
Crusaders' Thomas Waldrom is hammered into the ground by Brumbies players in the Super 14 rugby match at Canberra Stadium, Saturday, Feb. 21, 2009. AAP Image/Alan Porritt
Whatever John O’Neill’s faults, he’s a pragmatic fellow. One of O’Neill’s favourite sayings, a constant reminder to rugby fans, is that too many of us “see the world as we want it to be, and not as it actually is.”
While the sentiment is noble, it is often highly illogical and impractical, as O’Neill points out.
‘Roarers’ have debated ad nauseum various models of Australian national comps, myself very much in the vanguard, as well as various Super Series models.
The reality is, we’re building sandcastles in the air.
A question to ask at this point is “how did it all come to this?” At the beginning of the millenium, there appeared to be no end to Australian rugby’s bright new dawn.
Yet, less than a decade later, the code is floundering in Australia.
I don’t care for the statistics, they can be manipulated in any variety of ways. Sure, you can find fault with all four football codes, but rugby union is still at the bottom of the pile, whichever way you dissect the problems.
I admire the constant positive vibes of some rugby fans. But eventually reality must bite. It’s like losing a limb where no amount of positive attitude will make that limb grow back again.
A positive attitude helps you cope with the disability, and to move on. But it doesn’t reverse the process.
Perhaps one day humanity will find the means, but at present it’s impossible. So let’s stop pretending rugby union is doing okay, or that the limb will grow back!
Last week at a sports seminar, O’Neill warned the four football codes that they all “needed to tighten their belts.” In response, a FFA spokesman said football would continue with its expansion plans as “it had deep player penetration in all those markets.”
And that is the crux of the matter – deep player (participation) penetration.
Whatever his faults, O’Neill is on the money with his proposed Super 15 suggestion of five provinces from each of Australia, New Zealand and South Africa.
Each province playing its fellow countrymen twice, and the others once each for a total of 18 matches per province. Plus, a six team finals series.
Perfect!
If South Africa don’t come to an agreement, it will become a trans-Tasman competition with the five Aussie and five Kiwi provinces.
Okay, there might be less broadcasting revenue for a trans-Tasman competition, but operating costs (air travel, accommodation, transfers) will also be less. The bottom line could possibly come out the same.
Furthermore, Aussie and Kiwi fans won’t have to put up with early morning games in South Africa (our time). All practical, common sense stuff.
Even putting a fifth provincial team together will require the co-operation of all the stakeholders in Australian rugby. We need to get as many quality players back from Europe and Japan as we can. We also need a draft to ensure the five provinces are more or less of a similar standard.
Any thoughts of a eight to ten team national competition is regrettably sandcastles in the air stuff – unsustainable. It won’t happen for about twenty years, if ever.
How did it all come to this?
Recommend this story.
The Crowd Says (141) | Page 2 of Comments
Have Your Say
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Reds back in contention, but Waratahs need a cleanout (287)
- What Hansen’s first squad means for the Wallabies (191)
- ‘Campo’ too generous: Lord’s dream XV contains just two current Wallabies (161)
- Will Cooper and Mitchell be back in time for Wallaby selection? (156)
- Who will be in the Wallabies’ backrow? (150)
- CAMPO: Will Deans change the style of the Wallabies play? (128)
- Tahs out. Brumbies win ugly. And Quade’s back! (124)
- ALAN JONES: We have the players, it’s the coaches that are to blame (58)
- Road to the 2015 World Cup starts in June
- Six lessons Robbie Deans must learn (Part 2) (13)
- Who will be the Wallabies’ centres? (35)
- RATHBONE: Whatever you do, don’t choke! (6)
- Captain Warburton lifting Wales, says Halfpenny (5)
- Precocious Brumbies eye conference crown
- Road to the 2015 World Cup starts in June (0)
- Six lessons Robbie Deans must learn (Part 2) (13)
- Who will be the Wallabies’ centres? (35)
- Are Roarers picking the Wallabies for the wrong reasons? (17)
- Who will be in the Wallabies’ backrow? (155)
- When should a game plan change and who makes the call? (4)
- Six lessons Robbie Deans must learn (Part 1) (30)
- Explore:
- Australian rugby, John O’Neill, Rugby Union

May 12th 2009 @ 8:27am
sheek said | May 12th 2009 @ 8:27am | Report comment
Pothale,
O’Neill certainly doesn’t let the grass grow under his feet he’s the ultimate opportunist. A TT may have not even been plan B, but it is now looming large as “the plan”. From the snippets I’ve heard, both Fox Sports (Australia) & Sky Sports (NZ) are very receptive to the idea (perhaps because they think they can get it cheap!).
One thing that continually concerns me is the lack of player participants in Australian rugby. We might have doubled our playing numbers in 10 years, but we’re still way behind the other 3 codes.
We might just manage to scape a 5th professional team together, while soccer will move from 8 to 12 in the next 3-5 years, rugby league has 15 & Australian football 16 professional teams.
I don’t believe the player participation figures put out by either rugby code, which I believe are rubbery, & purely for political consumption.
May 12th 2009 @ 8:30am
sheek said | May 12th 2009 @ 8:30am | Report comment
Leftie,
Ditto my reply to pothale.
I think the Sydney premier rugby clubs have a lot to answer for. The fact they held rugby union together for 100 years doesn’t give them the automatic right to prevent the code from expanding across the country. The game won’t evolve if it remains confined to Sydney & Brisbane.
Which regrettably, is what has happened these past 100 years.
May 12th 2009 @ 10:16am
Working Class Rugger said | May 12th 2009 @ 10:16am | Report comment
Trans-Tasman comp. is the way to go. Forget SA. Add in two PI Teams one from Fiji and Samoa. A TT Comp opens the door for further growth of Rugby. As mentioned above in 5-10yrs down the track we could add a Sth Aust team at least while NZ could include Nth Harbour and a Japanese franchise. It would be a fanastic comp. One that we need.
May 12th 2009 @ 10:18am
Working Class Rugger said | May 12th 2009 @ 10:18am | Report comment
But I’m adamit about one thing that has to happen alongside this comp. A correponding U20′s comp must be included
May 12th 2009 @ 10:30am
Pippinu said | May 12th 2009 @ 10:30am | Report comment
People continue to refer to the need for a national comp – but if you have 5 teams in Super 15s, or if you have a new TT comp with up to 6 Australian teams – why is a national comp necessary?
May 12th 2009 @ 10:37am
sheek said | May 12th 2009 @ 10:37am | Report comment
Pippinu,
Precisely! I think many of us rugby fans have woken up to the fact, right now, Australian rugby can provide no more than 5 professional teams. And that’s at a stretch!
Hence the title, “building sandcastles in the air”.
And we NEED both NZ & SA to help us with a S15, or at worst, NZ to help us with a S10/12.
Any talk of an ARC, or APC, or similar, is now many, many, many, many years away.
May 12th 2009 @ 10:53am
PastHisBest said | May 12th 2009 @ 10:53am | Report comment
sheek,
Four is a stretch, five is impossible with purely Aus resources (players).
May 12th 2009 @ 11:19am
sheek said | May 12th 2009 @ 11:19am | Report comment
PastHisBest,
Disagree. Numerically at least, if you added up all the Australian professional players in Australia, Japan, Italy, France, Ireland & UK, we can do 5 teams. Contractual obligations aside, of course!
Even with purely Aussie-based players, how many talented youngsters are running around just champing at the bit for an opportunity. Some talented players are perhaps just treading water, playing club rugby, because they see no professional future for them.
But what if that opportunity was open to them???
As they used to say in the NT ads -”you’ll never-never know if you never-never go”. With Australian rugby, we’ll never know if we never try. Let’s see what hidden talent we have out there!
May 12th 2009 @ 11:27am
Viscount Crouchback said | May 12th 2009 @ 11:27am | Report comment
I’ll tell you precisely how it came to this.
Australia lacks a rugger culture because it lacks the types of well-bred, hearty chaps for whom attending a rugger match is second nature.
You need more decent public schools of the traditional English type, more stockbrokers, more old money, and fewer of these ghastly, x-wearing vulgarians who somehow convince themselves that rugby league is a genuine sport.
Come on, chaps, you’ve been colonists long enough. It’s high time you developed a proper rugger culture down there.
May 12th 2009 @ 12:00pm
James Mortimer said | May 12th 2009 @ 12:00pm | Report comment
It came to this because the ARU dropped the ball between 1999 and 2004.
1999/2001, Second World Cup, Lions conquerers, even a Tri Nations and Bledisloe – and did nothing to attempt to grow the game.
2004, cashed up with close to 100 million – ditto above.
The game is floundering because the Wallabies aside, after barely three months you are about to see no major rugby being played in Australia. Even in Brisbane, that has a sort of club competition, recieves no exposure and sweet little coverage.
This is where not only the ARU, but QRU and other such unions are missing a trick.
A rugby culture is about watching and going to rugby. Even the “rugby club” (not the fox sports program, but the Queensland rugby club – based at Eagle street pier and ballymore) has become more and more elitist. Every year they drive their membership fees up by close to 20%.