Socceroos still have a lot of work ahead – World Cup or not
By Jesse Fink, 2 Apr 2009 Jesse Fink is a Roar Pro
- Tagged:
- 2010 World Cup, football, Socceroos
I started off my column last week mentioning Michael Cockerill and his curious column urging the Socceroos to go all out and “entertain” us against Uzbekistan, and he deserves another mention this week for doing a complete 360-degree turn on that on national television, saying he was a “results first” person and that qualifying for South Africa is more important than playing with style.
Jeez, Mike, please make up your mind, will you?
But at least Cocko knows who Pim Verbeek is, unlike Ken Sutcliffe, Channel Nine’s face of sport, who called the Australian national-team manager “Tim” in the evening bulletin before the game.
Walkley Award-winning stuff from the Who’s Who of News.
Hardly award-winning football, either, from Verbeek’s side, and you could tell our Dutch boss wasn’t happy with what he was seeing, grimacing on the bench like he was suffering from wind and agitatedly pacing up and down the sideline.
I doubt there was anyone at Stadium Australia other than the most inebriated Fanatic who liked what they were seeing up until Josh Kennedy pulled a rabbit out of hat in the 66th minute and sent the crowd into paroxysms of delight and Harry Kewell made it two to the good with a penalty in the 73rd .
Yes, the conditions were awful but that was no excuse for Australia being outclipped for a large part of the match by a group of Central Asians with mullets who were suffering jetlag.
The fitness levels of the Socceroos have to be questioned – or at the very least what they are doing in training.
But Australia has the three points it wanted and, depending on the result of Bahrain vs Qatar today, we could be on our way to the World Cup in South Africa.
Congratulations to Verbeek, his assistants Henk Duut and Graham Arnold, and the entire playing group. To qualify for the World Cup with three games to spare is a tremendous achievement.
I’ve asked it before, though: How are we going to go when we get there?
What presents to me as the Socceroos’ most urgent problem is striking options. Scott McDonald just doesn’t seem to have what it takes at this level and last night appeared more effective when he trailed off to the wing than he was as a target man.
The Socceroos need a world-class striker, a Mark Viduka or identikit of one, badly.
In defence, too, the selection of Michael Beauchamp was a worry when it was announced – and he lived up to expectations. Not that the Aalborg defender is a bad player, but he just never plays well for the national team and he was caught out a number of times in the first half because of poor positioning, dereliction of effort and lack of pace. Other than his height, what does he offer the team? I’m not trying to be mean. It’s a legitimate question I think needs to be answered.
The habit of just picking a player because he’s getting game time with his club – something Verbeek favours with McDonald, Beauchamp and Hull’s Richard Garcia all being picked for the starting XI – clearly doesn’t always guarantee form or the attacking chemistry required to get that “result”.
It wasn’t until Kennedy came on (arguably the most out-of-form, out-of-favour player in the entire squad) that the Socceroos looked consistently dangerous and took the game to the tiring Uzbekis. So a lot of unanswered questions for the Socceroos.
We got the “result” but at the World Cup we’re going to need to get results with style to get beyond the first round.
Like everyone else, I’m just waiting for that elusive alchemy to come.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
- Explore:
- 2010 World Cup, football, Socceroos


sheek said | April 2nd 2009 @ 6:47am | Report comment
Jesse,
Maybe the Socceroos were boring, but wouldn’t the primary aim be to qualify first? We can worry about the entertainment later. besides, if we played thrilling football but failed to qaulify, who would remember the good football in 20 years time?
We would simply be bemoaning another lost opportunity. Pim’s not stupid – the tactics required for the WC itself won’t be the same as those for qualifying.
I think McDonald is a terrific player, but he can’t do it by himself. I think there’s an argument to start both McDonald & Kennedy.Anyway, I’m no footy expert.
However, I reckon Pim is doing just great!
Dave said | April 2nd 2009 @ 6:59am | Report comment
Sheek
Absolutely right! In 35 years of watching and going to Socceroos games their best most stylish performance for 75 minutes was versus Iran at the MCG in 1997. They absolutelt toyed with Iran and a 5 or 6 goal lead wouldn’t have flattered…the result turned out to be 2-2 and Iran went to the 1998 WC! So much for your stylish play Jesse…lets get their first and now that we virtually are well done to the team. Pim can now have a good look at what needs to be done in SA.
Part 1 Qualify – Mission accomplished (just about)
Part 2 South Africa – watch this space!
BTW Pim becomes only the 3rd coach in history to take the Socceroos to the WC…well done.
True Tah said | April 2nd 2009 @ 7:19am | Report comment
Congrats to the Australian futbol team first of all!
Sheek I agree that we should aim to get to the party first before we think about entertaining.
I watched the Uzbekistan v Qatar game on the weekend and they played pretty sharp although last nights conditions wouldnt have helped, and it was clearly evident that the jetlag was killing them, they looked pretty sluggish, and after 60 minutes, they were struggling – as I predicted, Australia won by a fair margin, their energy got them home in the end.
Brett McKay said | April 2nd 2009 @ 7:30am | Report comment
Jesse, I’m glad you too picked up “Tim” Verbeek last night, because I’m sure I’ve been hearing the Male Model from Mudgee calling Pim “Tim” for the last week!!
1 point to get from three games, probably safe to start looking for a training base in the Republic..
Kazama said | April 2nd 2009 @ 7:54am | Report comment
We are pretty much home and dry, but you learn from previous campaigns not to celebrate until we are there. I stayed up last night and watched Bahrain v Qatar, hoping for the draw that would seal our ticket to South Africa, but sadly it didn’t happen and we are still 1 point away from qualification. We should get that point in Qatar, but when we were 2-0 up last night the Iran game kept popping into my mind. Until we’re actually there I’ll remain nervous, silly as you all (and even I) may think that is.
sheek said | April 2nd 2009 @ 8:03am | Report comment
True Tah,
“I agree that we should aim to get to the party first before we think about entertaining”.
Love that line, wish I had thought of it. I now plan to use it & flog it to death!
Mattay said | April 2nd 2009 @ 8:22am | Report comment
I found a better one than “Tim” Verbeek. According to my radio this morning, “last year” we finished “3rd in our group” and had to play against the “5th placed Brazilian side” to qualify for the World Cup. Brilliant!
But yes, Australia technically poor but won due to better fitness, strength and pace. We are a better side when we are the underdogs, because we have no playmaker. We play best when the other side is making the play and we exploit their openings.
Pippinu said | April 2nd 2009 @ 8:40am | Report comment
Pim
we never, ever lost faith in you – never (although we’re still a little bit unsure about Holman).
md said | April 2nd 2009 @ 9:19am | Report comment
Can I really be the only one thinking this???
WE WILL BE FINE!
It was not that long ago that our national teams ability to execute any plan other than kick and rush was highly suspect. Now the problem seems to be that we have a coach with a pretty solid, if conservative plan and a team that, if anything, execute the plans too roboticly. At the start of this process, we were shitting ourselves with the prospect that we had signed up for something infinately more difficult than Oceania. Suddenly we are now a nation of friggin Spurs supporters… (and I say that as a longstanding Spurs supporter), demanding the Danny Blanchflower formula be applied to every minute of every game.
Cheers
md.
PS Pip – as for Holman, well – he does what it says on the box. We have a defence that is awfully good at dealing with longballs, but slightly suspect at dealing with throughballs – particularly from quick passing opponents. Holman is Pim’s attacking defensive midfielder that runs madly around in front of the midfield, making it difficult for the opposition to play anything other than a longball out of defense. It’s a plan that works just about perfectly. More power to him really.
Pippinu said | April 2nd 2009 @ 9:29am | Report comment
md
I understand that – it’s just that when he occasionally has the ball….