Give Wallace his due, and another three-year contract
By Bruce Walkley, 3 Sep 2008 Bruce Walkley is a Roar Pro
- Tagged:
- AFL, Bulldogs, Carlton, Carlton Blues, Chris Judd, Dean Bailey, Fremantle, Fremantle Dockers, Geelong, Geelong Cats, Gold Coast, Leigh Matthews, North Melbourne, North Melbourne Kangaroos, Port Adelaide, Port Adelaide Power, Richmond, Richmond Tigers, Saints, St Kilda, St Kilda Saints, West Coast, West Coast Eagles
Related coverage
- Geelong Cats news
- Carlton Blues news
- Port Adelaide Power news
- Fremantle Dockers news
- West Coast Eagles news
- Richmond Tigers news
- North Melbourne Kangaroos news
- St Kilda Saints news
- AFL news
- Toyota Premiership news
It’s time for people power to come to Richmond. The cheer squad, members and fans need to put their hands up to ensure Terry Wallace gets the same sort of fair go that kept Paul Roos in the job at the end of his successful 2002 stint as caretaker coach after Rodney Eade’s departure from the Swans.
Roos’s appointment cost Wallace the Swans job and sentenced him to a couple of years in the media wilderness until he took over at Punt Road in 2005.
Any fair-minded observer would have to agree that 2008 – year four of Wallace’s five-year plan – has been a successful one for the Tigers.
To get the side up the ladder from stone-cold motherless last to only half a game outside the top eight has been a terrific achievement by Wallace and his coaching staff.
It would have been even better, with finals football on the agenda this weekend, if the players had performed maybe 10 per cent better in three or four games they either lost or drew – but then, you can say that about just about any team that narrowly misses out on achieving a goal.
The pluses are there in abundance – Trent Cotchin, Mitch Morton, Jack Riewoldt and Will Thursfield, to name a few, have shown that they will be forces to be reckoned with in the next few years.
The strengthening of the side – through careful blending of outstanding young talent with experienced players who are finally seeing some reward for their efforts in the lean times – should have club officials reaching for the cheque book to re-sign Wallace for another two or three years after his contract expires at the end of next season.
But instead, the club president, Gary March (Gary who?), has gone on public record as saying the team’s effort this year is worthy of only a five out of 10 rating, and there are mutterings that the board could be trying to find a way to get a new coach a year early.
Fans would be entitled to think that, after all the upheaval of recent years, including the hamfisted handling of Danny Frawley’s departure, the people running Richmond would be sitting back with smiles on their faces and looking forward with much anticipation to the next few seasons – a premiership in, say, 2011 or 2012 would be a distinct possibility if this group keeps up its present trend.
Gun West Coast midfielder Daniel Kerr as a recruit for 2009, if there was any substance to such a move, would reinforce this view, although West Coast are adamant Kerr will stay put for the final year of his contract, and if he did move he’d be wise to join former teammate Chris Judd at Carlton rather than chance his arm as a pawn in a president v coach power struggle.
Wallace has said he’ll never coach anywhere else, but who could blame him for revising that thinking if he doesn’t get the support he needs where he is?
It’s understandable that Wallace doesn’t want to go through the whole process of rebuilding a struggling team again, but he might consider overtures from the AFL and the new Gold Coast club to help out in some kind of overseeing role in the lead-up to the team’s introduction.
Barring Wallace being sacked, though, there won’t be too many jobs around in the next few years unless the new hierarchy at Melbourne suddenly decides Dean Bailey isn’t the man for the rebuilding job, which seems unlikely. Most other coaches’ jobs look secure for the foreseeable future.
West Coast, rebuilding under John Worsfold, will need to find another assistant after releasing Michael Voss to take over from Leigh Matthews, but that’s about all that will be available in the west – Mark Harvey will be given longer to turn Fremantle around.
So any other budding coaches will have to content themselves with looking forward at least another year, when Sydney and Collingwood are likely to be looking for replacements for Roos and Mick Malthouse.
I don’t think either of those two will stay on beyond the end of next season, and Malthouse could even give it away after this finals series, although the quality of his younger brigade should tempt him into one more year.
It’s possible there could be one more vacancy at the end of next year if Port Adelaide have another season as bad as this one, which could result in the club and Mark Williams parting company.
Meanwhile, we have some unexpected match-ups in this weekend’s finals games as a result of the turn-ups in round 22, in which Collingwood and North Melbourne were the biggest losers, followed by St Kilda.
The Saints have extended Robert Harvey’s career by a week, as they’ll get a second chance after losing to Geelong instead of going out first-up, but the belting they’ll cop will make them easy meat for the Crows or Magpies.
The Bulldogs should just beat Hawthorn, although it’s a real toss-up; and the home ground advantage should get Sydney and Adelaide over the line against North Melbourne and Collingwood.
Last week’s tips: 6 right, making 114/176 overall.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
The Crowd Says (8) | Page 1 of Comments
Have Your Say
- Explore:
- AFL, Bulldogs, Carlton, Carlton Blues, Chris Judd, Dean Bailey, Fremantle, Fremantle Dockers, Geelong, Geelong Cats, Gold Coast, Leigh Matthews, North Melbourne, North Melbourne Kangaroos, Port Adelaide, Port Adelaide Power, Richmond, Richmond Tigers, Saints, St Kilda, St Kilda Saints, West Coast, West Coast Eagles


Mark B said | September 3rd 2008 @ 10:10am | Report comment
Interesting article Bruce. I guess though, at the end of the day, coaches live or die by the sword, and Wallace’s reputation and record can only count for so much. Making or missing finals football should be determining factor behind whether a season has been successful or not. And despite performing better than recent years, Wallace missed the mark. Coaches get stale and Richmond are in need of some fresh ideas.
footylover said | September 3rd 2008 @ 3:02pm | Report comment
Short-terminism is a problem with every facet of Australian society now – from investment returns to footy- time to get back to the long-haul or struggling clubs will only be able to attract coachs who cannot get a job anywhere else and the code will lose its best and brightest to eleswhere – how much do gridiorn coaches get – I can just see Wallace, Roos etc giving this some thought – aftter all we do now live in a global economy
rugbyleagueforever said | September 3rd 2008 @ 3:11pm | Report comment
Its great to see AFL exploding -getting rid of those that are working damm hard to lift the standards of the clubs at the bottom of the ladder – good for the greatest game on earth (RL) Look at tim Sheens – he has failed many times with Wests Tigers after one glorious win , but there is no talk of turfing him – and if he stays long enuff he may succeed again
The Wounded Tiger said | September 3rd 2008 @ 3:16pm | Report comment
In a competition with 16 teams, where 8 make the finals, to not make the finals once in a 5 year period would mean that you should not continue coaching. I am frightened by the idea that we might sack Wallace before that, but I don’t believe that if we don’t see results next season, that there can be any doubt that he should be shown the door. 5 years is a long time to be in “rebuilding” mode, and the fact that there are some really good signs for the future, suggests that Richmond have taken the correct approach up to now.
getreal said | September 3rd 2008 @ 3:35pm | Report comment
As a sort of a Brissy lions fan I think we must be mad to go for Voss as our coach -good player, nice guy but totally unproven in the coaching department – It would be a good job for Wallace and Voss could be his assistant so he can learn the ropes from a pro
matta said | September 3rd 2008 @ 8:01pm | Report comment
yeah keep Wallace on…hey why not give Richo 3 more years too…Joel Bowden and extra 5…and why you’re are it get Nick Daffy and Wayne Campbell back and give them a few more years….
If you cant tell I am being sarcastic..I just hope one day Richmond wake the f#ck up and see that they waste year after year on people that give them 6 – 10 good games a year but go missing when they are needed. Actually no, keep doing it lads…its so sad its now funny and it keeps you as also rans..
Lancelot said | October 2nd 2008 @ 8:38am | Report comment
Wallace and Clarkson were appointed at the same stage hen their clubs were struggling. Wallace opted for a the quick sticky tape fix & Clarkson made the hard decision to rebuild. Clarksons choice was clearly better.
If Tigers don’t make the finals next year, then Wallace is gone.
It will be interesting to see which of the new breed of coaches will be 1st to the stop out of Knights, Ratten, Harvey, Bailey & Voss.
P.S – For Richmond | Hawthorn rivilry fans – you’ll love the BuddyShow @ http://www.buddyfranklin.com
dalapetus said | February 21st 2009 @ 2:28am | Report comment
Wallace knows what he’s doing… over the years, Richmond have had many off-field issues (recruiting being one of them) that have proven detrimental to their on-field performance. However, things are looking up and to sack Wallace when they are clearly moving in the right direction would be pointless.