Qatar has no business coming to Queensland
Roar Pro
By Jesse Fink, 19 Sep 2008 Jesse Fink is a Roar Pro
A few months back your Roar correspondent wrote a column about the disgraceful decision of FIFA, football’s world governing body, to not take any action against the Qatar Football Association for fielding an ineligible player during the just completed third round of Asian World Cup qualifying.
Qatar is in Australia’s group in the final elimination round for the Asian Football Confederation’s four automatic spots (and one half spot) at South Africa 2010 and is currently leading the group of five on four points with two games played.
Australia, one game in, is on three points. Both meet in Brisbane next month.
The reality, of course, at least as any fair-minded football follower is concerned, is that Qatar shouldn’t be there at all. Instead it is the Iraqis who should be facing off against Pim Verbeek’s Socceroos.
But all FIFA decided to do when faced with a clear breach of its own rules (to wit: a team “found guilty of fielding an ineligible player shall forfeit the match in question”) was let the Qataris get off on a technicality for its fielding of the Brazilian Emerson in March in a WCQ.
That technicality was the timing of the complaint. Any protest was to be delivered 24 hours before the match in question.
The Iraqis complained three months later.
Really it shouldn’t be an issue, but FIFA, politically motivated, always find a way to help West Asian teams when they’re in a pickle. (While on the topic, what strikes me most about the absurdity of that clause is that coaches, by habit, tend to release their teamsheets or starting line-ups as late as possible. It is asking a lot for the affected federation in question to be able to file their protest, with all the necessary paperwork, the moment they know the make-up of the team they’ll be facing. Such things tend to take quite a bit of time.)
In a just world, the onus should have been on the Qataris to play by the rules, not for Iraq to have a forensic knowledge of the statutes and their myriad intricacies and loopholes.
But we don’t live in a just world. Especially when it comes to international football.
To cut a long and boring story short, the Iraqis didn’t accept FIFA’s decision and they were right not to.
So they took their case to the Court of Arbitration for Sport in Switzerland, a body that normally rights wrongs and lends some commonsense to disputes such as these.
Understandably, the Iraq FA asked FIFA to postpone the qualifying rounds featuring Qatar until a determination was made but were rebuffed. The Qataris, not surprisingly, wanted the games to go ahead and were – shake me down – granted their wish.
From beginning to end, FIFA has well and truly screwed the Iraqis.
However, what is surprising is that Iraq has been let down by the CAS as well.
Rather than address the situation immediately the CAS has delayed making any decision and probably won’t announce its finding until for another fortnight, with no clear date set for the announcement.
It could happen before or after the WCQ in Brisbane.
The only explanation they have proffered for their tardiness is, according to CAS Secretary-General Matthieu Reeb, “there was no request by the parties involved for an urgent release of the court’s findings”.
Another case of the Iraq FA expecting professionalism, swiftness, diligence and natural justice from the authorities but being punished for procedural oversight.
It’s a total crock. The Iraqi people have copped enough injustice over the past decade. And it looks like there isn’t going to be any let-up any time soon.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Football articles
- Phoenix need more than flash in the pan crowds (133)
- ‘New football’ fans may help save the game in Australia (124)
- Does Tasmania have a case for A-League inclusion? (119)
- What happened in Port Said was not a football riot (118)
- Magilton struggling to make a mark (68)
- Does the A-League need an injection of humour? (44)
- Socceroos screwed over by FIFA, again (41)
- Sydney and Perth eye A-League crunch game
- Melbourne Victory vs Central Coast Mariners: A-League live scores, blog (97)
- Liam Miller: Bargain buy of the A-League season? (9)
- Zambia plays Cup of Nations final in memory of their fallen (7)
- Capello’s resignation ends an awkward marriage (8)
- Does the A-League need an injection of humour? (46)
- Redknapp the best bet to clean up Capello’s England mess (2)
- Melbourne Victory vs Central Coast Mariners: A-League live scores, blog (97)
- Liam Miller: Bargain buy of the A-League season? (9)
- Zambia plays Cup of Nations final in memory of their fallen (7)
- Capello’s resignation ends an awkward marriage (8)
- Redknapp the best bet to clean up Capello’s England mess (2)
- Melbourne derby reveals tale of two journeys (3)
- O’ so close for John: How JON almost landed the biggest job in sport (16)
- Explore:
Midfielder said | September 19th 2008 @ 8:26am | Report comment
Jes, a sorry state of affairs ……………. makes you wonder what oil can buy.
Dickroo said | September 19th 2008 @ 8:46am | Report comment
It is not fair for the Iraqis, but Qatar is a blessing for the Socceroos. Possible another 6 points for the Aussies.
With the in-form Kewell, Chippers, Cahill and Moore’s back to the centre, I can’t see the Qatari would take any point from Brisbane.
Mick of Newie said | September 19th 2008 @ 8:48am | Report comment
Jes the only problem with this as a blog topic is finding anyone who would argue against you. It is an absurd situation and the CAS should swiftly deal with it.
The Bear said | September 19th 2008 @ 8:55am | Report comment
Could have Iraq pressed for a quicker response from CAS, Jesse? Sec-Gen saying “there was no request by the parties involved for an urgent release of the court’s findings”. Que?
It seems that by prolonging this decision, the iraqi’s may presume that if the decision goes their way, that FIFA will have to just “let them take Qatar’s place”, and perhaps the Iraqi’s are banking on Qatar making it to at least the next round play offs against 3rd place in Group B.
I feel sympathy for them, absolutely, but i do not think they would ever spare us any charity, if the shoe was on the other foot.
And maybe they are playing their own games, even now? By prolonging the assessment?
Graciously,
The Bear
The Bear said | September 19th 2008 @ 8:58am | Report comment
And In the meantime, Australia is caught up in this prolonged haze of uncertainty, surrounding the outcome of our group.
Not so good for us.
Millster said | September 19th 2008 @ 11:14am | Report comment
The Bear, Dickroo – while I agree that all things equal I would prefer to face Qatar than Iraq, I have to stand firmly with Jesse on this one. Football is about Fair Play and the World Cup is the pinnacle event in the sport. I’m not going to get into the broader geo-politics of how much ‘fairness’ Iraq has copped over the past decade, or the oil equation with gulf states, or FIFA favouritism. Because I’d have the same position if we were talking of Mongolia, of Tahiti or of Venezuela.
A team was promoted to the next round at the expense of another despite breaking the accepted rules about player eligibility. There is no way in which I can twist my sense of natural justice – however hard I try – that makes me believe that the rule-breaking team should not be disqualified and the displaced team should not be reinstated.
To me its a sad situation with a simple resolution which is to allow Iraq back in at Qatar’s expense.
The only complexity, now that the round has started, is how best to make the switch in terms of group points to neither disadvantage Iraq nor the teams that have played Qatar already. For mine I would scrub Qatars results against the Uzbeks and Bahrain, and give Iraq 1-1 draws against both. Bahrain wouldn’t be affected as its result against Qatar was 1-1. The Uzbeks would gain a point and lose 3 goals against but would stay bottom of table. Iraq would enter the group on 2 points – in third position – with a goal difference of zero. The group tabulated would look like this, and would remain wide open:
Team MP W D L GF GA Pts
Japan 1 1 0 0 3 2 3
Aust 1 1 0 0 1 0 3
Iraq 2 0 2 0 2 2 2
Bahr 2 0 1 1 3 4 1
Uzb 2 0 1 1 1 2 1
Of course, the chances of this happening before October 15 – well enough before that the Iraqis can prepare – are zip, and as time goes one and games are played the complexity and unfairness on everyone of this situation compounds upon itself.
Ben of Phnom Penh said | September 19th 2008 @ 11:36am | Report comment
One concern I have is that the decision will be made on the eve of our game against Qatar resulting in a debacle of ticket refunds and a loss of goodwill from a footballing public in Queensland that may already be feeling slightly miffed from the Australia-China game. I’d rather a decision be made quickly to lessen the impact, however truth be told I think the problem is the rules and that Qatar will be found to be in the clear. The question is as to whether a revision of the rules will result from this scenario to better reflect natural justice. If not then insult will indeed have been added to injury.
Mick of Newie said | September 19th 2008 @ 11:40am | Report comment
Millster
The only fair way is for Iraq to play the games against Uzbek and Bahrain. There is enough time to replay the games if there is the will. I hope the Iraqi team are preparing to come to Brisbane so they don’t lose another fixture.
Forget about what is good for Australia, we control our destiny, we are off to a great start if we don’t qualify from here it will be solely Aust fault.
The Bear said | September 19th 2008 @ 11:51am | Report comment
Millster, i guess what i am trying to point out, that the Iraqi’s may not be in a hurry to sort this out. Which they may feel is to THEIR advantage. And subsequently, not to ours. Make no mistake, the Iraqi’s are looking after their own interests here, and i think that they are in no hurry to play us right now. Perhaps, i am being purely speculative. Thoughts?
Graciously,
The Bear
Millster said | September 19th 2008 @ 12:16pm | Report comment
Bear, I do agree that there are some potential resolution of this that could seriously advantage Iraq, and that they would be wanting to influence any proceedings to achieve those outcomes. So yes I thoroughly agree with your pragmatic caution. With what’s at stake, everyone is understandably self-interested. This makes it all the bigger a pity that FIFA – as the supposedly independent arbiter – is not following due and fair process.
From an Australian point of view I would not want to have won 3 points against Qatar on an international date when all our stars were available, only to have them scrubbed and to have to face Iraq – a stronger team – in a make-shift fixture, probably not on a sanctioned date, and therefore with our B team. I think a quick resolution is very much in our interests whichever way it goes so we know what we are facing. It also tells me that getting the reamining 3 points against the Uzbeks, and getting all 6 against Bahrain, is now an absolute priority. I’m not counting on any against Japan, and the Iraq/Qatar thing is the great unknown and a potential problem.