<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: All Blacks: Fit for the fire</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/07/07/all-blacks-fit-for-the-fire/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/07/07/all-blacks-fit-for-the-fire/</link>
	<description>The Roar is a sports opinion website. We tackle sports opinion rather than simply sports news. And we embed user-generated content — in the form of articles and comments — into the fabric of the site. Featuring some of the best sports writers in Australia — including the Sydney Morning Herald's Spiro Zavos — The Roar aims to be the leading sports website in Australia.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:46:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/07/07/all-blacks-fit-for-the-fire/#comment-53016</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 07:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/?p=8138#comment-53016</guid>
		<description>OJ, for years the Springboks have scored, I would guess but cannot be sure statistically, the majority of their tries from Habana or De Villiers intercepts. Despite Jake White&#039;s adulation it is something that he never addressed. Against Wales, although weakened, sometimes the Boks looked very comfortable on the ball, othertimes less so. I&#039;m interested to see how the Boks will play this week. I&#039;d rather they kept James because Steyn continues to pound these drop goals time and time again. His miss rate must be sky high. Perhaps if some teams struggle with the ELVs the 5 metre scrum defence will increase opportunitys for drop goals, and thus we get a Jannie de Beer game again.

Around the tackle area though constant Bok mediation and &#039;professionalism&#039; will surely slow the game down relentlessly against most teams barr the All Blacks, because the short arm rewards that tactic. I suppose it is how the ref interprets the day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OJ, for years the Springboks have scored, I would guess but cannot be sure statistically, the majority of their tries from Habana or De Villiers intercepts. Despite Jake White&#8217;s adulation it is something that he never addressed. Against Wales, although weakened, sometimes the Boks looked very comfortable on the ball, othertimes less so. I&#8217;m interested to see how the Boks will play this week. I&#8217;d rather they kept James because Steyn continues to pound these drop goals time and time again. His miss rate must be sky high. Perhaps if some teams struggle with the ELVs the 5 metre scrum defence will increase opportunitys for drop goals, and thus we get a Jannie de Beer game again.</p>
<p>Around the tackle area though constant Bok mediation and &#8216;professionalism&#8217; will surely slow the game down relentlessly against most teams barr the All Blacks, because the short arm rewards that tactic. I suppose it is how the ref interprets the day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ohtani's jacket</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/07/07/all-blacks-fit-for-the-fire/#comment-52900</link>
		<dc:creator>ohtani's jacket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 00:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/?p=8138#comment-52900</guid>
		<description>They&#039;ll struggle for the time being given that the ELVs nullify their strengths. 

The Boks strengths have been the lineout, their rush defence and swarming the breakdown. 

The All Blacks have had a habit of avoiding touch for awhile now, to the point where Carter often couldn&#039;t find touch even when he needed to. Now they can avoid it altogether. The Boks have a weak front row and the 5m rule means their rush defence is ineffective. This gives the All Blacks untold room to attack. Given that the lineouts under the ELVs tend to favour the defending side, it&#039;s not really an attacking weapon until some coach figures out the right combinations/calls. And given that no-one&#039;s throwing straight, the All Blacks can get off scott free despite having few jumpers.

The Boks remain strong in the tackle area, but the breakdown isn&#039;t the point of contention it was under the ELVs because the ref will call short arm penalties without second thought. If the Boks do have strong ball carriers, they need to start using them, because their number one problem is their pivot. Carter and Giteau are going to destroy the Boks under the ELVs, given room to create. 

We all know the type of first five that South African rugby prefer. The only flyhalf they&#039;d had in recent memory that would suit the ELVs is Errol Tobias. That&#039;s at Springbok level, I&#039;m ignorant about the Currie Cup. 

It&#039;s possible that South Africa will play better this weekend. New Zealand started like a house on fire and their fitness over 80 minutes is impressive. The fact that the Boks only scored off a well-worked turnover, deep in their own half, doesn&#039;t bode particularly well, considering the amount of chances the All Blacks created. 

South Africa&#039;s inability to score tries is a big part of why their Tri-Nations record is worse than it ought to be. Given that the ELVs are meant to encourage try-scoring &amp; keeping the ball in play, it requires more of a philosophical shift that a one week fix.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;ll struggle for the time being given that the ELVs nullify their strengths. </p>
<p>The Boks strengths have been the lineout, their rush defence and swarming the breakdown. </p>
<p>The All Blacks have had a habit of avoiding touch for awhile now, to the point where Carter often couldn&#8217;t find touch even when he needed to. Now they can avoid it altogether. The Boks have a weak front row and the 5m rule means their rush defence is ineffective. This gives the All Blacks untold room to attack. Given that the lineouts under the ELVs tend to favour the defending side, it&#8217;s not really an attacking weapon until some coach figures out the right combinations/calls. And given that no-one&#8217;s throwing straight, the All Blacks can get off scott free despite having few jumpers.</p>
<p>The Boks remain strong in the tackle area, but the breakdown isn&#8217;t the point of contention it was under the ELVs because the ref will call short arm penalties without second thought. If the Boks do have strong ball carriers, they need to start using them, because their number one problem is their pivot. Carter and Giteau are going to destroy the Boks under the ELVs, given room to create. </p>
<p>We all know the type of first five that South African rugby prefer. The only flyhalf they&#8217;d had in recent memory that would suit the ELVs is Errol Tobias. That&#8217;s at Springbok level, I&#8217;m ignorant about the Currie Cup. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s possible that South Africa will play better this weekend. New Zealand started like a house on fire and their fitness over 80 minutes is impressive. The fact that the Boks only scored off a well-worked turnover, deep in their own half, doesn&#8217;t bode particularly well, considering the amount of chances the All Blacks created. </p>
<p>South Africa&#8217;s inability to score tries is a big part of why their Tri-Nations record is worse than it ought to be. Given that the ELVs are meant to encourage try-scoring &amp; keeping the ball in play, it requires more of a philosophical shift that a one week fix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamins Saunders</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/07/07/all-blacks-fit-for-the-fire/#comment-52839</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamins Saunders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 15:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/?p=8138#comment-52839</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a relief to see Inky articulate what has long been on a lot of people&#039;s minds. Despite the advent of profesionalism a large amount of &#039;niggle&#039; still resides in general South African play. Wannenburg&#039;s recent kamikaze hit on Matthew Tait is the perfect illustration. I doubt many English fans have forgotten the 40 or so incidents in the 2002 53-3 Twickenham game. Likewise I doubt many Wallaby fans would have forgotten the 2003 Kempson and Botha incidents. Having said that the All Blacks have hardly been blameless over the past few years; Ali Williams stamping on Lewsey&#039;s head and the O&#039;Driscoll assault specifically. However these appear to be aberrations in their game. Ultimately Thorn apologised. Surely the end of the matter? Saying he should have been sent off is clutching at straws.

Also OJ, I don&#039;t see why you think the BOKs will struggle under the ELVs? Juan Smith and Burger have had exceptional work rates for the past four years, and Spies/Kankowski are exceptional runners in open play. Van Der Linde is tidy in the loose, Matfield and Botha also. I imagine Smit would struggle but that Du Plessis or Brits would thrive, so there is a definite balance there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a relief to see Inky articulate what has long been on a lot of people&#8217;s minds. Despite the advent of profesionalism a large amount of &#8216;niggle&#8217; still resides in general South African play. Wannenburg&#8217;s recent kamikaze hit on Matthew Tait is the perfect illustration. I doubt many English fans have forgotten the 40 or so incidents in the 2002 53-3 Twickenham game. Likewise I doubt many Wallaby fans would have forgotten the 2003 Kempson and Botha incidents. Having said that the All Blacks have hardly been blameless over the past few years; Ali Williams stamping on Lewsey&#8217;s head and the O&#8217;Driscoll assault specifically. However these appear to be aberrations in their game. Ultimately Thorn apologised. Surely the end of the matter? Saying he should have been sent off is clutching at straws.</p>
<p>Also OJ, I don&#8217;t see why you think the BOKs will struggle under the ELVs? Juan Smith and Burger have had exceptional work rates for the past four years, and Spies/Kankowski are exceptional runners in open play. Van Der Linde is tidy in the loose, Matfield and Botha also. I imagine Smit would struggle but that Du Plessis or Brits would thrive, so there is a definite balance there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ohtani's jacket</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/07/07/all-blacks-fit-for-the-fire/#comment-52593</link>
		<dc:creator>ohtani's jacket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 09:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/?p=8138#comment-52593</guid>
		<description>Neither side played that great &amp; Thorn ought to have been sin-binned. 

A lot of South Africans think he ought to have been sent off, but a red card would&#039;ve been ridiculous. The one week suspension is enough. He was cited and reprimanded. He also apologised on the field. Smit trying to milk a card was humourous. He looked pretty good for a guy who could&#039;ve died. Boks fans are pretty angry that Thorn only got one match while someone like Burger gets five, but at least he was cited.

It was a stupid bit of retaliation, though it probably served its purpose in terms of the All Blacks bashing the Boks around a bit. It&#039;s funny to hear Boks supporters outraged about foul play. In the history of SA vs. NZ, this incident rates about zilch.

Anyway, the All Blacks didn&#039;t look unbeatable, but the Boks weren&#039;t very good. People want them to play to their strengths, but their strengths are nullified under the ELVs &amp; one week isn&#039;t long enough to fix that. There&#039;s a good chance they&#039;ll lose to Australia on this leg. 

I think they&#039;ll be much more difficult to beat in South Africa.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neither side played that great &amp; Thorn ought to have been sin-binned. </p>
<p>A lot of South Africans think he ought to have been sent off, but a red card would&#8217;ve been ridiculous. The one week suspension is enough. He was cited and reprimanded. He also apologised on the field. Smit trying to milk a card was humourous. He looked pretty good for a guy who could&#8217;ve died. Boks fans are pretty angry that Thorn only got one match while someone like Burger gets five, but at least he was cited.</p>
<p>It was a stupid bit of retaliation, though it probably served its purpose in terms of the All Blacks bashing the Boks around a bit. It&#8217;s funny to hear Boks supporters outraged about foul play. In the history of SA vs. NZ, this incident rates about zilch.</p>
<p>Anyway, the All Blacks didn&#8217;t look unbeatable, but the Boks weren&#8217;t very good. People want them to play to their strengths, but their strengths are nullified under the ELVs &amp; one week isn&#8217;t long enough to fix that. There&#8217;s a good chance they&#8217;ll lose to Australia on this leg. </p>
<p>I think they&#8217;ll be much more difficult to beat in South Africa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben from Pretoria</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/07/07/all-blacks-fit-for-the-fire/#comment-52584</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben from Pretoria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 08:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/?p=8138#comment-52584</guid>
		<description>Inky

You sound like a very relieved man, typical NZ one eyed account of the game.  Beautiful how you enhance every Bok indescression and airbrush the AB&#039;s mistakes.

It was never going to be easy for the Boks to win but they have another shot at it this coming weekend. You make it sound like the Boks were just mere flies being sswotted away, I think reality might have been  a bit different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inky</p>
<p>You sound like a very relieved man, typical NZ one eyed account of the game.  Beautiful how you enhance every Bok indescression and airbrush the AB&#8217;s mistakes.</p>
<p>It was never going to be easy for the Boks to win but they have another shot at it this coming weekend. You make it sound like the Boks were just mere flies being sswotted away, I think reality might have been  a bit different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TembaVJ</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/07/07/all-blacks-fit-for-the-fire/#comment-52537</link>
		<dc:creator>TembaVJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 04:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/?p=8138#comment-52537</guid>
		<description>Inky normally you have such a great view on things, today you shock me. Both teams had plenty of off the ball niggles, the AB&#039;s where not a bunch of angels. Their was one late tackle on Carter, the others where tackles and if he doesnt like getting tackled perhaps you need to move him to 15 or the NZ nation ballet team. Dickinson did not control the match and allow for many things to pass. Thorn wasn&#039;t even a late tackle it was just plain wrong and that set the standard for the match.

Everything said and done, the AB&#039;s played better and deserved to win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inky normally you have such a great view on things, today you shock me. Both teams had plenty of off the ball niggles, the AB&#8217;s where not a bunch of angels. Their was one late tackle on Carter, the others where tackles and if he doesnt like getting tackled perhaps you need to move him to 15 or the NZ nation ballet team. Dickinson did not control the match and allow for many things to pass. Thorn wasn&#8217;t even a late tackle it was just plain wrong and that set the standard for the match.</p>
<p>Everything said and done, the AB&#8217;s played better and deserved to win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/07/07/all-blacks-fit-for-the-fire/#comment-52497</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 01:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/?p=8138#comment-52497</guid>
		<description>Inky - alot of what you have written was spot on. Carter was the main difference between the 2 sides. He controlled the match beautifully and in defence was spot on too with some timely tackles. SA must adapt to the ELVs as they were poor in S14 and did not pick a 15 or 22 that suits the new laws. No Stankowski or Spise in their was a crucial oversight. By the way what has happened to the Cats 5/8 whose name has escaped me for now, has played numerous Tests for the Boks and has had some injuries. Is he in the NH or still injured or just out of favour? James showed his lack of consistency yet again, his kicking was atrocious as was his organisation. Steyn may have to come in, I thought he at least gave their attack some width but they need a centre with more venom than Jacobs.

Whilst I agree SA were providing some niggle (as usual BB &amp; BJ) and late shots Thorns actions were inexcusable and a stronger ref may have put him in the bin. It was late, he lifted him up and did not bring him to ground safely as he must if he lifts. His one match ban would back this up. Lets face it the little hold down of the head was nothing, he would get that in league week in week out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inky &#8211; alot of what you have written was spot on. Carter was the main difference between the 2 sides. He controlled the match beautifully and in defence was spot on too with some timely tackles. SA must adapt to the ELVs as they were poor in S14 and did not pick a 15 or 22 that suits the new laws. No Stankowski or Spise in their was a crucial oversight. By the way what has happened to the Cats 5/8 whose name has escaped me for now, has played numerous Tests for the Boks and has had some injuries. Is he in the NH or still injured or just out of favour? James showed his lack of consistency yet again, his kicking was atrocious as was his organisation. Steyn may have to come in, I thought he at least gave their attack some width but they need a centre with more venom than Jacobs.</p>
<p>Whilst I agree SA were providing some niggle (as usual BB &amp; BJ) and late shots Thorns actions were inexcusable and a stronger ref may have put him in the bin. It was late, he lifted him up and did not bring him to ground safely as he must if he lifts. His one match ban would back this up. Lets face it the little hold down of the head was nothing, he would get that in league week in week out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/07/07/all-blacks-fit-for-the-fire/#comment-52457</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 23:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/?p=8138#comment-52457</guid>
		<description>Nick, you are correct. We also lost to Australia at the same ground in 2001. It strikes me that Wellington hasn&#039;t been a particularly happy hunting ground for the AB&#039;s over the years. 

The very first test I attended was the 1986 Bledisloe loss at Athletic Park and 4 years later I was there to see the All Blacks end their 4 year unbeaten streak, also against the Wallabies. Add the 1993 pasting by the Lions and the 1998 loss to the Boks to the losses listed above and it&#039;s a  pretty bad record comparitively (for instance they&#039;ve not lost at Eden Park since 1994 and I think Carisbrook has only hosted 5 losses by the AB&#039;s in its 100 year history). 

However, I think Inky was meaning that since 1999 the AB&#039;s have beaten SA every time they&#039;ve played in NZ - the last loss to the Boks was a 13-3 loss at...gasp...Athletic Park!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick, you are correct. We also lost to Australia at the same ground in 2001. It strikes me that Wellington hasn&#8217;t been a particularly happy hunting ground for the AB&#8217;s over the years. </p>
<p>The very first test I attended was the 1986 Bledisloe loss at Athletic Park and 4 years later I was there to see the All Blacks end their 4 year unbeaten streak, also against the Wallabies. Add the 1993 pasting by the Lions and the 1998 loss to the Boks to the losses listed above and it&#8217;s a  pretty bad record comparitively (for instance they&#8217;ve not lost at Eden Park since 1994 and I think Carisbrook has only hosted 5 losses by the AB&#8217;s in its 100 year history). </p>
<p>However, I think Inky was meaning that since 1999 the AB&#8217;s have beaten SA every time they&#8217;ve played in NZ &#8211; the last loss to the Boks was a 13-3 loss at&#8230;gasp&#8230;Athletic Park!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/07/07/all-blacks-fit-for-the-fire/#comment-52447</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 23:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/?p=8138#comment-52447</guid>
		<description>We last lost in NZ in 2003, to England, at Cake Tin (15-13 I think).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We last lost in NZ in 2003, to England, at Cake Tin (15-13 I think).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk
Database Caching using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn0.theroar.com.au (user agent is rejected)

Served from: hspikebl170.hyperspike.com.au @ 2010-03-22 11:52:19 -->