Wallabies first Tri Nations cab off the rank
By James Mortimer, 10 Jun 2009 James Mortimer is a Roar Pro
Related coverage
- Rugby Union news
- Wallabies news
- Tri Nations Tournament news
- New Zealand All Blacks news
- South Africa Springboks news
- Sonny Bill Williams news
- 2011 Wallabies squad news
Historically regarded as a team that takes time to warm into a Test season, it was a portentous performance from the Wallabies in what will be a challenging season for the Australians.
Gruelling not so much for the fourteen more Test matches that they have to play, but more for the fact that Robbie Deans will raise the bar considerably higher for the expectations of his team.
Deans has made it no secret that he thought that the Wallabies should have beaten the All Blacks on two occasions – in Brisbane and Hong Kong last year.
While it was a solid season, the five losses, especially the thumping suffered at the end of the Tri Nations by the Springboks, would be considered only a basic pass mark by the five time Super rugby title winning coach.
So we now move to 2009, and while we are still to see the World Champions and current Tri Nations and Bledisloe Cup holders this year, the Wallabies have unveiled a performance which one could imagine ticked all of Dean’s boxes.
The Barbarians though were a major disappointment.
While on paper it was an astounding team, one witnessed a cadre of aging superstars, who seemed to be focused on anything but a test match class performance.
The Baa-baas methodology is that of being relaxed, playing open free spirited, and gentlemen’s rugby. There were few dominant performances from such a hyped up invitational side.
For all of the good performances, there was a glaring negative aspect to each individual Barbarians game.
Sonny Bill Williams showed glimpses of his potential, but the reality was that most Wallaby tries were scored through his midfield channel.
Luke McAlister continually looked to overplay his hand, trying to win the game by himself, and clearly feeling the eyes of the All Black selectors on him.
And others, like Jerry Collins, looked as if they have been living the good life of the French Riviera for too long.
As the game played out, the glaring remark by returning All Black Chris Jack came to mind: that the game in Europe is notches below the requirement of a Southern Hemisphere Test player.
And as the Wallabies showed, rugby is a team game, and the cohesion and coordination of both the offensive and defensive structures of the Australians was of a different class.
There was no factor, statistically or otherwise, that suggested an even contest.
There are world class players in the Wallaby line up, such as Stirling Mortlock, Matt Giteau and George Smith, as well as veterans such as Al Baxter and Nathan Sharpe. But outside of this, there are still men finding their feet at rugby’s top level, in terms of both age and Test experience
But there is intensity and a sense of being primed that has not been seen by Australian teams for some time, far beyond that of either the Eddie Jones or John Connelly era.
It is still a long way off from being compared to the most successful age in Australian rugby, under the watchful eye of Rod McQueen.
At the end of his reign in 2001, the Wallabies had their second World Cup, were in the fourth year of a five year Bledisloe sovereignty, and had just won back to back Tri Nations crowns.
But the hunger and professionalism of this Wallabies team is there, and it is absolutely crystal as to the intentions of the captain and coach.
Mortlock had an outstanding match in his “traditional” position, despite playing at inside centre and wing in the last year, and any concerns that his position was under threat were completely unfounded.
“I thought our intent was clear for the first 15 or so minutes, we were very effective at the breakdown at the tackle area and we set the standard from their onwards.” Mortlock said.
It defined exactly what he was seeking from his troops.
For when a rugby team dominates at the breakdown and the tackle area, inevitably they will win the game.
Equally, Deans identified the one area that concerned him last year, and the key factor that allowed the All Blacks to finish 2008 as the world’s premier team.
“The guys played to the end … and that’s going to be something we’ll be keen to take forward with us,” Deans said.
If the Wallabies can execute a complete 80 minute performance like this against the incoming Azzuri and Tri Colours, then their Tri Nations foes will be wary indeed.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Will Super Rugby crowds continue their slide? (201)
- Will South African rugby force a Super 21 by 2018? (173)
- The real story of how John O’Neill turned Manchester City down (70)
- Dan Parks and the unsolved questions of expat rugby (65)
- Australian teams at Super disadvantage (58)
- Pocock set to be named new Force skipper (56)
- Can the ‘Tahs win the battle after losing the Waugh? (51)
- France turns to Parra and Trinh-Duc
- Rebels look to lift for formidable Blues in rugby trial
- Mr Fix-It Lucas wants to nail down No.10
- Force roost loses ‘Mother Hen’ Sharpe
- Victory beat Mariners with Kewell winner
- Waratahs romp to 83-5 trial win over Samoa A
- Quade Cooper’s return to the Reds goes up a gear
- Wales show Southern Hemisphere how to play running rugby (29)
- What opening matches of Six Nations taught us (19)
- Will Super Rugby crowds continue their slide? (202)
- Clinical Chiefs cost rusty Rebels in Corio (9)
- Six Nations shows rugby is a parochial game at heart (5)
- Goose’s Super Rugby up-and-comer XV for 2012 (29)
- What does the future hold for the Six Nations (50)
- Explore:
- All Blacks, Barbarians, Luke McAlister, Matt Giteau, robbie deans, Rod McQueen, Rugby Union, Sonny Bill Williams, Springboks, Stirling Mortlock, Tri Nations, wallabies

Greg Russell said | June 10th 2009 @ 11:29am | Report comment
““The guys played to the end … and that’s going to be something we’ll be keen to take forward with us,” Deans said.”
When Robbie Deans made this remark about a month ago, I like most others took it as a statement that he intented to target fitness (as he specifically said in 2008). No doubt that is one plank. But watching on Saturday night it struck me that Deans also has another plank in mind: attacking impact off the bench. Polota-Nau, Alexander, Pocock and O’Connor all had major attacking impact in the second half, and we all know that Mumm and Cooper are no slouches in this regard either. So it seems to me that perhaps even more than Deans is looking not to concede second-half tries through improved fitness, he is really looking to score second-half tries (cf. last year) through a bench stacked with players who can do so.
I also thought Mitchell and Turner on the wings were interesting. Does anyone know their 40-m sprint times vis-a-vis Tuqiri and Hynes? Lote (when switched on, which admittedly isn’t always the case) and Hynes are both players who will not concede many tries, but nor do they score all that regularly. On the other hand, Mitchell and Turner are both players with uncanny noses for getting the ball over the line. So again, another way in which Deans is definitely looking to score more tries.
I think it’s way too early to tell with the 3N. Deans said on NZ radio last weekend that NZ has all the silverware but has key players under injury clouds, that South Africa is hugely on the rise, and that Australia is going to give it a real good shake from starting in 3rd position. Sure, there’s an element to this of Deans looking to claim underdog status, but probably he’s correct. He said that he’s anticipating a really exciting 3N, perhaps the best yet. I suspect he’s correct.
Hemjay said | June 10th 2009 @ 11:39am | Report comment
I think Australia has a half decent side this year and could go on to win the Tri-Nations. Their second year under the tutelage of Robbie should bring out the best in the team and the problems they had last year should be well polished before the 3N.
If anything I would say NZ will be the 3rd cab of the rank considering the amount of reshuffling going on due to injury and rest breaks.
The biggest question to me is do the All Blacks have the desire this year?
All seems a little quiet here on the home front.
Is it because the public can see this is not a very strong All Black team and on paper it looks vulnerable especially in the loose trio.
Robbie is a smart man and last year was more about relaying the foundations for the Wallabies it will be interesting to see how they go.
ohtani's jacket, said | June 10th 2009 @ 12:02pm | Report comment
It may seem like Australia’s best opportunity in a while, but they win their June Tests every year. Let’s see how they go on the road, starting with Eden Park.
Greg Russell said | June 10th 2009 @ 12:35pm | Report comment
All Black fans trying to claim underdog status? This is going to be an interesting 3N, isn’t it. I now await the Boks trying to claim that they should be regarded as “3rd cab off the rank”!
Getting serious, OJ’s point about Eden Park is very important. From memory Australia has not won there since 1986, and no team has beaten NZ there since the French in 1994 (although it’s interesting that NSW won there this year, and the Reds won at North Harbour). So I agree, Australia’s chances at Eden Park have to be seen realistically.
Speaking of the French, Hemjay’s point that “All seems a little quiet here on the home front” is interesting. There seems to be a misconception with much of the NZ public that this is a “France C” side. In reality it is full strength except where players are injured (just as McCaw, Carter, etc. are injured for NZ), and in that players from Clermont and Perpignan (Top 14 final) are not meant to be playing this weekend. So by next weekend it will be full strength and even for this weekend it is well above the France C level of recent tours.
Hemjay said | June 10th 2009 @ 12:53pm | Report comment
Greg I see once again in your very Australian bais that you still feel that NZ can not claim to having a weaker side.
Is this an admission by you that NZ is far superior to its Wallabies counterparts and that we could field two or three teams to play the best Australia has and still be rated the favourites.
Maybe Greg this is another attempt by those who do not back the ABs to rate them highly to take more credit out of a win than what is really on offer. You of all people Greg should know this current line up is far from New Zealands top team. However reading between the lines you insinuate that your Aussie team still doesn’t stack up compared to the boys from the Shakey Isles.
Greg the team to face the All Blacks this weekend are far from full strength a large portion of the squad and arguably their better players won’t be playing until the second test. So reality is this is a weak team for the first test. The second test will be the one that shows the real French team.
Sometimes I question your logic Greg you have a very bais opinion to the Wallabies and thats cool as you are an Aussie. However I have said this before to you, but you seem to have a chip on your shoulder about NZ and many of your posts are somewhat sarcastic but in a PC manner. yes I know you live here so there is no need to go down that track.
So in short why is it Greg in your eyes NZ can’t claim underdog status?
AndyS said | June 10th 2009 @ 1:11pm | Report comment
I don’t know how Greg sees it Hemjay, but it certainly doesn’t feel that long ago that many were drawing some pretty damning conclusions about Australian rugby when NZ had four teams in the S14 finals and Aus had none….
Sam Taulelei said | June 10th 2009 @ 1:42pm | Report comment
AndyS
That is true and the lack of a top four placing is damning for those sides but not necessarily for the Wallabies. The top talent is dispersed amongst those four teams but when they’re brought together, coached together and play together they can achieve greater success than their individual franchises. That is why the Wallabies continue to be competitive in the Tri Nations even if they’ve had a poor Super season in comparison. You can only field 15 players on the field at a time and as NZ is now experiencing all the depth in the world can’t overcome the drop in quality when you’re missing some or all of your world class players.
I agree with Greg that until the Tri Nations begins and selections are finalised we won’t know how each side stacks up against each other so it’s too early to be writing off our chances or for NZ to claim underdog status. I daresay that all sides will be affected by injury at some stage and this will be an even tougher coaching challenge for Henry and company than last year. I’m looking forward to watching how things develop.
Greg Russell said | June 10th 2009 @ 1:46pm | Report comment
Come on Hemjay, lighten up a bit, mate. Maybe I should be flattered that you have read all sorts of things into my comments that aren’t there, but really I’m not such a master of the written word. The main thing I have to take from what you have written is that no matter how hard one tries, it is always possible to find phantoms in what others write (and yes, I am guilty of doing this too!). For example, in my initial post I wrote ” there’s an element to this of Deans looking to claim underdog status”, indicating that I am not sure he’s correct. Personally I think the whole game of claiming underdog status is a bit tiresome, not to mention meaningless. I am perfectly happy for you to claim underdog status if you want to. But really, we are talking here about a competition that Australia has won only twice in 13 years, the last such time being 8 years ago. There is nothing about last year’s 3N or the S14 this year (see intervening comment by AndyS) that gives rational reason for thinking that Australia should be favored to do better than NZ this year. I agree that injuries to Carter, McCaw, Williams and So’oialo, all fantastic players (how much more respectful can I be?), even things up considerably. But I personally do not think that makes Australia favourites. I mean, come on, would Matt Hodgson even make a S14 team in NZ? But hey, these are just one man’s opinions, not meant with any disrespect.
James wrote an article last week entitled “Underestimate the All Blacks at your own peril”. I commented:
“James, underestimating the All Blacks would be as stupid as underestimating the Brazilian football side – neither ever has nor ever will field a weak side. However, just as some Brazilian football sides are not as strong as others, similarly some NZ rugby sides are not as strong as others. I for one am on record as wondering whether NZ will be as strong this year.”
I think it would be hard to be more respectful towards NZ rugby than this. I also think this evidences that we are actually of a like mind about the NZ team this year.
Take Isaac Ross, for example. On paper he might look like a weakness, because he’s a debutant. But anyone who has watched this guy in S14 knows, as G Henry has said this week, that he’s a fantastic athlete with phenomenal skills. Why should this not translate into the international arena?
I may not always succeed, but I do try to be objective in all (OK, most) of what I write. Just because I am a Wallaby supporter, that does not mean that everything I write is biased towards them. Similarly, just because I am not fervently for NZ, that does not mean I am fervently against NZ. There is always a middle ground.
Sam Taulelei said | June 10th 2009 @ 2:03pm | Report comment
Yeah Greg,
I was thinking along similar lines when I cast my eye over the team again and individually they all performed strongly in the Super 14. Even a green loose forward trio like Messam, Thomson and Read have been in excellent form and most people would be debating or arguing over which ones were left out if McCaw and So’oialo were available and picked.
I don’t have any qualms over Isaac Ross and expect him to continue his form with the Crusaders and have an outstanding debut. The trick will be for Henry to get these talented individuals to strike up combinations, learn all the calls and moves and adapt to the speed and intensity of international rugby. If they record a convincing first up win against France then all the reports will switch to the strength of depth in NZ rugby and everybody will be caught up in a wave of warm fuzzy feelings – until the next game.
Hammer said | June 10th 2009 @ 2:10pm | Report comment
I for one wouldn’t be stating that the AB’s have underdog status … personally I reckon they’re further down the track than they were this time last year …. yeah sure we have had the big names running out against the Irish first up … but as we found out pretty quickly the depth was pretty thin on the ground …
12 months on and I think this side is raw yes but certainly got some promise … for starters if that loose trio fires then we could definitely been on the way to answering some of those nagging questions of what if our aging, injured lads don’t make the line in 2011 …
2 good hit outs against the French for this outfit and then a decent run against the Italians for those coming back from injury and we’ll be in a very good position to tackle SA in SA first up …