Central Coast Bears too ambitious for their own good
By Brett McKay, 6 Apr 2009 Brett McKay is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- Central Coast Bears, David Gallop, NRL, Rugby League
120 Have your say
North Sydney fans of old, and would-be fans of the club’s new alter ego, the Central Coast Bears, were possibly dancing in the street last week with NRL boss David Gallop formally putting expansion of the code back on the table.
This was the news Bears fans have been waiting to hear ever since the club was forced into an unpopular and ultimately doomed joint venture with Manly that went pear-shaped in 2002.
The Central Coast Bears entity has been in demand ever since, and after losing out to the Gold Coast Titans when the NRL added a sixteenth team for 2006, the Bears have maintained a proactive approach to readmission through former player and now CEO, Greg Florimo.
It should be said that Florimo and his team have done a great job of maintaining interest in their bid, never missing a chance for a headline.
Despite this, up until this week the NRL had maintained a “not in the foreseeable future” stance on future expansion. But a recent change of tact would seem to be in direct retaliation to the AFL’s aggressive push into so-called rugby league heartland regions of western Sydney and the Gold Coast.
With the next television deal to kick off for the 2013 season, the NRL is literally banking on new teams bringing in increased broadcast revenue.
Gallop made no secret of this ploy during the week when he said, “the next big commercial gain for the game will be around the new TV rights deal for 2013 onwards, and while the focus between now and then is on existing clubs, there is a good possibility after 2012 we would be looking at expansion.”
In framing a schedule for potential teams to lodge their bids, Gallop added: “We would start to look at that in 2011.”
Now, for the record, I’m firmly in favour of North Sydney being readmitted to the NRL as the Central Coast Bears and playing out of Bluetongue Stadium in Gosford.
It would be the easiest and most logical way for the NRL to right the wrongs caused by the ill-fated mess that was the three joint venture seasons of the Northern Eagles.
At the risk of running with a well-worn cliché, “it’s what the fans want!”
But here’s the thing.
With the Bears being so proactive and so obvious about their goal, and with their actions being rewarded by the NRL now agreeing to look into expansion, I’m wondering if the Bears’ bid team might actually have been too ambitious for their own good?
Think about this.
The NRL have now stated that the next broadcast deal would be the obvious starting point for new teams. The Bears would happily start discussions about readmission tomorrow.
The broadcasters, in turn, won’t just want one new team, though. They’ll need two new teams to get an extra game on TV each week.
But because further expansion has only ever been spoken of as “not in the foreseeable future”, no other prospective bids are any where near as advanced as the Central Coast’s quite obviously is.
Sure, Perth and Adelaide, and second teams from Brisbane and New Zealand, have been mentioned as potential candidates. But right now, they’d be no better prepared for admission into an expanded NRL comp as would the Parkes Spacemen or Wagga Magpies.
And so if other expansion bids aren’t ready for discussion in 2011, then all the Central Coast’s pro action and ambition might count for nothing if the broadcasters can’t get more content for their bucks.
It would seem to me that if the NRL is once again serious about expanding the competition from 2013, and David Gallop’s comments would suggest they are, they need to get a little proactive themselves to garner sufficient interest from potential new teams.
A failure by the NRL to guide prospective bids up to the same strength of argument that the Central Coast currently has could see broadcasters maintaining the status quo of sixteen clubs.
And if that were to happen, fans of the Bears – both old and new – would be screwed over yet again.
Recommend this story.
Follow Brett McKay on Twitter: @BMcSport
The Crowd Says (120) | Page 2 of Comments
Have Your Say
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby League articles
- NSW State of Origin 2012 team announced; expert reaction (221)
- Make this the last Origin in Melbourne (165)
- League and Union: we should embrace the different codes (141)
- An answer to Sydney NRL crowd problems? (120)
- Who missed out on NSW State of Origin selection (115)
- That Origin try: Did Inglis score or did the refs get it wrong? (110)
- Brisbane Broncos on borrowed time (104)
- The Agony and the Agony of State of Origin (11)
- State of Origin Game One: NSW player ratings (9)
- BROWNIE: Blues dominant everywhere except scoreboard (7)
- State of Origin Game One: Queensland player ratings (7)
- Why Victoria should never host another Origin match (22)
- Channel Nine cross-promotions: Delta just the tip of the iceberg (10)
- The next century of rugby league (7)
- State of Origin Game One: NSW player ratings (9)
- State of Origin Game One: Queensland player ratings (7)
- Why Victoria should never host another Origin match (22)
- Channel Nine cross-promotions: Delta just the tip of the iceberg (10)
- The next century of rugby league (7)
- The science and magic of rugby league (4)
- State of Origin 2012 Game 1: NSW vs QLD live scores, blog (264)
- Explore:
- Central Coast Bears, David Gallop, NRL, Rugby League

April 6th 2009 @ 4:26pm
sheek said | April 6th 2009 @ 4:26pm | Report comment
col the Bear,
Very inconsiderate of me, I know. I was sort of hoping the Bulldogs’ fans might follow them to the Central Coast, & leave Sydney in peace!
April 6th 2009 @ 4:26pm
Midfielder said | April 6th 2009 @ 4:26pm | Report comment
There are five teams with a hope of gaining a place, being CC, Second Brisbane team , Perth, Wellington & PNG…
Both the CC & Brisbane are already in RL strongholds so what extra would they bring TV media deals in terms of viewers… not sure that many TBH … much the same for PNG already a massive RL TV audience…
More to the point Perth / Wellington & PNG if you call the boarder Pacific offer a real chance for TV audience growth.
What is the safest is both the CC & Second Brisbane … both will get reasonable crowds thus not need popping up but what else do they offer… CC maybe some link with the Bears whereas a second Brisbane team can offer a further armoury in the fight with AFL having an extra team to take on the Brisbane AFL side..Also the power base in RL is heading north..
So as I see it a second Brisbane team is a cert …. then it is a case of taking the Tasmanian AFL option i.e. the CC or picking one of the more risky options with the hope of expanding the TV audience… which way will they jump .. time will tell
April 6th 2009 @ 4:28pm
Col the Bear said | April 6th 2009 @ 4:28pm | Report comment
See; just an add on here,I think clubs like Redcliffe Dolphins have made it clear they want to come into the NRL and thats why they fought so hard to keep the Dolphins name when Gold Coast originally called themselves the Dolphins and had merchandise already made up..hmm?? ..The Western Reds look like they have been working for this for some time, with their push all of a sudden into the Jim Beam cup beginning of last season..and that was out of the blue..Hey just put the Bears in as the defianite and let the others compete for the 18th licence, that would suit me to a tee…
April 6th 2009 @ 4:30pm
Midfielder said | April 6th 2009 @ 4:30pm | Report comment
Col
As I have always said to you .. the CC is a very safe bet in terms of crowds and TV viewership .. the broader concern is how much will the CC draw extra in audience over and above who currently watch.. The CC is already a very strong viewing audience for RL… whereas Wellington / Perth & PNG to a lessor extent offer increase TV audiences…
April 6th 2009 @ 4:33pm
sheek said | April 6th 2009 @ 4:33pm | Report comment
Papua…..you’re got to be kidding. I was born in Papua…well, Samarai Island (beautiful little island off the south-east mainland tip). PNG got independence about 25 years too early, & they’re a long way off being consistently competitive week-in, week-out, in the NRL.
It’s still a dysfunctional country, much is the pity. Physical beautiful though, a land of extremes. iIwent to a primary school in Madang on the north coast. While we were sweltering in the coastal humidity, you could look out the window to the snow-capped peak of Mt.Wilhelm (twice as high as Mt.Kosciusko) in the far distance.
April 6th 2009 @ 4:35pm
Midfielder said | April 6th 2009 @ 4:35pm | Report comment
Sheek
Clive Palmer has offered to fully fund a PNG team..
April 6th 2009 @ 4:35pm
oikee said | April 6th 2009 @ 4:35pm | Report comment
April 6th 2009 @ 4:36pm
Waterboy said | April 6th 2009 @ 4:36pm | Report comment
Forget Perth at this stage, another Brisbane team should be the additional licence to go with the Bears. If you can get a Sydney team to relocate to Brisbane, all the better.
What about the Brisbane Bulldogs? They have played home games out of Suncorp a number of times, and the Dogs no longer have a traditional home ground to play out of like Leichardt or Jubilee. Their junior base as dwindle and their generous Leagues Club can just as easily assist in financing them at a new location ( ala wests Ashfield). The name is a great fit, and they are the antipathy of the Broncos ( knock ‘em down drag them out side as opposed to the glamourous Broncs).
Brisbane is only going to get bigger both population-wise and commercially through this century, they should jump on board.
Another Auckland side and Perth to come in later.
April 6th 2009 @ 4:38pm
Midfielder said | April 6th 2009 @ 4:38pm | Report comment
Waterboy
This is to annoy Col… what about the Eagle Rock at Bluetounge they are having a bit of trouble right now…
April 6th 2009 @ 4:39pm
Col the Bear said | April 6th 2009 @ 4:39pm | Report comment
well let the fun begin..Central Coast Bears.. Vote 1.