Hurricanes legitimate threat to Super 14 title
By James Mortimer, 29 Dec 2008 James Mortimer is a Roar Pro
- Tagged:
- Hurricanes, Rugby Union, Super Rugby, Wellington
Possessing the strongest squad on paper arguably of any team – the arresting of a poor sudden death record will see the Wellington Hurricanes take their maiden Super rugby championship.
If you take actual titles out of the equation; there is no team in domestic world rugby with the recent record and pedigree that the Hurricanes wield in Super history. Three times in the last four years they have reached the semi-finals, and in 2006 were runners up in the first Super 14 championship.
Considering as well their outstanding New Zealand provincial record – where in the last three years they have been the runners up to the Air New Zealand Cup. They are also the current holders of the famous Log O’Wood; the Ranfurly Shield. However, outside of this prestigious trophy, they have not won the New Zealand domestic title since 2000; and have been unable to break Canterbury and Auckland’s grip of power for New Zealand representation of the Super 14.
This year sees Coach Colin Cooper with a typically star studded squad that we come to expect from the franchise that has brandished some of the finest players in world rugby, including Christian Cullen, Jonah Lomu and former All Black captain Tana Umaga.
Of the men who in 2008 wore an All Black jersey, no less than thirteen national representatives are in the Hurricanes team.
The production line of Wellington rugby has ensured that despite player losses, that only one player, New Zealand Maori player Jason Kawau – has been selected from outside the Hurricanes selection region.
The set piece and pack, long regarded as the weak point of Wellington rugby, is no longer a concern for the faithful. Andrew Hore (the Kelvin R Tremain New Zealand rugby player of 2008) and Neemia Tialata are both starting All Blacks; and will be backed up by future All Black Dane Coles and vastly experienced props John Schwalger, Tim Fairbrother and Jacob Ellison.
Jason Eaton continues his renaissance as an international lock and will combine likely with Jeremy Thrush who was unlucky not to be rewarded with a test cap after a brilliant ANZC.
In the loose forwards Wellington have an embarrassment of riches, headed by Rodney So’oialo who put a poor 2007 behind him to have a stellar international season including captaining the All Blacks in Richie McCaw’s absence. New All Black and McCaw’s understudy Scott Waldrom will likely mortgage the open side flank position, which will see five other players vie for the final back row spot.
Many believe it maybe former seven’s prodigy Victor Vito – who has risen through the New Zealand system and is a heady cross of Jonah Lomu and Sonny Bill Williams. The 1.92 metre 110 kg Vito was one of the fastest players on Wellington’s roster last year; and could cause chaos if a strong Hurricanes pack is consistent.
The backline has long been considering the jewel in the crown of Wellington’s power, and this year it appears to be no different.
In the halves, Piri Weepu will likely start but it could be in either position. While Daniel Kirkpatrick and Willie Ripia are both considered exciting talents in a national pool of 19-21 year olds that seems immense – back up halfback Alby Mathewson had an outstanding ANZC and Cooper may wish to start him with Weepu playing first five.
Weepu will have lofty goals for 2009 – he was named the New Zealand Maori player of the year for 2008, captained the Maori to victory in last year’s Pacific Nations, and the pain on his face in Wellingtons ANZC final loss to Canterbury was very reminisce of McCaw when the All Blacks lost to the Wallabies in Sydney. He also captained the All Blacks against Munster.
In the three quarter line, the Hurricanes depth persists; with the All Black midfield of Ma’a Nonu and Conrad Smith likely to continue for Wellington. Both, Nonu in particular enjoyed excellent test years – but Tamati Ellison, so impressive for Wellington in the ANZC, will keep both players honest.
Deep in the backs, Cory Jane and Hosea Gear were rewarded with imperious late season form to earn All Black call ups, and will ensure that the long known attacking prowess of the Hurricanes will thrive in 2009; combined with brilliant young Hawkes Bay wing Zac Guilford and the robust David Smith – we round off the team seeing depth and skill all across the team.
With a good draw, that sees them play away only once in the first six weeks, should ensure that the talent laden outfit reaches the top four. If the mental fortitude demonstrated by the All Blacks last year permeates to Wellington, look for the men from the capital to hoist their first title.
Super Rugby roll of honour
Canterbury Crusaders (98,99,00,02,05,06,08)
Auckland Blues (96,97,03)
ACT Brumbies (01,04)
Blue Bulls (07)
Wellington Hurricanes 2009 match schedule
Week one V Waratahs WGTN
Week two V Highlanders WGTN
Week three V Crusaders Christchurch
Week four V Cheetahs New Plymouth
Week five BYE
Week six V Bulls WGTN
Week seven V Lions Johannesburg
Week eight V Sharks Durban
Week nine V Western Force Perth
Week ten V Stormers WGTN
Week eleven V Brumbies WGTN
Week twelve V Blues WGTN
Week thirteen V Chiefs Hamilton
Week fourteen V Reds Brisbane
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Will Super Rugby crowds continue their slide? (201)
- Will South African rugby force a Super 21 by 2018? (173)
- The real story of how John O’Neill turned Manchester City down (70)
- Dan Parks and the unsolved questions of expat rugby (65)
- Australian teams at Super disadvantage (58)
- Pocock set to be named new Force skipper (56)
- Can the ‘Tahs win the battle after losing the Waugh? (51)
- France turns to Parra and Trinh-Duc
- Rebels look to lift for formidable Blues in rugby trial
- Mr Fix-It Lucas wants to nail down No.10
- Force roost loses ‘Mother Hen’ Sharpe
- Victory beat Mariners with Kewell winner
- Waratahs romp to 83-5 trial win over Samoa A
- Quade Cooper’s return to the Reds goes up a gear
- Wales show Southern Hemisphere how to play running rugby (29)
- What opening matches of Six Nations taught us (19)
- Will Super Rugby crowds continue their slide? (202)
- Clinical Chiefs cost rusty Rebels in Corio (9)
- Six Nations shows rugby is a parochial game at heart (5)
- Goose’s Super Rugby up-and-comer XV for 2012 (29)
- What does the future hold for the Six Nations (50)
- Explore:
- Hurricanes, Rugby Union, Super Rugby, Wellington

pothale said | December 29th 2008 @ 7:00am | Report comment
James – Interesting cheerleading piece for the Hurricanes.
Don’t quite get the bit about “If you take actual titles out of the equation; there is no team in domestic world rugby with the recent record and pedigree that the Hurricanes wield in Super history. Three times in the last four years they have reached the semi-finals, and in 2006 were runners up in the first Super 14 championship.”
Domestic world rugby presume means clubs. Do Crusaders not have a better pedigree, since they seem to win S14 practically every year recently as you point out in your post? If they didn’t come first (which you want to exclude), they came close otherwise.
And can you honestly say in ‘world rugby’?
Over last 8 years, Munster have been in 4 finals and 3 semi-finals – they’ve won the title twice. That’s why they’re currently seeded #1 in the competition.
Stade Toulousain have a similar pedigree with their performance in H Cup and in the Top 14.
Leicester and London Wasps in English Premiership are likely to have similar stats in GP and H Cup.
Other than that – go you Hurricanes.
HIYA said | December 29th 2008 @ 9:38am | Report comment
I agree with Pothale.. says to me they’re the biggest chokers in World Rugby.
hayden said | December 29th 2008 @ 11:14am | Report comment
The Hurricanes would once again seem to only have themselves to beat to win the title. You cannot argue with their talent across the park, but their record at the knockout phase [ and Wellington's at NPC level ] is hardly encouraging. They have a friendly draw, Weeks 7 – 9 will make or break them. For a team that has consistently had so much talent available to them , they also deserve the tag of most consistent under achievers. [ and I am a long suffering Blues fan, but at least they have sipped from the cup occasionally. ] That said, I hope they win.
Sam Taulelei said | December 29th 2008 @ 11:47am | Report comment
James
Hailing from Wellington I’ve become used to the pre-season hopes and expectations for the Canes. They have improved to the point where they are an expected top 4 finisher but like Hayden mentioned above they are still under achievers. Teams on paper count for nothing in competition and despite the strength of their squad and a favourable draw they still lack a quality first five to link the forwards and backs and may have to revert to a converted Piri Weepu at no. 10 which won’t help his claims to winning the All Blacks halfback position against Cowan, a rehabilitated Brendan Leonard and challenge from teammate Alby Matthewson.
The Chiefs in 2007 had similar expectations after their NPC title in 2006 and with so many talented players in their squad, but they imploded and Wellington finishing second this year after being the form team still points to a mental block at knowing how to win those big games.
They could be the best performed Kiwi team next season but I predict the title will be heading away from NZ.
James Mortimer said | December 29th 2008 @ 11:49am | Report comment
You are on the money pothale – it is a cheerleading piece.
And would agree that technically, Munster and Canterbury are untouched as the best performers in world domestic rugby.
That is, world domestic rugby is my definition of clubs (i.e. not international/national teams).
But am a tragic Hurricanes fan, who watched countless live games supporting his team many years ago when I resided in the windy capital. My point regarding their recent form, is that game for game recently, they have shown form even beyond Canterbury and Munster – but, as HIYA so smoothly points out – they are effectively chokers.
Unlike the two champion teams of the north and south, Wellington have a ********* annoying habit of playing terribly in their elimination games – where we all know the mark of great teams is the ability to have a OK season (much like Canterbury do at times – winning by small margins) but then turn it up in the finals.
Hopefully, with my disturbingly one eyed piece as vocal support, history should be overturned.
James Mortimer said | December 29th 2008 @ 11:53am | Report comment
Sam, title heading away from NZ – you really think so?
Sam Taulelei said | December 29th 2008 @ 12:07pm | Report comment
James I do
The Blues and Crusaders are in coaching transitions and some key players in key positions will be missing next year. The Chiefs weakness in their tight five and lack of depth will expose them if they suffer injuries which always dogs them each season. The Highlanders without being disparaging are making up the NZ numbers again and are a couple of seasons away from developing into a good side which leaves us with our beloved Canes.
Of course this is all relative to the relative strengths and weaknesses to the Aussie and SA sides but I do believe that the title is the most open in memory.
pothale said | December 29th 2008 @ 11:17pm | Report comment
James – I gotcha. Know what it feels like to support a nearly-made-it team.
If the title is as open as Sam says above then why not for the Hurricanes? Munster were in line to be the biggest chokers in the H CUp, having been in endless semi-finals, and two finals, before delivering the goods in 2006. And then repeated it in 2008.
One-eyed Hurricane fan? That’s what fans are supposed to be. Unashamedly.
brad said | December 30th 2008 @ 5:25pm | Report comment
Any of the super rugby sides could beat Munster and Toulouse even the reds. Hurricanes are like the All Blacks all the stars and flash but can not grind out a victory as illustrated by the wellington lions this year. I would bet my house that they can nit win the cup. Without Deans I think its going to go to the sharks in 2009.
Jaredsbro said | December 30th 2008 @ 7:46pm | Report comment
Brad’s right (and he may be cousin in disguise afterall!) Super Rugby is superior to Northern rugby (and I know this thread’s not about that) but it is! The ELVs when they are added (minus the Free-kicks thing) may well prove the best way to win Rugby is to run the ball: leave your options open with great kickers (touch-finding, goal-kicking, blitz kick-chasing) and have players who can pass without making their offloads look too deliberate, even tho that is a joy to watch it is getting a little predictable these days
And until the Canes/ Blues or Chiefs or Warratahs or Force (if Heaven stretched that far, I dunno) develop a must-win culture to their must-win games ie on the road at cauldrons like SFS and Suncorp, ABSA and Loftus and Capetown for the first time in years I’m picking (Subiaco’s still got to earn its stripes) you’re not going to get a very competitive competition: Crusaders in re-building may be the best thing since the North vs South challenge if the comp is to actually grow its following
Still reckon a SANZAR draft would do wonders for a balanced comp: too often the draw sinks teams around about the half-way mark and yes teams like Crusaders play poorly against fierce rivals Highlanders in order to pick themselves up when it’s all important