Wallabies locked in a prison of the mind
By Andrew Logan, 29 Jun 2008 Andrew Logan is a Roar Expert

“These walls are funny. First you hate ‘em, then you get used to ‘em. After long enough, you get so you depend on ‘em. That’s “institutionalized.” Red talking about Brooks Hatlen in The Shawshank Redemption.
Last night’s Test match against the French revealed just how institutionalised the Wallabies have become under their last two coaches, and how far they have to go under new coach Robbie Deans.
If you take an animal, or a man, and lock them up for long enough, eventually they forget how things work on the outside. Everything looks faster, more modern, more daunting. And often, even after you remove the walls, they’ll still stay within the boundaries because they don’t know anything else any more.
Perhaps the most worrying thing about this tedious victory was the stark difference between approach of the experienced players, and their rookie counterparts. No-one was perfect, or even very good, but at least the rookies had a go. Peter Hynes continued to play with energy and enterprise, chancing his arm and running the ball back at the visitors. Luke Burgess (although his service was slow) had a couple of valuable snipes at the line. James Horwill supported well and ran hard with ball in hand.
By contrast, others looked lost. Nathan Sharp was caught twice receiving the ball flat-footed and on one occasion was driven back several metres. George Smith wasn’t sighted, as wasn’t Wycliffe Palu. Giteau drifted across field, away from his halfback, crowding his outside backs. Tuqiri fielded a kick in the first half directly in front of a large hole in the French line, but by the time he had finished looking around and deciding what to do, it was closed. Had he just gassed it, things might have been different, but he seems incapable of spontaneity these days.
Cameron Shepherd did not run a ball back at the opposition until the 30th minute, which must have been driving Deans to distraction, given he is used to having Leon McDonald as his custodian. The less said about Shepherds pre half-time non-touch-finder (eventually resulting in 3 points to the French), the better.
In general, the home team looked lost with the ball in hand, as though they just weren’t sure what to do with it. Three main tactics emerged – the hopeful midfield kick, the tired old short ball to trundling forwards close to the ruck; and the all purpose give-it-to-Gits-and-see-what-he-can-do.
This was the unequivocal sign of a team who, when the structure is removed, has forgotten how to operate without it. If further proof was needed that a structured environment is the Wallabies “safe place”, it came when the French pressed the Wallaby line. All of a sudden the urgency, the talk and the zing that was missing in attack, bubbled to the surface in defence. Here was a team who suddenly looked relieved that they knew what to do, and they did it exceptionally well.
Which suggests that as much as the Wallabies, their fans and their coach might like to see some flair and width in their game, it could be some time before that happens, and that for now at least, any hope of salvation lies in their rock solid defensive patterns. The Wallabies may not be much in attack right now, but it is a good side that gets through their defensive line without either a hefty dose of luck, or being forced to go to the air.
Where to from here? There were signs that Robbie Deans is also keen to get things moving (and put some pressure on the institutionalised Wallabies) by giving all of his rookies some serious time. Unlike the Eddie Jones era, where players were given farcical 3 minute cameos, most reserves were given upwards of 20 minutes to show their wares. It looks like Deans knows the direction he is going, and that several established Wallabies may not figure in his long term plans.
If the Wallabies are to succeed in their new strategy of minimal structure rugby, they need a few things to change. First, they need a five-eighth who will direct play, create opportunities, kick when required and back up relentlessly. Matt Giteau is tremendously skilful (as shown by his almost solo try), but just not that effective as a five-eighth. There is no doubt he can create chances, but his tactical kicking is only average and his backline direction is poor. He is drifting badly across field and was doing so for the Western Force during the Super 14. Until he starts fixing defenders and looping, the Wallabies will struggle to create gaps.
Also for this style, we need a fullback who is not only capable of running a ball back in broken play, but who lives for that opportunity. Oh for a Chris Latham at the beginning of his career! Shepherd is not this type of fullback and is just too conservative to develop that way. Hynes could actually be exactly the man we need. He loves running in broken play, can clean up well and tackles hard. Ashley-Cooper would fill Hynes’ wing spot nicely.
Our forwards (memo Nathan Sharp) can no longer exist to do little leaguie style hit ups one or two off the ruck. They need to either get wide as genuine support players and ball handlers, or get in behind their runners ready to clean out hard and keep the fast ball coming. We no longer need to build 18 phases, so unless Sharpe can change his modus operandi, he may suddenly find his services are no longer required.
Of course, Robbie Deans knows all this, which is why he is fixing to get rid of the institutionalised sooner rather than later. His only hope, in the absence of any world rated stars, is to create a team that knows only his way, and doesn’t remember the old ways.
For those who have the old ways burned into their brains, and who are incapable of change, the end of the road is fast approaching.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Will Super Rugby crowds continue their slide? (201)
- Will South African rugby force a Super 21 by 2018? (173)
- The real story of how John O’Neill turned Manchester City down (70)
- Dan Parks and the unsolved questions of expat rugby (65)
- Australian teams at Super disadvantage (58)
- Pocock set to be named new Force skipper (56)
- Can the ‘Tahs win the battle after losing the Waugh? (51)
- France turns to Parra and Trinh-Duc
- Rebels look to lift for formidable Blues in rugby trial
- Mr Fix-It Lucas wants to nail down No.10
- Force roost loses ‘Mother Hen’ Sharpe
- Victory beat Mariners with Kewell winner
- Waratahs romp to 83-5 trial win over Samoa A
- Quade Cooper’s return to the Reds goes up a gear
- Wales show Southern Hemisphere how to play running rugby (29)
- What opening matches of Six Nations taught us (19)
- Will Super Rugby crowds continue their slide? (201)
- Clinical Chiefs cost rusty Rebels in Corio (9)
- Six Nations shows rugby is a parochial game at heart (5)
- Goose’s Super Rugby up-and-comer XV for 2012 (29)
- What does the future hold for the Six Nations (50)
- Explore:
- Chris Latham, Eddie Jones, George Smith, Giteau, Luke Burgess, Matt Giteau, robbie deans, Rugby Union, Super Rugby, wallabies

Ben C said | June 29th 2008 @ 11:34am | Report comment
Two lessons from last night’s match:
(1) Playing what is in front of you won’t work with player’s whose instincts are atrophied from years of Eddie Jones’ style regimented coaching and play. Rookies who have not been brainwashed (braindead?) are needed urgently.
(2) ANZ Stadium is truly a soulless dump.
John said | June 29th 2008 @ 1:12pm | Report comment
Deans will struggle for a long time because he is choosing from a player base that has been moulded by others who were disciples of the Jones era. That Jones philosophy has been passed down to even schoolboy and junior level because to gain your coaching certificate you had to pass assessments based on Jones’ theories. It has seeped into all levels of coaching and selections.Deans will not succeed until he gets out into the ” sticks ” of NSW and QLD and into the club comps.so that he can find his own raw talent to work with. Even the ” up and coming ” players from the academies etc have been selected by Jones cronies. Robbie, get out into the ‘ burbs and see what is on offer there. Many of the so called stars of the future that we are seeing are really second rate and have only got there because of the political push behind them so when and if they come up against quality they will be seen for what they are.
Harry said | June 29th 2008 @ 2:27pm | Report comment
I have little to add to this excellent and accurate analysis except to ask was Lote being replaced due to injury or was he dragged? I hope the latter, certainly Mortlock and Shepherd looked to gain a bit of urgency after that.
Modern test match rugby heh. Here we are (rightfully) moaning about a 20 point win by the Wallabies against one of the world’s supposed rugby superpowers.
Agree, the atmosphere was non-existent out at the Olympic stadium.
Justin said | June 29th 2008 @ 5:38pm | Report comment
Humorous stuff John, where do you get your info from? Do you think there are 15-20 Wallabies playing club football that we have decided not to pick for political reasons? Also the ARU has a coaching director and it has been the same guy from pre Jones to now. Quit making stuff up, Jones has changed nothing in the lower levels of the game.
chas said | June 29th 2008 @ 6:32pm | Report comment
A chap wrote to the SMH a couple of weeks ago and stated that anyone who thinks that RU is a better game than RL should pull his head out of his arse. I was surprised that this letter was published but I’m beginning to agree with him. The recent round of RL showed more skill and enterprise than I’ve ever seen in a RU match. The Wallabies are pretenders if their performance against France C is any measure. They’ve seen the last of many of my mates.
Russ said | June 29th 2008 @ 7:48pm | Report comment
I had a few mates over for the rugby last night but it wasn’t long before we got bored with the match and had a few quick flicks onto the league.
The many stoppages in the test match provided us with ample opportunities to do so and then sneak back to the Wallabies without seemingly missing a thing.
But I’m sad to report that we didn’t return from one of our channel changes as we became enthralled with the Cowboys v Souths match.
That’s right.
A Souths match became more interesting to four diehard rugby fans than a Wallabies test and none of us are even Souths fans – I can’t stand them.
Even sadder is the fact they were playing the North Queensland Cowboys.
The bottom line is that the two worst teams in the NRL provided a better spectacle than the Wallabies, or “Qantas Wallabies” as they are known on Fox.
Top yarn Andrew.
Mart said | June 29th 2008 @ 7:48pm | Report comment
Went to the Ireland game (which we should have lost, let’s face it) and was not impressed, watched this and switched off after about 70 mins (and I’m a rusted on rugger bugger). Just boring, especially when numerous replacements reduce the contest to training game level. France with a B or C team frustrated to Wallabies far too well. The only positive is we are winning poor games, didn’t do that under Eddie.
As someone who has visited Stadium Australia ion around 10 occassions for rugby I think it s truly dire for atmosphere. Then again the fans don’t exactly help – the Irish fans got several choruses of Fields of Athenry going in Melbourne to no Aussie response. Ditto Saturday in Sydney where I could discern some vibrant Marsellaise / Allez Lez Blues on the TV but not much else. I recall being at the 2003 RWC semi between Aus / NZ and about 10 mins in the Poms in the crowd got Swing Low going (to be met by the predictable round of booing). Turned out to be the loudest sung song of the night despite a heck of a contest. For my money the redeveloped Suncorp in Brizzy is by far the best Aussie rugby stadium….
Seriously, you’d have to worry if you were JON – reduced to virtually giving tix away and then those that paid good money get served up that fare….
mtngry said | June 29th 2008 @ 10:28pm | Report comment
I would rather go to the SFS ( which I may on Sunday for Aus A v NZ MAORI)
but to get back to the topic… can anyone see the Wallabies winning a single 3N match this year?
mcxd said | June 30th 2008 @ 5:31am | Report comment
Even though he did score the intial try Matt Giteau had a very ordinary game at fly half. People have talked about Luke Burgess having an off night, I would not blame him at all. How is Burgess supposed to find his man when he has split second decisions to make and Giteau was all over the place, he was deep, he was wide, he was swapping with Barnes, he was sometimes not there at all. The backline was a mess. In my opinion Giteaus wallaby fly half experiment should end now.
At the tahs Brugess was always able to find Kurtley Beale. Even though young KB looks to be more and more suitable each day.
Number3 said | June 30th 2008 @ 8:05am | Report comment
The important thing to me, from Sat night ,is that I really hope the ELV’s will be adopted for the long run. Outside of one obvious Cameron Shepherd head explosion we mostly managed to find touch when required ( a great result under the old rules). This would explain the feeling and reality of many stoppages. We have been spoilt with more ball in play over the S14 series. While not excusing the Wallabies totally for their efforts I believe that the change in rules are having more impact than some would believe.
Can’t wait to the Tri Nations.
Also agree with Justin above. Coaching levels 1through to 3 are in no way associated with any individual ideology. They are building blocks of coaching that allow baic skills to be developed at grass roots rugby. Good coaches take these and apply their own interpretations.