Delete the word ‘free’ from ‘free agency’
By Bruce Walkley, 11 Feb 2009 Bruce Walkley is a Roar Pro
- Tagged:
- Adam Cooney, Adam Schneider, AFL, Cameron Mooney, Campbell Brown, Gary Ablett, Jimmy Bartel, Lance Franklin, Luke Hodge, Max Hudghton, Nick Riewoldt, Sam Mitchell, Western Bulldogs
Buried away in recent news about AFL matters, behind crushing pre-season wins by the Indigenous All Stars and Collingwood over Adelaide and Perth respectively, and Setanta O’hAilpin’s extraordinary good fortune, has been speculation that the AFL and the Players’ Association are getting closer to some sort of agreement on “free agency.”
As usual, the words have to be written in inverted commas, especially the “free” bit.
It seems that what is on the agenda is allowing out-of-contract players to choose which club they want to move to, but only if they have “served” seven years with their present club. That’s a bit like someone who’s been given life in jail having the sentence commuted to seven years.
It certainly doesn’t meet any definition of the words free agency.
The AFL and the clubs still seem to be clinging to the belief that they can prevent players who have fulfilled the terms of their contract – which, of course, they can continue to do in the absence of a legal challenge to the present system.
Such a challenge, though, seems unlikely to come from the present players’ association, so unless an individual at the end of his contract wins the lottery or gets some other huge financial windfall to finance a long battle in the courts, it won’t happen.
The news that O’hAilpin accepted his four-week suspension within two hours of it being handed down came as no surprise. The only surprising thing is that it wasn’t two minutes, especially since he can serve some, possibly all, of the sentence during the pre-season. I suspect the tribunal would have put the boot in a lot harder, of you’ll pardon the expression, in days gone by.

The AFL Dream Team
I’ve picked a couple of AFL Dream Teams in the lead-up to the 2009 season’s competition, which you should all be entering, too.
I’ve picked one side with proven form on the board, and the other based on possible improvers in this year’s competition.
So this week I’ve named only players who helped their teams to finish in the top four last year, and next week there will be only players from the remaining twelve clubs, possibly with some pulling on this year’s guernsey for the first time.
That second team will be even harder to choose than this week’s, particularly since it will contain players from traditional powerhouses Collingwood, Carlton, Essendon and Richmond, all of whom are widely expected to make moves up the ladder this year.
This week’s team, not surprisingly, contains a majority of players from grand finalists Hawthorn and Geelong, with the Western Bulldogs and St Kilda pretty much just making up the numbers.
Competition entrants can, of course, pick their Dream Teams from wherever they like.
My top-four side:
B: Tom Harley (Gee) Matthew Scarlett (Gee), Brent Guerra (Haw)
HB: Lindsay Gilbee (WB) Max Hudghton (StK) Campbell Brown (Haw)
C: Jimmy Bartel (Gee) Luke Hodge (Haw) Cyril Rioli (Haw)
HF: Brad Johnson (WB) Cameron Mooney (Gee) Adam Cooney (WB)
F: Adam Schneider (StK) Lance Franklin (Haw) Cameron Ling (Gee)
Foll: Steven King (StK) Joel Corey (Gee) Gary Ablett (Gee)
Int: Sam Mitchell (Haw) Michael Osborne (Haw) Nick Riewoldt (StK) Chance Bateman (Haw)
Recommend this story.
Jim Beam Devil's Cut
As bourbon ages, a portion of liquid is lost from the barrel due to evaporation. This is known as the Angel's Share. When the bourbon is taken from the barrel, a certain amount is left trapped within the wood. It's that extracted liquid, and the rich flavours from deep within the barrel that are in Jim Beam's Devil's Cut.
Click here to learn more about Jim Beam's wicked new bourbon.
The Crowd Says (13) | Page 2 of Comments
Have Your Say
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
AFL articles
- Giants prepare to christen new AFL home (145)
- The players are right: bring back AFL State of Origin (144)
- My colleagues are wrong: AFL State of Origin is a terrible idea (81)
- Could an AFL player make it in the NRL? (81)
- GWS Giants deserves more credit (71)
- The most even AFL season in years (60)
- The brain may be the AFL’s greatest enemy (54)
- Grimes, Jones question Demons’ AFL effort
- AFL needs to grow a pair when it comes to staging (36)
- Cats still building to AFL peak, says Scott
- Melbourne Demons’s problem is a lack of effort (22)
- Giants prepare to christen new AFL home (179)
- Jetta makes AFL history with charge (6)
- What AFL can learn from other sports (66)
- Melbourne Demons’s problem is a lack of effort (22)
- What AFL can learn from other sports (66)
- Carlton and Melbourne: don’t believe the hype (4)
- Dear AFL: Give us a break (22)
- What is the best structure for a sporting league? (26)
- Carlton v Adelaide Crows: AFL live scores, blog (149)
- Brisbane Lions vs. GWS Giants: AFL live scores, blog (93)
- Explore:
- Adam Cooney, Adam Schneider, AFL, Cameron Mooney, Campbell Brown, Gary Ablett, Jimmy Bartel, Lance Franklin, Luke Hodge, Max Hudghton, Nick Riewoldt, Sam Mitchell, Western Bulldogs


February 11th 2009 @ 6:48pm
Michael C said | February 11th 2009 @ 6:48pm | Report comment
Midfielder -
it’s one of those things, until someone can come up with a better idea.
The AFLPA and the AFL have all recognised that the system isn’t perfect – - especially the trade period. It’s just not working the way it was designed. Too often the one big deal just holds up everything else, and at the end of the ‘week’, only a handful of deals get through.
So – the system needs a tweak, and that’s what will be done.
It DOES actually work. The symbiotic relationship between an organisation that needs the players and the players that need the organisation. The AFL can’t afford to be as some people seem to imagine them to be.
February 13th 2009 @ 3:31pm
tony said | February 13th 2009 @ 3:31pm | Report comment
I believe its West Coast, not Perth
February 17th 2009 @ 9:57am
Bruce Walkley said | February 17th 2009 @ 9:57am | Report comment
To Michael C and others re the “minimum term of service” – in a fair world, that’s the length of the player’s contract – one, two, three, four years, whatever. After that he should be able to sign another contract, either with his present club or another of his choice.