Five changes isn’t enough for wounded Kangaroos
By Gabriel Knowles, 5 May 2009 Gabriel Knowles is a Roar Pro
- Tagged:
- Kangaroos, Rugby League, Test rugby league, Tim Sheens

Australia's Greg Inglis races away for a try during the New Zealand Kiwis v Australian Kangaroos Centenary test at Westpac Stadium, Wellington, New Zealand. Sunday Oct. 14 2007. Australia won the game 58-0. AAP Image/Hagen Hopkins/PHOTOSPORT
If ever there was a time for the Australian selectors to break from their policy of choosing sides full of incumbents, regardless of form, this was it. The Kangaroos hardly covered themselves in glory when they lost the World Cup final to the Kiwi’s last time out.
But you wouldn’t know it after only five of them weren’t selected to play on Friday night in Brisbane.
A lot has been made already this week of the fact that the twelve incumbents have been given the chance to make amends for the their last-start loss. And on a purely emotional level, it’s hard to argue against giving them the chance.
But from a purely sporting perspective, things aren’t always quite that simple.
Of course, there’s the argument that the incumbents have already developed the vital combinations, understanding, and team spirit that are especially priceless given the short preparation time they’ve got for this game.
All well and good, but there are only so many chances at the highest level and the New Zealanders aren’t the easy beats of years gone by.
New South Wales selectors have shown just how far a complacent selection policy can take you in recent years.
The New South Wales comparison mightn’t be exactly on par with that of the Australian side, but they’ve definitely ignored some quality in-form players this time around.
New coach Tim Sheens even said so himself.
There aren’t many players in the history of the game who have had a mortgage on a representative jumper, and those that have are generally talked of as the game’s truly great players.
Scott Prince, for one, must be wondering what he has to do to get a look into any representative side despite his consistently dominant form over the last few seasons.
Another player who should feel a touch aggrieved is Trent Waterhouse.
The Panthers backrower has been in career best form this season and surely had a case for selection ahead Paul Gallen, whose discipline has started to become a real liability.
The Dragons’ Ben Creagh also put forward a good claim for a spot on form and might consider himself unlucky to have missed out to Anthony Laffranchi and Anthony Watmough.
The problem is that whatever way the selectors choose to go, there’ll always be some controversial decisions given the depth they have to pick from.
Theoretically, they could pick a number of different combinations and still be competitive. Let’s just hope they remember to take a peek at the form guide every now and then.
If anything, it’ll keep the current team looking over their shoulders.
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- Kangaroos, Rugby League, Test rugby league, Tim Sheens

May 5th 2009 @ 3:08pm
Chop said | May 5th 2009 @ 3:08pm | Report comment
Slegder,
Watmough is every bit as much of a thug as Gallen (or vice versa) and I can’t argue with the stats you present, would they be the same if you counted the times each player is penalised during the game?
Watmough and Gallen would (without stats to back this up) I think be two of the most penalised players in the game, which I would suggest detracts from their overall contribution to the team.
May 5th 2009 @ 3:10pm
cosmos forever said | May 5th 2009 @ 3:10pm | Report comment
One penalty equates generally to about 25 metres gained which equates to up to three tackles. Put that in your stats machine Sledgy…
May 5th 2009 @ 3:34pm
sledgeross said | May 5th 2009 @ 3:34pm | Report comment
Ok lads, last round:
Creagh 2 penalties conceded, ran for 67 metres
Gallen (136), Parker (69) and Thaiday (132) all conceded one penalty apiece.
For the season, Gallen has conceded 6 penalties, followed by O’Donnell (another firebrand) on 7. All the rest haveconceded 8.
May 5th 2009 @ 4:49pm
Gabriel Knowles said | May 5th 2009 @ 4:49pm | Report comment
Sledgeross, I did also say that Ben Creagh had a case for selection over Watmough in the next sentence after Waterhouse/Gallen one. On form over the course of this season, yes I do think there are other back rowers ahead of Gallen in the pecking order. I’m not saying he’s not there or thereabouts, I’m just saying there are players in better form than him right now.
Stats are fine but they don’t always tell the whole story. For example a player might only give away one penalty during a match but stats can’t tell us what context that penalty had on the game. Did the opposition score from the next set or did they kick a goal to win the game etc? So one player didn’t take as many hit ups one week, but perhaps his coach had given him instructions not to take as many hit ups that week? There are some things in all sports that are simply unquantifiable and for that reason stats might not lie but that doesn’t mean they’re always telling the truth.
May 6th 2009 @ 8:03am
sledgeross said | May 6th 2009 @ 8:03am | Report comment
Fair enough mate, but you can lose credibilty when you start dealing in intangibles, because they can be contorted to solidfy any arguement. An your right, taking stats from one week doesnt always give a clear picture, but I can give season and career stats if you like
May 7th 2009 @ 12:14am
sunshinecoaster said | May 7th 2009 @ 12:14am | Report comment
well well well what a surprise
Luke gets banned for a week yet the Australian thugs get let off,its almost comical
Its a disgraceful decision,its a sad and embarrassing for rugby league when Australia gets to pick and choose who plays.
May 7th 2009 @ 8:03am
sledgeross said | May 7th 2009 @ 8:03am | Report comment
I see where you are coming from mate, but the evidence is pretty damning, raising an elbow into the tacklers head. Its an open and shut case really. Luke deserved a week.
The problem is the judiciary do themselves no favours by being inconsistent. Gallen got off on a technicality (there was no video evidence that shows him hitting Wing in the head with his arm “inconclusive video evidence”). If there had been a camera on that side of the field then Gallen would have been gone. Ennis should have got a few weeks though for his chicken wing, which is probably the worst one seen this year. Its frustraing for the players and fans when there is inconsistency like this.
May 7th 2009 @ 9:38am
CronullaKiwi said | May 7th 2009 @ 9:38am | Report comment
Absolutely ridiculous. Decided in a little over 10 minutes by three former Kangaroos so we really shouldn’t be surprised. The Aussies are still in agony over the world cup. They want a little payback and will go to any lengths to win. Thats the way they are, their ancestry has something to do with it. We will do it tough and if we win it will be even sweeter. Although they are a class act so it wont be easy.
May 7th 2009 @ 10:00am
Chop said | May 7th 2009 @ 10:00am | Report comment
Sunshine,
I agree with you about Issac Luke getting a ban, it was soft there’s no way it was worth missing an NRL game never mind representing your country (I might write something on suspensions carrying to different comps later). In soccer the ban only stands in the comp that the offense occurred in, I think the NRL (and Rugby League in general) should look at it that way to.
May 7th 2009 @ 11:13am
sledgeross said | May 7th 2009 @ 11:13am | Report comment
Its pretty simple Chop, he lifted his arm and elbowed Laffranchi. Any idiot could see that, but any idiot could also see that it wasnt hurtful. He didnt get suspended because of the elbow itself.
“Luke was contesting a grade one striking charge – the lowest end of the scale – arising from an incident late in last Saturday’s loss to Gold Coast……….. Due to two previous charges in the past two years, Luke had faced a one-match ban if he issued an early guilty plea or contested the charge and lost”. (Source: NRL.com)
So it looks like it was the dreaded carry over points that got him.
I know some people will whinge about this system (and quite rightly in some respects), but its pretty cut and dried. He lifted his elbow into a players face, got charged with a minor offence. It was because of his prior record that he got the one match suspension.