Buying an A-League franchise takes some heart
By jimbo, 6 Oct 2008 The Crowd is a Roar Pro
128 Have your say
Related coverage
- Melbourne Victory news
- Central Coast Mariners news
- Wellington Phoenix news
- Football news
- A-League news
A few months ago the A-League franchise hotline was ringing off the wall with investors looking to buy a share of a sporting business with annual growth running at nearly 20 per cent.
Following several highly enthusiastic and well-credentialed bids for additional A-League licenses in the past year or so, Ben Buckley CEO of the FFA said, “We continue to be very encouraged with the level of interest in the Hyundai A-League. The attractiveness of the competition is clearly reflected in the level of interest in the additional licenses and the quality of the bids we are receiving.”
Buckley reiterated the FFA’s earlier view that, ultimately, the Hyundai A-League has the capacity to expand from the current eight teams to be at least a twelve team competition and possibly fourteen teams.
He added: “When and where we expand the competition is measured simply by whether it is right for football, right for the existing Hyundai A-League clubs, right for the new clubs and right for the local community.”
It takes a lot of heart to buy an A-League franchise these days.
The starting point for any A-League bid is five million dollars or more in financial guarantees and a sound technical, football and business plan to take the club forward. Not withstanding are also the requirements for access to the playing and training facilities and a large enough population base to attract the fans to pay their money at the turnstiles.
Frank Lowy also specified that a club would need an average of about ten thousand spectators per game to just about break even. The FFA would also provide clubs with a share of television and media deals, gate receipts, sponsorship and other revenues.
Clubs can also raise money from trading football players to other clubs and selling club merchandising and their own local sponsorship deals.
Melbourne Victory is the best supported and most profitable club in the A-League.
The FFA recently announced they have begun exclusive talks with a consortium to create a second Melbourne A-League side for the 2010/2011 season, which will compete directly with Victory in the Melbourne football market. Melbourne businessman and thoroughbred racehorse owner, Peter Sidwell leads the consortium and the bid has been provisionally named the Melbourne Heart.
The FFA has given the Melbourne Heart syndicate the exclusive bidding rights for the next Melbourne football team franchise ahead of another consortium known as Southern Cross FC, which was linked with former NSL side, South Melbourne FC.
How will a second Melbourne team fare? Is this a good time to buy into a football team in Australia?
Understandably, Melbourne Victory chairman Geoff Lord doesn’t think it’s the right time for a second Melbourne A-League team. With Gold Coast and Townsville entering the A-League next season, Lord has no issue with new teams in new markets, providing they are viable, sustainable and progress the competition and the game.
But with the new team in Melbourne, Lord is not certain of the sustainability of the current market and for the sake of both franchises, Lord believes a second team might be about five years too soon. “As a businessman, I was prepared to start Melbourne Victory,” Lord said. “Today, as a businessman, I wouldn’t be prepared to start up a second team in Melbourne. But that’s only my personal judgment. They’ll have love of the game and passion, but whether their business model will work, I’m a bit skeptical.”
“I don’t think Melbourne is ready or big enough for a second side. I would say they need 10 years. It’s going to be hard work (but) we’ve got our own issues and that’s to keep building the club and making sure it represents the whole of Melbourne.”
Lord has reluctantly come to accept that a second Melbourne team is now inevitable. “If there is a second side coming in from Melbourne, then the best thing for Victory to do is continue to build on our progress as much as we can and drive to a new level of support. We’ll have to work harder.”
The financial performance of the A-League teams to date has been mixed and a good return on the large outlay is far from guaranteed.
On the plus side, two A-League clubs; Melbourne Victory and Central Coast Mariners have already turned a profit in only their third year of operation and are looking to make a handy surplus in the coming financial year.
Recouping a five million dollar plus outlay and making a profit within three years is a very good return on investment for any type of business.
At the other end of the scale, the owners of the defunct New Zealand Knights football team from Auckland have had their fingers badly burned and their financial backers will see very little of the millions they invested for their failed license.
This season, the poor crowds and diminishing support at Perth Glory and Wellington Phoenix put them below Frank Lowy’s break even benchmarks.
If the FFA are consistent in their rulings, Perth and Wellington will have their A-League licenses revoked if they fail financially. There are a number of consortiums willing to take their place.
With the A-League’s slow start this season and falling attendances – from a high of over fourteen thousand per game last season to below twelve thousand per match so far this year and the major financial collapses and market meltdowns across the globe, its going to take a lot of heart to hand over millions of dollars for an A-League franchise license in the next couple of years and get a decent return on your investment.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Football articles
- Phoenix need more than flash in the pan crowds (133)
- ‘New football’ fans may help save the game in Australia (124)
- Does Tasmania have a case for A-League inclusion? (119)
- What happened in Port Said was not a football riot (118)
- Magilton struggling to make a mark (68)
- Does the A-League need an injection of humour? (44)
- Socceroos screwed over by FIFA, again (41)
- Sydney and Perth eye A-League crunch game
- Melbourne Victory vs Central Coast Mariners: A-League live scores, blog (97)
- Liam Miller: Bargain buy of the A-League season? (9)
- Zambia plays Cup of Nations final in memory of their fallen (7)
- Capello’s resignation ends an awkward marriage (8)
- Does the A-League need an injection of humour? (46)
- Redknapp the best bet to clean up Capello’s England mess (2)
- Melbourne Victory vs Central Coast Mariners: A-League live scores, blog (97)
- Liam Miller: Bargain buy of the A-League season? (9)
- Zambia plays Cup of Nations final in memory of their fallen (7)
- Capello’s resignation ends an awkward marriage (8)
- Redknapp the best bet to clean up Capello’s England mess (2)
- Melbourne derby reveals tale of two journeys (3)
- O’ so close for John: How JON almost landed the biggest job in sport (16)
- Explore:
- A-League, Central Coast Mariners, football, Frank Lowy, Melbourne Victory, Wellington Phoenix

Redb said | October 6th 2008 @ 8:37am | Report comment
Jimbo,
Good article.
Almost any new business let alone a new sporting franchise is going to find it tough to raise money from shell shocked banks (who are acting like timid crustaceans at the mo) , gather sponsors,etc.
Geoff Lord was interviewed on radio SEN in Melbourne just after the Victory game and he was a little disappointed in the crowd figure of 18,000 for the Melb v Perth game despite no AFL or horse racing on. He didn’t state he blamed the prevailing economic climate and waning confidence but you can take it as read that this is a significant factor.
Fans will pick and choose much more carefully where they spend their hard earned, whilst attending sport is a religion in Melbourne it is a still a discretionary spend item. If only the banks in the US had been more discretionary in their lending practices and not adopted casino captialism with such vengeance we all wouldn’t be in the shite.
Still, in 2-3 years we will be back on the road to recovery again (hopefully) its the nature of these boom and bust cycles, if the pockets are deep enough new franchises will be OK. Although doubts still linger in my mind if second teams in previously one town one team cities work.
Redb
p.s. the looming Melb v Sydney battle on 25 Oct will be well attended.
Savvas Tzionis said | October 6th 2008 @ 10:29am | Report comment
A second Melbourne team is probably doomed to fail. Unlike Sydney which has distinct regions, Melbourne is quite united.
It looks like they are going to give a licence to the outer Eastern team called Casey. But that area caters for the large British contigent that already follows the Victory.
If it fails, who will they turn to (if at all( for the second team?
Will they allow the biggest team from the old NSL, South Melbourne, the chance to compete?
Redb said | October 6th 2008 @ 10:44am | Report comment
Savvas,
I’ve said a few times, the remnants of South Melbourne and its fan base have the best chance of survival as a 2nd team those SM fans would automaticially jump off Melb Victory (If there were ever on) and support South Melb. Southern Cross FC (South Melb backed) was not selected as the 2nd Melb bidder no doubt due to ethnic ties, FFA are obviously trying to avoid them. Probably with justification.
The only 2nd teams that have succeeded thus far in Australia were pre-established teams with rusted on fan bases from feeder competitions.
Your right about Melbourne, the only social division is perhaps the Yarra River – Melbourne Victory support is not sourced from either side, it is generic Melbourne. Casey is a far flung south-eastern suburb – the pure definition of mortgage belt.
Redb
BigAl said | October 6th 2008 @ 10:59am | Report comment
Those ‘ . . . Baghdatis fans’ at the last Australian Tennis Open probably provided a timely reminder to all decision makers, of the likely problems that would ensue if a team associated with South Melb. / Hellas were admitted into the A-League
keeper11 said | October 6th 2008 @ 11:08am | Report comment
..A-league should justfollow the NRL’s formula for a…ahem ‘ national’ competition..
..sell yourself and be propped up by a media company to the tune of $16million a year ala MEL Storm…..
..sh**tload of free and positive publicity out of step with your actual popularity to boot……
jimbo said | October 6th 2008 @ 11:58am | Report comment
keeper11,
I’ve often wished that Lowy or Constantine had made their billions from TV and newspapers – it would make the game so much easier to promote and sell.
Although Gordon, who owns WIN TV, is now looking to invest in South Coast FC, so they might get some good media coverage in the Wollongong area.
Interesting question about Southern Cross FC. Many people think they would get more fans than Heart. They are more football savvy and would do a better job of putting together a good side and running a team than Sidwell – who only knows horse racing.
They would probably get a couple of high profile Greek footballers as Marquees and fill the new stadium.
The FFA didn’t react kindly to the “ethnic” elements of the Southern Cross consortium.
Really funny isn’t it – must be the only country in the world where being ethnic and following football is a negative.
I know a lot of the ethnic pioneers of the game are really p1ssed off by it and wouldn’t watch the A-League, even if you paid them too – only in Australia.
Redb said | October 6th 2008 @ 12:09pm | Report comment
Jimbo,
What’s your call then, should FFA keep the old ethnic teams out of the A League? They didn’t play nicely together at times in the past.
Are you implying the FFA have racist tendencies with regard to expansion ?
Redb
oikee said | October 6th 2008 @ 12:09pm | Report comment
Maybe the Storm just move outta melbourne because lets face it, the melbourne crowd over-all are pretty piss-poor supporting other codes. Another football team in melbourne would only create more angst among the rules supporters. Keep the growth up north where all games are appreciated not just the rules game. Face it, queensland is where all the action is happening. They will be building bigger stadiums soon to house all the finals with-in 10 years. The growth is queensland, not melbourne. The largest building projects over the next 5 years is coming out of queensland, get in now or get left behind.
The next game between the socceroos and quatar and you will see the truth. Dont be fooled by the old slogan, we are the sporting capital, thats fast dissapearing. The power and passion is in queensland.
Redb said | October 6th 2008 @ 12:13pm | Report comment
Oikee,
Hardly accurate. Melbourne A League crowds are the biggest in the land.
Redb
Slippery Jim said | October 6th 2008 @ 12:16pm | Report comment
RedB, so is Pippu back to his chirpy self after MV smashed whoever it was and avoided the red-card conspirators on Saturday?