Memo to Ricky and Gus: We don’t care

 

41 Have your say

Related coverage



Sydney, July 7, 2004. NSW Blues Coach Phil Gould celebrates a try. The NSW Blues beat the Queensland Maroons 36-14 in the third State of Origin match to win the series at Telstra Stadium, Sydney tonight. AAP Image/Action Photographics/Colin Whelan

Sydney, July 7, 2004. NSW Blues Coach Phil Gould celebrates a try. The NSW Blues beat the Queensland Maroons 36-14 in the third State of Origin match to win the series at Telstra Stadium, Sydney tonight. AAP Image/Action Photographics/Colin Whelan

Maybe I’m totally out of step with the rest of the rugby league community, but the public saga of the fallout between Ricky Stuart and Gus Gould is surely one of the most boring things to grace the code in living memory.

Considering rugby league never seems to have trouble filling newspaper space in Sydney; the fact that both major newspapers seem to want to fill their endless column space documenting the latest chapter in the lover’s tiff makes things even more astounding.

If there was ever proof that the editors of the Sunday papers took us all for morons, this is it.

It is the sort of thing you’d expect from the women’s mags as they detail a Hollywood divorce, and the fact that both men seem are so keen to continue things under their own column does little for either one’s reputation.

During his tenure Phil Gould has told anyone who’ll listen that the Telegraph is full of untrustworthy journalists who are constantly misrepresenting him and anyone else who said for the side of right in rugby league, but then suddenly he is happy to do any interview with them when they give him a call.

He is very lucky his players were never so naive.

Honestly, just what is the problem? So a couple of blokes don’t like each other. Big deal. I don’t like certain people and certain people don’t like me, it’s a fact of life and in the world of rugby league it is hardly earth shattering.

It is the sort of thing you might occassionally get from a lovestruck teenager constantly retelling the mistakes of their past relationship before it all headed south.

You‘re supportive for a while figuring it is good therapy, then it gets boring and finally you give him a break until they find something else to talk about.

So while it gets irritating from a teenager, it is embarrassing that two grown men who advertise themselves as the leading thinkers of the game retell their versions of history with such obvious bias and spite while each scrambles for the moral highground.

Isn’t it obvious to both that they are coming across as military grade peanuts.

So you both left the Roosters with a lot of baggage, but why do we both need to suffer for what seems like eternity for it?

Where are the sport’s editors of the respective newspapers to tell either of them that maybe it is time to move on and we don’t need any more trees cut down in defence of their egos?

Clearly someone thinks it is selling newspapers, but just who is deciding to buy either the Telegraph or the Herald in order to read about which sook has spat his dummy?

Honestly, so much for balanced journalism. You really would hope that the sports section might be one area of the paper we can keep the agendas to a minimum, but alas that seems like a bit too much to ask. Just ask Denis Fitzgerald.

Give me an alcohol related incident any day.

Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.

Get a daily rugby league email

Our daily emails are only sent if there is content for the sport. You can subscribe to multiple daily emails; or get the daily Roar email with all our content in it.

We value privacy. More.