Are the Super Bulls setting up a dynasty?
By Spiro Zavos, 1 Jun 2009 Spiro Zavos is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- Bulls, Chiefs, Lelia Masaga, Morne Steyn, Rugby Union, Super Rugby

South Africa's Bulls players celebrate after scoring a try during the final of the Super 14 rugby match against New Zealand Chiefs at the Loftus Versfeld stadium in Pretoria, South Africa, Saturday May 30, 2009. AP Photo/Themba Hadebe
At the end of their stunning 61 – 17 massacre of the Chiefs the Bulls players and coaching staff formed a circle with linked arm, went down on their knees and with heads bowed gave thanks to their God for the victory. God helps those, however, who help themselves. The Bulls played superbly and were coached superbly.
Fourie du Preez demonstrated once again that he is the best player in world rugby. Every facet of the Bulls play, from the confrontational defence, to a ball-stealing lineout, to abrasive running by forwards and backs, to Bryan Habana’s thief in the night inercepts and to Morne Steyn thumpingly accurate kicking, the Bulls were several classes above the hapless Chiefs.
If this Bulls side can stay together for a couple of years, and it will probably will with the Rugby World Cup coming up in two years time, they can win a couple more Super Rugby titles and set up a South African dynasty to rival the Crusaders.
The Bulls were helped by incredibly dumb tactics on the part of the Chiefs. At the the beginning of the match, and throughout its diastrous course for them, they steadfastly refused to kick for touch, even when they had the safety of kicking out from their own 22.
Moreover, the high kicks the Chiefs put in were not chased. Lelia Masaga is a one-trick winger. He has a certain pace but his chasing and catching of high balls is poor.
He put no pressure on the Bulls back three. As a consequence, the Bulls were able to field the high balls, return them with higher interest and then force mistakes with their own whole-hearted chasing.
The other aspect of the stupid Chiefs tactics is that the Bulls have developed a great fractured ball series of plays which requires the big forwards to rumble forward and then for du Preez to chose the right time for a hard, flat pass to unleash a stacked backline.
The Chiefs also neglected the basic rule of altitude play, too, which is: ‘when in doubt kick it.’
Teams coming to Pretoria have to learn the Bulls game which is let the ball do the work, until you are within striking distance and then occur everything into attack.
Most of the Bulls tries came from mistakes made by the Chiefs trying to do too much inside their own territory.
After giving up the opening try, the Bulls then got their game together and demolished the Chiefs, helped by the Chiefs inability to take the right tactical options. From the kick-off, for example, Sione Lauaki tried to run the ball from inside his 22. He was isolated. The Bulls forced a turnover. Not long after, following a short-arm penalty awarded by Jonathan Kaplan, du Preez was over for a try.
From then on it was all the Bulls. They scored again soon after and the flood gates opened up.
So superior and confident were they that were able to sub most of their stars well before the final whistle in an indication that the match was wrapped up well before its end.
For years the Bulls were a hard team to defeat in the pre-ELV days with their lineout and driving maul. With the maul de-clawed as it were by being able to be collapsed legitmately, the Bulls developed a wider, explosive running game.
Ironically they have mastered this game just when collapsing the maul has become illegal. Will they give up their running game to go back to their old rolling maul game? Hopefully they won’t. But the ability to roll mauls near their opponents tryline will give the Bulls yet another scoring option.
From what they showed this season, winning all of their home matches and then producing the biggest margin and most points ever in a Super Rugby final (the previous record was 36 – 6 by the ACT Brumbies against the hapless Sharks at Canberra in 2001), the Bulls are on the rampage for the next few years.
In the 14 years of Super Rugby, has there ever been a more impressive finals victory? Have the Bulls played the perfect final? I think so.
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- Bulls, Chiefs, Lelia Masaga, Morne Steyn, Rugby Union, Super Rugby

June 1st 2009 @ 9:47am
Chris said | June 1st 2009 @ 9:47am | Report comment
Re a possible Bulls dynasty-
Possible, the bulls have developed a great structure over the last couple of years, their youth players aer easily the best prepared of the SA’can team by the time they make the first team.
What is also benefitting them is that they are just about the only Southern Hemishere franchise that can go toe-to-toe with the northern hemisphere clubs in terms of money. Just look at how well attended their home games are and how well theri shirt sales are going. They make a massive amount of money. I predict that they will lose far fewer players than many people are expecting because of this off field success.
June 1st 2009 @ 9:58am
Temba said | June 1st 2009 @ 9:58am | Report comment
James, neutral venues for the finals? Now I have heard it all…
Lets do it next time a kiwi team wins the rights to host the final.
Du Preez is the player of the series in my books and without a doubt the best 9 in the world. He also puts a strong case for best player.
June 1st 2009 @ 9:59am
Robbos said | June 1st 2009 @ 9:59am | Report comment
Pip, I think this is quite common in most sports. Look at the French Open after Hewitt got knocked out, Australia tends to lose interest.
Of course this is still a provincial competition, but then I can assure you that people in Sydney lose interest in the AFL finals once Swans are out or not competitive (see crowd figure last year finals match finals match against Nth melb).
June 1st 2009 @ 10:03am
LeftArmSpinner said | June 1st 2009 @ 10:03am | Report comment
Spiro, come on. All season you have shown us the way, shown us the light that is correct English. At the final hurdle, it all falls over.
Bulls dont have Dynasties!!!! They have herds!!!! And yes, I think that they are setting up a herd.
June 1st 2009 @ 10:05am
Rusty said | June 1st 2009 @ 10:05am | Report comment
Given the vast distances between countries and venues the neutral idea is dead in the water. The distances makes it too inhibitive on the travelling support and defies the point of finishing top. Terrible to imagine the final without the vibrant seething mass of colour that was the local crowd.
June 1st 2009 @ 10:07am
Pippinu said | June 1st 2009 @ 10:07am | Report comment
Robbos
what are we going to do about Sydney people?
You remind me, I’m just about to send an article to The Roar on this very subject!!
June 1st 2009 @ 10:07am
Rusty said | June 1st 2009 @ 10:07am | Report comment
on a tangent though – in terms of the Currie Cup it will be interesting to see if post 2010 Football WC if the CC final would be played at Soccer City with its 90K seating.
June 1st 2009 @ 10:13am
Hammer said | June 1st 2009 @ 10:13am | Report comment
Neutral venues are just not practical and don’t reward season long consistency … the Bulls deserved home ground advantage for being the best performing side over the season … you can’t take that away from them – just because they play in SA at altitude …
what needs to be looked at is the turn around time between semis and finals – and this should have been addressed years ago … its just not practical for a team to fly NZ – SA or SA – NZ within a week and be expected to perform at optimum – there’s no way that the chiefs are 44 points worse side than the Bulls (in fact both would have rolled the Lions) … perhaps what needs to be looked at is mid week semis …
June 1st 2009 @ 10:23am
Rusty said | June 1st 2009 @ 10:23am | Report comment
Hammer – not a bad idea and maybe one to consider for the S15. I still remember my Stormers team arriving back in CT from Australasia playing I think it was 1 possibly 2 games and then flying back to play the Saders in Christchurch. Think they covered something like 24K+ of travelling in the season to get to the semi and were noticabley buggered after the first 30min. Back on the S15 I suppose with the conferences we should actually see less long distance travelling and this should take some of this fatgue out.
June 1st 2009 @ 10:23am
sheek said | June 1st 2009 @ 10:23am | Report comment
The point I was attempting to make, is that things aren’t always what they seem. While the scoreline was a massacre, that doesn’t suggest in any way a future dynasty for the Bulls. Next year, everyone starts again from scratch.
The Essendon Bombers were expected, with the teams they had each time, to create 5 years dynasties after winning the premiership flag in 1993 & 2000. It never happened.
And who would have thought the Geelong Cats would lose last year’s GF to Hawthorn Hawks? Although ironically, that will now probably work in their favour, since the Cats players have had a tangible & painful lesson in taking nothing for granted.
For all their dynasty building, the Canterbury Crusaders could never win more than 2 Super 12/14 titles in a row. It’s tough gig. In any year, there are 3-4 genuine candidates for top dog. You do need some luck, along with all the hard work.