By Darren Walton
November 1st 2008 @ 1:51am


ADVERTISEMENT
---------------
Super 14 tipping now live for sign-ups. Join now and invite your mates..
---------------

Let the players roam freely, says O’Neill

Australian Rugby Union boss John O’Neill has called for an open player market between the southern hemisphere powerhouses to help curb an alarming talent drain to Europe.

In a wide-ranging interview on the eve of the historic Bledisloe Cup Test in Hong Kong, O’Neill also urged stubborn South Africa to get its act together for the sake of SANZAR rugby.

He also revealed he’ll meet representatives of the Japanese government tomorrow about scheduling another trans-Tasman encounter in Tokyo in 2010 and nominated Moscow as another possible venue for future fixtures.

But while O’Neill took particular aim at South Africa, laying the blame squarely at their feet for the Super 14 not progressing to a six-team finals format next year, it was his proposal to allow All Blacks, Springboks and Wallabies to roam freely between Super 14 clubs that would have most concerned arch rivals New Zealand.

The Bledisloe Cup is a sellout

NZRU chief Steve Tew staunchly opposed All Blacks flanker Daniel Braid’s linking with the Queensland Reds next season and he probably wouldn’t fancy losing marquee players like Test captain Richie McCaw to the ACT Brumbies or an Ali Williams to the Cheetahs of South Africa.

O’Neill, though, claimed such scenarios - and even the prospect of seeing Wallabies pin-up Matt Giteau running out for the Auckland Blues - were far more desirable than continually losing players to cashed-up European clubs.

The ARU’s current policy is not to select overseas-based Australians for the Wallabies.

But O’Neill said times had changed and, estimating that the “English and French rugby economies were five times that of the southern hemisphere nations”, radical measures were needed.

He suggested the placing a cap on how many Test players could go offshore might be the way to go.

“Opening the door in a controlled manner is sensible,” O’Neill said.

“As long as you’re playing in SANZAR competitions, you don’t lose your eligibility.

“Since 2003 (when Australia hosted a highly successful Rugby World Cup), the northern hemisphere has stolen a march on the southern hemisphere.

“And the value of the competition is driven by the quality of the players. Five of the last six World Cups have been won by the southern hemisphere nations. The Super 14 product is one of the best in the world. But that can quickly erode.”
The other major issue threatening to stunt the growth of the game in the southern hemisphere was this week’s announcement that the Super 14 would retain its four-team finals system next year, casting doubts on the tournament’s planned expansion in 2010.

O’Neill blamed South Africa’s failure to budge on their proposed finals format, which involved at least one team from all three countries making the playoffs - regardless how low they finished on the ladder - for the impasse.

He said South Africa had embarrassed SANZAR officials who since February had been pitching “bigger and better things” to broadcasters.

“We came out on the 18th of July in Perth and made all sort of pronouncements and, sadly this week, simple things like a six-team playoffs series and which ELVs we were going to be using next year became major issues,” O’Neill said.

“It’s not a good look, in my view. We’re talking about the future of SANZAR, we’re talking about going to a Super 15, Super 18 down the track, moving into conferences etc, etc and we couldn’t even agree to a format of a six-team finals series.

“From our backyard, we even convinced the (NSW) Waratahs to cross the Indian Ocean twice (during the Super 14 regular season). Everyone had shifted and then South Africa said no. Bang.

“I don’t think it’s necessarily damaged the game’s profile. What it has damaged is our credibility with broadcasters.”

Super 14 tipping now live for sign-ups. Join now and invite your mates.

Free Email updates:

Our daily emails are only sent if there is content for the sport or that author. You can subscribe to multiple daily emails; or get the daily Roar email with all our content in it. We value privacy. More...


© 2007 AAP

 

Crowd Says (5)

Nelson said  | November 1st 2008 @ 3:09am | Report comment

WOW I cant believe these comments haven’t been taken up in the SA press yet! this alliance is creaking at the seams and ready to split at any point now

Benjamin said  | November 1st 2008 @ 9:31am | Report comment

Nothing like airing your dirty laundry in public.

Westy said  | November 1st 2008 @ 9:53am | Report comment

Nelson and Benjamin………he simply told the truth. It is embarrassing to announce to all and sundry especially your media backers a six team format for semi finals and then not be able to deliver. It is difficult for those overseas to understand how rugby is run here.
In the last world Cup year the NZers did not play their squad in the super 14 competition. This meant it was substandard competition.Which it was. NZ still won . Depth in Australian rugby is not a common byword
The ARU continues to promote on occassion second rate touring national teams . This cheapens their best product international rugby . They then wonder about falling test attendances.
Now we have Wallabies v Blacks in Hong Kong. How many times will these teams play tests in a year let alone each other 16 /17/18/….20 times and where. I know they could be the Harlem Globetrotters of rugby.

LeftArmSpinner said  | November 1st 2008 @ 10:16am | Report comment

O’Neill is right. Allowing players to move between all organisations in the S14 and future incarnations is a great idea but needs more detail to it for it to succeed.

And the implementation needs to be carried out in small steps so that no one S14 partner becomes disadvantaged.

In the end, I would like to end up with a salary cap system that levels things between provinces and also allows them to match the northern hemisphere salaries for the most valuable players. There should also be allowances for players coming through local development programmes, loyalty programmes and long serving players.

The attraction for junior players to choose rugby is because they get comparable money to NRL, a better lifestyle and the opportunity of significant upside.

The mid range players get benefits for loyalty and longevity to narrow the gap between SH and NH.

The most valuable players remain in the SH because they are can earn as much in player salaries in S14 as overseas, they can earn more promotional dollars nationally and internationally, and they play for their country in prestigious competitions such as 3N, Bledisloe and RWC.

The less heralded benefit of SH rugby is that the players don’t play in the endless, concurrent multi-competition schedule of NH rugby and in particular France and England. This schedule demands that players carry niggles and more serious injuries because they don’t have sufficient recovery periods. By comparison, the current Wallabies haven’t played for 6 weeks.

True Tah said  | November 1st 2008 @ 10:20am | Report comment

Westy,

the 2007 super 14 final was between the sharks and bulls from South Africa.

Have your Say

If you like this article, Subscribe! Subscribe to our daily email

Please be sure to enter your name and email before submitting this comment. Please also refer to our comments policy

 

Hot debate

What you're Roaring!

  • What do you think?

    Has Hayden played his final Test innings?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...
  • Featured Profile

    By signing up to the daily The Roar email you'll receive all the new articles and sports opinion that we put up on the website each day - delivered direct into your inbox. For free. We think it's the best way to receive our content.

    Our emails contain the article along with the images - just like on the website.