F1′s shake up is great for the sport
By Adrian Musolino, 27 Apr 2009 Adrian Musolino is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- Brawn, F1, Formula One, motor sports
Predictability has long blighted Formula 1 as a sport in which engineering and budgets play such a crucial part in determining success. This season’s mammoth regulation changes have helped throw away the traditional formbook giving the year an amazing start.
The new force in the sport, Brawn GP, born so late in the day out of the remains of Honda’s, typifies this shake up but it is more widespread than that.
The performance and rise of the likes of Red Bull and Toyota along with the tightness of the mid pack and struggles of Ferrari has been sensational and it has helped to revitalise the sport.
It’s allowing new faces to shine.
Such a phenomenon is incredibly rare in modern F1 considering constant evolutions combined with financial might have meant a select few have been able to dominate for a sustained period.
Only four teams have won championships in the past two and half decades. That stranglehold will come to an end this season.
These regulation changes have caused such a widespread shake up due to their scale and unpredictability.
While some teams chose to focus their development on the much disliked KERS believing it could give the most advantage, they have lost significant ground on aerodynamic advances, most notably the controversial diffuser design which has been the biggest area of gain.
Now that the diffuser design has been approved by the FIA, the onus turns to the rest of the grid to seek gains on the ‘diffuser gang’ and in this area there is huge potential for gains, demonstrated by the improved pace of both Renault and McLaren when the pair fitted interim diffusers.
But with in season testing now banned teams face greater challenges to develop.
The result of this disparity with diffuser and non-diffuser teams and KERS and non-KERS teams, combined with the soft tyre options has helped shuffle the pack and improve the racing and strategic options.
This imbalance is helped by KERS, a system that gives drivers a certain allocation of power boost from used energy within the car.
Rubens Barrichello was substantially held up behind the slower Nelson Piquet Jnr in Bahrain, the latter running KERS.
The irony is that all these variables were not intended in the regulation changes.
It has simply worked out this way as the amount of regulation changes enabled the teams to focus individually on different aspects and go down very different paths.
When KERS is universally adopted next season and teams maximise use of the diffuser and other aerodynamic devices expect the typical hierarchy to re-emerge.
This season could therefore be a one off, a glorious gap year while the natural order takes time to adapt to F1’s new rules and parity is restored, perhaps too as the politics of the shake up and a clear direction for future regulation change is agreed upon.
The question now is how long it will take for the traditional powerhouses, the likes of McLaren and Ferrari to work their way back into winning contention this season and if anyone will be able to haul in Jenson Button and Brawn.
Amazingly Ferrari avoided their worst ever championship start with a 6th place in Bahrain.
The days of Michael Schumacher and Ferrari predictable domination seems like a long time ago, in more ways than one.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
The Crowd Says (5) | Page 1 of Comments
Have Your Say
- Explore:
- Brawn, F1, Formula One, motor sports

LeftArmSpinner said | April 27th 2009 @ 7:54am | Report comment
adrian, I agree. the shake up has had the desired effect and it is no longer a procession. Drivers have to drive, but teams will have short term technical advantages that see them win races until the next big thing is developed.
I also like the proposed Spending cap. that will make things very interesting…………..
Spinner said | April 27th 2009 @ 11:18am | Report comment
Adrian, things aren’t looking all that great for KERS in 2010…
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/74793
Still, the changes next year will be interesting, no more refuelling will change the way race strategy works (now tyre performance will determine pitting). Even more, it will thicken up competition in qualifying for the middle of the pack, as there more uniformity in fuel loads.
Getting rid of tyre warming will make things a bit more hairy after a tyre change too, imagine a driver attacking because his opponent just came out of the pits in front with cold, hard tyres.
The changes will help remove F1′s image as a sport of extraordinary excess (back to a sport of significant excess) and hopefully improve the quality of the racing.
I think the diffuser situation was a mistake, the standard should have been set that the rules should be interpreted without loopholes, but it has certainly made this year more interesting. But if F1 really wants to cut costs, rubbish like this will need to be fixed in the future.
James said | April 29th 2009 @ 5:54pm | Report comment
Motorsport needs those artificial ways of spicing up the racing otherwise the quickest cars just pull away from the rest and they run in line. Tyre options etc are needed.
Keith said | May 1st 2009 @ 10:11am | Report comment
I’ve never really watched F1 partly because of a background suspicion that it’s too much about the machines and not enough about the man. It’s the same reason I don’t pay any attention to competitive sailing. This may or may not be true in F1′s case, but I reckon it’s a fairly popular assumption among alot of motor sport novices.
Anyway, I saw an ad on TV that explained the rule changes to F1 this year, and I reckon it looked pretty cool. That Kers thing sounds like alot of fun anyway.
Here’s the ad on youtube if anyone’s interested.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTkVKPdyWs0
Adrian Musolino said | May 2nd 2009 @ 10:12pm | Report comment
Thanks for sharing Keith.
You are right the perception of the sport is that it is ruled by technology but at the heart of it is the driver and a great one can lift a poor performing car.
James is right too. Motorsport needs these regulation changes to keep the racing interesting while keeping the competition fair. It is a delicate balancing act and one that faces its greatest challenge in the just announced F1 regulations for next year with a two tier salary cap introduced with those who adhere to the cap allowed some technical advantages over those who don’t stay below the cap.