For credibility’s sake, give us neutral umpires

The Collingwood cheer squad berate the boundary umpire during the AFL Round 15 match between the Geelong Cats and Colingwood Magpies at the MCG. Slattery Images
The AFL needs to act urgently to introduce neutral umpires for all matches. I was staggered, after being an interested follower of a discussion on The Roar last week about the perceived imbalance of free kicks in games involving Sydney, to discover that no fewer than 20 of the 28 field umpires listed in the league’s official guidebook are based in Victoria.
Yes, that’s right: more than 70 per cent of the men in control of a supposedly national competition come from one of the five states involved.
Of the remaining eight, four are from Western Australia, three from South Australia and one from Tasmania, with none from either Queensland or NSW.
One of the Victorian umpires did spend some time serving an “apprenticeship” in the AFLQ before being appointed to the AFL panel, and another began his career in Tasmania before moving to Victoria more than a decade ago.
This is an outrageous situation.
Let’s be clear, nobody is suggesting any umpire consciously cheats.
But that’s not the point – it’s all about perception, a vital factor when it comes to gaining and keeping the confidence of the people who fork out good money week after week in the hope that their team will get a fair go.
It’s an undeniable fact that young Victorians who end up being umpires have almost invariably spent their childhoods barracking for one of the (too) many teams in their home state.
And with the belief that the only true home of the code is Victoria – an attitude they must find hard to overcome, no matter how hard they try, when they get control of a whistle at the highest level.
This is an area that other football codes have addressed successfully.
Soccer has neutral referees for all meaningful international matches, so if Australia is playing Qatar in a World Cup qualifier the ref could be from somewhere like India, Iran or Singapore.
An even more stringent policy is the order of the day for international tournaments like the World Cup finals, where the officials must come from a different confederation from the two teams involved.
Rugby union events like the Six Nations and the Super 14 also have neutral referees, and even in Sydney-centric rugby league, Queensland refs have been used going back as far as, and even further than, the late lamented “Grasshopper”, Barry Gomersall.
The AFL will no doubt say there are two reasons it can’t use neutral umpires – it will say there aren’t enough of them of the required standard outside Victoria, and it will bleat about the extra expense involved in sending umpires from Sydney or Brisbane to Perth or Adelaide.
If the first of those two arguments is true there is only one place to lay the blame, and that’s with the AFL itself.
And as for the second, it’s rubbish.
The AFL is a big enough, and, as it continues to remind us, wealthy enough, organisation to overcome both these hurdles, with training programs for the first, and an adjustment of spending priorities, and/or appropriate sponsorship, for the second.
Games between teams from Victoria and South Australia need to be umpired by officials from WA, SA, Queensland and NSW, and so on.
The only time Victorians should officiate in matches involving interstate teams is when they’re playing each other, such as Adelaide v Sydney or Brisbane v Fremantle.
Until that happens the perception will remain, regardless of the reality, that it’s Victoria v the rest, rather than a truly national competition.
Particularly while the AFL persists in its stubborn refusal to include a Tasmanian team, instead leaving the state off the agenda, just as it has been regularly left off maps of Australia for countless years.
Meanwhile, back at the ranch, so to speak, two pertinent things emerged from round three – St Kilda might at last have become a credible contender, although I’m still reserving judgment until closer to the business end of the season; and Richmond’s terrier-like first quarter exposed some glaring deficiencies in the Western Bulldogs’ structure, although the Tigers didn’t have the skills or the endurance to go on with it for the rest of the match.
- Explore:
- AFL

April 14th 2009 @ 6:46am
Kurt said | April 14th 2009 @ 6:46am | Report comment
I’m sorry Bruce but what an absolute joke. 70% of field umpires come from Victoria? Oh my God that’s a shocking statistic, I mean it’s not like the majority of teams come from Victoria is it? Your comparison with soccer and rugby internationals is completely spurious as these are representative competitions. A better comparison would be a club competition like the EPL – do they really get concerned that the referee in a match between Arsenal and Man U must be from the Midlands rather than London or the North West? I suspect not.
April 14th 2009 @ 7:29am
Redb said | April 14th 2009 @ 7:29am | Report comment
I think the premise behind this article is unfair, the AFL cannot just conjure umpires out of thin air to suit some perceived bias.
The other point is that Victorian umpires are more likely to be biased against certain Victorian teams than any of the interstate clubs. In line with the lack of spirit behind AFL State of Origin most of us couldn’t give a rats about the clubs from other states.
Beating Carlton on the other hand, now that is important.
Redb
April 14th 2009 @ 12:55pm
Gruffalo said | April 14th 2009 @ 12:55pm | Report comment
Redb
The general attitude of VICs to the Swans is that their succes is due to massive favours that other (i.e. Victorian) clubs never had. Of course, this is rubbish because the Swans had to stat in the early 80′s against 2 rugby vodes at their strongest – and now face the attarction of a resurgent soccer.
It doesn’t help when the head of the AFL sledges them publicly – in the year they won the 05 flag. It doesn’t help when officials accuse Paul Roos of tanking a pre-season game OR charging Brett Kirk with umpire contact.
The exposure of this attitude, cemented by the media, will of course be in the psyche of umpires.
But, statistics bear it out. Typically, the most penalised teams in a season will the under-performers, where ill-discpline arises when skills and fitness are found wanting. In the Swans’s case, they were arguably one of the most successful clubs in the last 5 years YET have been the most penalised clubs by the umpires EVERY YEAR FOR 5 YEARS. Even as the hardest at the ball and best tacklers, they never gained the deserved rewards for such play in holding the ball frees.
The answer? I believe the umpires sub-consciously focus on the Swans and ensure that they get away with nothing. This means that, in any cointest, there is a greater possibility that the Swans will be penalised than the opposition.
In 05 and 06, the Swans could deal with this and overcome the additonal possession and sings against them in momentum. Nowadays, they are older and slower – still competitive – but umpires will cost them many more games than in years gone by.
Watch this week. Call me Nostradamus. Good contest – but the umps will protect Judd all game and Fevola will get at least 3 goals from soft frees. Meanwhile, Barry Hall will be held all game, double-teamed, and get one free kick with a minute to go during “even up” time. swans will fight back and lose by 2 goals. Roos will come out and say “we need to be harder” meaning “we’ve been ripped off again”.
April 14th 2009 @ 1:14pm
Redb said | April 14th 2009 @ 1:14pm | Report comment
Gruff,
This is your view and your entitled to it. I just think people read too much into umpiring decisions. When I’m at a game though hate the biased bastards as well.
The Swans are many Victorians second team, for years they were the first club to have games telecast live (1980s). We all grew up watching the Swans in Melbourne. Most Melb people were pleased to see them win in 2005 – a great GF.
However, the Swans have received significant favours in the form of increased salary cap and draft concessions, not to mention being propped up by the AFL financially in their lean years. All facts I have no problem with as most fans of the game want a viable Sydney team in the comp.
Barry Hall and Brendan Fevola would compare notes on how many free kicks they miss out on. Some forwards, read the more aggresive ones tend have to work very hard to free kicks. Most should just get on with it, the laws of the game have made it far easier in recent years for forwards with rules like ‘hands in the back’, no chopping of arms,etc
The Swans playing style gets them into trouble with hard tackling bottle them up type games, I admit I find them hard to watch. They do play an ugly style of football – watch Geelong and even Essendon if you want to see free flowing attacking Australian Rules footy at its best. The emphasis on tackles and creating stoppages creates more umpiring decisions and if players like Kieran Jack can’t adapt to the AFL tackle that’s not the umps fault.
It is well known that Adam Goodes is a protected species, a former Brownlow medallist and ump favourite. Some of his cowardly bumps should got weeks a couple of years ago, instead he got a slap on the wrist.
I will be watching the Swans V Blues game – you’ll have to catch Chris Judd – he gets free kicks becuase often the only way to stop him is against the rules, he’s that good. (and that is from an Essendon supporter).
Redb
April 14th 2009 @ 2:09pm
Gruffalo said | April 14th 2009 @ 2:09pm | Report comment
Redb
As an essendon supporter, you would never have experienced what Swans fans have to put up with. The comparison between the treatment Swans forwards get compared to Matthew Lloyd is laughable.
I remember Telstra Dome for Round 1 Swans v Essendon 2006 or 2007. Lloyd got more free kicks within 30 metres of goal in the first 2 quarters than Barry Hall got in 4 years. It was so bad it was laughable.
but, that is what Interstate supporters see. Essendon and North Melbourne will usually be guaranteed the lion share of possession and momentum because tbey will always get the rub of the green.
Many Swans fans still rue the 2nd half of the 06 grand final where the swans mounted a magnificent fightback, created their own momentum – but, despite the West Coast trying to shut them down, received no frees, soft or otherwise. It deprived them of arguably the greatest fightback in AFL/VFL history.
April 14th 2009 @ 2:26pm
Redb said | April 14th 2009 @ 2:26pm | Report comment
Gruff,
Heard it all before. Lloydy earns his free kicks. No doubt a player’s rep makes it harder for them in the umpires eyes, becuase so often they have transgressed and been reported.
What is laughable is your assertion than Essendon win games gifted by umpires. We got the rub of the green on Saturday night but that was also because were were first to the ball with eyes only for the ball.
I can rattle off many games where the ump has got it wrong in Essendon games.
Redb
April 14th 2009 @ 2:55pm
BigAl said | April 14th 2009 @ 2:55pm | Report comment
CREDIBILITY !!!!???
Bruce . . . your volunteered info. on this blog that you havn’t attended an AFL game since ’98 (or was it ’96?) does nothing for yours here !
April 14th 2009 @ 3:26pm
Kurt said | April 14th 2009 @ 3:26pm | Report comment
I’m quite staggered that any reasonable person would mount a case that their team is genuinely conspired against by the umpires. Like Redb there have been plenty of times during a game when I’ve been convinced the umps are out to get my team, but upon reflection after the game this
As for the Swans, the reasons they get penalised more than other teams is pretty simple – their game plan is based upon generating stoppages and putting immense physical pressure on the opposition ball carriers, then relying on their highly efficient forwards to kick winning scores from liniited opportunities. That’s a game style that will always carry the risk of plenty of frees against for holding the ball, in the back etc and that is a risk that the Swans coaching staff have always been happy to take. No point having a big sook about it when the inevitable happens and you lose a few games due to weight of free kicks – which to be fair Paul Roos rarely does.
And please Gruffalo, realise that the only reason Chris Judd is protected is because he is a genuine ball player who like Redb says is so good that his tagger normally has to break the rules to stop him.
April 14th 2009 @ 3:58pm
Greg Russell said | April 14th 2009 @ 3:58pm | Report comment
I think Bruce is correct but I feel he fails to deal with Redb’s practical point that “the AFL cannot just conjure umpires out of thin air to suit some perceived bias.”
Just sending some Victorians to live in Sydney and Brisbane will not immediately change their innate biases, although I guess after several years these biases may be significantly diminished.
Similarly, I cannot see how it would be possible to develop top umpires in Sydney and Brisbane, simply because there is not a high enough level of competition there. (It is for the same reason that New Zealand, where I live, cannot get its best referees into the NRL.)
Finally, there is the solution of sending the best young umpires from Sydney and Brisbane to “finishing school” in Melbourne for several years. But this involves investing a lot of money into such aspiring umpires to finance their relocation to Melbourne (as opposed to them living in Melbourne and paying for their own development), and then hoping that most of them do develop into top-level umpires (a big if), so that there is a return on investment.
I do not see an obvious solution here. Probably the first one (transplanting some of the many Victorians) is the best.
April 14th 2009 @ 4:31pm
Pu Ti Klahc said | April 14th 2009 @ 4:31pm | Report comment
Bruce, first things first. I am just wondering, have you ever been involved in umpiring at any level?
I agree completely with Kurt in saying that you are comparing the AFL to a International Competitions rather than other domestic leagues which makes those points irrelevant.
I am heavily involved in umpiring in Queensland and have been for 6 or so years. I have also been apart of the junior development programs at times. Although they have only been running over the past 4 or 5 years these development programs are very good and are improving and becoming more professional each year. However it will take time. At the moment there is just no-one that is up to AFL standard umpiring in Queensland. But when there is, I am sure they will be in the AFL system.