Is this the Super 14 year of the South African teams?
By Spiro Zavos, 2 Mar 2009 Spiro Zavos is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- Bulls, International Rugby, Northern Bulls, rugby, Rugby Union, Sharks, South Africa, Springboks, Stormers, Super Rugby, The Springboks
Related coverage
- Cape Town Stormers news
- Sharks news
- Blue Bulls news
- Rugby Union news
- Super Rugby news
- International Rugby Union - Six Nations, Heineken Cup, Rugby Championship news
- South Africa Springboks news
The two outstanding sides in the 2009 Super 14 tournament after the third round are the Sharks and the Bulls. Not far behind them are the Waratahs. It’s early days yet but I expect these three sides, especially the Sharks and Bulls, to make very strong runs for the finals.
Both the Waratahs and the Sharks have won a match in New Zealand, always a difficult thing to do. The Waratahs match against the Hurricanes involved an Australian referee (Stu Dickinson). The Sharks got their victory at Hamilton over the weekend against the Chiefs with a New Zealand referee (Bryce Lawrence). So if this was a diving competition you’d have to say that their degree of difficulty was higher than that of the Waratahs. It was rainy, too, and these conditions usually suit New Zealand teams.
It’s been mentioned by some readers of The Roar that the local referees have tended to be more generous with their impartiality to the visitors. Certainly Ian Foster, the coach of the Chiefs, was probably correct when he said the video referee at Hamilton gave several decisions on tries against the Chiefs that seemed to be somewhat harsh on the home side.
What the Sharks have going for them is a side that has a terrific defensive system. Their statistics on defence, apparently, are the best in the tournament. They are resilient and courageous under pressure. The Chiefs spent minutes at the end of the match hammering away near the Sharks tryline. Admittedly it was one-off barging stuff that was not clever. But the Sharks line never looked like being broken.
During the rest of the match the Sharks had the ability that good South African sides tend to have of converting any break-out or bit of luck into points. There is tremendous pace in the forwards. The lineout and scrum are strong. And the five Springboks in the backline are all high quality players.
The Sharks also have a great draw. On Saturday they play the Blues at Eden Park after the home side has had to fly all the way back to Auckland from South Africa following their splendid victory against the Stormers, which also involved a tremendous late-game defensive effort.
The Bulls play their fourth match in South Africa and their fourth on the veldt against the Stormers. If they play with the hard-shouldered, smart aggression and skill they have in their previous matches, especially the demolition of the Blues in the second round at Pretoria, they will be well-placed for their overseas matches.
The Bulls have a mighty pack, even without Victor Matfield who has been injured, with the monster Bakkies Botha playing at his very best. They’ve got the best halfback in the world in Fourie du Preez; a strong kicking five-eight in Morne Steyn (South African teams generally play well with a kicking five-eights); the best number 8 in world rugby Pierre Spies; arguably the best winger in Bryan Habana.
More importantly, they are playing very smart rugby. The comparison with the heady, not-much kicking and lot a running game of the Bull and the headless-chooks play of, say, the Chiefs (another team loaded with talent) is very stark.
The Zavos rule is that the only teams that win a tournament as gruelling as the Super 14 are those teams whose rugby nous is matched by talent from the number 15 jersey through to the number 1 jersey.
Another Zavos rule that comes into play every four years is that the play of teams from a country that is hosting a tour by the British and Irish Lions invariably improves for that touring year.
We saw how good Australian rugby at all levels was in 2001 when the Lions toured here. And the same in 2005 when the Lions toured New Zealand.
The 2009 Lions tour of South Africa seems, at this stage in the Super 14 tournament, to be having a similar uplifting and energising effect.
Recommend this story.
Jim Beam Devil's Cut
As bourbon ages, a portion of liquid is lost from the barrel due to evaporation. This is known as the Angel's Share. When the bourbon is taken from the barrel, a certain amount is left trapped within the wood. It's that extracted liquid, and the rich flavours from deep within the barrel that are in Jim Beam's Devil's Cut.
Click here to learn more about Jim Beam's wicked new bourbon.
- Explore:
- Bulls, International Rugby, Northern Bulls, rugby, Rugby Union, Sharks, South Africa, Springboks, Stormers, Super Rugby, The Springboks


March 2nd 2009 @ 10:35pm
westy said | March 2nd 2009 @ 10:35pm | Report comment
Sam Taulelel Ihave seen the games by the Australian franchises against the NZ franchises but no “intra ‘ NZ games. Whilst competitive is it just me or has there been a gradual falling of in the competitive edge of the NZ teams. My observation is crowds are down and so is membership. It seems to me that the Australian franchises although losing some good players to Europe have been hit no where near as hard as the NZ franchises. 4000 in the opening super 14 game was not great.
March 2nd 2009 @ 11:21pm
ohtani's jacket said | March 2nd 2009 @ 11:21pm | Report comment
Super 14 has been on the decline in NZ for a number of years. It’s not just the players who’ve gone overseas, thousands of New Zealanders have migrated. And the ones who haven’t seem sick of rugby.
March 3rd 2009 @ 12:36am
Sam Taulelei said | March 3rd 2009 @ 12:36am | Report comment
Westy match attendances are certainly down and so are sales of season ticketholders. Yeah we could try to soften the blow pointing to the loss of so many players and mounting injury tolls etc but that’s just reality and all teams have to manage that challenge at one time or another. I think of the Aussie teams only the Tahs have really improved upon last year as the Force and Brumbies have flattered to deceive despite their victories. The Reds are playing like how the Hurricanes did in the past and while their high risk rugby is entertaining it will also be extremely frustrating for fans to watch as they manufacture defeat from the jaws of victory. The Sharks and Bulls have been impressive to date but you don’t win a Super 14 playing well in February.
OJ I would say the decline has only been in the last couple of years and the decision to pull 22 All Blacks out of the 2007 competition has had a bigger impact on the NZ public than the NZRU would care to admit. The Hurricanes have been the best supported NZ franchise since Super rugby began but even they are struggling to attract fans. My brother was in Wellington recently to attend a wedding and was surprised with how busy the bars, cinemas and restaurants were in the city when the game against the Waratahs was being played and the lack of buzz for the Super 14.
It’s easy to grow sick of something when you never seem to escape from it.
March 3rd 2009 @ 12:49am
ohtani's jacket said | March 3rd 2009 @ 12:49am | Report comment
I’ve never had that big an interest in the Super 14 myself, except for maybe the business end. Rugby is oversaturated in NZ. As soon as they started increasing the number of Tests, people figured they’d just tune in for the Tri-Nation games.
March 3rd 2009 @ 12:23pm
Greg Russell said | March 3rd 2009 @ 12:23pm | Report comment
Note Sam Taulelei’s point (one also made by a few NZ journos in recent days) that the Blues have come out of their trip to the far West (Perth and South Africa) with 10 points out of a possible 15, and that they have 9 of their remaining 10 matches on NZ soil. It would be foolish to bet against them making the top 4.