Stirling Mortlock sees no need to remind Sonny Bill Williams that shoulder charges are illegal in rugby union, but uppercuts are another matter.
Williams was infamously sin-binned on his rugby debut for French club Toulon last year after shortening up second division player Laussucq Arnaud with one of his NRL-trademark shoulder charges in a pre-season “friendly”.
Arnaud described the hit as “like an electrocution”.
Wallabies captain Mortlock has no concerns about a similar fate when he marks the 23-year-old ex-Bulldogs giant in Saturday night’s Sydney Football Stadium clash with the Barbarians.
“I think he learned that pretty quickly in union, that shoulder charges are illegal,” Mortlock said with a grin on Friday.
“And (it’s) just as lucky that uppercuts are pretty illegal too.”
Mortlock was referring to Williams’ bout on the undercard of good friend Anthony Mundine last week.
“At the end of the day Sonny’s a world class athlete, he’s proved his worth in league and he’s been going very well overseas in union,” Mortlock said.
“Last week he was in the ring doing a bit of damage there as well so I’ve got no doubt that he’ll be looking forward to the opportunity of playing at a bigger stage in rugby and he’ll be up for it.”
The match-up at outside centre is one of the most anticipated of the international season opener, not least from Bulldogs fans still angry about Williams’ walk-out last year.
“I’ve had a few people come up to me and say put a shot on him for me or whatever but I think it’s all a bit tongue in cheek really,” Mortlock said.
“It certainly is from my perspective quite different.
“We’ve had a fair bit of footage from Sonny playing at Toulon.
“I’m not really focused on going at one player. Usually I’m more focused on my role to play in the group, from my perspective making sure I link in well with the guys around me in the backline.”
Mortlock said the unpredictability of the Barbarians would be an ideal test for the Wallabies in their first match of 2009.
“You’re not too sure of what to expect but that’s probably a good thing for us,” Mortlock said.
“It’s our first match, we’ve got to have a real focus on being as cohesive as possible in our first outing so it just brings back the focus on ourselves and what we’re about.
“You want to be tested across the paddock, you want to have teams trying to counter-attack against you because the best teams in the world do that whenever they see opportunities.
“So, from our perspective, I guess that’s why this first-up match is a great one, we’ve got no doubt we’ll be tested.”
© AAP 2012Five things you might not know about the Barbarians Rugby Football Club:
* They were formed in 1890 in Bradford, northern England, the brainchild of WP Carpmael, who wanted to give players the chance to play alongside those who were usually their opponents.
* Players are selected to appear on an invitational basis and are awarded life membership of the club on the date of their first appearance.
* The club’s motto is: “Rugby football is a game for gentlemen in all classes, but for no bad sportsman in any class”.
* The club’s traditions include players wearing their club socks, and an uncapped player appearing in every game.
* They have played Australia 10 times since 1948, with the Wallabies winning seven times. This will be their first game on Australian soil.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Will Super Rugby crowds continue their slide? (198)
- Will South African rugby force a Super 21 by 2018? (172)
- Brumbies 2012: New coach, new players, new attitude (128)
- Dan Parks and the unsolved questions of expat rugby (61)
- Pocock set to be named new Force skipper (56)
- Can the ‘Tahs win the battle after losing the Waugh? (51)
- What does the future hold for the Six Nations (50)
- Wales show Southern Hemisphere how to play running rugby (28)
- What opening matches of Six Nations taught us (18)
- Will Super Rugby crowds continue their slide? (201)
- Clinical Chiefs cost rusty Rebels in Corio (9)
- Six Nations shows rugby is a parochial game at heart (5)
- Goose’s Super Rugby up-and-comer XV for 2012 (29)
- What does the future hold for the Six Nations (50)
- Explore:
- Barbarians, Rugby Union, Sonny Bill Williams, Stirling Mortlock, wallabies

hammer said | June 6th 2009 @ 8:59pm | Report comment
Did Dickinson get this gig because he’s so poor he’d nail home a convincing win …. I mean it was always going to be 1 way traffic – but how poor has he been …. or is one of the new laws you’re permitted to knock on and play one if you’re in gold jerseys ,,,,
I really don’t know why O’Neill complains about the strength of NH teams in June … the Wallabies are woeful early they need poor teams to get their game going …
westy said | June 6th 2009 @ 10:09pm | Report comment
Good point first
Great to see 40000.at SFS.
But I wince when the commentator says it is rugby’s equivalent to SOO. Do not do this . It smacks of an inferiority complex.
I like both games . On wednesday I tuned in to watch rugby league State of Origin. They quite rightly do not mention rugby union a different game.
I tuned in to watch rugby.
I do not know why we do this. But there I am looking at Wendell Sailor talking about rugby league and the SOO.What moron is running this . It smacks of an inferiority complex. And it is not rugby league’s fault.This crowd obviously just want AFL.
I can watch SOO and enjoy it in its own right.
I can do the same for rugby union. We have the problem
how many shots of SBW doing nothing do I have to look at.
channel 7′s coverage was woeful .
hammer was right did the refereeing all become a bit to much so best ignore it.
I needed a game to promote our test series not drive people to distraction.
The Barbarians were poor. Gimmicks seldom work.
JF said | June 6th 2009 @ 10:23pm | Report comment
Agreed westy,
Channel 7 really showed a lack of consideration to the rugby public, it looked like they had used the Today Tonight team to cover the game. Matt White, Wendell, countless shots of SBW, what a disgrace. Regarding the rugby, the Ba Bas were pretty ordinary, they lacked some cool heads in their inside backs and I thought their loose forwards looked tired. Giteau and Barnes were the big difference.
Working Class Rugger said | June 6th 2009 @ 10:55pm | Report comment
The Wallabies were very, very scrappy. I feel for England. They lost to the BaaBaas. They are in trouble. Hopefully next week their wil be a vastly superior performance. Dickinson had a shocker. On both sides.
Knives Out said | June 7th 2009 @ 8:01am | Report comment
‘The Wallabies were very, very scrappy. I feel for England. They lost to the BaaBaas. They are in trouble.’
I’m not sure why I would even bother pointing this out to you but you might like to consider that England played their 3rd team, hence the changes made to the winning starting xv for the England test, and also that the Baa Baas team that faced England was clearly superior to today’s model that was patently selected to gain approval from the Australian republic – hence the Sanzar players. You might also like to consider the travel and the fact that Jerry Collins publicly stated that the Baa Baas had done no training for the Australian game.