Australia’s bowlers go back to the future with aggression
By Benjamin Conkey, 4 Mar 2009 Benjamin Conkey is a Roar Pro
- Tagged:
- Glenn McGrath, Graeme Smith, Mitchell Johnson, Peter Siddle
In Perth, a little more than two months ago, Peter Siddle looked like another Scott Muller at the WACA. He was ordinary at best. But just when you thought he couldn’t bowl he found something in Melbourne, and now in South Africa he looks the real deal.
Mitchell Johnson is receiving most of the credit for Australia’s win (and rightly so), but it was Siddle who took it to South Africa with unrelenting aggression.
It takes courage to bounce the opposition’s best bowler and that’s exactly what he did to Dale Steyn.
He switched to around the wicket and pitched three balls in a row at Steyn’s throat, followed up by some even shorter words of wisdom.
It was a psychological ploy that said to the opposition “we hold no fear.” For Siddle can now expect to face similar chin music for the rest of the series from a fired up Steyn.
It brought back memories of Glenn McGrath in 1995 when he consistently bounced all of the West Indies tail-enders. During that re-building tour, it gave his fellow team-mates a tremendous lift because they knew McGrath would cop a hiding when he came out to bat.
But he didn’t care.
He wanted to send a message to the West Indies that Australia would not take their foot off the accelerator for one millisecond.
And that’s exactly what Australia is doing right now.
They are back to their ruthless best. No more mister nice guy. They put the squeeze on the Proteas batsmen through the best Australian bowling performance since Warne and McGrath.
It’s widely considered that this is really a six-Test home and away series, which means it’s now locked at two each.
The good news for Australia is that they could have won every match.
They had the upper-hand in Perth and Melbourne only to let it slip from their grasp. But with those harsh losses they seem to have learned the art of concentration, especially with the ball.
Johnson, a man so accustomed to taking wickets with the angle across the right-hander, is now swinging the ball, which means he is a potential weapon of mass destruction, not just for this series but the Ashes too, where the Duke balls tend to swing more in heavy English conditions.
Add Hilfenhaus to the swing list and all of a sudden Australia’s bowling stocks are looking rosier.
He didn’t take the wickets in this Test but he kept the runs down and made the ball consistently shape away from the right-handers, which would have impressed the captain and selectors.
McDonald, as the all-rounder, chipped in with a couple of wickets and went for just 1.65 runs an over in the match. He still needs to improve in the batting stakes to cement his position.
As for South Africa, they now need to win the last two Tests to steal the number one mantle from Australia.
Graeme Smith needs to think about changes.
Personally I think Albie Morkel should be in their side. He’s a handy bowler and a devastating lower order batsman, as we saw in the recent one-day series.
Sometimes you have to make a selection based on what the opposition would least like you to do and surely Australia would groan at the sight of Albie strolling to the crease.
Recommend this story.
The Crowd Says (7) | Page 1 of Comments
Have Your Say
- Explore:
- Glenn McGrath, Graeme Smith, Mitchell Johnson, Peter Siddle


March 4th 2009 @ 9:20am
Brett McKay said | March 4th 2009 @ 9:20am | Report comment
Conks, I have to admit I was also wrong about Siddle. Through India and as you mention, Perth too, he just did nothing to enthuse me, or to show me that he was worth persevering with. However his spell in Sydney, and now his whole performance at the Wanderers has shown me that he really is the workhorse around which you can build an attack. I think comparisons with the great Mervyn G Hughes are fairly appropriate, along with the Queenslanders Bichel and Kasprowicz.
However… (and there’s always a ‘but’)
News that both Siddle and Hilfenhaus are in doubt for Durban is a major worry, as the replacements bought in aren’t going to bring much fear to South Africa, who would be ‘cherry ripe’ for revenge against the Australian attack. Hopefully both guys can come through ok and hold their spots in the team. They certainly deserve to…
Oh, and do you think JP Duminy can expect too many more deliveries bowled in his half for the rest of his Test career??
March 4th 2009 @ 10:49am
Michael C said | March 4th 2009 @ 10:49am | Report comment
Brett -
had you not watched Siddle for Victoria??
(me thinks that many folk in NSW have just written off Victorians for a tad too long – given the recent history of partial domination in state cricket – - – i.e making just about every final for X number of years)
I wonder – is A.McDonald winning you over for his bowling?? He reminds a bit of Ewan Chatfield and the role he played supporting R.Hadlee.
March 4th 2009 @ 11:09am
Brett McKay said | March 4th 2009 @ 11:09am | Report comment
Michael, I didn’t even know what Siddle looked like prior to him being picked for India. I knew about his 9fa in the Shield final on a pretty docile SCG deck, but that was about it. Not a case of writing off Victorians, just a case of not hearing about them. I at least wait ’til I see them before I write them off
And yeah, McDonald bowled very well in the second innings, I’ll give him that. But no, he’s not winning me over. If that Test was on a track with next to no assistance (and plenty of Test decks don’t nowadays) he would have been picked off pretty easily. To me, he isn’t really effective until the pitch starts playing low, which pretty much rules out bowling on the first 2-3 days. He made the most of the conditions at the Wanderers in the second innings, and bowled very well. In fact, if the injury concerns for Siddle and Hilfenhaus are as is being made out, he may well have earned another Test.
March 4th 2009 @ 11:26am
Michael C said | March 4th 2009 @ 11:26am | Report comment
Brett -
that’s cool. Siddle had some pretty good wraps on him, and actually impressed some in India for his bullish efforts and he probably deserved another run.
The key thing is that bowlers, batsmen etc, need to be given a couple of tests to find their feet. So that fear of failure doesn’t see them chocking the bat grip or squeezing juice from the cherry.
Siddly too has been working hard with niggles. Getting through games and given 14 wkts in last 2 matches, one a MotM performance, and each one he pulled up sore but still did the job first. He’s a tough nut.
McDonald, might be a horses for courses. I’m more thinking heading to England. McGain might be just right for the next 2 tests of this RSA tour. But, going to England, McDonald might be a perfect wicket to wicket foil, on some pitches anyway.
March 5th 2009 @ 9:59am
Jameswm said | March 5th 2009 @ 9:59am | Report comment
If Siddle and Hilfy are injured, we are in major trouble.
Look who is out –
Apart from McGrath, Warne, MacGill and Hogg, all retired, we’d have the following out with injury
Hilfenhaus
Siddle
Bollinger
Tait
Lee
SClark.
Noffke too I believe, or maybe just returning from injury
We’d then be down to our 9th and 10th best bowlers to partner probably our best available (Johnson), or close to it.
An Ashes bowling atack of SClark, Johnson and Siddle looks very solid, with Lee and Hilfy also around. I still can’t work out the 4th slot, but if North blossoms at 6 and with his offies, you have the option of playing 4 quicks.
One other thing – if you want a holding medium pacer, who is hard to score off yet has more wicket taking balls and variety than McDonald, wouldn’t you go for the best one-day bowler in the world? Poor old Bracks must wonder what he’s done wrong.
March 5th 2009 @ 12:33pm
Benjamin Conkey said | March 5th 2009 @ 12:33pm | Report comment
Yep I agree James Australia is in trouble with all the injuries mentioned. I wonder what Kasprowicz is feeling right now. He was in the Ashes side four years ago, and then could not get in the team, and now as soon as he retires there’s plenty of vacancies to fill.
It is unfortunate that Bracken has been pigeon-holed as a one-day bowler only. He has improved bucket-loads since his last Test match.
If those players recover from injury will there even be a spot for Brett Lee? He seemed to be performing well below par in the Australian summer and it will be a risk to play him in England if he can’t pick up wickets and goes for loads of runs. Jason Gillespie was that bowler four years ago when England destroyed him.
Brett, I think Duminy can certainly expect more bouncers. As well as he’s played, I think he’s only one Test away from being dropped, considering Ashwell Prince is waiting in the wings.
March 7th 2009 @ 2:10am
Offcutter said | March 7th 2009 @ 2:10am | Report comment
I think its kinda sad that you didn’t rate Siddle since his first appearance. To actual fans of the game he appeared as a workhorse. It is the reason Ricky rates him so highly.
It’s great to see no name journalists eating their words.
I told my old man about Petey after his debut. Now he won’t shut up about him.
If only I’d gone to uni…