The Bulls are bullish for the Super 14 final
By Spiro Zavos, 11 May 2009 Spiro Zavos is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- Brumbies, Bulls, cheetahs, Michael Foley, Phil Waugh, Rugby Union, Stirling Mortlock, Super Rugby, Waratahs
Related coverage
- ACT Brumbies news
- Central Cheetahs news
- NSW Waratahs news
- Blue Bulls news
- Rugby Union news
- Super Rugby news

Brumbies Francis Fainifo tackles the Blues Rene Ranger in the Super 14 rugby match at Canberra Stadium, Saturday, May 9, 2009. The Brumbies won the match 37-15. (AAP Image/Alan Porritt)
The last two rounds of the Super 14 tournament resemble a rope with a knot in the middle and the contending teams are pulling both ends as hard as they can. The result is a very tight knot of seven teams contending for four places in the finals.
It seems certain that the last match of the tournament, with the Bulls (top of the table) playing the Sharks (6) will have some effect on the allocation of finals places and where the finals will be played.
The big story of the round, in my view, was the very impressive bonus point four-try victory by the Bulls over a strong challenge from the Cheetahs. The victory was achieved by perfect altitude rugby by the Bulls.
Altitude puts extreme pressure on the aerobic fitness of the players – and referees. It is far more effective to play position, and then chance your arm from well inside your opponent’s half of the field. This type of game is helped, too, by the fact that the ball travels much further and higher at altitude.
So the Bulls have created this altitude machine with a formidable lineout to capitalise on their kicking game. They have huge ball-runners in the forwards to smash away near their opponent’s tryline. And they have Bryan Habana, the explosive broken field runner to give the team the threat of exploiting a poor opposition kick (which he did to set up one try) or an intercept (which he also did to score the fourth, crucial try for the Bulls).
Why any team would kick speculatively to Habana’s wing or do cut-out passes anywhere in his vicinity is a mystery to me.
Habana is one of those gifted players who reacts instinctively and correctly to make the best of any of the situations he is confronted with on the rugby field.
For the most part the Bulls attack, rather like the Pumas so successfully at the 2007 Rugby World Cup, through massive bombs which are chased hard. Turnovers from these bombs are exploited by barrel-chested, thigh-pumping running.
The Bulls came back from a 20 – 10 deficit in the second half to steam-roller the Cheetahs. This sort of response, rather like the Brumbies against the hapless Blues, is the sign of a team that has that special chemistry that makes the whole team much better than the sum of its parts.
It’s a hard style for opponents to combat, too, as the Bulls do not give their opposition much to play off. I would expect them, therefore, to defeat the Sharks who are now fulfilling Robbie Deans’ prediction when they were on top of the table that they ‘might not make the finals.’
Of the top 7 sides, it’s hard to see the Waratahs and the Sharks getting into the finals, and certainly not both these teams. The Waratahs for/against record is not good and this might be crucial in the end if they get 5 points from defeating the Lions.
Most of us who have an interest in the Waratahs getting into the finals will say that if they fail, they’ll deserve to miss out.
Even against the Sharks, the Waratahs continued to kick away possession. Someone should tell whoever creates the tactics for the Waratahs that it is hard to score points when you are kicking the ball to the opposition, and – unlike the Bulls – don’t bother to chase hard to get the ball back or force the opposition into errors.
There are ominous signs that the finger of suspicion is being pointed at Phil Waugh and Michael Foley for these negative tactics. The Sunday Telegraph, that great rugby union newspaper, ran a gossip item on Sunday to the effect that Chris Hickey’s position is under threat from Foley; and that Waugh seems to be the one laying the law in the dressing room at half-time.
Journalists know that these sort of items do not come out of thin air. Your correspondent has been regaled by rugby insiders about how when Foley was an assistant coach at Bath they went 9 games without scoring a try. More recently, there have been telephone calls along the lines of the Sunday Telegraph gossip item.
What does all this mean? Who knows. But it is true that with the talent they had this year, along with the fact that they were finalists last year, the Waratahs should have been more strongly placed on the ladder to make the finals.
If the Waratahs do make the finals, it will be at the bottom of the top four. They would then probably play the Bulls. The one advantage in all of this is that the Waratahs would not have to make the journey from Sydney to Pretoria to play the match.
Will this unlikely outcome be an example of good luck or some sort of planning to tie in with the Waratahs’ last three matches in the round robin being in South Africa?
As far as the Brumbies are concerned their future lies in their own hands. If they defeat the Chiefs, especially with a bonus point, they will make the finals. This is a tremendous result for a team that has suffered injuries and trauma during the season.
A monster tackle by Stirling Mortlock on Tony Woodcock which left the prop prone on the ground and Mortlock groggy and led to a try indicated that the Brumbies are that most dangerous of sides, a team that plays with a sort of invincible self-belief that it is capable of doing great things.
Have they got at least one more match in them for their ‘Gipper,’ Shawn Mackay. What a wonderful story it will be if they do!
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
- Explore:
- Brumbies, Bulls, cheetahs, Michael Foley, Phil Waugh, Rugby Union, Stirling Mortlock, Super Rugby, Waratahs

Knives Out said | May 11th 2009 @ 7:39am | Report comment
Oh I see.. praise for the Bulls again – weeks after having labelled them as easily disruptable, one-dimensional bully boys having already previously labelled them SA’s next great hope. How utterly untypical.
It is far too simplistic to label them as altitude monsters without recognising their away form: beating the Lions away, beating the Hurricanes away, beating the Waratahs away and scoring bonus point losses to the Brumbies and the Crusaders. That said, let’s not forget the scrummaging issues that the Bulls have and the fact that their defence has been so porous recently. Probably best to cover your bases Mr. Zavos as another loss might mean you’ll have to label them easily disruptable, one-dimensional bully boys once more.
LeftArmSpinner said | May 11th 2009 @ 8:03am | Report comment
Hey Knives, how are your ribs? Did you get an MRI to check if your organs are still in the correct places?
Spiro, not sure I get it fully? Are you saying that foley and Waugh are behind this kick fest, over the head of coach Hickey and around Wisemantel? Geez, if so, that is a recipe for disaster. NSW rugby, the flagship for Aust rugby in NRL heartlands is in for more trouble. cant they just stick to basic principles of management and common sense. If this is true, surely the backs will be very, very unhappy………. Team harmony and spirit seems to be okay. Wisemantel needs to step up and out!!!!!
Knives Out said | May 11th 2009 @ 8:06am | Report comment
Fortunately so, Spinner. My diaphragm took a bit of a pounding, but once the giggles settled down I was fine. My heart would have skipped a beat – worryingly – upon reading this but one tends to build up an immunity after a while.
Sandy B said | May 11th 2009 @ 9:25am | Report comment
Ok here is the final wash up:
Brumbies beat cheifs by 30 + BP
Tahs bt lions by 20 + BP
Crusaders bt Blues by 20 – no BP
Canes draw with Reds – no BP
Force v Highlanders – who cares
Cheetahs v Stormers -who cares
Sharks bt Bulls by 38 + BP
Fanciful – yes of course but look at the final result:
Brumbies 42pts + 39
Bulls 42 pts + 38
Canes 41 pts +92
Sharks 41 pts +82
Cheifs 41 pts +69
Crusaders 41 pts +61
Tahs 41 pts +44
The semi final hosts would have the lowest points difference of the top 7
Happy punting
sheek said | May 11th 2009 @ 9:33am | Report comment
Spiro,
No splinters on me!
Bulls will cement 1st/2nd position by beating the Sharks. Bulls finish on 46 points, Sharks 36, maybe 37 points (I did tip the Sharks to hold in the top 4, but the Waratahs exceeded expectations!).
Chiefs will beat Brumbies, possibly with a bonus point, which will put them in 1st spot on for & against. Chiefs on 45, maybe 46 points. Brumbies on 37, maybe 38 points.
Hurricanes will pummel the Reds, with a bonus point, making up for the disaster this past weekend. Hurricanes on 44 points, Reds on 18.
Crusaders should beat the Jekyll & Hyde Blues, since we can only go on what we know. Crusaders on 41 points, Blues 31, maybe 32.
Waratahs should beat Lions, but it will be a hollow victory, as they still miss out on a top 4 possie. Waratahs on 40, Lions on 24, maybe 25. Even with a bonus point, the Tahs have an inferior for-against compared with Crusaders.
The other two games have no bearing on top 4 finishes, so we won’t worry about them. What we don’t know is whether Bulls or Chiefs will finish 1st. Either way, they each have the home game, & I don’t think either would be overly worried about playing Hurricanes or Crusaders.
My tip for the Championship – Bulls. Even if they have to travel to NZ.
Worlds Biggest said | May 11th 2009 @ 10:07am | Report comment
I posted an article recently regarding the Tahs negative tactics and whether or not Captain Courageous was behind all this so I know where Spiro is going with it. Scott Wisemantle should be the first casualty as the position of ” Attack Coach “. I have never seen such inept backline play as I have this season. Even worse is there is talent out wide but rendered useless. The Tahs Coaching heirarchy has a strong Eastwood influence with Hickey, Wisemantle and Matt Burke. Maybe the Woodie mafia will ensure Wisemantle enjoys a stay iof execution. I hope the Brumbies sneak in there although a real long shot. It would be against all odds. Apart from the drubbing against the Canes two weeks ago Andy Friend has done very well to have them still in contention. The tragic loss of Macca and the injury toll to key players have been massive hurdles to climb yet they are still in with a chance.
Hammer said | May 11th 2009 @ 10:07am | Report comment
Talking up the Brumbies – FFS that Blues outfit has to be the one of their worst teams ever … if you want a benchmark re the Brumbies surely you’d take from their last encounter with one of the top NZ sides … the Hurricanes rolled them and the Chiefs will do the same …
this Chiefs outfit are now displaying what all championship sides need – confidence .. their pack’s going well, they excelling in the loose and the half’s are playing top rugby to release the back 3 ….
Semi’s will be Chiefs v Crusaders / Bulls v Hurricanes … with a 1st final in Hamilton …
Worlds Biggest said | May 11th 2009 @ 10:16am | Report comment
The Blues are ordinary to say the least however It would be a great story if the Brumbies made the semi’s at least for us Aussie supporters.
Ben C said | May 11th 2009 @ 10:34am | Report comment
So it is looking like Bulls, Chiefs, Hurricanes, and Crusaders for the finals. Notwithstanding the tragedy for the ACT, all the coaches in Australia need to take a long hard look at themselves. Hickey has wasted a talented backline. Friend has a solid team but (even before the loss of Mackay) their form was patchy. The Force have been largely carried by moments of Giteau brillance and are still underpowered in the forwards. Mooney has the Reds trying to play seven’s rugby over eighty minutes. And people wondered why we needed to bring in a foreign coach for the Wallabies.
It is hard to pick the outcome of the semi-finals as the only consistency this season has been inconsistency. The Bulls play a fairly conservatvie game but their defence has occasionally gone MIA. The Cheifs have strike power but again the defence is patchy on occasions. The whole Hurricanes teams seems to avoid showing up to some matches, both attack and defence. The Crusaders are rebuilding and the weakest of the contenders but they seem to be at least reasonably consistent in the latter half of the season. All of the matches could easily go either way, and it is far from impossible the weakened Crusaders may hoist the trophy again although the smart money would be on the Chiefs or Bulls. It will be a fascinating finals series even if no Australian team features. At least the Wallabies will get two extra weeks of training together before the Tri-Nations.
Hemjay said | May 11th 2009 @ 10:47am | Report comment
The Blues are pathetic and I wouldn’t take too much from beating them like the Brumbies and Warratahs fans and scribes seem to be taking.
Heres a bit of fact for you not one of the Blues sub unions made the 8 team finals in the ANZC in 2008 the best performing team of the three unions Northland who not only finished in 9th place also beat both their Blues partners. Is also the most under represented in the Blues franchise hmm go figure?
The Blues are awful and sing your own praises at your own risk thats all I will have to say for those of you who seem to be taking far to much out of what is a very ordinary win over a struggling franchise.
Bulls should beat the Sharks however I’m hoping against all odds the sharks will get one up against their rivals.
Brumbies to get a lesson in the rugby basics in Hamilton.
Hurricanes to beat the reds but will probably make hard work of it.
Crusaders should beat Auckland howver a boinus point win may be beyond them, as Auckland Canterbury matches are always a step up from other games the rivalry wil be intense but it will be a question of when Auckland tires not if.
Lions – Tahs flip a coin the Tahs are not as good as many keep making them out to be if they were they wouldn’t be hanging on other teams to trip up to make the finals.
The rest of the games are irrelevant really