There were two plangent moments during the ACT Brumbies – Stormers match, an emotional event that will become known as one won for Shawn Mackay, rather in the Notre Dame tradition of winning ‘one for the Gipper.’
First, instead of a minute’s silence for Mackay there was a minute’s heartfelt applause which continued on for more than 60 seconds. This was a touching and relevant way to farewell a player who simply loved rugby, from playing it, to practicing it relentlessly (apparently his bleep tests were phenomenal) and to coaching the World Champions Australian Women’s Sevens side as a self-described ‘one of the girls.’
Second, after Patrick Phibbs scored the match-winning try for the Brumbies late in the second half he looked up to the heavens as he ran back to the Brumbies half, there were tears in his eyes, as he made his ‘this one was for you Macca.’
Phibbs was close to Mackay. They were part of a very good Waverley First XV in 1999. The side also included Stephen Hoiles and Morgan Turinui.
As it happened I live close to Queens Park where Waverley play their rugby. In 1999 I made my way there to see the home side play St Joseph’s. One of the Waverley coaches strolled across to me and said: ‘Watch our inside centre. He’s a great talent.’
The inside centre was Turinui. He played splendidly and scored, from memory, a couple of tries as Waverley defeated Joeys (I think).
The point is that Mackay was probably playing that day. And while the best of his team-mates still have years to go in their professional careers, he’s been taken away from us.
My ancestors, the ancient Greeks, explained the seemingly unexplainable of why some people die young with the parable of Achilles who was given the choice of a long and boring life or a short and vivid life. Achilles chose to seize the day. In a sense, Mackay will be forever young in the memory of his friends. Whenever we think of him it will be the image of him striding towards the tryline in his Australian Sevens colours, looking somewhat like a runaway Viking …
On to rugby, now. The Brumbies lifted their points on the table to 22, with six teams in front of them and two others, the Crusaders and the Highlanders also on 22 point.
The Brumbies are only 5 points behind the fourth-placed Waratahs who like the Sharks (on 30 points) are the only teams in the top nine who are yet to have their bye.
The Brumbies were helped by one piece of really dumb play by Shalke Burger. Late in the match Burger was charging towards the Brumbies tryline, about 10m out and with only Mark Gerrard (who had missed Jean de Villiers in a similar situation earlier in the game0 to beat.
Burger put in a chip kick! Gerrard could hardly believe his eyes. There was no one chasing the kick and even if they had the dead-ball area at Bruce Stadium is designed for the thin rugby league format.
With minutes from time the Stormers had a penalty from about 40m out. One of the threads on The Roar is critical of the Stormers for taking the penalty shot. But on reflection this was the right decision. The points were actually there on offer to take. There was still time to score a try, if the kick was successful, to win the match in the same manner of the Hurricanes in the last play of their match against the hapless Western Force.
As it happened, Peter Grant, missed the penalty and the theorising became academic. There is talk of Grant being offered a job with the Force next year. Say it isn’t so, John Mitchell. How can Australian rugby develop five-eighths if overseas players take the position from locals?
The Force as it happened did everything to win their match against the Hurricanes, except actually win it. They scored four tries to three. They led by 11 points with about 10 minutes to play.
Then the Hurricanes kicked a penalty. Shortly afterwards they scored a try and Willie Ripia took a lot of time to ensure he converted. This meant that with only a minute or so remaining, the Hurricanes had to score a try (but not a converted try) to win.
The Force rather conveniently gave away a full-arm penalty. Again Ripia was precise with his kick. From a lineout just inside the Force’s 22 the Hurricanes smashed forward and then released Corey Jane, a neat stepper to cut inside Nathan Sharpe to score the try their season needed.
The tournament is so close that if the Force had won they would have been on 23 points and only 4 points behind the Waratahs (with their bye round still open).
The Reds scored a try virtually from the kick-off against the Highlanders. For about an hour their backs looked like ripping the Highlanders apart every time they got the ball. Unfortunately, that was not often enough.
The Reds have to learn that expansive rugby depends on tough, grinding, ball-winning rugby from the forwards.
Then towards the end of the match they started to rely on Digby Ioane for every attack. The Highlander double-teamed him and the breaks he made so effortlessly in the first half dried up.
At the end of the match the Reds needed a try to snatch a victory that should have been there’s if they had played a smart game. The whistle sounded as they were awarded a penalty on the halfway mark. They had no option but to run the ball. But on the second phase Mark McLinden, who played pretty well aside from this mistake, grubber kicked the ball down field where is was joyfully taken in and belted over the touchline.
Why did McLinden put in this kick? James Horwill, after the game, conceded that the wrong option was taken. My feeling is that McLinden was in his rugby league mode. Did he feel that play would be over when the next tackle was made?
Or perhaps he’s being watching too much of the Waratahs who have definitely caught the kickitis disease. I talked with a noted rugby man before the Waratahs match and he told me that the level of skill of the players was incredibly low.
‘Why don’t they practice the skills at training?’ I asked.
He shrugged his shoulders.
At the beginning of the game against the Bulls, the Waratahs made a succession of mistakes that endorsed the criticism of their skills deficiency. Then Ben Mowen broke away. He only had to draw the fullback and pass to the winger for a certain try.
The pass was not given. Mowen was tackled ball and all. Miraculously, however, the Waratahs won the ruck and seconds later there was Mowen with the ball and charging into the Bulls 22 with virtually no defence to beat.
And what does he do? He kicks. Can someone explain to me why fast monsters like Mowen and Burger try a fancy kick near the tryline instead of barging through, over or around a flimsy defence to score?
I got rang up after the game and told: ‘After that terrible display by Waratahs, you’ve got to admit that the ELVs are ruining rugby.’
I told the caller that the opposite was the case. The rugby over the weekend was exciting and generally skillful, EXCEPT for the Waratahs. And the proof of that contention was the final match of the round when the last-placed Cheetahs thrillingly demolished the top-placed Sharks.
The Cheetahs did it with some terrific rugby. Their lineout, particularly, and their scrum were solid. Their loose forwards were everywhere, making tackles, winning the ball and then making charges that threatened to over-run the Stormers, which happened at the end.
Best of all, though, was the way the Cheetahs moved the ball along the line with a sequence of thrilling and menacing backline movements. The two flyers on the wings, Jonji Nokwe and Bjorn Busson, scored three tries between them and exposed the limited, defense-oriented, break-out game that has so far taken the Sharks to the top of the table.
The other aspect of this game that I found intriguing is that Nathan Pearce, the young Australian referee had a splendid game. Three times in the first four phases of play by the Cheetahs he warned the Sharks to move back to behind the last feet in the ruck.
With the Sharks about half a metre further back than what they’ve been allowed this season, the Cheetahs were able to get their wide game going, something that other opponents of the Sharks haven’t been able to do.
Without pushing this matter of non-neutral referees too much, it was interesting that Stuart Dickinson started to hand out full-arm penalties to the Western Force towards the end of their match against the Hurricanes for continual infringement at the ruck and maul.
This was something he did not do when the Waratahs played the Hurricanes at the beginning of the tournament at Wellington and conceded 19 short arm penalties and only a warning about a future long-arm penalty.
The Waratahs crowd, too, after having Dickinson and James Leckie refereeing two home matches against the Chiefs and the Highlanders (both won by the Waratahs) did not enjoy Jonathan Kaplan, an excellent South African referee, handling the match Bulls.
To be fair, though, to the crowd, it was sometimes difficult to work out if the booing was for the referee or for the Waratahs. If it was for the Waratahs, it was well-deserved.
If they want to be title-contenders they have to start playing title-winning rugby, which means more skills and brainpower being applied, and much less kicking.
Are they capable of this type of rugby? If the bottom team in the competition can play so exuberantly and aggressively, surely one of the top teams can do so as well.
Next Saturday’s match against the Force which is to be played at the Sydney Football Stadium (where a run of 11 straight victories for the Waratahs is now over) could provide an answer to the riddle of the Waratahs on why they are so high on the table when they are playing ordinary rugby.
- Brumbies V Stormers team huddle, photo by Darrell Wallace
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
- Explore:






Graham said | April 13th 2009 @ 9:05am | Report comment
Love your commentary on rugby normally – but Kaplan is incompetent. The statistics for win/lose for his matches with the Waratahs and Wallabies, in comparison to their overall win/lose record show that his bias (I personally don’t think it is – I just think he’s clueless) is statistically significant. Hence, I can say with confidence that he is either a cheat, or he has an incompetent bias. What else would explain his win/lose ratio being so different to the average? His display on Saturday night was mistake ridden and the crowd also thought so. Ultimately if a referee is not able to explain to a player or team why they have just been penalised twice in a row in the scrum, then they do not deserve to be there. He’s a pedantic referee that scores well on the IRB system of refereeing incompetence, but he stuffs up the game by calling the ball out when it isn’t etc etc. I could go on…
LeftArmSpinner said | April 13th 2009 @ 9:24am | Report comment
Spiro, I had to reach for the dictionary for “Plangent”. You learn something new every day. Thanks.
Thanks also for the wonderful piece on Shawn Mackay. As a former Wicks player, (Starting in Bob Outerside’s GF winning team U9B’s in 1966) and born and bred in Randwick, I watched Shawn play his rugby and admired his achievements, primarily from the reports of the ABC commentary team when he turned out for the Wicks. They spoke generously of the man, and less about the player. He achieved so much in such a short period of time. If only more of our 26 y.o. elite players put back into the game in the way Shawn did with things like the Womens 7′s. They would be so much better off, as people.
The Tahs and the force? Where do I start? The Force played like an U9 B team, without a coach or manager, or anyone who could count….. Sure the canes kept coming and deserve praise for that, but the force lost it.
The Tahs: Spiro, you and I agree. they are capable but are not playing try scoring rugby and cannot expect to achieve anything in the long term, once all factors, (such as the Bye and daunting SA trip) are determined.
It is embarrassing and hard to fathom, that the coaching staff have not learnt from last year’s similar tactics for the first 6 or so games, until Burgess and more expansive tactics arrived.
The Tahs ignore the fundamentals of rugby, no matter the laws in force at the time. You need to score tries. The points system rewards it and the players enjoy it more and develop confidence as a result. And of course, the spectators and TV audiences, who ultimately pay the bills, want and deserve it. I find it insulting that this ignorance has been allowed to continue for so long.
Why go and recruit backs whose strength is in attack, and then not use them.?
I can only conclude that neither Chris Hickey or the invisible Wisemantel don’t have the courage to play such a game. Fortune Favours the Brave. Lets hear from Wisemantel, get him to justify the tactics and the lack of results………..
Knives Out said | April 13th 2009 @ 9:33am | Report comment
“How can Australian rugby develop five-eighths if overseas players take the position from locals?”
Probably in the same way they have done for years. The selection of Daniel Braid has in no way hindered the openside stocks and neither will a foreign fly half at the Force hinder the progress of Giteau, Cooper or Beale. Four teams is more than enough develop good players. If foreign players are to be brought in the key is talent identification. Peter Grant would not be a worthwhile signing, a top tier test fly half would. In any case, how does Australian rugby expect to develop younger players if it is so quick to ignore the veteran player? Why exactly is the ARU content for Scott Fava to trot about doing very little and yet Phil Waugh is not worth keeping? The same argument is surely consolidated when one recalls that Chris Latham and Justin Harrison never wanted to leave Super rugby.
WheresTheBloodySideline said | April 13th 2009 @ 10:28am | Report comment
On the Brumbies, it was a good win and a fine way acknowledge their lost mate. But…apart from the close scoreline and some of Gerard’s work, the game was difficult to watch. I’ve been waiting for Lealiifano to achieve his potential, but now I’m wondering if he actually has any. A kicking game in the conditions was warranted, but he continually kicks short and puts his defence under unnecessary pressure.
On the Waratahs, I just can’t believe how dumb they play. They must have absolutely no football brains out there at all. Time and again, the good work of their forwards is frittered away with aimless kicks. Counter-attack is never considered. Tahu refuses to pass the ball until he’s wrapped up. He will cause no trouble to any defence playing like this and his wingers are wasted. Why doesn’t Lote give him a shove in the back a la SNK? I really feel sorry for the NSW forwards. they are consistently as good as any other pack in the S14.
Harry said | April 13th 2009 @ 10:32am | Report comment
Knives Out its quite simple … the rich European clubs aren’t queing up to pay big money for journeyman (at best) Fava, but someone the quality of Waugh attracts big bucks … apparently his co Tahs flanker Elsom has been terriffic value for Leinster this year, even at 3/4s of a million bucks (thats more than the average Wallaby earns).
Knives Out said | April 13th 2009 @ 10:44am | Report comment
I know that Harry, but the ARU aren’t willing to top up the contracts of the elder players because they don’t think it in the interests of Australian rugby. That’s madness. It isn’t in the interests of Australian rugby to have Fava taking up a playing spot. The Elsom debacle and their failure to get him to sign a contract sums up the ARU.
ohtani's jacket said | April 13th 2009 @ 11:28am | Report comment
“I got rang up after the game and told: ‘After that terrible display by Waratahs, you’ve got to admit that the ELVs are ruining rugby.’
I told the caller that the opposite was the case.”
Spiro! You’re in denial. You ought to listen to your friends or perhaps your fellow columnists on rugby heaven. Even if the opposite were the case, nobody’s watching.
There was an excellent article in the NZ Herald recently by the guy who was the NZRU’s Commercial and Marketing Director when Super Rugby was conceived. He compares the current situation to the crisis in ’95 that gave birth to Super rugby.
I sincerely hope that you start advocating some changes.
Cliff Bishkek said | April 13th 2009 @ 12:13pm | Report comment
All of the above is interesting. I am sitting here in Kabul and had the chance on the weekend to watch all of the Aussie Super 14 teams play. And I agree with the “Noted Rugby Man” in Spiro’s article — where are the skills?
In all games, irrespective of ElV’s or go back to the original – the skills of running rugby are the same – take the ball up, and continue to ruck the ball forward until the backs are ready – do it fast and simple – and openings will occur – then release the backs – ball to the wingers – kick only when in trouble.
But there are 2 MAJOR flaws – 1. REFEREES – (i) Keep the defending team “BEHIND” the last foot/boot in the ruck and this will stop a lot of the problems at the ruck; (ii) When a man lays over the ball or does not roll away – penalise – I do not care if short-arm of full-arm – peanlsie and after a TEAM does it 2 times – YELLOW CARD – but after a WARNING from the Referee.
If these rules are enforced in accordance with good refereeing and the laws – the game will improve.
Now the other FLAW — 2. SKILLS — On the weekend the skills were atrocious and I mean the forwards. Why do forwards try to pass in impossible posiitons or kick. I was always taught that when a forward makes a break he looks for support and aims to stand in the ruck or fall in a posiiton to allow his team the advantage. Another ruck and set up plays. On the weekend, forwards passing the ball to people in a worse position or passing from impossible positions where the ball going to hand is a 50/50 or less chance of being taken.
The BASICS of Rugby have not changed. Australian Teams have played running rugby (ELVs style rugby) for years – GRAND SLAM in the 80s. Forget the rules – keep it simple and basic and the teams can do it. BUT without the proper skills, it will not happen.
For my mind the prolbem with Australian Rugby at the moment is SKILLS and the applicaiton of same.
Mr Grumpy said | April 13th 2009 @ 12:37pm | Report comment
Spiro, more and more followers of the game feel the new laws have made the game worse.
The interview with Fourie de Preez in the Tahs-Bulls match program was a possible indicator of what players from South Africa think of the ELVs.
“I like the five metres rule from the scrum but the lineouts are a bit of mess because of the numbers rule. The rule governing kicking out of the 22 should be scrapped. Teams should have the option of kicking directly into touch or keeping the ball in play.”
“My main gripe is the free kick at ruck time. It disrupts the flow of the game because there are more free kicks than there would have been penalties because the sanction for an infringement doesn’t cost you points.”
“The lawmakers want a quick game, but they inadvertently give a team permission to slow the play down by awarding free kicks for ruck infringements. It doesn’t make sense.”
The Bulls made the Tahs look very ordinary on Saturday, though the skills’ level of NSW was atrocious.
With the Sydney Swans playing Carlton before the Tahs this Saturday, maybe NSW fans will decide to watch the AFL?!?
They will see at least a better display of kicking.
LeftArmSpinner said | April 13th 2009 @ 1:46pm | Report comment
As the Yanks say, “Do the math.”
Compare a full arm penalty to a free kick.
The penalty kick comes resplendent with a delay for the kicker to get the ball, tak few steadying steps, then a kick for touch, players getting to the lineout, then into position, then a call by the Hooker and then the ball comes back into play, but not on all occasions because there are multiple infringements possible, not least of which is the throw being crooked.
A free kick comprises fetching the ball, a quick tap and off we go again, ball in hand at a partially set defensive line. You should get over the gain line and the defenders have to come into the next ruck from through the gate, conceding more territory. the further the incursion, the more defenders out of the defensive line. good. it favours the team on attack who have got over the precious gain line.
Yes, they can be tweaked. Cynical play should get a yellow so that players dont abuse the less penalties around the ruck. Give the NH back the rolling maul, but with a way of the defence stopping it, other than crowd displeasure and boredom!!!