Related coverage

England's Phil Vickery, center, tries to muscle his way through the Italian defence during the Six Nations rugby union international match at Twickenham stadium in London, Saturday Feb. 7, 2009. AP Photo/PA, David Davies
England must host the 2015 Rugby World Cup. There I’ve said it, and I don’t have my fingers crossed, nor am I trying to be sarcastic.
The fact is, for every reason, financial, access to great stadiums, spectator comfort and interest, the need for a geographically compact tournament and in the spirit of rewarding countries that have kept the faith in rugby, England should be awarded the hosting rights to the 2015 Rugby World Cup.
With Australia pulling out for 2015 and 2019, and probably for decades to come, only Italy, South Africa and Japan are left in the race.
It is doubtful whether Italy has the rugby infrastructure to run a World Cup tournament. Anyway, with France hosting the 2007 World Cup, another tournament on the European continent is just not on.
South Africa hosted a most successful World Cup in 1995.
But with New Zealand hosting the tournament in 2011, it is the turn of a northern hemisphere rugby nation in 2015. South Africa’s next best chance is 2019, when it is the southern hemisphere’s turn or the turn of a nation like Japan, which is not aligned to either the northern or southern hemisphere powers.
South Africa, too, will want to demonstrate with the 2010 Football World Cup, the biggest sports event in the world, that it can handle something of the size (admittedly smaller than the Football World Cup) of the Rugby World Cup tournament.
This brings us to Japan.
Eddie Jones and John Kirwan, both big figures in world rugby who coach in Japan, have pushed the claims of Japan. Kirwan, a former All Black, dismayed New Zealanders by disputing New Zealand’s claim to the 2011 World Cup tournament.
The Japanese authorities, too, secretly hired a PR firm (Dentsu, one of the biggest in the world) to employ a British legal firm to white ant the IRB’s decision to grant New Zealand the tournament.
The legal firm challenged the IRB’s decision, a challenge that was rejected. Information detrimental to the IRB was leaked to the media, a tactic that was not appreciated among the power brokers of world rugby.
Dentsu is behind the Japanese bids, and was behind Japan hosting the Football World Cup.
As with the promotion of the Football World Cup, the promotion of a Rugby World Cup held in Japan would be part of a marketing push by Japan Inc. to push the major Japanese major trading companies.
The language used to promote Japan’s bid is all about how Asia needs a World Cup to push the game forward.
The fact is that, while Asia remains to be embraced or to embrace the rugby game, the best growth prospects for world rugby are in the Americas, the former communist countries like Georgia, Russia and Roumania, and Africa, where Kenya, for instance, has developed a formidable Sevens Rugby team.
Eddie Jones, anyway, suggests that Japan is more interested in 2019 than 2015 to host a Rugby World Cup.
This leaves us with England.
England’s bid ticks all the boxes. They are going to use the great venues of Twickenham, Wembley, Old Tafford (Manchester United’s home ground, where rugby Tests have already been played) and the Millennium Stadium (hopefully something will have been done about solving the problem of the perennially slippery pitch by then).
These magnificent stadiums will be packed and they will provide the IRB and the RFU with a largesse of income that will enable the reserves to be built up and huge sums of money to be spent developing and promoting rugby around the world.
There is also the consideration that England will be user-friendly for the thousands of spectators from around the world who will come to England to watch the event.
The geographical compactness of England will enable a World Cup feeling to permeate the country for the seven weeks of its duration. Journalists, for instance, and spectators who can afford to, will be able to go to many more matches than, say, they were able to in France.
I know that in 1991, England produced a very poor World Cup tournament. There was an arrogance with the officials running the tournament, and a certain incompetence that mitigated against the success of the tournament.
The fact that matches were played in Ireland, as well as England and Wales, also tended to diminish from the sense of a World Cup in England.
The RFU will have the example of England running the Olympic Games in 2012 in London. The expertise gathered from that exercise will be invaluable for the RFU three years later in hosting the Rugby World Cup.
One of the major figures involved in England’s Olympic Games preparation is Sir Clive Woodward. I nominate him as the CEO of the England’s Rugby World Cup committee.
Two other points should be made.
First, the imperative in presenting a World Cup tournament as a spectacle that enthralls viewers around the world might, just might, encourage the RFU to be more amenable to needed reforms in the laws of the game and in its administration.
Second, rugby received a huge boost from the successful World Cup in 2007 in France. Eight years on, with a successful World Cup in England rugby could and should top that boost and entrench itself as a very viable alternative to football.
This would be virtually inevitable if, in the spirit of making rugby as accessible to world audiences as possible, England would lead the way to creating one rugby season around the world, a reform that would create the chances of many more northern and southern hemisphere contests.
So for many reasons, England must host the 2015 Rugby World Cup.
There, I’ve said it again.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
- Explore:
- 2015 Rugby World Cup, England rugby, Rugby Union, Rugby World Cup

Mark said | May 7th 2009 @ 2:09am | Report comment
Sorry Spiro, I dont agree. Rugby needs to get away from traditional countries if the sport is to survive. Japan / Argentina / USA + Canada need to be look at before the ol dart. The RFU has enough money and support without a WC. I understand the Olympics etc but thats not a good enough excuse. Expansion and inclusion. Even allowing Russia a crack at it.
Viscount Crouchback said | May 7th 2009 @ 2:52am | Report comment
It’s nonsense to say that rugby needs to expand to survive. Why? Part of rugby’s appeal is that it consistently brings together nations who enjoy a shared history going back centuries. Games against nations who don’t share this history – Italy, for instance – are intrinsically less interesting.
Why should any Englishman be remotely interested in regular games against Georgia or Japan or Russia? It holds no appeal whatsoever.
The only reason the IRB talks up expansion is because it wants to grow a bigger pie. In other words, it’s all about money. But they ought to be very careful. We’ve seen in football and cricket that horible things can happen to sports when they slip out of the control of benevolent Anglo-Saxons.
pothale said | May 7th 2009 @ 4:18am | Report comment
Horrible – like other countries become better at the sports than England are. And that would never do.
sheek said | May 7th 2009 @ 6:41am | Report comment
Spiro,
I don’t know…..I’ll swear you wrote this piece with just the hint of a smirk on your face!
Will England make a profit after paying their ransom to the IRB? Will the profit pay for the debt of the Olympics 3 years prior? Is the IRB actually trying to destroy the world cup concept with its exorbitant guarantees? And since when does the IRB use its largesses to develop lesser nations?
MVDave said | May 7th 2009 @ 6:44am | Report comment
Havent England already held the Rugby WC twice already? It seems only a few countries can or are willing to host it, similar to Cricket. It seems the same countries get to hold it in the relatively short time it has been run…no real sense of adventure from the ruling body.
True Tah said | May 7th 2009 @ 8:04am | Report comment
Spiro – Italy would be a fantastic place to host a world cup, the infrastructure is there, and I understand the government is looking at stumping up the fee.
I would have loved Argentina to have put their hands up, with the futbol world cup in 2014, when will South America ever host a large international sporting event? I guess their economy isnt too strong, but they could have staged some pool games in Chile, Uruguay, Paraguay and Brazil.
Also dont understand why Ireland would never try to host the world cup alone – obviously they would need the support of the GAA to do this though (and thats a big if). If they had GAA support, they could host a pool in each of the four provinces.
IMO I would love to see either of these three countries host a WC before either England or Japan. England has had its time in the sun, and Im not convinced the Japanese would really take to the world cup, in terms of a growth area, Spiro correctly points out that these areas are places like the US, South America, Africa, Russia and Georgia.
Yikes said | May 7th 2009 @ 8:24am | Report comment
Sorry Spiro, you’ve got this all wrong.
Italy doesn’t have the infrastructure to support a tournament like this? They have enough soccer stadia to sink a battleship. Sure some of those could be converted without much worry.
Take rugby somewhere slightly different. Italy 2015, Japan 2019. The next RWC must be held in Europe. The Home Nations supporters will travel happily to Italy.
cookie said | May 7th 2009 @ 8:24am | Report comment
dead set sick of bloody england hosting the damn world cup.
For christ sake it all ends up and some bs you vote for us we give you a test and a semi somewhere in bloody france, wales, ireland, scotland.
This is no a england hosting the world cup.
Send it to Japan, Argentina, Italy even but haven’t we had enough ’5/6 nations’ world cups?
The fact that Australia hosted the world cup alone was the right thing. NZ should never have been part of it just as Australia should not be part of NZ’s world cup hosting.
Vincent said | May 7th 2009 @ 8:58am | Report comment
I agree Cookie, Who knows what happens with the English and UK rugby unions and what back room deals they concoct? England is more likely to sell a few games to the home unions up there and end up hosting a UK Rugby World Cup, I say give it to a country like Italy or Japan, we know what disaster a world cup can be in distributed locations outside the supposed ‘host’ country.
Vincent said | May 7th 2009 @ 9:01am | Report comment
addendum: Big question yes Africa might be a rugby growth area, where in Africa apart from South Africa would there be an infrastructure to support a rugby world cup? And at the cost the IRB has put on the World Cup which African country could afford that initial outlay?