‘Krazy’ Krejza’s crazy non-selection
Columnist
By Kersi Meher-Homji, 26 Apr 2009 Kersi Meher-Homji is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- Andy Ganteaume, Australian Cricket, Cricket, Jason Krejza
Australian bowler Jason Krejza, center, is congratulated by teammates Ricky Ponting, right, and Mike Hussey for dismissing Indian batsman Ishant Sharma, unseen, on the second day of the fourth and final cricket test match between India and Australia in Nagpur, India, Friday, Nov. 7, 2008. AP Photo/Gautam Singh
Is Jason ‘Krazy’ Krejza injured or kidnapped? I had asked this question on The Roar last fortnight. As I have not received an answer, I presume he is neither. He is forgotten by the selectors.
Strange, because he is a spinner and a spinner is what Australia needs.
Let’s go back to his Test debut in Nagpur in November 2008. He took 8-215 in the first innings and 4-143 in the second.
Expensive but effective. Especially because Indian batsmen are masters at flaying spinners.
To capture 12 wickets on one’s Test debut is rare. Only Australia’s Bob Massie and India’s Narendra Hirwani with 16 wickets each had better initiations in 1972 and in 1988, and England’s Frederick Martin had started off with 12 scalps way back in 1890.
Since the Nagpur debut Krejza has been selected in only one Test, against South Africa in Perth last December. Although expensive as an off-spinner, he batted well in both innings scoring an unbeaten 30 in the first knock and 32 in the second.
Krejza has yet to play in a one-day international.
He is not even a contracted player.
To be picked only once in a Test after a great initiation must be frustrating for him.
Such neglect by selectors reminds me of the sad tale of a West Indian opening batsman. In his only Test, against England six decades ago, he scored a century. And he was never selected in a Test again, believe it or not!
The Andy Ganteaume story defies logic. He was 27 when he scored a century on debut against England in the Port-of-Spain Test of February 1948. He is 88 now and still cannot explain why he was never again picked in a Test after scoring 112 in his only Test innings.
He retired a decade later with a Test batting average of 112.00, the only one to average higher than Don Bradman. It was a pleasure discussing Andy’s bitter-sweet moment with him, his memory razor sharp.
I asked him, “After such a dream start why were you never picked again in a Test?”
“I’ve asked this question to myself for 60 years and cannot get the answer. I was told that I had batted slowly, disregarding my captain’s orders. I disagree. When captain Gerry Gomez sent a note to us to bat faster, Frank Worrell told me to ignore it and said, ‘Let’s sun them [Englishmen] some more.’ ”
Worrell went on to become a legend while Ganteaume is a forgotten man.
“I ask anyone, could you imagine any player of the Establishment being dropped immediately after making a century in his first Test for batting slow?”, he continued. “Had I played the next Test and scored well, it would have been very difficult to bring back injured [regular opener] Jeff Stollmeyer with Geo Carew in brilliant form. It would have been embarrassing for them. Things got curious and curiouser. Them’s my sentiments.”
Krazy Krejza can echo Ganteaume’s sentiments.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Cricket articles
- What we do and don’t know about our Baggy Greens (112)
- Success of Twenty20 spells trouble for ODI cricket (106)
- Channel 9 commentators an annoyance this summer (99)
- Media should call stumps on Rodney Hogg (93)
- One Day Cricket is suffering from Middle Child Syndrome (89)
- Cricket Australia must take a stand against racist spectators (86)
- Dave’s Warner-ful switch-hit panned by precious critics (84)
- Hall of Fame for Indian legend Gavaskar
- Sri Lanka to target ‘weak’ Aussie bowlers
- India backing Rohit Sharma to find form
- Game-by-game preview of round 19
- Twenty20 cricket not up to the test
- Like father, like son: Alister McDermott on a fast track to the Test team
- Channel Nine unwise to snub sub-continent clash
- Twenty20 cricket not up to the test (0)
- Pakistan’s win over England a triumph of character (20)
- Steve Waugh is right about cricket’s succession plan (4)
- India vs Sri Lanka, Perth ODI: cricket live scores, commentary (180)
- Let’s talk about selection, Test fans (28)
- Pakistan win shows what’s beautiful about the game (12)
- Stats say Kallis is greatest of his generation (27)
- Explore:
- Andy Ganteaume, Australian Cricket, Cricket, Jason Krejza
david said | April 26th 2009 @ 12:06pm | Report comment
Perhaps he doesnt have the right connections.
drewster said | April 26th 2009 @ 2:48pm | Report comment
The Australian team has fair list of spin bowling casualties recently Beau Casson, White, Hauritz and McGain although none of these bowlers had the anywhere near the success of Krejza’s debut. He also injured his ankle prior to the Adelaide test this summer and his match figures of 1/204 in 49 overs in the WACA test would not have helped his cause. The selectors appear very reluctant to give a spinner a fair go and seem to have forgotten what figures a Mr S. Warne produced in his test debut 1/150 in 45 overs. Only the selectors in their “infinate wisdom” (Pardon the sarcasm) know why he has gone from wonderboy to forgotten man.
Timmuh said | April 26th 2009 @ 11:16pm | Report comment
He got tewlve wickets because India batted long enough and nobody else got any. And then he got belted by South Africa.
Maybe he will develop into a Test class spinner, at the moment he is raw and expensive. He should not be thrown into limited overs cricket, even at ListA level, as all this would do is entice him to bowl faster and flatter. He is an attacking spinner, if he is to become a Test bowler he needs to keep that instinct and learn a bit more about himself and the game. The short game could well ruin him, and he should be kept away from it until (unless) he develops for the game’s true form. There is promise, but he is far from a sure selection just yet.
Severian said | April 27th 2009 @ 1:21am | Report comment
Nice article, Kersi. Kreja needs to be persisted with. He doesn’t have the accuracy or the nouse yet, but he’s got natural dip and turn it, which makes him a potential test winning spinner.
Whoever they pick (Cameron White aside, because he’s not a spinner or a full time bowler), they need to stick with the guy and give him a chance to learn how to play at international level. I blame Ponting for a lot of this. Kreja is an attacking bowler, not a guy who will keep it tidy. You’ve got to use him like Stuart MacGill, not Peter Taylor.
Rickety Knees said | April 27th 2009 @ 12:25pm | Report comment
The Australian Cricket Selectors have much to answer for – not just Krejka. He needs now to just keep getting wickets, scoring runs and taking catches so that he demands selection.
Jameswm said | April 27th 2009 @ 4:12pm | Report comment
What the selectors also haven’t worked out is that Krejza would be a good one-day bowler, and they haven’t even given him a go.
They assume that Haritz is more acurate, so therefore more suited to one day bowling. Right?
I’d say wrong. Yes Krejzq does bowl too many long hops and full tosses at the moment, but in the one dayers you have men back protecting the boundaries, which you don’t have in the tests. And the attacking bowling – the extra dip and turn and general effort on the ball – picks up wickets in the one-dayers when they’re coming at you. In the tests they can wait for the loose one and even play out the odd maiden.
If this is obvious to me, a part time cricket thinker, why hasn’t it occurred to any of the selectors?
And I haven’t even mentioned yet how good his batting is.
Jameswm said | April 27th 2009 @ 4:14pm | Report comment
And I think the point needs to be made more strongly – in Krejza’s debut in India, the Indianbatsmen absolutely slogged him. Textbook free slogging, plain and simple. It was part of an obvious plan and that’s why he went for so many runs, but he had the last laugh.
And yes, the disappointingly conservative and narrow-minded Ponting deserves some of the blame.
Greg Russell said | April 27th 2009 @ 4:17pm | Report comment
Kersi et al.,
Re Ganteaume, do you know the story of Rodney Redmond, the father of current NZ player Aaron Redmond? Here is the relevant portion of Redmond Snr’s cricinfo profile:
“Brought into the New Zealand side at the age of 28 for the third Test against Pakistan at Christchurch in 1972-73, he cracked 107 and 56 and was an automatic choice for the 1973 squad to tour England. But he struggled to come to terms with new contact lenses and his form on the trip was poor – he managed 483 runs at 28.41 and did not play in any of the Tests. He subsequently missed the 1973-74 season, was never again in the reckoning for a Test berth and played only two more summers before retiring.”
One often hears in New Zealand that Redmond only played one test because he lost his eyesight. In fact this is rewriting of history. While his form on the tour of England may have been poor (actually, 483 runs at 28.41 is not too bad for a Kiwi touring England!), one would have thought that a player would be guaranteed several more tests given that he made a 100 and a 50 on debut!
So, Rodney Redmond is a story very similar to Andy Ganteaume.
Kersi, if you are interested in writing a book on this (I know you like such esoteric things), you will find Rodney Redmond in Perth.
Aaron grew up in Australia but was lured back to New Zealand during a drive to find NZ-eligible players in Australia. The most famous of that bunch was Lou Vincent, but Aaron and Tama Canning (a Perth all-rounder regarded as good enough to be the state’s successor to Tom Moody) have also had brief appearances for the Black Caps. From memory there was a fourth player, but I can’t remember who it was.
Incidentally, I don’t rate Krejza very highly, but that is just my opinion.
Kersi Meher-Homji said | April 27th 2009 @ 7:36pm | Report comment
Thanks, Greg.
When writing my book “Dramatic Debuts and Swan Songs” in 2001 (ABC Books), I had interviewed Rodney Redmond on phone in Perth. (Another Kiwi, Richard Collinge settled in Sydney, had given me his contact details.)
An accountant, Rodney, was then coaching South Perth Clubs in Grades 1-4. He was quite philosophical about his dropping after scoring a century and a fifty in his only Test appearance. “Had it not been for the unavailibility of John Parker and Vic Pollard, I may not have played a single Test, let alone score a debut century.”
Krejza will be consoled to know that WH Ashley for S Africa v.England, Cape Town, 1888-89 took 7-95 in his only Test innings. Also Charles “Father” Marriott captured 11-96 (5-37 and 6-59) in his only Test, England v. WI at The Oval in 1933. His victims included the great George Headley.
At least Krejza got a second chance. May he get at least one more!
Jameswm said | April 27th 2009 @ 10:25pm | Report comment
Greg
How highly did you rare Warnie after his first test?