Hughes returns the headlines back to cricket
By Geoff Lawson, 9 Mar 2009 Geoff Lawson is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- Australia, Cricket, Phillip Hughes, South Africa
The events of last Tuesday morning in the suburb of Gulberg III, downtown Lahore, have shaken the foundations of the cricket world. Questions have been raised about tournaments and series all over the globe, but most severely about those events in the Indian sub-continent.
India is where all the big money games abound. Cricket Australia could not resist the lure of the rupee when it sent the team in October, ignoring the numerous blasts that had occurred in that country during the IPL and the terror threats from Hindu fundamentalist organizations.
Fortunately that series was completed with the most serious concern being limited to the loss of the rubber, and Ricky Ponting’s indefensible captaincy in Nagpur.
That is sport, and though it can mirror the real thing it is not life (although the two often come close to merging in India and Pakistan).
Good people do not usually lose their lives in sporting contests, but they did so defending international cricketers. It would be nice if they could catch some of the perpetrators so we can find out their motives, however irrational.
Meanwhile in South Africa the combatants were strictly on field. The fans and followers were allowed the luxury of discussing batting, bowling and fielding rather than body counts and ballistics details.
The Australians have played very well. The debutants have proven the trust of the selectors, the less experienced have done their jobs at the level required of Test cricket.
The Proteas have felt the pressure of playing at home. They have started each Test match in second gear and found the clutch slipping while their opponents have raced away.
Down Under they fought back, in Africa they have gone to the well too many times and the underdogs have refused to relinquish their number one rung.
Mitchell Johnson has been taking small steps forward in search of the full tool box the really top class fast bowlers have.
Here he has made a significant leap with the addition of an inswinger, unreliable maybe, but certainly asking many more questions of top order batsmen.
His hostile spell after lunch on the second day at Kingsmead was hostile and physically damaging. The coup de grace is always the wicket taking ball and he had that going as well.
Siddle was persistent and accurate, reminding me of Merv Hughes sans ‘tache, McDonald bores them to distraction with ‘stump to stump’, good length belligerence. A spinner was not needed under these conditions as he was not needed at Johannesburg. That is a question, though, to be answered in the near future. If the series is decided in Durban should Bryce McGain be given a ‘Test trial’ in Capetown with a view to the Ashes?
For three Tests in a row going back to the victory at the Sydney Cricket Ground in early January, the Australian attack showed admirable if not impeccable discipline. The South Africans, Paul Harris apart, employed the scattergun approach with the expected effect – plenty of boundaries.
Through all this, cricket history was made by the 20 year old from Macksville. Phillip Hughes became the youngest batsmen in the 132 year old (birthday next Sunday) history of Test cricket to make a century in each innings. A quick eye and lightning hands are his raw ingredients.
The technique is far from orthodox but who cares when you have such sweet timing and the term ‘nervous nineties’ has more to do with a ‘P’ plater’s speed in an 80 zone than the scoreboard registering.
It is hard to imagine that such a debate raged over Matthew Hayden’s faltering future when the exuberance of youth was waiting to bound onto the international stage.
Weather and cricket miracles permitting (Gary Kirsten made 275 over two days to save the Test on this very ground against England in 2001 after SA followed on), Australia should win on day five sometime or maybe even day four.
They have been much the better team which is difficult to believe after the events on home grounds in the summer.
Cricket, at least for the moment, has the headline maker in Hughes and it is a blessed relief after the game was so tragically maimed by events that have nothing to do with the innocent pursuit of sport.
Recommend this story.
The Crowd Says (10) | Page 1 of Comments
Have Your Say
- Explore:
- Australia, Cricket, Phillip Hughes, South Africa

March 9th 2009 @ 7:58am
hazey.the.bear said | March 9th 2009 @ 7:58am | Report comment
*sigh*…Will you ever learn Geoff? Since the attack in Pakistan, three things have happened.
1) People have called for your head on a platter (figuratively, of course), or more specifically, demanding an apology because you were wrong about cricketing in Pakistan being “the safest occupation” (which is obviously no longer the case, if it ever was)
2) People have responded to this stance, and commented (quite strongly at times) that this is not the time for “You were wrong” point-scoring…This, to a fair degree, is understandable – There are people who lost their lives or were wounded, and this is a far more important issue that needs dealing with, along with the need to apprehend these terrorists.
3) Despite the calls for you to apologise and admit you were wrong, you haven’t done so and instead have continued your cheap pot-shots at the Aussie cricket team especially (You even managed to have a crack at Ponting as well, despite his recent turn-around in captaincy effectiveness), as well as anyone else who *dares* tour India or plays in the IPL…
From what I understand of the human mind and cognitive dissonance, this is understandable…When someone has a strong view about something, and new information comes in which directly contradicts this belief, there are three possibilities: 1) Discard this new information (which of course, you simply cannot do – The attacks on the Sri Lankan team happened and you can’t just push this aside and pretend it didn’t happen), 2) Reinterpret your stance (obviously not the path you’ve chosen), or 3) Believe more strongly, and try to convince people…
Sorry, Geoff, but you haven’t convinced me…And more to the point, you could have just as easily have written your article congratulating Hughes, Johnson and co. without your continued propaganda.
Are you right though? Is India (or any country for that matter) a dangerous place? Yeah probably, but I honestly believe that the love of cricket in that country will make *every* effort to ensure that events such as the Sri Lankan attack do not happen. Could I be wrong? Sure…but I’ll admit it.
It’ll hurt to admit it, but it’s a damn sight more classy than continually criticizing everyone else…
March 9th 2009 @ 12:14pm
Brett McKay said | March 9th 2009 @ 12:14pm | Report comment
very well played Hazey, that could not have been said any better…
March 9th 2009 @ 12:57pm
Harry said | March 9th 2009 @ 12:57pm | Report comment
I was one of the “now is not the tiime for point scoring” commenters last week.
However this time Geoff has been comprehensively and deservedly thwacked by hazey.
March 9th 2009 @ 3:27pm
Greg Russell said | March 9th 2009 @ 3:27pm | Report comment
Re Geoff’s stance on Pakistan, I have a slightly different point of view. I believe one can only expect people to be objective where they are set up to be objective. As Pakistan coach Geoff was dutybound to promote the touring of Pakistan teams by other international teams. So I forgive him this folly.
A more serious lack of judgement for me is that on this website Geoff has constantly advocated for Chris Rogers to replace Matthew Hayden in the Australian team. How could he have missed the prodigy in the blue cap that Geoff so loved as a player and coach?
March 9th 2009 @ 9:03pm
Justin said | March 9th 2009 @ 9:03pm | Report comment
Spot on Greg – we dont need another 30 something debuting for AUS when there is a 20yr old dynamo. Hussey may be gone soon too if he doesnt pick up and Geoff may well want another 30 something to replace him.
A new generation is needed. I also think despite what Mac did in the first innings that McGain should have played on a dry cracking wicket. Still a bowler short at present, win lose or draw
March 9th 2009 @ 10:58pm
O'Neill said | March 9th 2009 @ 10:58pm | Report comment
Spot on Hazey,
I was one who was ridiculed for daring to question Mr Lawson and what you say is dead right and the reason i wrote the artcile i did, not becasue of point scoring. Continually critising is poor journalism to me, Its almost as if Geoff can’t fill the pages, so he just throws in cheap Jabs.
And Brett McKay stop trying to be everyones mate, make up your mind
March 10th 2009 @ 10:05am
Brett McKay said | March 10th 2009 @ 10:05am | Report comment
O’Neill (David?), you might recall in my response to your artcile that I opened with “I agree with a lot of what you said” before agreeing that the next morning was not the time to throw the “I told you so” barbs. Also, I make no attempt to hide that I disagree with almost everything Geoff Lawson writes. In this particular piece, Lawson’s praise for Hughes and other Australian players was a refreshing change from someone who seems to make a habit of criticism, but as Hazey so correctly said, the article was still laced with cheap shots that weren’t just unnecessary, some were just plain wrong.
So in this case, I can hardly see how agreeing with Hazey – which you also did, by the way – is changing my opinion on this matter?
March 10th 2009 @ 7:36pm
Who Needs Melon said | March 10th 2009 @ 7:36pm | Report comment
Greg,
“As Pakistan coach Geoff was dutybound to promote the touring of Pakistan”
As an employee of an organisation I have a duty to turn up to work today, be professional, etc.
As a husband and father I have a duty to support my wife and kids in times of need.
A man can have several ‘duties’ imposed on him which will sometimes conflict.
After I posted criticisms during this time many have posted that I should get my priorities right. Surely what’s good for this goose is good for you ganders.
WNM
March 10th 2009 @ 10:54pm
O'Neill said | March 10th 2009 @ 10:54pm | Report comment
Sorry Brett Mckay, i did re read your comment afterwards and your right you did agree, just thought you were sitting on the fence, friendly jibe mate, didn’t mean to sound so rude
March 11th 2009 @ 7:12am
hazey.the.bear said | March 11th 2009 @ 7:12am | Report comment
O’Neill, Brett – Good to see you boys kiss and make up