By Jesse Fink
September 12th 2008 @ 1:19am
Ghana fix doesn’t stack up
Factoring in the usual myopia of the Australian sporting press, it’s not surprising that potentially one of the biggest football stories of the year has flown under the radar in these parts.
There’s a fascinating article in the German magazine Der Spiegel regarding the case made by a Canadian journalist, Declan Hill, that the Ghana vs Brazil match at the 2006 FIFA World Cup was fixed.
Hill, well regarded internationally for his work investigating corruption in ice hockey, makes the sensational claim in his book The Fix, published in Germany, and has set up a website to promote it.
“This book will forever change the way you think and feel about professional sport,” it puffs. “The Fix is the most explosive story of sports corruption in a generation. It presents compelling evidence that some of the highest soccer matches in the world may have been fixed: European Champions League, Olympic and World Cup tournaments.”
Now we all know match-fixing is a cancer afflicting the Asian game and some smaller European leagues; that is not new. But a World Cup fix is a major story.
In the book, Hill claims to have met a Malay Chinese man he calls “Lee Chin” back in November 2005 and kept in close contact with him over the following six or seven months, during which time he was allegedly informed a thrown game was on the cards at Weltmeisterschaft 2006 featuring Ghana.
“[Chin] told me that people from his syndicate had already been in touch with a few of Ghana’s players during the 2004 Olympic Games in Athens and that he had succeeded at the time in getting Ghana to lose the final match against Japan,” Hill tells Der Spiegel.
“He claimed contacts existed now and that things [at the World Cup] would go ahead.
“Then, on 25 May 2006, he told me to come to a Kentucky Fried Chicken branch in a shopping centre in the north of Bangkok. I was to witness the deal being negotiated. Why was I allowed to be present? No idea. I sometimes got the feeling that Chin viewed my scepticism as a personal affront.”
Hill describes how one of the men present was a junior coach for the Ghanaian FA who “needed an initial down payment in order to secure the team’s trust”.
“Chin said the man had obtained the consent of eight of Ghana’s players. A few days earlier I had read in the newspaper that Ghana’s team would receive $20,000 for each victory at the World Cup. I asked Chin whether that wouldn’t be more important to Ghana’s players. He replied: ‘But a victory is not 100 per cent certain. And each player is guaranteed to receive $30,000 from me. Get it?’”
When Hill got to Würzburg in Germany for the match, he was told “the deal with someone in the Ghana camp was on, 100 per cent” and the team would ensure they lost by two goals.
Hill was sceptical, but watching the game he observed, “The Ghanaians played as though they were putting their whole heart into it, but then there were a number of stupid mistakes: passes didn’t succeed, the defence was careless, the team collected three stupid goals. After the game I was in the stands in Dortmund with tears in my eyes because I was convinced, at least emotionally, that the match had been fixed.”
My first thought reading this was that Hill hadn’t watched enough African football, but I digress.
Hill, wanting to confirm his hunch, thus flies to Ghana to meet the black guy from the KFC in Bangkok, who it emerges is Abukari Damba, former Black Stars goalkeeper and national under-17s coach and assistant to under-23s.
“[Damba] admitted that he had gotten the Malaysian access to the team and that the match fixer also approached the team captain Steven Appiah … [but he didn't] know what happened after that.”
Hill must have thought he had won the Pulitzer even before meeting Appiah, because nothing Appiah told him during their meeting in Accra, the capital of Ghana, added any credence to the story. What he did get Appiah admit to was taking money to win games, sort of like Shane Warne pocketing cash to give weather forecasts.
Appiah regarded them as match bonuses, incentives to perform. He did not make any admission regarding fixing the Ghana-Brazil match and if you read the transcript of the interview on Hill’s website it seems to back him up.
So it’s odd that Hill went ahead with the book without what I would regard as solid evidence and effectively makes the allegation anyway.
Appiah, rightfully, is livid and claims to have been quoted out of context.
His federation, the Ghana Football Association, is threatening to sue.
“What Declan wants [is to] create publicity for the book and drive up sales,” says Appiah. “The truth of the matter is that I have never accepted money to influence the outcome of a game and never will. If
anyone has doubts, they should look back at the game and what it meant to us. To suggest we will throw all that away for some $20,000 is ridiculous … the amount of money [Hill] talks about compared to the money we made from reaching the second round alone makes his claim even more laughable.”
I tend to agree, and for the first time in memory, I agree with FIFA, who have poured cold water on Hill’s claims.
From what I’ve read so far, his argument is weak and the evidence, truth be told, isn’t that compelling; when your star witness, Appiah, says he’s been misrepresented, it’s not a good look, and the real identity of “Lee Chin” is never disclosed. Hill says he will be killed if he spills the beans.
Football is a sport full of dodgy operators. Games are frequently thrown and it’s happened at the World Cup before (think Argentina 1978). I hear stories all the time from people in high places in football about very important matches being fixed. I wrote about the controversial Iraq-Qatar WCQ here and when I first heard the Qataris had thumped Uzbekistan 3-0 last week I thought a fix was in again.
But I have no evidence. Nothing but suspicion.
In my opinion that’s not enough information to go on with to write a book making such a claim, but Hill clearly feels otherwise.
I don’t know what the German libel laws are but they would have to be a lot more lax than they are here for him and his publisher to emerge from this without being taken to the cleaners.
Jesse Fink's columns now appear every Wednesday and Friday on The Roar.
Free Email updates:
Our daily emails are only sent if there is content for the sport or that author. You can subscribe to multiple daily emails; or get the daily Roar email with all our content in it. We value privacy. More...



(13)














Michael C said | September 12th 2008 @ 6:34am | Report comment
This is an example of the flip side of the whinge of many soccer folk that their game doesn’t get the coverage it warrants, or should or they’d like.
Strangely though, such folk whinge anytime anything negative is reported (which is super rare, although, granted, in the old NSL days was usually related to crowd violence and ethnic flags, flares etc). At any rate, anyone who follows the AFL in Melb or NRL in Sydney knows only too well that much of the coverage is negative and not at all related to the on-field.
A good example of local media myopathy was the illicit drugs and wada drugs code story a few years back. This was a time when the AFL was attempting to stand up to the Fed Govt and WADA - - - and in this country, all the reporting was the AFL was soft on drugs etc etc.
There was even an article at one point that attempted to compare the ‘domestic’ codes - - and at the time, the official quote from the FFA (in it’s infancy) was “we’re in line with FIFA”………….and it was left at that (apparently an assumption that FIFA MUST be okay…..there was no expansion on the comment).
And, yet, even at that time, FIFA was NOT signed up to WADA. FIFA had a relatively long running (over several years) ‘issue’ with WADA (on several points - - very similar to the AFL) - - that, eventually saw a couple of things happen - - one was that soccer was only permitted in the 2004 Athens Olympics after FIFA and WADA came to a temporary and compromised agreement to allow it.
And then, finally, about a year and a half after the AFL had been railroaded by the Fed Govt and the ignorant court of public opinion in Australia - finally FIFA signed on to WADA (but with strings attached and WADA weren’t overly pleased - so, an uneasy ‘peace’).
And how much of any of this was reported in the local media……………I couldn’t find it - I was following this story via the Internet because I was discovering just what WAS NOT reported by our ignorant/negligent local media more interested with baking the local institutions than reporting an issue evenly. (it should also be noted that Fairfax (& News ltd) had lost a court case seeking to publish names of AFL players with 2 strikes - - - and seemingly both media groups were going to keep the torch (however unfairly) on their prey…………..thankfully on this issue the Howard ‘zero tolerance’ govt has faded away and Kate Ellis has a far more educated approach on the issue).
So - - - it surprises me not that (and I heard a mention of this on radio SEN about a week ago) this story will get zero coverage - - - because of the above myopathy……
….and…..also, because the ‘token’ soccer coverage in papers these days is usually fairly trite fluff articles…..stuff all serious analysis, or critique - - - the one staff soccer writer seems reluctant to be anything other than an FFA publicist. (likewise in Melb the NRL reporter who surely must edit the Storm newsletter).
Spiro Zavos said | September 12th 2008 @ 8:41am | Report comment
From a journalist’s perspective I would endorse Jesse’s approach that the evidence for the particular fix he was writing about just isn’t there - right now. But my suspicion, just a general feeling, is that there is something in the story. It reeks somewhat of the Indian bookmakers and ODI, where the main evidence initially was that some players were somewhat stupidly drawn in by doing seemingly unexceptional things like pitch reports and team-line-up.
But later on a fuller story of corruption and event-fixing (the number of runs a particular player would score, a no-ball in the first over etc) emerged.
I was living in the UK in the 1970s when the great football writer Brian Glanville working for The Sunday Times did some exceptional investigations into corruption and match-fixing in Italian soccer.
Football, like cricket, is a relatively easy game to fix for certain events. The goal-keeper can be lined up to allow a certain number of goals through. The strike forwards can be lined up to miss chances etc
For a game like AFL football, rugby league or rugby union, unless in the latter sports you got to the kickers, it is difficult to fix matches because of the ensemble nature of the games. The best way to fix these matches is to get to the umpires and referees. And this, apparently, has been done. But this is another story.
The problem for journalists, especially in the UK and Australia, are the draconian defamation laws that make it virtually impossible to expose rorts, corruption and match-fixing.
sledgeross said | September 12th 2008 @ 8:48am | Report comment
So, John the bookie wanted Ghana to ‘throw” the game against Brazil?
Even for a bookie, the odds of a Ghana win surely wouldnt make it a wise investment to throw too much money at a team at longish odds to win.
Mick of Newie said | September 12th 2008 @ 9:09am | Report comment
When I heard this story I wanted to know what the specific fix was because surely it wasn’t just a Brazil win. I’m with sledgeross this game is not a likely game for a fix. If for example Australia was to lose to Bangladesh at a cricket world cup now that would be a good game for a fix.
Dickroo said | September 12th 2008 @ 9:09am | Report comment
if socceroos had already qualified before the away Qatari game in next June and the oil-rich nation and Bin Hamman offered the FFA 3 million dollars and full support of 2018/2022 WC bid to fix the match, would you think Mr Lowy could reject it without blink his eyes? Jesse?
Midfielder said | September 12th 2008 @ 9:19am | Report comment
I am with Mick & Sleg ……… if it was the other way Brazil lost ……….. it would make some kinda of sense.
Clutch Cable said | September 12th 2008 @ 9:32am | Report comment
Haven’t seen his widely reported, although it was somewhat suprisingly front page news on the Canberra Times.
“This is an example of the flip side of the whinge of many soccer folk that their game doesn’t get the coverage it warrants, or should or they’d like. Strangely though, such folk whinge anytime anything negative is reported”
Football fans (at least this one) don’t mind if negative news is reported, all they ask for if balance in reporting across all sports. There was violent clashes between rival fans at the AFL last weekend…oh you didn’t hear about it? Funny that. If’d been at the A-League than I’ve no doubt ’soccer riots’ would have got a run in the news.
Prime example, 3 people ejected from a crowd of 50,000 at the Melbourne Victory received radio and newspaper coverage as ‘disgraceful soccer riot’. A few days later 179 people were ejected from a One Day Cricket crowd of 79,000…and nary a peep was heard. If 3 from 50,000 is a riot, what’s 179 from 79,000?
Michael C said | September 12th 2008 @ 10:05am | Report comment
Clutch Cable -
I agree - the balance is needed - - from the soccer front, I gather the media would associated the word ‘riot’ with any occurrence of flares………….which of course meant that everything was labelled a riot back in the ’70s……
sledgeross said | September 12th 2008 @ 10:10am | Report comment
I mean, I know that bookies stand to lose plenty when Brazil win (which they almost always will), but thats why they are usually close to even money, and then you can factor in the draw, which is more prevelant than in say RL or Union. Of course, if you make sure that the fave definately wins (not lose or draw), then thats a different story I guess.
chris said | September 12th 2008 @ 10:36am | Report comment
Hmmmmm. I remember watching that Ghana/Brazil game. If I recall correctly Ghana were all over Brazil in the first half. The Brazilian Keeper kept them in the game. Second half, Brazil turned it on. It just doesnt make sense, the above article makes reference to Steven Appiah, this bloke is one of the top midfielders in Euro and currently plays for Fenerbache in Turkey. He would be on massive money there, I would say 50K a week MINIMUM. Now, why would he want to throw a game for say 100k or half a mil. It would be very suprising. Although I dont know, corruption is prevelant in EVERY sport. For us to think otherwise is stupid.
I guess the question is, how do you control it? You cant!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Rob of Perth said | September 12th 2008 @ 1:32pm | Report comment
Mick of Newie -
You are right in saying it doesn’t make sense for bookies to fix Brazil v Ghana to simply back a Brazil win, which would likely have occurred anyway.
However, the rise of spread betting and margin betting throws many more possibilities into the mix. For example, a bookie could have their cash on Brazil to win by 2 clear goals, or a spread bet per goal above 2, or something similar.
So if a lesser team, eg Ghana, could be persuaded to allow the scoreline to blow out a little, then it could be very helpful to the bookies.
Mick of Newie said | September 12th 2008 @ 4:13pm | Report comment
Rob
I agree, that is why I was interested in what the fix was.
Organisers need to be aware of gambling risk in organising tournaments. I have always thougth the cricket world cups with their extended formats and surfeit of dead rubbers are prime for fixing.
I think Chris has a good point. Most players at a world Cup are on serious $$. It would need very serious $$ to surely tempt a player given the risks involved. On the other hand a referee could be more susceptible.
Dean said | September 28th 2008 @ 12:55pm | Report comment
http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2007/10_02/grobbelaar1110_468×1080.jpg
Thats all I have to say on the matter.