Gold Coast, call draft concessions ‘skinny’
By Guy Hand, 5 Sep 2008 Guy Hand is a Roar Pro
- Tagged:
- AFL, AFL Commission, GC17, Gold Coast, salary cap
The consortium behind the Gold Coast AFL bid has declared it is not satisfied with the draft concession package the league unveiled for its would-be 17th club.
More AFL
Coast must trade smartly, says ex-Bears boss
Fremantle the new Baby Bombers, says Harvey
Marketing black hole in Blacktown, says Roos
The prospective club unveiled their red, white, yellow and blue colours and surf lifesaver mascot tonight at the official launch, but said they would let their nickname “emerge”.
They will be known as the Gold Coast Football Club and will present their official bid to the league on October 13.
GC17 bid committee member Graeme Downie said earlier this evening that his group had concerns the package was not generous enough to allow Gold Coast to hit the ground running in their 2011 AFL debut season.
The concessions include nine first round picks in the 2010 national draft, an expanded player list and increased salary cap – on paper they appear the most generous ever afforded an expansion club.
But Gold Coast say they have concerns with the package, developed by a working party comprising AFL and existing club representatives and approved by the AFL Commission.
Downie said Gold Coast should receive more draft picks to allow suitable bargaining chips for trading for the mature players the club will need on entry to the AFL.
“It’s not as good as it looks. We won’t be popping any champagne corks,” Downie told AAP tonight ahead of the GC17 bid’s official launch on the Gold Coast.
“The rules are fair and we understand the logic of them.
“But what we’re concerned about is that we have a maximum of 24 draft concessions. It’s a skinny start.
“We would have preferred more draft choices.”
AFL national development general manager David Matthews said the package provided a “balanced outcome” for both the Gold Coast and the other 16 clubs.
But the league made it clear some of the high draft picks were designed to be traded on to existing clubs, allowing Gold Coast to bring in senior players and other clubs access to 2010′s best 17 and 18-year-olds.
As well as unveiling the draft concessions, the AFL also set Gold Coast an on-field performance target for its debut year – at least five or six wins for the season and a percentage of more than 80.
“In year one, the list can’t be just completely young. They’ve got to get some maturity on to it,” Matthews said.
The club will receive first call on most of the country’s best 17 and 18-year-olds in two years’ time, getting the first three picks in 2010, as well as picks 5, 7, 9, 11, 13 and 15.
They are set to join the Victorian under-18 competition next year and the second-tier VFL the following year before joining the AFL in 2011.
GC17 chairman John Witheriff said the club decided not to start with a nickname because no proposal had attracted strong popular support.
“We listened to the Gold Coast – we had nearly 95 per cent of the well over 10,000 people say to us `we want the Gold Coast’,” he told Channel Nine’s The Footy Show.
“We were evenly split at less than 30 per cent across (the) three names that we were focussed on.
“What we’ve done is taken a pretty courageous, bold sort-of Gold Coast step, really – we’ve said we’re going to be called the Gold Coast Football Club and what we’ve done is create a mascot who’s going to represent the icon of the city, the beach.
“We’re going to let that (a nickname) emerge and we’ve got a mascot that reflects our beach culture.”
© AAP 2012KEY POINTS OF GOLD COAST DRAFT CONCESSION PACKAGE FOR 2011 AFL ENTRY:
* Nine first round draft picks in 2010 national draft – picks 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13 and 15
* Expanded list of 48 senior players and nine rookies in 2011, reducing for the next four seasons and reverting to a 38-player senior list by 2015
* Extra $1 million in salary cap for 2011, reducing for the next four years until no extra advantage by 2015
* Access to a maximum of 16 uncontracted players from the other 16 clubs
* Access to 12 17-year-olds in 2009
* Access to 20 Queensland under-18s
* Ability to pre-list 10 players who had previously nominated for the AFL draft or were previously listed with an AFL club at the end of 2010
* Existing clubs that lose a player will be eligible for a compensation pick in future drafts
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
The Crowd Says (8) | Page 1 of Comments
Have Your Say
- Explore:
- AFL, AFL Commission, GC17, Gold Coast, salary cap


Pippinu said | September 5th 2008 @ 8:42am | Report comment
Red, white, yellow and blue – couldn’t they fit a 5th colour in??
Redb said | September 5th 2008 @ 12:00pm | Report comment
http://www.goldcoast.com.au/images/2008/09/04/gazza050908.jpg
A very good reason why you should never give graphic designers too much scope. That’s a shocker.
Redb
Pippinu said | September 5th 2008 @ 1:21pm | Report comment
Thanks for the link Redb!
I guess with so many teams, tasteful colour schemes are quickly running out.
Will the mascot define the likely nick name?
How about the Gold Coast Ironmen?
Club song: Black Sabbath’s “Ironman”
“I am Ironman___”
Redb said | September 5th 2008 @ 1:55pm | Report comment
If only….
“Now the time is here
For iron man to spread fear
Vengeance from the grave
Kills the people he once saved
Nobody wants him
They just turn their heads
Nobody helps him
Now he has his revenge
Heavy boots of lead
Fills his victims full of dread
Running as fast as they can
Iron man lives again!”
Not Black Sabbath more like Village People by the looks of that mascot.
Message to GC17 – sack the designer and start again.
Redb
Pippinu said | September 5th 2008 @ 1:59pm | Report comment
Hmmm..
I can imagine these words might appeal to quite a few Victorian footy fans:
“Nobody wants him
They just turn their heads”
But is there a sting in the tail?
“Nobody helps him
Now he has his revenge”
cosmos forever said | September 5th 2008 @ 4:18pm | Report comment
geez – aren’t those colours a bit close to both the broncos and lions.
Red instead of maroon, yellow instead of gold odd odd choices
The Substitute said | September 5th 2008 @ 4:40pm | Report comment
I’m not so fussed about the mascot — its pretty much in line with what every other club has.
http://www.aflauskick.com.au/fileadmin/user_upload/mascot_manor/2006/002%20intro.jpg
Not a fan of the colours though, there is enough clubs with red on their jumpers as it is. (I expect Gold Coast to come out with about 8 different clash jumpers — and maybe even let a primary school kid design one on top of that, Port Adelaide style.)
As for the name, a bit anti-climatic to not have one. But I geuss this is how all the Victorian clubs did it, starting out as the XX Football Club. As time went by they picked up nicknames like the ‘Pivotonians’ or the ‘Bloods’ then eventually settle with their current names.
I’m not normally a fan of the traditional names, particularly in this modern era. Although I am a fan of letting the fans decide, so if the public survey could not provide a winner (as was the case here,) then I’m all for going down the traditional path and letting a nickname “emerge”.
Rich_daddy said | September 6th 2008 @ 5:58pm | Report comment
The Gold Coast are kidding themselves if they think they are going to be a force in their first season. Recruiting champion players will not guarantee a champion team. Also spare a thought for existing clubs who will miss out on priority picks because of the Gold Coast.