Should Gus Gould replace David Gallop?
By Steve Kaless, 2 Sep 2008 Steve Kaless is a Roar Guru
There’s been much debate on David Gallop’s handling of the Sonny Bill Williams affair. And we hear loud rumblings that rugby league is in poor shape in Australia and that change is needed. So I invited Roar editor, Zolton Zavos, to put his thoughts forward on why he thinks Gus Gould might provide the solution, while I suggest that an even a Crow could do a better job.
Zolton Zavos: pro-Phil Gould
Even before all the drama broke this year about off (and on) field player behaviour, it was pretty clear to most ardent followers of the code that rugby league was in serious trouble.
It’s not about the product itself, which remains exciting and competitive.
Rather, it’s in the roots of the game, which – until Super League shook things up a bit — has traditionally pitched itself as a blue collar, working-class code.
And, perhaps more significantly, it’s in a dearth of lateral thinking displayed by many of the code’s most prominent decision makers.
David Gallop’s at the head of queue.
Really, recent media attacks aside; Gallop must have one of the easiest jobs in professional sports administration. The clubs are all self-managed, there’s a further layer of management with the NSW and Queensland Rugby Leagues, and then another one again with the Australian Rugby League.
It might be a little facetious to ask it, but aside from being quoted from time-to-time when players step out of line, what else does Gallop actually do each day?
What he should be doing is drawing firmer lines in the sand on abhorrent player behaviour and thinking more creativity about how better to promote his code to a new audience who want their action fast and accessible at all times.
Of course, there’s another answer.
Loathe him or hate him (are there any shades in between?), Phil Gould is a forward thinker. He’s an agent for change. He understands league players, and the league market, because he’s one of them: a former player and successful coach.
And he has the nous and the balls to take the rugby league code firmly by the scruff of the neck and drag it kicking and screaming into the twenty-first century.
If rugby league continues on its current trajectory, there’s a real danger that it will soon be swallowed up by the more financially sustainable codes – AFL, union and football.
Gallop is not the man for the rescue job.
Why not give Gus a crack? If nothing else, it might shut him up for a minute.
Steve Kaless: against Phil Gould
Making Gus Gould the CEO of the NRL is the equivalent of making the ADHD kid the litter monitor in the playground.
It might help keep him quiet, but it is not going to make any real impact on the state of anarchy and lawlessness that is the rugby league playground.
You can make Greg Bird pick up 25,000 pieces of litter or write on the blackboard “I will not allegedly attack my girlfriend or allegedly ask my friend to take the rap” (damn lawyers) but the game needs more than that.
A restructure of the organisation of the body that governs rugby league in Australia is long overdue, but that is perhaps a separate debate to who should perhaps take over.
One thing is for sure, it shouldn’t be Gus.
The next boss of the NRL needs to come with one thing, no baggage and be able to do two things, unify the factions of the game and drive the game forward.
Out of a possible score of three, Gus gets the goose egg, the big donut a big round zero.
If Gus Gould was in charge of the NRL you’d need to hire every porter from every big city hotel to carry his baggage to each and every meeting.
Gould seems to be the sort of bloke who if locked in a room by himself would soon start an argument.
He may be passionate about rugby league, but his passion (for want of a better term) has seen him fall out with a long long list of players, administrators, coaches and journalists.
This is hardly the sort of character to heal the wounds and bring the game together before charging forward.
One of the biggest criticisms of current hierarchy is it allows someone like Nick Politis to sit on a number of boards, can you imagine Gould, his life long ally making the phone call to tell Nick “thanks for your help mate, but we need a new direction”.
And what about the next TV deal, while it is no death sentence not to be on the News Ltd Christmas card list, wouldn’t the fact that he has been a long term employee (loyal servant?) of Channel Nine be enough to disqualify him as someone to negotiate that deal.
If past lives are enough to end the reign of Gallop, surely the same must apply.
Gus is a populist, he is great at telling you that your club means so much to rugby league.
It might be when they are getting flogged 30-0 on Friday night footy and he says “stick around folks, this is just how Team X likes it, they’ve got a rich fighting history and I reckon this game is far from over.”
Or maybe he is tugging on the heart strings on a Sunday with an article about suburban rugby league grounds and the good days of footy when we used to go to games and leave our front doors unlocked because even the thieves wouldn’t dare steal from a working man while he was at the footy.
Gus’ biggest problem is that he has already nailed his name to the church door of too many issues.
As the game moves into its next centenary the challenges that lie ahead mean that everything needs to be investigated and explored.
Arthur Beetson and Andrew Johns are just two former greats of the game who have said that the number of teams in the competition needs to be examined, Gus has made it clear he believes every team in Sydney is vital to the game.
Gus may be right, but his refusal to entertain the idea is not the hallmark of a great CEO.
When Gus starts one of his rants on the Nine coverage, you can minimise the damage but filling the fridge, emptying the bladder or making a phone call.
It wouldn’t be so easy if his name in the Big League program wasn’t just followed by the letter C but also E and O.
The list of alternatives could be a long one.
Mick Cronin has run an excellent pub in Gerrigong for years.
Vote One the Crow.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.


The Link said | September 2nd 2008 @ 9:48am | Report comment
Steve, I agree that the issue is more structural rather than about individuals.
An independent commission, akin to the AFL, needs to be running the game and (almost just as importantly) be negotiating the TV deal. Having News on both sides of the table in negotiating the TV deal is a confict and only serves to diminish what League should be getting for rights.
Zolton, big call to say the game runs itself!!
oikee said | September 2nd 2008 @ 10:00am | Report comment
You are pretty spot on there steve with what you have said about Gus, on top of that he is to quick to judge and make comments without thinking, and then has to do a backflip to cover. He is alright to have around, i dont really have a problem with him, but he should never be allowed to run a organisation, the game is in good hands.
Lots of peole will say Gallop is not doing enough, behind the scenes i think he is doing fine. The league needs to change its way of doing things and this is being looked at and (done) by gallop. I think we all need to be a little patient, this wont happen like yesterday, it takes 3-4 years to acheive results. Memberships are a must and expanding is also something that has to be looked at in other states.
The only real issue with the game at this time is the crowd figures at A.N.Z, league is a game that fits well with a crowd of 20 to 25 thousand, so we need these well built stadium to accomadate. Veiwing figures are not a issue. We really dont need a bigger stadium than 50 thousand, so suncorp is perfect and purpuse built for the big games.
As for off-feild behaviour, i was watching a series of crime stories about a policeman who pulled girls over on the high-way and then raped them, he got caught when he killed one of them. All professions have problems , why do you think that league should be squeaky clean, we will always have problems, we just need to try to keep the lads focused on good and bad, still dont mean we wont have any problems, its the way we deal with them is how we move forward. At least there out in the open and not brushed under the carpet now. Admit you have a problem and the reabilatation starts after that, like Gallop has said about the clubs, yes we have a problem, but at least we know.
skull said | September 2nd 2008 @ 12:43pm | Report comment
Gould is a goose of that there is no question but in my opinion he is right about one thing and that is there should be more games on Sunday afternoons. The weather is usually warmer and generally there is less competiton for the entertainment dollar on Sunday afternoons as opposed to Sat. nights.
As far as the leadership of RL is concerned there is currently no leadership, it is all reactive. RL needs a strongman in charge supported by an independent board which overseas all levels of the game. As it is all we get is News Ltd lackeys or ARL people still fighting the war.
I dont know who that strongman or woman would be but it needs to be someone who also has the best interests of the grassroots of the game in the suburbs and bush in mind when decisions are being made, not just the elite competitions.
Spiro Zavos said | September 2nd 2008 @ 1:03pm | Report comment
Phil Gould would make a terrific CEO of the NRL. It’s the poacher-gamekeeper syndrome that would make it work. Of course, he is opinioniated. He’s paid to express his opinions on television and for the Sun-Herald. I always find his written stuff, particularly, very impressive.
He won’t get the CEO’s job because he is not a News Ltd protegy. David Gallop was involved with News Ltd’s Super League bid. This has totally compromised him when it comes to issues regarding the contracts of players, as the Sonny Bill Williams affair revealed.
There has been a vicious campaign run against Gould in The Sunday Telegraph by Phil Rothfield and Rebecca Wilson. And this campaign, in itself, is a justification for putting Gould into the top seat. He would certainly give RL a coherent game plan to take it securely into the 21st century. Right now, the game is the play thing of two media outlets, Channel 9 and News Ltd who are milking it for all they are worth.
Gould would do for RL what John O’Neill has done and continues to do for RU in Australia.
Jeff said | July 11th 2010 @ 11:54am | Report comment
c’mon folks. Gus is annoying inhis commentaries, Our game needs a leader with a love of the game but a person with great Business acumen, we are not talking about a youth league negotiating with councils for ground space and running Chuck Raffles. — We need the best, with a proven track record. As Gus would say, No No No.
Justin said | September 2nd 2008 @ 1:20pm | Report comment
Gould should be involved in some capacity as he has a passion for the game and has a great understanding of its nuances also. Some sort of role in operations and or future competition strategy may be a possibility. However being involved as a consultant and running the show are 2 entirely different matters. What experience does he have in running multi-million dollar business?
Not sure why having a couple of journo’s running a “campaign” against you is grounds for becoming top dog of a sporting organisation?
cosmos forever said | September 2nd 2008 @ 1:53pm | Report comment
Spiro, I look forward to the Gould-led NRL – A five team Sydney competition that changes the rules each week based on a mixture of ridiculous ‘rose coloured glasses’ statements and whatever gets more ratings for the 47 minutes of (delayed) footy shown on the CEO’s former network (sms us now if you want the stripping rule chucked out by next week – 131bundy for yes, 131rum for no).
I could take Gould’s ramblings if they were genuine and less about the perpetuation of some commentator’s WWE type persona. I have no doubts has the good of (his and his only) game at heart but he’s become too much of a cliche of himself.
Redb said | September 2nd 2008 @ 2:17pm | Report comment
How long will it be before Gallop gets the chop or is he doing such a good job for News Ltd he’s safe or as long as he wants the job?
Redb
oikee said | September 2nd 2008 @ 3:14pm | Report comment
Spiro, yes i do enjoy to read gus when he writes because he can look back before he enters the send button to make sure he has not put his big foot into it. Him running the game would be like, hey lets try this, spend 100 million and say, no that dont work, ok give me another 100 million to fix it. We know where we need to improve, it takes time to see results like memberships and other growth. We all think that cutting Sydney teams would be good in the long run, Gallop does not think this way.? Why.
If Gus could fix the problem then it would already be fixed. I am sure that they all look at surgestions from everyone’s ideas, and Gus would have plenty,.
As for Union and john O’neil , he cant get any worse because they are at rock bottom. So he is only going to look good in future years. But then again, with the wallibies performing like they are at the momment, nobody might care enough to worry about them. At least they have the world cup in new zealand 2010 which will keep a few amused.
One thing assured in this world, Kangaroos winning world cups, the others are a lottery. We have 9 , i am looking forward to 10.
Koala Bear said | September 2nd 2008 @ 3:45pm | Report comment
Absolutely Yes!!!
~~~~~~~
KB
Midfielder said | September 2nd 2008 @ 4:07pm | Report comment
In its current management structure it would not matter who was in charge. As many have said change the management structure ………. whether PG is CEO material I am not sure, but I am reasonably sure DG is not the person to take league forward as he is to close to News and IMO being part of the SL war on the News side it would be hard for him to take all the League guys behind him.