transferred from the whiteboard to the pitch.
It was time, he told me, for Australian coaches – all coaches – to stop being so cerebral and analytical and put on a pedestal the thing that makes good footballers great: imagination.
Of course, this was manna from heaven to this writer. I’m a big believer in art over craft and for a long time have been promoting the cause of Nicky Carle, whom I believe is the most gifted attacking player we have in this country.
Technically he is a class apart from anyone else, except for perhaps Harry Kewell when he is at his best, glimpses of which we saw last Sunday in the World Cup qualifier against Iraq in Brisbane.
Kewell had a wonderful game and was the difference between the two sides. But imagine what we could have done had we managed to fit Kewell and Carle on the pitch. Australia would have been lethal.
But Pim Verbeek is still reading from the Graham Arnold coaching manual and not picking Carle.
I had the opportunity a few weeks ago to ask Verbeek about Carle and got something akin to Arnold’s defence: that Carle didn’t put in enough effort tracking back; that he had to be more mobile across the pitch, going backwards and forwards.
All of which may be true, who am I to doubt Verbeek. But isn’t it possible for an Australia side just to make a concession for god-given talent when it’s in our midst?
Instead, since the era of Guus Hiddink, we’ve followed a more analytical path: calling up young, fit players who can adhere to systems, who can run all day and not drop, and who will blindly follow the coach’s gospel. A player such as Luke Wilkshire is the prototype. He came to prominence under Hiddink, kept his place under Arnold, and is now a key figure in Verbeek’s Socceroos. Others are Jason Culina, Brett Emerton and now David Carney.
Physical stamina is their strength, not creativity.
And it is creativity that Australia, under Verbeek, sorely lacks. Outside of Kewell and Mark Bresciano, there are no players in the side who you sense have that unteachable quality to pull out something game breaking, something special, at any time.
Carle is that kind of player.
And in my opinion we will need him this weekend in Dubai for the second leg of the Iraq showdown.
We’ve tried aerial tactics before in the Middle East, with little success, and I’m not sure that just pegging balls in the direction of Josh Kennedy and praying for the best is necessarily the best way to go.
Graham Arnold tried so-called “green football” twice – in Kuwait City in 2006 and Bangkok in 2007 – and found it desperately wanting both times, the last occasion against our opponents this weekend, Iraq.
The Iraqis aren’t midgets, so the lanky, slippery Kennedy isn’t going to have the same advantage he exploited against the Qataris in May. He will be hustled and grappled and most likely neutralised by the Iraqi defenders.
The key, I believe, is putting on a player who has the ability to do something extraordinary in a very constricted space, and there are only three players who can do that for Australia: Kewell, Bresciano and Carle.
If Australia wants to come away with a result in Dubai, starting Carle alongside Bresciano, behind a strike partnership of Kennedy/Kewell and McDonald/Kewell, for instance, would be a very aggressive but positive move.
But, like so many times in the past, I feel like I’m screaming into a deep, deep canyon and no one is listening. Maybe with Roar readers we can start a hell of a racket.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
- Explore:


Spiro Zavos said | June 6th 2008 @ 8:39am | Report comment
What Jesse is talking about is the shape of the national side. And this is a crucial point in selection. A strong football side needs a strong defensive system and pattern by the very nature of the game with scoring relatively difficult. The ‘easiest’ way not to lose is not to concede goals. But this difficulty of scoring needs to be balanced by having players who can get goals or set them up for the team. For the ‘surestr’ way of winning is to score goals. I find Jesse’s analysis very compelling and will watch with interest to see how the defensive game goes against the Iraqis..
Dickroo of Blacktown said | June 6th 2008 @ 9:08am | Report comment
Study the strategy Rob Bann used against Nigeria, Pim.
Carl should at least give 35 minutes run to replace Bresciano if he can’t be started.
I found Bresciano’s first touch was not great and his “creative” passes gave away too many possessions.
But Carl hasn’t found the back of net for a long while.
I don’t think Pim has the view/ball to drop Bresciano on the bench and start Carl. He needs Bresciano’s goal scoring ability/form.
Millster said | June 6th 2008 @ 9:24am | Report comment
Jesse – having religiously followed your posts for over 18 months now I’m salivating at the thought of an Australian team with Carle in the centre, supported by a Bresh, a Grella, or a Culina and feeding a forwardline that includes a fit Cahill and a Kewell in the kind of form that he showed last weekend (I’m glad that you gave him credit for what was a totally splendid game).
I wish we could sort out our defence as that would give us the luxury to select players such as Carle with more confidence in the centre of midfield rather than having to opt for at least one modfield ‘stopper’ to cover the centre-backs.
That said, do you think you’re being a little harsh on Emmo and on Carney? I agree 100% with your views in relation to Wilkshire, Beauchamp, Holman etc. But, without saying they are perfect, to call Emmo and Carney all stamina and no art is I think going a little far.
I hope we get the 3 points in the bag this weekend. Maybe then you’ll get your dream as Verbeek will feel like he can test out some other players. Carle may well be at the centre of defence feeding Djite and one of Kewell or MacDonald in Sydney against China. I’d pay to see that….
Mick of Newie said | June 6th 2008 @ 10:08am | Report comment
I agree but you know Pim is no visionary. He will pick Arnie’s specials and scrape a point either his week or against Qatar to get through. His real test will come in the next stage when he has to go to Iran, Saudi Arabia, Japan or Korea.
Interesting to watch Nick play the recent playoff semi for Bristol. Everytime his team had a throw in Nick just jogged up the park so the fullback could heave it down the line. It saddenned me because when he was at the Jets he received every throw in, always under pressure, always got it on the deck and did something with it. Look at his 30 minute cameo against Argentina (the rebona game) and there he was demanding the ball, getting it on the deck and looking to do something with it.
The real tragedy will be if Nick who is so keen to play for the Roos and please his club and national coach, makes himself into one of the robots and then in the great irony he then starts to get picked.
Mick of Newie said | June 6th 2008 @ 10:23am | Report comment
correction, as your photo clearly shows the “rebona” was against Uruguay.
Sorry to double post but one thing I don’t get is why when you are away from home playing in oppresive conditions the game plan appears to be to play long ball to a lone striker.
The result of long ball is you give up possession and have to work so much harder defending thus brining the conditions more into play.
If survival is the goal I would argue your best chance is to pick those players who can retain possession and thus deny the opposition possession.
I am resigned to Carle not playing but it is alarming that it appears that Bresciano is seen as the next most dispensible.
Midfielder said | June 6th 2008 @ 10:42am | Report comment
The side can only have some many attacking mids, if Harry is in, it leaves, Timmy C, Bresh & Nick, well Timmy is out. So its a choice between Bresh & Nick, IMO Bresh is better.
NUFCMVFC said | June 6th 2008 @ 10:43am | Report comment
I was pissed off When Holman came on, knew it was the Arnold influence coming out, give Nicky a run, if not starting then at least at some point
Glad to see Kennedy back, he will ony get about 20 mins though
NUFCMVFC said | June 6th 2008 @ 10:45am | Report comment
But it is all about circumstances remember, we are looking to play defensively, and Iraq will have to come at us, so we have to prepare with that in mind
If he doesen’t get a run out in these two games, hopefully against China when we have it sewn up or something
Slippery Jim said | June 6th 2008 @ 11:03am | Report comment
“the most gifted attacking player we have”
What??? How is that possible – he hasn’t scored even once for his club. The last I heard attacking players scored goals. I know I sound like a broken record, but that hasn’t stopped you either Jesse coming up with the same old head in the clouds stuff. I would have thought Tim Cahill, when fit would be our most dangerous attacking platyer, especially in tight areas (witness his overhead goal against Chelsea) or based on current club form, 30 goal a season Macca. National coaches pick players on form not fast-fading provincial accomplishments from years ago. As for the photo, it almost looks like he pulled it off! A more accurate picture would be one taken half a second later when he was flat on his arse and the ball out of touch.
Salvation said | June 6th 2008 @ 11:36am | Report comment
I can’t believe after all Nick Carle has done, and is doing, we have plenty of time and patience for Holman, plenty of low expectations for Wilkshire, and plenty of respect for Culina. Nick…. go to the erevidse!!!