Deans brings back Campo. Good!
By Spiro Zavos, 30 Aug 2008 Spiro Zavos is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- Alan Jones, Brumbies, David Campese, George Gregan, Gregan, robbie deans, Rugby Union, Rugby World Cup, Springboks, The Springboks, Tri Nations, wallabies
Related coverage
- ACT Brumbies news
- Rugby Union news
- Wallabies news
- Rugby World Cup 2011 news
- Tri Nations Tournament news
- South Africa Springboks news
- Rugby 2011 news
A disgraceful act of spite by senior Wallabies (read George Gregan, particularly) took place last year when they refused to allow David Campese to hand out the Wallaby jerseys to the players before the Test against the Springboks at Cape Town.
Campese, along with many other rugby writers (including myself), had argued for some time that Gregan was more of an impediment to the success of the Wallabies than a guarantor of victory.
When Gregan came into the Wallabies in the early 1990s he was a running halfback with some flair in his play.
I remember writing him up after seeing him on television starring in the Hong Kong.
As his career progressed, he became more noted for his defensive work, which included the memorable tackle on Jeff Wilson, ‘Gregan’s Tackle’, that won a Test for the Wallabies against the All Blacks in Sydney.
But he stayed on too long.
And he seemed to be resistant to new blood being introduced as his successor, both at the ACT Brumbies and at the Wallabies.
In the end, at the 2007 Rugby World Cup, he ended up a caricature of the dynamic player he was a decade early. He stood over the ball as if he were an emperor penguin waiting for it to hatch.
Gregan had some revenge on Campese for his calls that the emperor halfback had no clothes by thwarting the jersey presentation, and stating in his just-released rugbiography that Campese had such frail defensive skills and a lack of pace and strength that he wouldn’t have made it in the professional era.
This is arrant nonsense.
Campese would have been devastating in the professional game, especially under the ELVs. There has never been a better broken field runner in the history of rugby.
The claims about his lack of defensive skills have never really held up. There was not one winger in his long career who ever had the wood on him. His game wasn’t based around defence, but Don Bradman’s game wasn’t based around bowling.
Alan Jones called Campese, “The Bradman of Australian Rugby.” This is an apt and fair description of Australia’s greatest winger.
An All Black selector and coach once told me that when they were preparing to play the Wallabies in the Campese era, he was the only player who they had to work out and practice specific plans and systems to try and keep him – generally unsuccessfully – in check.
The Gregan-Campese spat has a happy ending for Australian rugby. Earlier this week Robbie Deans asked Campese to hand out the jerseys to the Wallabies in a ceremony that took place before the team traveled to Johannesburg for the crucial Tri-Nations Test.
Forever on the front foot, on and off the field, the great Campo allowed himself a counter-attack against Gregan and his comments: “You can sense there is a real change in the atmosphere of the Wallabies this year, a more relaxed feeling … The burdens have been lifted off the players and they are enjoying their rugby. There’s no baggage.”
I reckon George Gregan has been tackled ball and all.
And that David Campese has picked up the ball and scooted away for a long-range try.
Recommend this story.
Jim Beam Devil's Cut
As bourbon ages, a portion of liquid is lost from the barrel due to evaporation. This is known as the Angel's Share. When the bourbon is taken from the barrel, a certain amount is left trapped within the wood. It's that extracted liquid, and the rich flavours from deep within the barrel that are in Jim Beam's Devil's Cut.
Click here to learn more about Jim Beam's wicked new bourbon.


August 30th 2008 @ 8:39am
Spiro Zavos said | August 30th 2008 @ 8:39am | Report comment
Frank, the All Black selector was Earle Kirton.
David Campese gave me and I’m sure thousands of other lovers of rugby memorable moments(and opposition’s headache’s) that no one will ever repeat. He played for Australia Under-21 against a strong NZ side (Grant Fox et al) at the SCG in a curtain-raiser before, I think, a Australia-Scotland/France? Test. I was sitting in the Monty Noble stand and I’ll never forget a run he made towards us leaving NZers sprawling after he beat them with steps, one way and then the other, all at pace. He was like a downhill racer swerving through the gates (past the defenders). The people who were with me looked at each other, and gasped, ‘Who is this player!’
Brilliant Campese. After many deeds like this Campo is excused the occasional beat-up, although I must say that over the last few years I’d agreed with him far more times than I’ve disagreed.
August 30th 2008 @ 8:50am
matta said | August 30th 2008 @ 8:50am | Report comment
OJ, you’re usually more thought out than that.. you post sounds like it written by a Christchurch bogan who’s about to move to Sydney
August 30th 2008 @ 9:04am
ohtani's jacket said | August 30th 2008 @ 9:04am | Report comment
Sheek,
So you think the Wallabies would’ve won with say, Cook and Grant?
I don’t see how Gregan is wrong to be honest. Campo would’ve struggled in the professional era.
August 30th 2008 @ 9:07am
Justin said | August 30th 2008 @ 9:07am | Report comment
OJ – its clear you dont like Campo but you are just getting ridiculous if you think he couldnt cut it in the modern game. On what basis do you make your assertion?
August 30th 2008 @ 9:58am
Jason Cave said | August 30th 2008 @ 9:58am | Report comment
Spiro,
The Test you’re thinking about was an Australia/Scotland Test at the SCG.
August 30th 2008 @ 11:55am
Jesse Fink said | August 30th 2008 @ 11:55am | Report comment
“He stood over the ball as if he were an emperor penguin waiting for it to hatch.” Gold, Spiro.
August 30th 2008 @ 12:07pm
mudskipper said | August 30th 2008 @ 12:07pm | Report comment
Spiro…I’m surprised you prefer to defend a person with such a disposition as David Campese than a man like George Gregan.
David Campese is sadly today a tabloid egoist…a man who couldn’t step out of the limelight however stood out as a player of his time…but nothing more… He is no Bradman and Alan Jones is not worthy utter the great mans name.
The first thing David Campese should handout are apologies…
I think it was quite a reasonable stand for Gregan and others senior Wallabies players not being prepared to ceremoniously accept their Wallabies jerseys from Campese. Who would want to look the tabloid troublemaker in the eye before taking the field?
Its hypercritical for Campese to want ceremoniously to give Gregan the 9 Wallabies jersey when he was continually attacking him and others players and coaches through the media…Frankly that’s insincere…phony…
I doubt Deans asked for Campese recently to hand out the jerseys but he was suggested by others as Campese obliged as he lives in Durban….
Campese at his best would struggle against the best international wingers from the professional era. These players at their best would make Campese look ordinary, players like, Joe Rokocoko, Doug Howlet, Shane Williams, Jonah Lomu, Brian Habana, Jason Robinson, Joe Roff, Clyde Rathbone and Lote Tuqiri…would all return Campese inside out. If Campese played today’s game he wouldn’t have the space and opportunity he once enjoyed…Furthermore his turnstile defense would have seen him on the bench more than the field…
Gregan has been slammed for years by many and quietly held his tongue and has waited to have his say the right way, though his book…Gregan’s is a gentleman but not one without a memory… Additionally Campese was Gregan’s agent for a time were he was disloyal…Some of you may remember that…Gregan clearly thinks little of the man…
“The great men of the past become the shadow men of today and sadly snipe at the new champions form life’s sideline as they pass by…” They are not the guardians of the past but only seek to guard their own mortal achievements,” mudskipper…
August 30th 2008 @ 12:12pm
hayden said | August 30th 2008 @ 12:12pm | Report comment
Spiro – Great article as usual. On one point I would beg to differ. Memory does play tricks, but I recall St John Kirwan on numerous occasions going around Campo like he was stuck in quicksand.
August 30th 2008 @ 12:40pm
sheek said | August 30th 2008 @ 12:40pm | Report comment
OJ,
As Matta said, your comments are usually more thought out, & as Justin said, it’s clear you don’t like Campo. So obviously when you saw Campo being spoken of in glowing terms by Spiro, you had a bout of white line fever!
The arguments about 91 are pointless. You play with the cards you are dealt at any time (whether good or bad). I remember reading a ridiciclous article by Bob Howitt, that had John Gallagher been fullback in 91 instead of Kieran Crowley, his faster pace would have got him to Lynagh’s chip kick before it bounced, preventing the subsequent hail mary pass by Campo to Horan.
How the bloody hell could he say such a thing? And on what authority? Whose to say Gallagher would have been in the right position, or that the try might not have been conjured up some other way? Or if Australia had been able to call on all its league defectors since 1908. Dumb, dumb, dumb! It was nothing but sour grapes by an immature kiwi journalist who should have known better.
Let’s go back to 1987. What if Australia still had Ella, O’Connor, a fully fit Gould & an uninjured Moon. What if, what if, what if. Like I said, you play with the cards you are dealt at any one time.
Hayden,
And you forget the times Campo ran around Kirwan like he was stuck in quicksand????? I recall plenty of times Kirwan enjoyed a 2-3 man overlap against Campo. Not even the best defensive winger can do much about that. You’re right – the memory does play tricks!
Mudskipper,
The following, not from me, but from Bradman – “A champion in his own era is a champion in any era”.
I keep hearing this garbage that champions from other eras wouldn’t survive today. Well, for starters, they’re either dead or old & decrepit. However, bring them up in the current era, with all the scientific training & nutritional advantages of today, while allowing them to retain the skills they had in their own day, & a very different picture is painted.
It’s okay for us to all disagree, but let’s retain some perspective……….
August 30th 2008 @ 12:58pm
matta said | August 30th 2008 @ 12:58pm | Report comment
I hate it when people compare era’s…its pointless.
it like saying “man jessie owens was a crap runner..he would make the final in today 100m” no shit. but that the evolution of sport ..and man for that matter.
only way to comapre sports people is to guage how good they were in their particular generation.