Williams rejects Waldron proposal
By Steve Jancetic, 3 Oct 2008 Steve Jancetic is a Roar Pro
- Tagged:
- Brian Waldron, Cameron Smith, Craig Bellamy, David Gallop, Melbourne Storm, NRL, Rugby League, Storm
Disgruntled NRL judiciary panellist Darrell Williams has no regrets over today’s decision to proceed with a defamation case against the Melbourne Storm three days out from the grand final.
More league
Rival coaches hoping for pivotal performances
Manly look to dominate opening exchanges
As the fallout from Storm skipper Cameron Smith’s season-ending suspension stretched to a ninth straight day, panel members Williams, Darren Britt and Royce Ayliffe today decided to take a legal stand against Storm CEO Brian Waldron and coach Craig Bellamy after the pair appeared to question the panel’s integrity.
The outburst has already earned the club a $50,000 fine and it is yet to be specified what sort of damages the judiciary panellists will be seeking.
Waldron today urged the judiciary to hold fire until after Sunday’s clash at ANZ Stadium, claiming it would take the focus away from the decider against Manly.
“It is our belief that the focus of this week has to be on the culmination of the NRL home and away competition, that of course being the grand final on Sunday,” Waldron said in a statement.
“We do not wish in any way to undermine the history and tradition of Sunday with an unnecessary distraction that can be dealt with next week.
“We believe this is in the best interests of the NRL grand final on Sunday, and also of course rugby league in general.”
But Williams dismissed the proposition.
“I am not in the mood to sit down and wait for them to get over their grand final campaign,” Williams told SBS.
“They’ve had a week and a half to make their appropriate apologies. They chose not to. I’m not waiting for them.
“I don’t want to take the focus off the grand final between two great teams but I have a reputation to keep intact, I have my integrity to maintain and I need to do that now.”
The former Manly player described Waldron and Bellamy’s original comments as an “outrage”.
“I don’t need that. I’m in here doing my best and I don’t need the public to be influenced by someone like Craig Bellamy or Brian Waldron to have them saying I am less than honest or have no integrity. I just won’t stand for it,” Williams said.
Initially judiciary member Williams claimed he wanted an apology from the Storm before Sunday’s grand final, but on Wednesday said he had run out of patience and today officially lodged the claim.
Also on Wednesday, Bellamy said he had no regrets over his comments and refused to apologise for them.
Waldron said Bellamy’s stance should not be interpreted as the club dismissing the concerns of the judiciary, with the Storm boss saying he had been in contact with both judiciary chairman Greg Woods and NRL boss David Gallop via email.
“It is important to note that we do take seriously the concerns highlighted by judicial members and at no time have we stated or inferred that we will not address their concerns at the appropriate time,” he said.
© AAP 2012Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
The Crowd Says (5) | Page 1 of Comments
Have Your Say
- Explore:
- Brian Waldron, Cameron Smith, Craig Bellamy, David Gallop, Melbourne Storm, NRL, Rugby League, Storm

El Capitan said | October 3rd 2008 @ 8:02am | Report comment
I like the way Williams states “I don’t want to take the focus off the grand final between two great teams but I have a reputation to keep intact, I have my integrity to maintain and I need to do that now”. By him keeping it in the media and threating to sue, he is keeping the fire lit, so to speak. If he said nothing, no one would say “oh that Williams bloke rubbed Smith out of the Grand final cause he’s in bed with the bookies”.
Williams, wake up, take your hand off it and let the matter rest. There will be bad decisions that have to be made that will upset people, but hey thats part of life.
Terry Kidd said | October 3rd 2008 @ 9:44am | Report comment
Yeah El Capitan I’m over it too. Bellamy was angry and passionate and said too much. So what? No one seriously believes that the Judiciary is corrupt.
Gee, I’ve refereed league, touch football and umpired AFL, if I had $2 for every time I’ve been abused I’d be rivalling Twiggy Forrest for top berth on the rich list.
sledgeross said | October 3rd 2008 @ 10:07am | Report comment
I hope they sue the two buffoons. I can understand Bellamy spitting the dummy somewhat, but they just won a great match with their backs to the wall. It wasnt constructive criticisism, it was defamation. If they have an issue with teh media reporting stories a certain way, thats not the judiciarys fault.
Mick of Newie said | October 3rd 2008 @ 10:20am | Report comment
I haven’t followed this closely, if they want to sue go right ahead. I do however find David Gallop’s grandstanding on this quite annoying. I am not sure the CEO encouraging 2 judiciary members to sue a club coach and CEO is the best sound bite he could be giving in mid grand final week.
onside said | October 3rd 2008 @ 11:42am | Report comment
Dont you love it. Its like an episode out of a poor sitcom.
Darrell Williams amplifying feigned indignation in the media is silly.
Regardless of his decision , why cant he keep his mouth shut.
How can people trust a judge who mouths off when he’s miffed.