Barassi wants Melbourne to die not relocate
By Leonard Siragusa, 8 Aug 2008 Leonard Siragusa is a Roar Rookie
- Tagged:
- AFL, Demons, Gold Coast, Jeff Kennett, Jim Stynes, Melbourne Demons, Ron Barassi, Victoria
AFL great Ron Barassi said he would rather see his former club Melbourne die than relocate to another state to survive.
With a debt of close to $5 million, the Demons were teetering on the brink of collapse prior to former player Jim Stynes taking control two months ago.
While a fundraising dinner for Melbourne’s most influential supporters on Tuesday night erased more than $2 million of their debt, the club’s precarious position had prompted Hawthorn president Jeff Kennett to urge the Demons to move to the Gold Coast to survive.
Barassi, one of the club’s favourite sons who played in six Demon premierships from 1955 to 1964 and coached them from 1981 to 1985, rejected such a move.
He said it was imperative one of the game’s founding clubs remained in its original form.
If the Demons could not, he said, they should fall on their sword.
“I think it’s very important for the story of football that the original club does survive,” Barassi said.
“I think they are one of the Victorian clubs that can’t move. People will go `how unfair is that’ but to have the initial club with the name Melbourne leave, I’d rather the club dies.”
Despite costing themselves $115,000 following the sacking of president Paul McNamee, Melbourne’s dire situation has now seen the AFL order them to cut their player payments if they are to be granted a multi-million dollar injection from the game’s governing body.
Instead of paying their players close to 100 per cent of the salary cap, the Demons have accepted a cut to 92.5 per cent for next season.
Barassi was hopeful the new Stynes-led team would be the answer to the Demons’ current financial woes.
“We’re very hopeful there, we needed to start afresh, whether we have the right people or not, only time will tell,” Barassi said.
“But there’s more passion there now than there obviously had been in the last couple of decades.
“It is a hard task and they have made some good steps so far but we’ll know in about five or 10 years (whether it can survive).”
Barassi believed a better way to help struggling AFL clubs would be to pool all the gate receipts and evenly distribute up to 30 per cent of the takings.
He also thought there was a greater chance another Melbourne-based club would relocate to Tasmania because of a long-held belief that Melbourne could not sustain 10 AFL clubs in the future.
“I’d be surprised if (a club didn’t relocate to Tasmania) in the next five years.
“Tassie’s a real heartbreaker – they deserve to be in the competition but I don’t see how they can afford it. They only have half a million people and there’s split between north and south, if there was half a million people in just one area then it might be a different story.
“We already have three or four clubs at the money table, I don’t think we should do the same thing with Tasmania.
© AAP 2012Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
AFL articles
- More rugby league players to defect to the AFL? (160)
- Mobile madness: Optus decision bad news for codes (153)
- AFL divisions are the way of the future (106)
- Foxtel’s AFL coverage is nirvana for footy fans (89)
- AFL’s most hated club turns 120 years old (78)
- Israel Folau now ready for AFL (76)
- Optus ruling actually a good thing for AFL fans (52)
- Ling holds hope for club loyalty in AFL
- Andrew Krakouer given four weeks leave from Collingwood
- Giants inspired to prove doubters wrong (32)
- Malthouse not fazed by assistant issue
- Richo says look out for the Tigers in AFL
- AFL clubs’ leadership groups getting out of hand (15)
- Who’s to blame for the Majak Daw beat-up? (32)
- AFL clubs’ leadership groups getting out of hand (15)
- AFL divisions are the way of the future (107)
- Crows changing, but will this AFL preview change your life? (2)
- Is Heath Shaw the right leader for Collingwood? (11)
- Could a female coach succeed in the AFL? (36)
- Demons’ two captain Jacks the right leadership choice (5)
- Mobile madness: Optus decision bad news for codes (153)
- Explore:
- AFL, Demons, Gold Coast, Jeff Kennett, Jim Stynes, Melbourne Demons, Ron Barassi, Victoria


Redb said | August 8th 2008 @ 1:08pm | Report comment
Pooling 30% of the gate takings is unrealtistic and unfair. How does that reward the clubs who do get it right on and off the field? The salary cap is fine and justified, but let’s not go too far down the socialist path Barass!
Redb
Pippinu said | August 8th 2008 @ 1:22pm | Report comment
I have to admit – I prefer to see one of the oldest football clubs in the world to remain in the league as is. Perhaps an increased identification with the massive Eastern suburbs of Melbourne is the way of the future (or, as Redb suggested somewhere else, marketing themselves to all those yuppies moving into the inner city).
There’s no doubt that a team will eventually move to Tassie – we are never going to grow beyond 18 teams (and even 18 teams is a touch to much in my opinion).
When the bullies were in financial dire straits (yet again) – I had imagined them as the logical choice for a future Western Sydney team, or even in partnership with Central Districts as the 3rd Adelaide team.
Redb said | August 8th 2008 @ 1:29pm | Report comment
Pippinu,
I agree re Western Bulldogs to western Sydney has a semblance of logic, except the Canterbury Bulldogs in the NRL makes it difficult I would think. If that could be overcome, the bullies if necessary would be the ideal choice.
Redb
onside said | August 8th 2008 @ 1:47pm | Report comment
Melbourne died in 2007 from a fatal overdose of failed tanking syndrome.