League’s southern push finally working
By Adam_Santarossa, 9 Jun 2009 Adam Santarossa is a Roar Guru
- Tagged:
- melbourne rugby league, NRL, Rugby League, State Of Origin
Rugby league has been trying to assert itself in the AFL heartland of Victoria for many years. But it’s only in the last few days that the effectiveness of the NRL’s push south has finally been noticed.
However, it wasn’t noticed in the 55,000 strong crowd selling out Etihad Stadium for Origin 1, nor the record television audience recorded in Victoria for the game.
No, the NRL’s storming of Victoria was finally noticed by the actions of my 73 year old Grandma.
My lovely Nan, who is a Carlton tragic and AFL diehard through and through, was, to my surprise, excitedly preparing to sit down and watch Origin 1. “They are saying down here that no one will watch the game, but I can’t wait” she said.
Of course, like most Victorians, my nan cheers on the Maroons (which ensures she forgoes any decent birthday present from me come birthday time).
But whilst her support of the Maroons came as no surprise, her comment about being unable to wait to see “her Billy” ( as in Melbourne Storm, Queensland and Australian fullback, Billy Slater.) did.
This tagline is a true indication of my Nan’s affection and until now has only been reserved for Carlton footballers and her non-Blues faves, Jonathan Brown and Ben Cousins (pre-2007).
Now, although it is still a long way away before my Nan begins spruiking her love for her “international Dell” , her ” Wolfman” or her “Taniela The Tank”, it shows the NRL is making a mighty imprint South of the Border.
The fans present for Origin 1 also back up this claim, hootering and hollering at the right moments and were on the edge of their seats throughout.
This has been achieved even with NRL games shown in the wee-hours cramped between adult advertising and Danoz Direct (Free to Air).
Following the success of last week’s Origin, there has been renewed calls to make a Melbourne Origin an annual event.
I say let’s take it a step further: why not expand Origin to a five-game series, with two games each year in NSW and Queensland and one game a year in Melbourne.
I say you can’t have too much of a good thing.
And in case you’re wondering, Nan’s already camping out for Origin next year!
Recommend this story.
The Crowd Says (27) | Page 2 of Comments
Have Your Say
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby League articles
- NSW State of Origin 2012 team announced; expert reaction (221)
- Make this the last Origin in Melbourne (165)
- League and Union: we should embrace the different codes (141)
- An answer to Sydney NRL crowd problems? (120)
- Who missed out on NSW State of Origin selection (115)
- That Origin try: Did Inglis score or did the refs get it wrong? (110)
- Brisbane Broncos on borrowed time (104)
- Inglis try was fairly awarded, says Harrigan (26)
- State of Origin revels in ratings records (38)
- NRL miss their big chance in Melbourne (45)
- The Agony and the Agony of State of Origin (48)
- State of Origin Game One: NSW player ratings (36)
- BROWNIE: Blues dominant everywhere except scoreboard (65)
- State of Origin Game One: Queensland player ratings (16)
- State of Origin revels in ratings records (38)
- NRL miss their big chance in Melbourne (45)
- State of Origin Game One: NSW player ratings (36)
- State of Origin Game One: Queensland player ratings (16)
- Why Victoria should never host another Origin match (42)
- Channel Nine cross-promotions: Delta just the tip of the iceberg (15)
- The next century of rugby league (23)
- Explore:
- melbourne rugby league, NRL, Rugby League, State Of Origin

June 9th 2009 @ 5:59pm
Andrew said | June 9th 2009 @ 5:59pm | Report comment
Spot on. New Ltd via the Tele run an anti Rugby League discussion piece every day. Anything NRL related runs with the words “Latest NRL Scandal” and then you find out that someone missed the team bus and arrived late for training. Yeah, having News Ltd as a pay master does wonders for your code.
June 9th 2009 @ 6:25pm
wallythefly said | June 9th 2009 @ 6:25pm | Report comment
no no no, if something is good as it is (origin with 3 games) then its probably best to leave it as is, don’t flog a good thing to death.
are Melbourne crowds better than last year? based on (very) casual observations they seem to be better
league has done a decent job in melb and giving them an origin every 3 years or so (like is suggested here) is a good idea, i agree that if they had one every year the appeal may wear off
w/e papers reported melbourne going for the NRL grand final, surprised nobody has mentioned it on here…
June 9th 2009 @ 7:25pm
Boof said | June 9th 2009 @ 7:25pm | Report comment
My mate work`s down there & he say`s it`s pathetic,page after page of AFL & a tiny story about league stuck in the middle somewhere,no coverage & cant even find a pub that show`s league anywhere that is after midnight when they do show it.,nope…..a bridge too far.
June 9th 2009 @ 8:24pm
Justin said | June 9th 2009 @ 8:24pm | Report comment
Boof your mate is pretty spot on. You wont see League in any pubs down here, you will see Rugby in plenty though, be it S14 or Tests.
June 9th 2009 @ 8:53pm
Andrew said | June 9th 2009 @ 8:53pm | Report comment
Too bad no one is watching those TV’s. No wonder that Vic’s don’t care for “Rugby” when all they see most of the time is Super 14 and Wallaby test matches.
June 10th 2009 @ 7:57am
Crosscoder said | June 10th 2009 @ 7:57am | Report comment
Keeper11
News Ltd assisting ,you gotta be kidding,That chip wrapper has been giving the NRL and rugby league the biggest serve this year I have seen,since they became involved in the game.
The SOO is actually an ARL baby,not the NRL.
Melbourne Storm averages 13,000(10 years)from SFA base in a 3rd world stadium,.The Swans about 25,000 (27 years), the latter in a city with a population at least 600,000 larger.They(Swans) could only crack 19,000 for a semi in Sydney last year.
The same NRL team,that had the 2nd highest ratings on fox,when they played the bulldogs a fortnight ago.The same Storm,that has some of the highest sponsorship amongst both the NRL and AFL.The Same Storm with the under 20 side(incl 11 locals) near the top.The same Storm that was in the grand final of the under 18s NRL comp.
The 3.5 million viewers around Oz(a SOO record),were watching on ch9,not owned buy News Ltd.They all buy the Australian it appears sheesh!.
Not bad for a joke club.
June 10th 2009 @ 8:10am
The Answer said | June 10th 2009 @ 8:10am | Report comment
How can it be that one group of Melbournians will tell you that the News Ltd papers down in Melbourne are full of propaganda for rugby league with “front page stories” and the other group tell you it gets no coverage.
Does anyone read the papers?
June 10th 2009 @ 8:17am
Redb said | June 10th 2009 @ 8:17am | Report comment
I would like to know where it is written that you can only follow one code of football and soon as you start watching another code it is automaticially assumed your drop your original code. Looking at rugby league fans just as much Aussie Rules fans here.
What can be assumed IMO, is that your original team in a particular football code will always remain the dearest to heart, well if your fair dinkum anyway.
I can enjoy Melb Victory, West Tigers, but they will never compete with Essendon.
Redb
June 10th 2009 @ 8:20am
The Answer said | June 10th 2009 @ 8:20am | Report comment
Redb,
That is the precise reason I refuse to believe their is any football war. What stops someone supporting the Knights in July, and then the Jets in February…while cheering on the Waratahs and, say Collingwood, over a weekend.
I have never heard any ‘football warrior’ give me a decent answer.
June 10th 2009 @ 8:22am
Redb said | June 10th 2009 @ 8:22am | Report comment
Boof,
When I’m in Sydney I have to wade through pages and pages of NRL in the Daily Telegraph! What’s your point?
10 AFL teams, 1 NRL team in Melbourne – do the math.
or to put it another way, Melbourne crowds this last weekend.
AFL – 212,647 people.
NRL – 15,318 people.
Redb