Why can the guys strip down, but not the girls?
By Natalie Medhurst, 5 Jan 2009 Natalie Medhurst is a Roar Rookie
- Tagged:
- Michael Clarke, netball, sex in sport
This time of year is always my favourite. There are the Christmas and New Year festivities, the fantastic weather, and the love/hate relationship that comes along with the beginning of pre-season training. And of course the international cricket season kicks off here in Australia.
As much as I love to watch the cricket, what has caught my eye since the test series began has been the Men of Cricket calendar.
Whilst I have enjoyed looking at the pictures of the players as they have flashed across the television screen, what has interested me the most is the way in which the public as well as the media have had their opinion on the Australian Cricketers stripping down for this calendar, which is helping raise money for a fantastic cause.
Recently, several Adelaide Thunderbird netballers took part in a photo shoot for Alpha magazine. The opinions of media and the public in this case, as well as other cases involving female athletes, always appear to differ greatly compared to when any photos, which may result in a little less clothing, involve blokes.
Why is it that when these cricketers take their gear off people only have a laugh at the amount of ‘foliage” on Simon Katich’s chest as well as wonder why Michael Clarke hasn’t stripped down. And yet when female athletes do something similar people say that such photos are either controversial or that they are not projecting the right image?
Now, I understand that things need to be done tastefully, but I would like to think that as female athletes, who spend many hours training and looking after themselves to get their bodies in to the best physical shape possible for our chosen sports, that they are projecting a healthy body image to young girls and other women, unlike the majority of stick thin models and actresses who choose not to eat.
With all the talk saying that females should be proud of their bodies, surely those who spend most days of the week training can show theirs off even if it does attract a little bit of male attention.
I highly doubt that the Men of Cricket calendar, as well as the Men for All Seasons footy calendar, with the strategically placed bed sheets, is aimed at being sold to male supporters.
With sponsors injecting large amounts of money into the sports, and sporting organisations wanting to reach different demographics, it is no surprise that several AFL clubs have created relationships with netball teams in order to help promote their clubs and increase their female membership base.
Whilst the male sports are doing large amounts to increase their female supporters and interest in their game, some people almost appear to believe that female athletes should just play sport and keep quiet.
Now, I am all for equal opportunities, yet I believe that sometimes it just does not work, such as female tennis players earning the same amount as male tennis players …. they only do half as much work.
But surely in this case, female athletes have as much right as men to promote their sport in the same way, without all the extra judgement.
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- Michael Clarke, netball, sex in sport

January 5th 2009 @ 2:53pm
LeftArmSpinner said | January 5th 2009 @ 2:53pm | Report comment
Natalie, don’t wait for approval from anyone for the girls to get their gear off. Simply ignore the judgement!!!! The support will be overwhelming, well, at least from the boys and most of the girls. The only problems are the so-called feministas, who sometimes transgress into controlling behaviour and restrictions of freedom in the name of girl-power.
January 5th 2009 @ 3:53pm
cosmos forever said | January 5th 2009 @ 3:53pm | Report comment
I think the W-League has done a great job in their print ads of ‘glamming’ up the sport. I have two daughters and they like the ads – the players look sporty and glamorous. It works (in my opinion).
http://wleague.com.au/
January 5th 2009 @ 3:59pm
dasilva said | January 5th 2009 @ 3:59pm | Report comment
There was a documentary on streaking. They said when the guy gets naked. The public perception is because they are just having a laugh and a bit of fun
If a girl gets naked, it because they are trying to sell sex, using their body for money and a lot of cynicism is associated with that.
I’m afraid I don’t think society will change that perception for a while.
January 6th 2009 @ 12:21pm
Jaredsbro said | January 6th 2009 @ 12:21pm | Report comment
I’d usually put this in the too hard basket, but I’ve got time so I’ll join the war er ah Roar
The problems deeper than just about Sport isn’t it? Women still have to live up to a double standard and one which has only a nominal amount to do with men (unless all the world’s women’s magazines etc happen to be owned by all the men in the world…shareholders can be from both sexes anyway so…)
They have to be attractive (pretty much in the company of all men and women) and they mostly still have to be the carers and the nurturers of our youngins, even tho stay at home dads are increasing. This leaves very little time/energy for leisurely pursuits and even less tolerance on the part of society as a whole or the media specifically in enabling them to truly be who they want to be, which means being in the body they are most comfortable with, which for most women means being both desirable/valuable (however you want to read it) and workable, as in living up to a realistic standard. It’s because the pre-parental stage of a women’s life is associated most with freedom
Freedom to have sex, freedom to party on their own terms, freedom from immaturity more so than with guys. She must act free, while not being too free as that’s still frowned upon, as it seems value and desirability are add-ons when you are your own free agent in this current age. Sport is not considered an arena of freeedom, rather a site of regimentation and taking shite while not dishing it out. Women are still seen as less capable of controlling their emotions (stupid Enlightenment) and thus incapable of controlling their desires: which is said to sexualise all of their behavious. Basically in my opinion sport is a cultural attempt to try and de-sexualise (even if we’re only in denial about our real intentions) maybe connected with the old piety of the Victorian age, I dunno, but our culture seems to think that women’s sport a threat to this status quo. Because if they’re not playing to be valued for their sexuality then they’re playing to de-sexualise themselves which is perceived to be another form of sexuality
Oh and thanks for the compliment Spiro…
February 10th 2009 @ 1:50pm
nickypeeves said | February 10th 2009 @ 1:50pm | Report comment
not that i love seeing semi naked cricketers… but to me it appears the cricket photos at most summer/beach related photographs of the male upper-body. fairly tasteful.
on the other side of the spectrum, the netball photos show women is watered down s&m outfits.
i love the female form but i didnt find the netball shoot fun or sexy. at least the cricket shoot appeared to be tasteful.
February 10th 2009 @ 1:53pm
nickypeeves said | February 10th 2009 @ 1:53pm | Report comment
though i do agree with the contention of the article, i dont think the examples are terrific.
sorry… forgot to make that clear.
April 23rd 2009 @ 2:11pm
Chop said | April 23rd 2009 @ 2:11pm | Report comment
I completely agree with the article and most of the sentiments of the comments following. Especially Spiro stating that the angst is normally generated by sport hating killjoys is spot on.
There is a massive disparity between the coverage of mens and womens sport (I know that’s not a revelation). I don’t think the TV stations help the female cause at all even when they do shot womens sport. The womens cricket world cup was a good example, if you didn’t have FOX, would anybody at all have known what was going on?
I used to be a fan of the Netball on FOX, after playing badly for a while I appreciate the speed and skills involved plus it doesn’t hurt that most are fairly easy on the eye as well. Now it’s on at different times and on ONE (which is not available in lots of places, don’t get me started) I’m afraid to say it’s fallen into viewing oblivion.
Natalie, I’m impressed that you have expressed the view about female tennis players getting paid the same as male for potentially 40% of the work. I was having that exact argument at a tennis club recently and shot down by the feminista’s after suggesting that women’s tennis needed to be the best of 5 sets to get equal prize money.
April 26th 2009 @ 1:14pm
James said | April 26th 2009 @ 1:14pm | Report comment
Maybe you should lead by example, Natalie and actually pose like Katich; your Adelaide Thunderbirds shoot was hardly stripped down.
May 8th 2009 @ 1:52pm
davido said | May 8th 2009 @ 1:52pm | Report comment
Im all for as much nudity as possible!