Wallabies locked in a prison of the mind
By Andrew Logan, 29 Jun 2008 Andrew Logan is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- Chris Latham, Eddie Jones, George Smith, Giteau, Luke Burgess, Matt Giteau, robbie deans, Rugby Union, Super Rugby, wallabies
Related coverage

“These walls are funny. First you hate ‘em, then you get used to ‘em. After long enough, you get so you depend on ‘em. That’s “institutionalized.” Red talking about Brooks Hatlen in The Shawshank Redemption.
Last night’s Test match against the French revealed just how institutionalised the Wallabies have become under their last two coaches, and how far they have to go under new coach Robbie Deans.
If you take an animal, or a man, and lock them up for long enough, eventually they forget how things work on the outside. Everything looks faster, more modern, more daunting. And often, even after you remove the walls, they’ll still stay within the boundaries because they don’t know anything else any more.
Perhaps the most worrying thing about this tedious victory was the stark difference between approach of the experienced players, and their rookie counterparts. No-one was perfect, or even very good, but at least the rookies had a go. Peter Hynes continued to play with energy and enterprise, chancing his arm and running the ball back at the visitors. Luke Burgess (although his service was slow) had a couple of valuable snipes at the line. James Horwill supported well and ran hard with ball in hand.
By contrast, others looked lost. Nathan Sharp was caught twice receiving the ball flat-footed and on one occasion was driven back several metres. George Smith wasn’t sighted, as wasn’t Wycliffe Palu. Giteau drifted across field, away from his halfback, crowding his outside backs. Tuqiri fielded a kick in the first half directly in front of a large hole in the French line, but by the time he had finished looking around and deciding what to do, it was closed. Had he just gassed it, things might have been different, but he seems incapable of spontaneity these days.
Cameron Shepherd did not run a ball back at the opposition until the 30th minute, which must have been driving Deans to distraction, given he is used to having Leon McDonald as his custodian. The less said about Shepherds pre half-time non-touch-finder (eventually resulting in 3 points to the French), the better.
In general, the home team looked lost with the ball in hand, as though they just weren’t sure what to do with it. Three main tactics emerged – the hopeful midfield kick, the tired old short ball to trundling forwards close to the ruck; and the all purpose give-it-to-Gits-and-see-what-he-can-do.
This was the unequivocal sign of a team who, when the structure is removed, has forgotten how to operate without it. If further proof was needed that a structured environment is the Wallabies “safe place”, it came when the French pressed the Wallaby line. All of a sudden the urgency, the talk and the zing that was missing in attack, bubbled to the surface in defence. Here was a team who suddenly looked relieved that they knew what to do, and they did it exceptionally well.
Which suggests that as much as the Wallabies, their fans and their coach might like to see some flair and width in their game, it could be some time before that happens, and that for now at least, any hope of salvation lies in their rock solid defensive patterns. The Wallabies may not be much in attack right now, but it is a good side that gets through their defensive line without either a hefty dose of luck, or being forced to go to the air.
Where to from here? There were signs that Robbie Deans is also keen to get things moving (and put some pressure on the institutionalised Wallabies) by giving all of his rookies some serious time. Unlike the Eddie Jones era, where players were given farcical 3 minute cameos, most reserves were given upwards of 20 minutes to show their wares. It looks like Deans knows the direction he is going, and that several established Wallabies may not figure in his long term plans.
If the Wallabies are to succeed in their new strategy of minimal structure rugby, they need a few things to change. First, they need a five-eighth who will direct play, create opportunities, kick when required and back up relentlessly. Matt Giteau is tremendously skilful (as shown by his almost solo try), but just not that effective as a five-eighth. There is no doubt he can create chances, but his tactical kicking is only average and his backline direction is poor. He is drifting badly across field and was doing so for the Western Force during the Super 14. Until he starts fixing defenders and looping, the Wallabies will struggle to create gaps.
Also for this style, we need a fullback who is not only capable of running a ball back in broken play, but who lives for that opportunity. Oh for a Chris Latham at the beginning of his career! Shepherd is not this type of fullback and is just too conservative to develop that way. Hynes could actually be exactly the man we need. He loves running in broken play, can clean up well and tackles hard. Ashley-Cooper would fill Hynes’ wing spot nicely.
Our forwards (memo Nathan Sharp) can no longer exist to do little leaguie style hit ups one or two off the ruck. They need to either get wide as genuine support players and ball handlers, or get in behind their runners ready to clean out hard and keep the fast ball coming. We no longer need to build 18 phases, so unless Sharpe can change his modus operandi, he may suddenly find his services are no longer required.
Of course, Robbie Deans knows all this, which is why he is fixing to get rid of the institutionalised sooner rather than later. His only hope, in the absence of any world rated stars, is to create a team that knows only his way, and doesn’t remember the old ways.
For those who have the old ways burned into their brains, and who are incapable of change, the end of the road is fast approaching.
Recommend this story.
The Crowd Says (19) | Page 2 of Comments
Have Your Say
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Reds back in contention, but Waratahs need a cleanout (287)
- What Hansen’s first squad means for the Wallabies (191)
- CAMPO: Few modern Aussie players would’ve made it in my era (169)
- ‘Campo’ too generous: Lord’s dream XV contains just two current Wallabies (161)
- Will Cooper and Mitchell be back in time for Wallaby selection? (156)
- CAMPO: Will Deans change the style of the Wallabies play? (128)
- Who would win a rugby union State of Origin? (118)
- Brumbies want revenge against Reds
- James O’Connor ruled out of upcoming Tests
- Reviewing the Super Rugby action from round 13
- Why Cooper must be left out of Wallabies (3)
- Super Rugby teams that should start 2013 planning now (4)
- Who should partner Horwill in the second row? (5)
- Brumbies cement position atop Australian conference
- Reviewing the Super Rugby action from round 13 (0)
- Why Cooper must be left out of Wallabies (3)
- Who should partner Horwill in the second row? (5)
- Brumbies cement position atop Australian conference (0)
- Who do Waratahs fans support in Brumbies-Reds showdown? (1)
- Mark Ella’s greatest Wallaby performance (38)
- The Waratahs are Wallaby killers (53)
- Explore:
- Chris Latham, Eddie Jones, George Smith, Giteau, Luke Burgess, Matt Giteau, robbie deans, Rugby Union, Super Rugby, wallabies

June 30th 2008 @ 8:48am
GB said | June 30th 2008 @ 8:48am | Report comment
I went to test on Saturday night at Homebush and have to admit it was laclustre, soulless and disappointing. The best part was having a couple of beers with some mates in the Wallabies Bar after the game. I saw better Rugby being played in a 4th grade subbies match earlier in the day. Robbie Deans will not be able to change some of the entrenched play in the Wallabies overnight so perhaps we should be a little more patient with the team. That said though, the first 30 minutes was dire, the game was over by the 60th minute and it was all France in the last 20. Was good to see their diminutive winger Monsieur Palisson score a try at least. Even though the game was lost the French kept at the Wallabies until the final whistle. Of more of a concern is ANZ as a venue. Even the RL guys admit it is a terrible place to watch a game of footy. A few thousand fans scattered around a cavernous stadium makes for no atmosphere. Even the 50k on Saturday night made barely a whimper. There was more noise from the small but parochial French supporters. Sadly though, it seems we are locked in their untill 2011 under contractual arrangements. It seems the best option is to watch it on the TV and if it becomes dull then switch over to something else more exciting. Give me a packed SFS any day. And bring back daytime tests!
June 30th 2008 @ 10:32am
Terry Kidd said | June 30th 2008 @ 10:32am | Report comment
I agree that we still have fly half problems, for all his other skills Giteau cannot direct a backline. Contrast that with SNK against Tonga, and even Halangahu yesterday aginst Fiji …. although the backline direction improved even more when Gerard and SNK came on for the last 20. Mitchell was no good at fullback, his kicking was next to uselessand his runs came to bonecrushing halts as soon as he met a defender.
Some changes that I believe need to be made to the Wallabies bearing in mind that Tuqiri will be out injured ….. Barnes to the bench, Giteau to 12, Shepherd dropped, Ione replaces Tuqiri, SNK replaces Shepherd.
In the pack …. Kepu to replace Baxter, Sharpe out McMenimen in, Palu out injured, Hoiles in, Waugh starts, Smith to bench.
June 30th 2008 @ 10:59am
stillmissit said | June 30th 2008 @ 10:59am | Report comment
Great article Andrew and right on the money. Institutionalised players with all the imagination driven out of them. All the blather about the quality of the Australian backs if only the forwards would give them the ball. Well they had 70% of it on Sat.and didnt know what to do with it. Giteau is a great inside centre and Barnes is a better 5/8 than Giteau will ever be in my book. Lote covered himself in anonymity and fumbledom but at least he has been playing better lately just not on Saturday night. I thought the backs went better after he left.
John – I agree with you and think Justin has left his white stick in the corner. In all jnr grades all I see is one off drive it ups ad infinitum and then kick it. The defence is everything the attack predictable, whilst the scrum almost non existent, if they scrum at all. He could do worse than have a look around at grade etc and see whats around.
Was there Sat night and the anthem was ‘silent night’ weak, although my group of 4 did try. It is not the stuff to sing about. There was a group of Islander boys on the train home singing it and they did a better job amongst the 8 of them than 49k did at the stadium.
My mate who got me a ticket remarked that the French were predictable picking the blonde singing stunner.
June 30th 2008 @ 1:47pm
Blinky Bill - Bellingen said | June 30th 2008 @ 1:47pm | Report comment
Terry Kid – Enjoyed reading your observations & thoughts. I too am a SNK fan and wish that the guy would have got a decent shot at the 5/8 spot for the Tahs.
Not too sure with your thoughts of Gits at IC & Barnes to the bench with who is to be 5/8. You reckon SNK at full back but why not at 5/8? Your thoughts?
June 30th 2008 @ 2:06pm
Justin said | June 30th 2008 @ 2:06pm | Report comment
Stillmissit – are you serious? Anyone who believes this rubbish – “Jones philosophy has been passed down to even schoolboy and junior level because to gain your coaching certificate you had to pass assessments based on Jones’ theories. It has seeped into all levels of coaching and selections.Deans will not succeed until he gets out into the ” sticks ” of NSW and QLD and into the club comps.so that he can find his own raw talent to work with. Even the ” up and coming ” players from the academies etc have been selected by Jones cronies” should do a little research.
It is factually wrong, plain and simple. I suggest you check who writes the coaching manuals because it aint Eddie Jones. Can you also tell me who his cronies are?
June 30th 2008 @ 10:12pm
cosmos forever said | June 30th 2008 @ 10:12pm | Report comment
I think Ingliss should start at 5/8, then you could move Isreal to LT’s wing and have the fast running and skilful Slater hitting the holes these two spontaneous athletes create. That would make the 82,000 go crazy.
Whoops, sorry – wrong thread…
June 30th 2008 @ 10:42pm
Jameswm said | June 30th 2008 @ 10:42pm | Report comment
Just a comment on the Jones philosophies being passed down the levels.
It is a natural phenomenon that the style and philosophies of the national team will be copied by players and coaches at lower levels. I coach U9s and already we’ve renewed our focus on ball handling and practising 2 on 1s and 3 on 2s, as has my son’s school coach.
So Justin the comment about it being institutionalised was tongue-in-cheek – but there is truth in the methods being indirectly institutionalised.
All those calling on SNK going to 15 in front of Shepherd – the rest of them obviously failed to notice the difference to the tahs when SNk came in. He is skilled and gutsy and plays what’s in front of him.
Those dismissing Giteau at 10 obviously didn’t watch too many Force games – he ran the show and won them a couple of games almost single handedly. I recall the Kiwi commentators remarking how he destroyed opponents almost on his own.
It’s his natural position. so give him time to blossom.
July 1st 2008 @ 9:04am
Justin said | July 1st 2008 @ 9:04am | Report comment
Jameswm – I realise that some coaches will try and copy what the national team is doing straight away. I think it is a flawed strategy though particularly in junior teams as they should be playing as much game based activities as possible to make training enjoyable while incorporating correct technique.
Re Gits – I watched many of his matches with the Force and he certainly did win or heavily influence the result a number of times. Was it as a 5/8 or was it just his undoubted genius with ball in hand though? I would argue he could have been just as effective at 12. I have not given up on him as a 5/8 and think he deserves much more time there but he does have some fundamental flaws in his game as a 10 at present, namely a shocking habit of running across field. Carter is the best, lets hope Deans had a lot to do with that!
July 1st 2008 @ 9:18am
stillmissit said | July 1st 2008 @ 9:18am | Report comment
Justin I think you have your bloggers mixed. I am at a loss to tell you who Jones cronies are or answer any of your garbled message. I just accused you of having a white stick which, I agree was childish and purile but as an ex forward it is what we are known for.
I stand by my point about jnr rugby reflecting the national team for the last 5 (felt like 50) years. The damage done is widespread and not confined to the Wallabies. If you also add into the mix the lowest point in rugby parlance the UNCONTESTED SCRUM then the damage was almost terminal. Rugby is a game to turn boys into men (regardless of my aside above) and uncontested scrums is not going to help. If you cant scrum you cant play in the forwards, depart to the backs if you are quick enough, or just depart to soccer.