
Cameron Stokes of Hawthorn kicks for goal chased by Paul Bevan (front) and Jarred MvVeigh (rear) of Sydney during the AFL Round 02 match between the Sydney Swans and the Hawthorn Hawks at ANZ Stadium. Slattery Images
How many would show up? That was the critical question as Hawthorn headed north for their first visit to ANZ Stadium and the Sydney Swans faced the same old questions about their ability, their supporter base, and their standing in Sydney’s fickle market.
Fickle is the best way to describe the Sydney sporting market: like a roller coaster, the peaks and troughs of crowd support are extreme.
With a long history of trying to cement their position in the home of rugby, the Sydney Swans now must re-assure fans that their best days aren’t behind them, that the days of consecutive Grand Final appearances and flags are still realistic goals.
With the dip in form following their premiership success, Swans membership numbers this season are down by around 6,000 on last year’s figure and the club reported a $800,000 loss for 2008.
The ravens that hover over the Swans use such statistics to point to the inability of the club to cement themselves in the heart of Sydney, especially in light of the ongoing discussions over the sustainability of a second Sydney team based out in the city’s expansive western suburbs.
But the Swans have made significant head way since the fledgling and dark times of financial struggle and on-field capitulations of the late eighties and early nineties.
33,116 turned up to ANZ Stadium Saturday night, a very healthy crowd.
The crowd was rewarded with a brilliant performance from the home team, who nullified the Hawks threat, albeit a Hawks team missing several of its key premiership players.
In typical Sydney fashion, it was the veterans, Adam Goodes, Barry Hall and Brett Kirk who led from the front. Whether these aging players can keep that form going for the remainder of the season remains to be seen.
But what of the time when players like these are forced into retirement? Success is critical for the Swans, perhaps more so than other clubs.
The Swans can’t afford laborious and lengthy rebuilding phases. The fans would simply turn away in droves. Look at Sydney FC crowd figures last season as a point of reference.
Hence the over-reliance on established stars traded in from other teams throughout the Swans recent history: think Barry Hall, Tony Lockett, Dermott Brereton and Paul Roos.
In the build up to the match against Hawthorn, Paul Roos cleverly played up the ability of Buddy Franklin, achieving two goals: deflecting the attention away from his own team and their round one capitulation, and putting the pressure squarely on his opponents, while also stressing to the Sydney public to get out and see one of the games’ champions.
He knew the media’s focus would be on the crowd the Swans could generate at ANZ Stadium and he played it brilliantly. It was PR spin worthy of a politician.
Roos is the best person to lead the Swans. He understands the Sydney market and its unique features.
The Swans streak of six straight seasons of finals football was widely tipped to come to an end this season with its ageing squad. After the performance against the Hawks, a seventh consecutive finals appearance isn’t beyond reach.
This is a necessity, such is the dilemma of the Swans.
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- AFL, Sydney Swans

April 7th 2009 @ 2:16pm
Millster said | April 7th 2009 @ 2:16pm | Report comment
Not so related to anything but it was cool to see Adam Goodes and others enjoying the recent Socceroos game against the Uzbeks, having a beer and chatting with some fans coming up to them all the while decked out in the green and gold.
April 7th 2009 @ 2:18pm
Kurt said | April 7th 2009 @ 2:18pm | Report comment
I’m not so sure about the conventional wisdom that says the Swans can’t afford a rebuilding phase where they ‘bottom out’. I’m not a Sydney local but I did live there for a couple of years back in the 90s and from my experience for something to be successful there it needs to be seen as fresh, new and exciting. We Melburnians like our culture with a bit of grime and history attached, but in Sydney seems to be much more faddish – and I don’t necessarily say that as a put down. So in 93 the Swans were playing in front of crowds so low when I used to call the SCG and ask what time the game was due to start they would ask ‘well what time can you get here?’ (haha yes an old one I know but appropriate for the Swans of those years). Then in 96 with Plugger in form they were packing out the SCG most weeks. Then of course with their premiership side of the mid noughties they were attracting great crowds again, but now with the same old faces (as good as Kirk, Hall and co have been) and the same old defensive game plan they are very much yesterday’s story. Meanwhile the Waratahs seem to have gone through a similar period of being fashionable and come out the other side, Sydney FC had their year in the sun (although I know it is tough to judge a 3 year old club) and the socceroos are now the cool ticket in town.
So perhaps for the Swans to become really popular again, they actually need to spend some time out of the limelight, rebuild a young team with some fresh faces and burst onto the scene once more. Perhaps this is too simplistic a view, but I would be interested in what other current Sydney residents might think.
April 7th 2009 @ 2:27pm
Redb said | April 7th 2009 @ 2:27pm | Report comment
If you look at the 19,000 crowd for the Swans final last year, the 33,000 is a 70% increase over Christmas, New Year, Valentines Day and Pancake Tuesday – what a turn around
Swans have a niche and will do pretty well at the SCG with the redevelopment over and sooon good games, particularly the mighty Bombers. Crowds of between 25,000 and 30,000 on a regular basis are very acceptable.
They do need to rebuild though or else they’ll have a Carlton like experience at the bottom of the well sucking dirt for a few years.
Redb
April 7th 2009 @ 5:47pm
Bryan Ferrie said | April 7th 2009 @ 5:47pm | Report comment
Everyone who is interested in AFL in Sydney went to the Swans game. Problem is that left no tv audience and that is what pays for sport in the 21st century not bums on seats.
April 7th 2009 @ 7:01pm
megatron said | April 7th 2009 @ 7:01pm | Report comment
Were the TV ratings bad?
April 7th 2009 @ 8:04pm
Redb said | April 7th 2009 @ 8:04pm | Report comment
about 100,000 – which is average for the Swans. Hardly no-one, but nothing special. Swans a have a good niche in the market, better than most expansion teams from other codes.
Redb
April 7th 2009 @ 8:12pm
Woody Warambel said | April 7th 2009 @ 8:12pm | Report comment
Sydney TV Rating for Saturday night:
Sydney comparisons between 7:30pm-10:30pm
Ten
Saturday Night AFL 97,000
Average 97,000
ABC1
New Tricks Rpt 309,000
ABC News Up-Date 161,000
The Bill ABC1 242,000
Silent Witness Rpt 109,000
Average 205,250
Seven
Kath & Kim 243,000
The Vicar Of Dibley 258,000
M-Flightplan Seven 214,000
Average 238,333
Nine
Just Friends 213,000
Prime -Rpt 166,000
Average 189,500
SBS
Mythbusters 102,000
Iron Chef, The 125,000
Rockwiz Rpt SBS 75,000
Average 100,666
http://www.mediaspy.org/forum/index.php?s=6309964a509f8d00f2d969077286ebe1&showtopic=17036
April 7th 2009 @ 8:27pm
Redb said | April 7th 2009 @ 8:27pm | Report comment
Melb Storm TV ratings in Melbourne ….. zero. crowd? not even 12,000.
Redb
April 7th 2009 @ 8:32pm
Sam said | April 7th 2009 @ 8:32pm | Report comment
Red B
I am wondering which sport you despise more: rugby league or football?
April 7th 2009 @ 8:50pm
Waterboy said | April 7th 2009 @ 8:50pm | Report comment
Here is a story for you guys trumpeting the Swans crowd and their popularity in Sydney.
A friends brother had his mate tape some AFL show on Foxtel. He watched it 24 hrs later and during the show they said they were giving away 100 Swans tickets to the Hawthorn game. He thought “damn I wish I knew yesterday when the show was on” but decided to ring up anyway.
Answer from Foxtel, “plenty left, we’ll send them straight out to you”.
Struggling to get rid of the freebies…