Haddin’s form shifts focus back on Symonds
By Brett McKay, 3 Dec 2008 Brett McKay is a Roar Expert
While the cricket world waits with anticipation to see what England will do in in regards to the sensitive situation in Mumbai (which with respect, they’re entitled to think long and hard about), eyes and ears searched for on-field action and, happily, found a swashbuckling Brad Haddin in Adelaide.
Anyone who can recall Haddin’s first foray onto the Australian cricket scene in the late nineties will remember a super-talented ‘keeper fresh out of the Australian Under 19’s playing every shot possible for the Canberra Comets during their brief stint in the then Mercantile Mutual Cup.
Certainly NSW did: they snapped him up as a back-up to Phil Emery almost immediately.
So while Haddin’s breakthrough innings on Sunday was no surprise to many, there may well now be a group of four former cricketers whose job as national selectors has just become that much harder again.
As if it wasn’t already.
The selectors’ focus now surely has to look at form, and particularly, the form of Andrew Symonds.
For Symonds, three less-than-ideal events occurred during the Second Test in Adelaide:
1. An initially dubious umpiring decision that quickly proved to be correct (thankyou Hotspot, and remember where you read the suggestion of this technology helping umpires first)
2. Brad Haddin coming in and smashing a maiden Test century, and
3. Shane Watson’s timely double of 7/69 and 81 (from 83 balls) for Queensland against South Australia in Brisbane.
All three events have done few Symonds few favours, and it’s probably timely that he found himself in a delicate situation not of his doing, because it could well bring out the match-wining beast within.
I hope it does.
Already this week, I’ve read that Symonds is playing for his cricketing life, and that his great mate Matthew Hayden could be a better bet to make the trip to England next year. Personally, I think the executioners have been lined up a little too hastily.
And it would seem the Australian captain agrees with me too, although he is clearly the No.1 ticket-holder of the Symonds fan club.
Commenting after the Adelaide Test, Ricky Ponting said, “I think Andrew is going fine, I am not worried about his form. Symo’s not had a bad game [in Adelaide]. He got a decision that probably could’ve gone either way here, and all of a sudden everyone’s asking questions about him.”
But you do have to wonder how much latitude Symonds will get, especially now that Haddin and Watson are becoming the players they were always going to be. For how much longer can Australia carry a number six batsman not making too many runs, and not bowling anywhere near as effectively as he was this time last year?
There is one other factor firmly in Symonds’ favour however, and it’s one that I have bought up in previous weeks: bums on seats.
There’s no doubt crowds flock to see Andrew Symonds, and at his best, there’s not too many better sights in the game. Cricket Australia accountants will literally be banking on his return to form.
Steve Waugh always used to say that Australia could generally carry at least one player in something of a form drought, and that would still seem to be the case now. I tend to think that Ponting and Australia will continue to support and carry Symonds as long as required, but perhaps only while those around him continue their run of form.
Should Australia struggle at home this summer, however, or should those around Symonds in the batting order go into a similar form trough, watch for the executioners (and maybe even accountants) to return to their marks.
Follow Brett McKay on Twitter: @BMcSport
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Cricket articles
- What we do and don’t know about our Baggy Greens (112)
- Success of Twenty20 spells trouble for ODI cricket (106)
- Channel 9 commentators an annoyance this summer (102)
- One Day Cricket is suffering from Middle Child Syndrome (89)
- Cricket Australia must take a stand against racist spectators (89)
- Dave’s Warner-ful switch-hit panned by precious critics (84)
- Khawaja shouldn’t have been Shaun from the Test side (71)
- Mathews heroics almost shakes Clarke’s resolve
- Resurgent Pakistan inspire new generation to play
- Clarke stars as Australia beat Sri Lanka
- Australia vs Sri Lanka, Perth ODI: cricket live scores, commentary (197)
- Hall of Fame for Indian legend Gavaskar
- Sri Lanka to target ‘weak’ Aussie bowlers
- India backing Rohit Sharma to find form
- Resurgent Pakistan inspire new generation to play (0)
- Australia vs Sri Lanka, Perth ODI: cricket live scores, commentary (197)
- Twenty20 cricket not up to the test (6)
- Pakistan’s win over England a triumph of character (21)
- Steve Waugh is right about cricket’s succession plan (5)
- India vs Sri Lanka, Perth ODI: cricket live scores, commentary (180)
- Let’s talk about selection, Test fans (28)
- Explore:
- Andrew Symonds, Australia A, Australian captain, Australian Cricket, Cricket, Matthew Hayden, Queensland, Ricky Ponting, Shane Watson, South Australia

JohnB said | December 3rd 2008 @ 4:07pm | Report comment
I hope it was a breakthrough innings for Haddin. But if he doesn’t back it up, it seems to me the selectors would be entitled to take into account that it was made on a road against a pretty lacklustre attack that had already been bowling a full day, and benefitted from a couple of clear chances. If that innings by itself was a get out of jail free card for Haddin, Brad Hodge for one would be entitled to be very upset.
I’m not so sure that Haddin’s position influences Symonds’ selection (incidentally, “Hotspot” was conspicuous by its absence from the Channel 9 coverage of the Symonds caught behind – if it was on pay tv, fine, but the regular replays on 9 made it look not out to me, and that was the view of most commentators were consistently expressing). I don’t think the selectors would think Haddin’s batting is suddenly of such a standard that they could play him at 6 and select a bowling all-rounder (or 5th bowler) at 7 (which is what would have to happen for Haddin to be a factor in Symonds’ selection). You are right though that Watson is the one pressuring Symonds – which he was before last weekend’s games. Mind you, Symonds has made big runs at test level and Watson hasn’t, and that counts for a fair bit.
Brett McKay said | December 4th 2008 @ 8:04am | Report comment
JohnB, I think Haddin’s innings was seen as a breakthrough because, like Symonds’ 160-odd v England in Melbourne, it was the innings everyone knew he was capable of playing. It worked wonders for Symonds then, and yes, hopefully Haddin can kick on from here in the same vein.
My point about Haddin’s innings moving the form focus back onto Symonds wasn’t meant to suggest Haddin needs to move to 6 though; I was suggesting that with Clarke and M.Hussey in reasonable form above Symonds, and Haddin and to a degree Watson doing the same below, that no.6 spot where Symonds is, is possibly more crucial than ever. Symonds really needs to start contributing more from that spot than he has been, or else the torch will be turned on him even more than it currently is. And it’s not as if there’s a shortage of possible candidates either, Watson, D.Hussey, even Katich (if Jaques were to come back from injury) are the obvious names, and there’d be plenty more too.
Your point about Symonds making big runs at Test level is very valid though, and I’m quite sure that will be enough for him to see out the Australian summer.
Just on Hotspot to finish, it was on Ch.9 where I saw it. Within two or three balls of his dismissal while watching normal replays, Mark Taylor began suggesting that he thought there may well have been a faint nick, as the ball’s seam changed its rotation/axis as it went through. When they looked it on Hotpot, the nick became clear. I’m sure Symonds wouldn’t have felt it though, and as his bat most definitely hit pad, it was no surprise he was annoyed as walked off.