My good friend Pino Paonessa, who runs the excellent East Sydney cafe Latteria with his brother Tommy and mate Vito, is a typical football tragic with a difference: he holds an FFA coaching licence.
During the week he was invited out to the lecture room at Football NSW’s Valentine Park headquarters at Parklea to hear a review of the recently convened FFA National Coaching Conference held at Homebush.
An impressive array of talent had been assembled for the two-day pow wow: Jurgen Klinsmann, Jean-Michel Benezet, Erich Rutemöller and Josef Venglos, among others.
It was a nice gesture by Football NSW to invite the mums and dads of Australian coaching out west and put on this free night for those who couldn’t afford – or weren’t invited – to Homebush.
However Pino, who coaches under-15s Bankstown Sports Strikers, didn’t come away from the evening particularly impressed with the philosophies espoused by this football think-tank. It was all stats and figures, he told me. Eugenics sort of stuff: height, weight, leap, ability to cover X amount of metres in ten seconds, blah blah blah.
Football today, he was told, was all about set play, rigid structure, and crossing the ball; a lot of goals were scored early in games when teams weren’t properly “organised”.
But Pino wasn’t having any of it.
What about Argentina? He said. What about Lionel Messi? The guy was the size of Tattoo from Fantasy Island and played the game by running straight at players.
His football was about finesse, about dribbling, about unlocking with skill the elaborate codes that master coaches had transferred from the whiteboard to the pitch.
It was time, he told me, for Australian coaches – all coaches – to stop being so cerebral and analytical and put on a pedestal the thing that makes good footballers great: imagination.
Of course, this was manna from heaven to this writer. I’m a big believer in art over craft and for a long time have been promoting the cause of Nicky Carle, whom I believe is the most gifted attacking player we have in this country.
Technically he is a class apart from anyone else, except for perhaps Harry Kewell when he is at his best, glimpses of which we saw last Sunday in the World Cup qualifier against Iraq in Brisbane.
Kewell had a wonderful game and was the difference between the two sides. But imagine what we could have done had we managed to fit Kewell and Carle on the pitch. Australia would have been lethal.
But Pim Verbeek is still reading from the Graham Arnold coaching manual and not picking Carle.
I had the opportunity a few weeks ago to ask Verbeek about Carle and got something akin to Arnold’s defence: that Carle didn’t put in enough effort tracking back; that he had to be more mobile across the pitch, going backwards and forwards.
All of which may be true, who am I to doubt Verbeek. But isn’t it possible for an Australia side just to make a concession for god-given talent when it’s in our midst?
Instead, since the era of Guus Hiddink, we’ve followed a more analytical path: calling up young, fit players who can adhere to systems, who can run all day and not drop, and who will blindly follow the coach’s gospel. A player such as Luke Wilkshire is the prototype. He came to prominence under Hiddink, kept his place under Arnold, and is now a key figure in Verbeek’s Socceroos. Others are Jason Culina, Brett Emerton and now David Carney.
Physical stamina is their strength, not creativity.
And it is creativity that Australia, under Verbeek, sorely lacks. Outside of Kewell and Mark Bresciano, there are no players in the side who you sense have that unteachable quality to pull out something game breaking, something special, at any time.
Carle is that kind of player.
And in my opinion we will need him this weekend in Dubai for the second leg of the Iraq showdown.
We’ve tried aerial tactics before in the Middle East, with little success, and I’m not sure that just pegging balls in the direction of Josh Kennedy and praying for the best is necessarily the best way to go.
Graham Arnold tried so-called “green football” twice – in Kuwait City in 2006 and Bangkok in 2007 – and found it desperately wanting both times, the last occasion against our opponents this weekend, Iraq.
The Iraqis aren’t midgets, so the lanky, slippery Kennedy isn’t going to have the same advantage he exploited against the Qataris in May. He will be hustled and grappled and most likely neutralised by the Iraqi defenders.
The key, I believe, is putting on a player who has the ability to do something extraordinary in a very constricted space, and there are only three players who can do that for Australia: Kewell, Bresciano and Carle.
If Australia wants to come away with a result in Dubai, starting Carle alongside Bresciano, behind a strike partnership of Kennedy/Kewell and McDonald/Kewell, for instance, would be a very aggressive but positive move.
But, like so many times in the past, I feel like I’m screaming into a deep, deep canyon and no one is listening. Maybe with Roar readers we can start a hell of a racket.
Recommend this story.
- Explore:


June 6th 2008 @ 12:27pm
Mick of Newie said | June 6th 2008 @ 12:27pm | Report comment
Slippery Jim, the real debate is more about how we play not the individuals. Cahill is a wonderful talent with an eye for goal who has delivered for club and country. His goal against Chelsea was pure opportunism executed superbly. McDonald is clealry a talent but for all his SPL achievements he may never cut it with the national team because international football is not like the SPL. The roos don’t play like Celtic or Motherwell and Iraq and Japan don’t defend like Hibs or Inverness Caledonian Thistle.
Carle’s achievements may be provincial but look at his game against Nigeria, or his cameos against Argentina and Uruguay and I would suggest he deserves another opportunity to show his wares. He does put his foot on the ball and tries to play to feet. When the Roos are under the pump these are skills that some of our players struggle with.
June 6th 2008 @ 1:04pm
Rob Humphreys said | June 6th 2008 @ 1:04pm | Report comment
I agree with Mick of Newie – knocking long balls, and thus surrendering possession, surely is not the best way to go in hot/humid conditions.
If there was ever a game to play the one Australian midfielder comfortable with the ball at his feet, then surely it is this one.
I would not be unhappy to see Bresciano dropped to make way for Carle either. He has had a stop/start season over in Italy, and was on the bench for the latter part. Carle is in absolute tip-top condition after three very tough play-off games in the last month.
With regard to Verbeek’s criticisms re tracking back, covering the park etc, I hope he watched Bristol City’s play-off games. Carle was everywhere, seemingly covering every blade of grass between the two penalty boxes. He combined this with barely a missed pass over three high pressure games, and was showered with praise and high ratings by BC fans.
Get him in there Pim!
June 6th 2008 @ 1:43pm
Rosco said | June 6th 2008 @ 1:43pm | Report comment
Agree that the time is right to give Carle a go. Lets see if Pim has some faith in him.
Can someone tell me why Garcia & Bosnar have been totally overlooked in this squad?
June 6th 2008 @ 1:53pm
Slippery Jim said | June 6th 2008 @ 1:53pm | Report comment
Mick of Newie, read the article again. “Pick Nicky Carle” – the debate is clearly about Nick Carle, and not about the Socceroos as a whole. He has never scored for the Socceroos, and the few minutes he has played instill me with less confidence than his old performances for the Jets. Those saying we should drop Bresc for Carle are clueless.
June 6th 2008 @ 2:10pm
Rob Humphreys said | June 6th 2008 @ 2:10pm | Report comment
Slippery – an attacking midfielder does not have to have the goal output of a Gerrard or Lampard to be effective.
I think what Jesse is saying is that NC’s vision and passing game, and comfort in possession, could be very useful in both breaking down the Iraqi defence, and also helping Aus to keep hold of the ball (meaning players have to expend less energy).
He is never going to have the massive goal output of the two players mentioned above, but is more of an architect type midfielder, like a Xavi or Fabregas, ie he creates space and opportunities for the players in front of him.
June 6th 2008 @ 2:42pm
Mick of Newie said | June 6th 2008 @ 2:42pm | Report comment
Jim, the heading says pick Nick Carle, the article like Jess’s long history of Carle articles is about how we play or more to the point how the auther thinks we should play.
If we are going to judge players on goal scored why are we wasting our time with McDonald (0 from 7 games) Culina (1 from 30), Grella (0 from 34) or Holman (1 from 14).
June 6th 2008 @ 2:44pm
Kazama said | June 6th 2008 @ 2:44pm | Report comment
At the moment I am inclined to agree with Mick of Newie’s assessment of Scott McDonald. You are quite right Mick – Iraq isn’t anything like an SPL side. I wonder though how different Scott’s game against Iraq would have been had he been getting some service from someone who understands how to use strikers to unlock defenses, say Nick Carle, instead of being completely ignored by players who seem clueless about how to get the ball into the back of the net.
I remember the first time I saw Nicky play – it was a match between Marconi and Brisbane Strikers. Nicky was the difference between the two sides that night, and frankly also the difference between me enjoying the match and being bored to death for 90 minutes. It was like I was watching 19 guys running around pointlessly while one guy with flair, skill and brilliance ran the whole show and indeed scored the only goal. Nick Carle is one of the very, very few players representing Australia with the ablility to make a chance anytime he has the ball, so IMO we should be giving him every opportunity to play in a side that is becoming increasingly incapable of mounting an intelligent attack on goal. It might also be handy to have him on the pitch to rescue us once the football gods stop smiling on our defenders and we (deservedly) begin conceding goals.
June 6th 2008 @ 2:50pm
Slippery Jim said | June 6th 2008 @ 2:50pm | Report comment
Mick of Newie, hey I’m no fan of Holman either, Mick of Newie, but this discussion is about Nick Carle. Our newfound strength since Guus has been patient, smart possession, and this will be vital against Iraq away. The photo above gives clear evidence that Carle is not suited to a smart possesion game. He takes chances, he makes wrong decisions in crucial situations (such as giving away penalties for his club) and he does not make the simple, effective pass that can win the game. On top of that he is not in form, and does not track back enough for what will need to be a conservative game. The simple truth is, we have a strength in midfield for Australia. If Carle had been a full back or wing back, or even a striker he would have more chance to get in the first team. As it is, there are far better options available for Australia.
June 6th 2008 @ 3:00pm
Greg Russell said | June 6th 2008 @ 3:00pm | Report comment
Jesse, first let me say that I am a big fan of your work for The Roar.
By geographic necessity – I have lived in NZ for nearly 15 years – I watch far more rugby these days than football, but before that I did cut my teeth on football during 3 years of living in Germany. (Incidentally, I can thoroughly recommend football telecasts as a superb way to learn a new language).
I want to pick up on your comment that “a lot of goals were scored early in games when teams weren’t properly “organised”.” There is a myth in rugby that substitutes late in a game can make a big difference. The theory just doesn’t work because everyone else is too tired and disorganized by then, and games lack enough structure for tries to be scored. Anyone who doubts this should just look at the last few weeks of Super 14, e.g. all 3 tries in the Crusaders-NSW final were scored in the first half.
Anyway, I have long suspected that similar holds in football. Your throwaway line seems to confirm this. Therefore my recommendation to Pim for this weekend is to play Kennedy for the first 30 minutes rather than the last 30, which is reports are saying he intends to do. After all, with Kennedy running riot, all 3 of Australia’s goals against Qatar were scored in the first 33 minutes.
June 6th 2008 @ 3:02pm
Slippery Jim said | June 6th 2008 @ 3:02pm | Report comment
Holy cow, Kazama, it is par for the course for Nickyophiles to bleat on about how Carle’s Johnny Warren medal makes him the best player in Australian history, or reminisce endlessly about his sublime skills during his Jets playing days, but to have to dredge up his from at Marconi merely shows up the dearth of recent examples of Carle’s alleged skill. Next we’ll be hearing how your friend’s friend used to play against him at Fairfield in high school and he was the bee’s knees or some such drivel. Why do you think national coaches go to matches? To gauge current form. If they picked the squad on past form they would merely need a couple of dusty history books and a pencil and paper…