Bring back Whits to finally start for the Wallabies
By Greg Russell, 27 May 2009 Greg Russell is a Roar Guru
Related coverage
It was Chris Whitaker who gave us one of the better quotes of recent times. When asked in February 2006 who the new Wallaby coach would be, he quipped: “I suppose Steven Bradbury. He’s the only one left standing and you’d have to assume he’ll get it.”
Whitaker was referring to John Connolly in the wake of Ewen McKenzie and David Nucifora withdrawing from consideration.
The irony of this statement is that Whitaker himself spent the best part of a decade waiting for George Gregan to fall over, but it never happened, because the iron-willed little general was far too clever to offer his understudy even a sniff at the top job.
This presumably is why Whitaker’s nickname, according to Wikipedia, is “Anthem”: singing it is as much as he was ever allowed to do in “playing” for Australia.
Events in Europe in recent months raise the issue of whether Whitaker should be given further opportunities to blow his lungs singing “Advance Australia Fair”.
I refer here to Leinster’s Heineken Cup success. According to many reports, Whitaker’s masterful direction of play was a major contributing factor in this triumph.
Of course Rocky Elsom is drawing plaudits all around the rugby world for his back-to-back man-of-the-match performances in Leinster’s stunning accomplishment. These have Australian rugby fans positively clamoring for Elsom’s return to the gold Wallaby jersey.
But what’s good for the goose should also be good for the gander: if Elsom’s play for Leinster warrants him immediately returning to the Australian fold, then doesn’t it follow that Whitaker’s form for Leinster should also count in terms of Wallaby selection?
At this point I need to declare that I am raising this issue more as a point of logic than one based on intimate observation of Whitaker’s form.
In total I would have watched less than 5 minutes of the entire Heineken Cup competition (but gee, Whitaker looked pretty sharp in those 5 minutes!). So if all you HC experts want to tell me that Whitaker’s form sucked, then please, you are welcome to do so (politely!).
For now, let me assume that Whitaker’s form was good.
That being the case I would firstly note that he never received an extended opportunity in the Australian jumper, so how do we know how good he really is?
Secondly I would note that Australian rugby still has no solution at half-back. Yes, Luke Burgess can do special things, but he does so irregularly, and at other times he does not exactly inspire total confidence – and that is being polite.
The other current Wallaby-squad half-back is Josh Valentine. Admittedly he’s had a good season for the Force, but playing inside Matt Giteau is rather a luxury that many half-backs would die for. (It rather recalls the words of Barry John to a nervous Gareth Edwards on his Welsh debut: “Just throw it anywhere lad, and I’ll catch it.”)
Indeed, one has to wonder if Whitaker’s service might really add to Giteau’s already world-class game.
Thirdly, there is the issue of Whitaker’s age: 34.
No disputing it, this is getting on. However, one could point out that this is the age at which Fabien Galthié masterminded France’s 2003 World Cup campaign, at which point in time many considered him the best half-back in the world.
So these are just some points in favour of Whitaker’s consideration.
Above and beyond this are some broader issues that are raised: if European form can earn one player (Elsom) selection in the Wallabies, then shouldn’t all Australians playing in Europe have this path open to them?
And I fully realise that under current ARU regulations Whitaker is not eligible for Wallaby selection, because he is not contracted to an Australian Super-14 franchise (let’s ignore this complication in discussing whether his form is good enough).
But should the ARU’s rules be changed in this regard?
Sport, all day long. Does this sound too good to be true? We're searching for a Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. If you're a sales star who doesn't mind a hit, kick, throw, or cycle, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
Have you seen the new Wallabies jersey? Want one of your own? We're giving away a brand new 2013 Wallabies jersey to one lucky Roarer, click here to go in the running to win.
- Explore:
- Chris Whitaker, Ewen McKenzie, George Gregan, John Connolly, Rugby Union, wallabies



May 27th 2009 @ 6:09am
GladFop said | May 27th 2009 @ 6:09am | Report comment
The ARU should stop being so snobbish. And yes, Whitaker’s excellent service would launch the backline better than any other Aussie half now playing.
A good post, Greg, as always, but what I think a lot of us here in Sarsaparilla would like to have from you, as a digger resident in long white cloudland, is a rundown on what the Kiwis at your local pub think the AB starting team should be for the French/Italian tests, and whether the team and/or tactics should change for the Tri-Nations against the Boks and the Ws.
Also, what do you hear about Ritchie? He didn’t look too hot in the Bulls game. Is he still recovering?
May 27th 2009 @ 8:28am
Brett McKay said | May 27th 2009 @ 8:28am | Report comment
Um……. No. Sorry Greg, but I still can’t see the need to change the rules. I think Whittaker was/is a fine scrumhalf, but using your same point of logic, we could also be calling back Gregan or (heaven forbid) Cordingley if their form too is reasonable.
All the standard arguments about opening the floodgates, and killing the domestic game, etc, are all still valid and still strong enough to maintain the current policy. If Elsom re-signs with the ARU, then I’m happy for him to be selected if form dictates, and likewise Luke McAlister for New Zealand. But the domestic game(s) must be protected.
One policy I would be happy to see changed would allow national eligibilty maintained while ever and wherever Super rugby is played, and as we’ve all discussed on here previously, I think this will happen sooner rather than later. This would be especially beneficial for the Islands too..
May 27th 2009 @ 8:36am
Reg said | May 27th 2009 @ 8:36am | Report comment
“According to many reports, Whitaker’s masterful direction of play was a major contributing factor in this triumph.”
Did you watch it? He was average.
May 27th 2009 @ 8:50am
Greg Russell said | May 27th 2009 @ 8:50am | Report comment
Brett has been very polite, so I just wanted to clarify my own position of uncertainty (there’s an oxymoron!): here’s a sentence from my copy for the above article that didn’t make the final cut:
“As I have tried to make clear, I am not totally sold on this idea [recalling Whitaker] myself. However the editor of The Roar thought it might be an interesting one to throw out for discussion, so that’s what I am doing.”
I completely agree with Brett that “One policy I would be happy to see changed would allow national eligibilty maintained while ever and wherever Super rugby is played”. Even NZers are rapidly coming to this view, with quite a few talkback callers in recent days salivating over what Matt Giteau could do for the Hurricanes or Blues in their problem position of 10.
“using your same point of logic, we could also be calling back Gregan or (heaven forbid) Cordingley if their form too is reasonable.” Why not, if their form really is red-hot, and no halfback in Australia is the same?
Now to GF: “Also, what do you hear about Ritchie? He didn’t look too hot in the Bulls game. Is he still recovering?” People are keeping very quiet on this (and so they should: if there is one player who has deserved the right to be beyond criticism, it is surely McCaw). But insofar as anything is being said, it is indeed that his quiet form might be due to recovering from injury and concussion. Time will tell.
I actually wonder if we are seeing in McCaw the same transition as happened with Michael Jones, i.e., from a great 7 to a great 6. Time will tell.
As for what the Kiwi person on the street is thinking in terms of AB selections, there’s a whole host of really passionate, really knowledgeable AB supporters on the Roar who have covered that well and will continue to do so.
May 27th 2009 @ 8:51am
Greg Russell said | May 27th 2009 @ 8:51am | Report comment
Reg: see my article, where I wrote:
“At this point I need to declare that I am raising this issue more as a point of logic than one based on intimate observation of Whitaker’s form. In toto I would have watched less than 5 minutes of the entire Heineken Cup competition (but gee, Whitaker looked pretty sharp in those 5 minutes!). So if all you HC experts want to tell me that Whitaker’s form sucked, then please, you are welcome to do so (politely!).”
May 27th 2009 @ 9:17am
Spiro Zavos said | May 27th 2009 @ 9:17am | Report comment
Chris Whitaker is a fine distributing halfback. But he does not put any pressure on the opposition with his running or with his general play in the way, say, Fourie du Preeze, the best player in the world, does.
My pick for the long term Wallaby halfback is Willie Genia, when he recovers from his injuries, with Josh Holmes being in the picture too. Luke Burgess, whose play fell off this season, John Valentine are keeping the spot warm for the time being for the eventual long term candidate who is not either one of them.
May 27th 2009 @ 9:31am
Greg Russell said | May 27th 2009 @ 9:31am | Report comment
Spiro, I agree Whits is not long term (as admitted in the article). But would he be a better caretaker than Burgess or Valentine? Bear in mind that the job of a caretaker is to keep things STABLE (I emphasize that word) until an improved option is ready.
May 27th 2009 @ 9:53am
arthur rightus said | May 27th 2009 @ 9:53am | Report comment
Spiro, I agree Genia is an undeniable talent who should force his way into the Wallaby No.9 in the not too distant future, but Holmes is average & should be forgotten about until he makes serious improvement. Spends far too much time crabbing across field looking for runners, then placing his backline under pressure when he decides to pass it.
May 27th 2009 @ 10:31am
Chuck said | May 27th 2009 @ 10:31am | Report comment
Greg,
Whits has never been anything more than an average player – did you even watch the wallabies play last year to criticise Burgess? he’s pass the ball straight onto Giteau’s chest, he’d drop it and they’d blame Burgess…
watch some games before commenting next time
May 27th 2009 @ 10:40am
Hammer said | May 27th 2009 @ 10:40am | Report comment
“Thirdly, there is the issue of Whitaker’s age: 34.
No disputing it, this is getting on. However, one could point out that this is the age at which Fabien Galthié masterminded France’s 2003 World Cup campaign, at which point in time many considered him the best half-back in the world.”
did the French win the ’03 W/C then ?? … from memory the campaign was bordering on farce … and given he’s 34 – come the W/C in ’11 he’d be 36 … Aust have already gone that path of an aging, average halfback clogging things up …
dumb, revisionist idea … he wasn’t great in the first place