Wallabies first Tri Nations cab off the rank
By James Mortimer, 10 Jun 2009 James Mortimer is a Roar Guru
- Tagged:
- All Blacks, Barbarians, Luke McAlister, Matt Giteau, robbie deans, Rod McQueen, Rugby Union, Sonny Bill Williams, Springboks, Stirling Mortlock, Tri Nations, wallabies
Related coverage
- Rugby Union news
- Wallabies news
- Tri Nations Tournament news
- New Zealand All Blacks news
- South Africa Springboks news
- Sonny Bill Williams news
Historically regarded as a team that takes time to warm into a Test season, it was a portentous performance from the Wallabies in what will be a challenging season for the Australians.
Gruelling not so much for the fourteen more Test matches that they have to play, but more for the fact that Robbie Deans will raise the bar considerably higher for the expectations of his team.
Deans has made it no secret that he thought that the Wallabies should have beaten the All Blacks on two occasions – in Brisbane and Hong Kong last year.
While it was a solid season, the five losses, especially the thumping suffered at the end of the Tri Nations by the Springboks, would be considered only a basic pass mark by the five time Super rugby title winning coach.
So we now move to 2009, and while we are still to see the World Champions and current Tri Nations and Bledisloe Cup holders this year, the Wallabies have unveiled a performance which one could imagine ticked all of Dean’s boxes.
The Barbarians though were a major disappointment.
While on paper it was an astounding team, one witnessed a cadre of aging superstars, who seemed to be focused on anything but a test match class performance.
The Baa-baas methodology is that of being relaxed, playing open free spirited, and gentlemen’s rugby. There were few dominant performances from such a hyped up invitational side.
For all of the good performances, there was a glaring negative aspect to each individual Barbarians game.
Sonny Bill Williams showed glimpses of his potential, but the reality was that most Wallaby tries were scored through his midfield channel.
Luke McAlister continually looked to overplay his hand, trying to win the game by himself, and clearly feeling the eyes of the All Black selectors on him.
And others, like Jerry Collins, looked as if they have been living the good life of the French Riviera for too long.
As the game played out, the glaring remark by returning All Black Chris Jack came to mind: that the game in Europe is notches below the requirement of a Southern Hemisphere Test player.
And as the Wallabies showed, rugby is a team game, and the cohesion and coordination of both the offensive and defensive structures of the Australians was of a different class.
There was no factor, statistically or otherwise, that suggested an even contest.
There are world class players in the Wallaby line up, such as Stirling Mortlock, Matt Giteau and George Smith, as well as veterans such as Al Baxter and Nathan Sharpe. But outside of this, there are still men finding their feet at rugby’s top level, in terms of both age and Test experience
But there is intensity and a sense of being primed that has not been seen by Australian teams for some time, far beyond that of either the Eddie Jones or John Connelly era.
It is still a long way off from being compared to the most successful age in Australian rugby, under the watchful eye of Rod McQueen.
At the end of his reign in 2001, the Wallabies had their second World Cup, were in the fourth year of a five year Bledisloe sovereignty, and had just won back to back Tri Nations crowns.
But the hunger and professionalism of this Wallabies team is there, and it is absolutely crystal as to the intentions of the captain and coach.
Mortlock had an outstanding match in his “traditional” position, despite playing at inside centre and wing in the last year, and any concerns that his position was under threat were completely unfounded.
“I thought our intent was clear for the first 15 or so minutes, we were very effective at the breakdown at the tackle area and we set the standard from their onwards.” Mortlock said.
It defined exactly what he was seeking from his troops.
For when a rugby team dominates at the breakdown and the tackle area, inevitably they will win the game.
Equally, Deans identified the one area that concerned him last year, and the key factor that allowed the All Blacks to finish 2008 as the world’s premier team.
“The guys played to the end … and that’s going to be something we’ll be keen to take forward with us,” Deans said.
If the Wallabies can execute a complete 80 minute performance like this against the incoming Azzuri and Tri Colours, then their Tri Nations foes will be wary indeed.
Recommend this story.
The Crowd Says (38) | Page 2 of Comments
Have Your Say
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Reds back in contention, but Waratahs need a cleanout (287)
- What Hansen’s first squad means for the Wallabies (191)
- ‘Campo’ too generous: Lord’s dream XV contains just two current Wallabies (161)
- Will Cooper and Mitchell be back in time for Wallaby selection? (156)
- Who will be in the Wallabies’ backrow? (150)
- CAMPO: Will Deans change the style of the Wallabies play? (128)
- Tahs out. Brumbies win ugly. And Quade’s back! (124)
- ALAN JONES: We have the players, it’s the coaches that are to blame (133)
- Road to the 2015 World Cup starts in June (12)
- Six lessons Robbie Deans must learn (Part 2) (53)
- Who will be the Wallabies’ centres? (105)
- RATHBONE: Whatever you do, don’t choke! (12)
- Captain Warburton lifting Wales, says Halfpenny (5)
- Precocious Brumbies eye conference crown
- Road to the 2015 World Cup starts in June (12)
- Six lessons Robbie Deans must learn (Part 2) (53)
- Who will be the Wallabies’ centres? (105)
- Are Roarers picking the Wallabies for the wrong reasons? (20)
- Who will be in the Wallabies’ backrow? (155)
- When should a game plan change and who makes the call? (4)
- Six lessons Robbie Deans must learn (Part 1) (31)
- Explore:
- All Blacks, Barbarians, Luke McAlister, Matt Giteau, robbie deans, Rod McQueen, Rugby Union, Sonny Bill Williams, Springboks, Stirling Mortlock, Tri Nations, wallabies

June 10th 2009 @ 2:32pm
Cracker said | June 10th 2009 @ 2:32pm | Report comment
Hemjay I think you might be on to something – if we talk up the All Blacks and downplay the Wallabies chances this year, then it seems we have little to lose, so if we beat the All Blacks we look like world-beaters and can bask in the glory of our success. Brilliant!
June 10th 2009 @ 4:09pm
ohtani's jacket, said | June 10th 2009 @ 4:09pm | Report comment
I don’t think we’ll lose to the French, but we can’t afford too many more injuries.
June 10th 2009 @ 5:00pm
Peter K said | June 10th 2009 @ 5:00pm | Report comment
There is no such thing as a bad or weak AB team. Just teams that are not clearly better than the rest.
They could field 3 teams that would be competitive in the TNs. With all the injuries right now probably only 2 teams.
June 11th 2009 @ 7:46am
Hemjay said | June 11th 2009 @ 7:46am | Report comment
Ok lads it looks like you have all miss interpreted what I am saying and I can see why sort of.
I was trying to get across that the All Blacks have a very inexperienced team lining up against the French it is by far a long way from our first chice fifteen. If anyone can claim underdog status which I am not, surely it would have to be the All Blacks both Australia and the Springboks are playing with full strength teams heading into their June tests. Hopefully come the Tri-Nations NZ will be back to full strength but as it stands the current Lineup to face the Frogs is devoid of over a third of its Starting XV. Even the mighty All Blacks will struggle with so much experience gone. I could only imagine what would happen to Australia or South Africa should they lose the collective knowledge of 6 frontline men.
This team to me is one of the weakest I have seen in years.
It seems also Greg you failed to answer on the French. You have stated that you think the team is their top team when everyone else seems to think the total opposite for the first test.
June 11th 2009 @ 8:17am
spiro said | June 11th 2009 @ 8:17am | Report comment
Greg is right that the Tri Nations side teams seem to be scrambllng to get the underdog status. The point of this always escapes me. It is probably coaches protecting themselves against losses, and the need for players and coaches not to sound ‘arrogant.’ But the claims can have repercussions. In 1997 John Hart, after a fabulous year in 1996 with the first series victory by the All Blacks in South Africa ever, and 1997 started furiously claiming underdog status in 1998 to the extent that the team actually believed him and had a disastrous year.
I think I prefer teams to talk about the ‘journey’ and their excitement of the challenge in front of them rather than trying to downplay their chances. Words have consequences and sometimes too much humility can become self-fulfilling.
June 11th 2009 @ 8:34am
Greg Russell said | June 11th 2009 @ 8:34am | Report comment
Hemjay – I agree that France this weekend are not full strength, as indeed I said straight off in my initial comment (“In reality it is full strength except … in that players from Clermont and Perpignan (Top 14 final) are not meant to be playing this weekend”). That said, the NZ papers today are saying that two of the front-rowers from the T14 final will be in the 22 this weekend if they arrive in adequate health.
I am not an expert on French rugby, but I’m prepared to believe Richard Turner on RadioSport this week, who kept stressing that this is not France C, and that their squad for this tour is absolutely full strength apart from injured players (which, he said, is the same as NZ’s position, with McCaw, Carter, Williams, Leonard, So’oialo injured).
Maybe an expert on NH rugby (e.g. Knives Out if he is reading) could comment on whether this is really France’s best available squad.
I think we all just want to see the rugby begin, with plenty of exciting new players (e.g., Isaac Ross, James O’Connor) in the various SH sides. So let’s all agree on that.
Let’s also agree that it would be a major upset if either NZ or Australia were to lose before the 3N.
Hemjay – tell us a bit about yourself. I think it helps us all if we can know a bit more about the person behind the comments. For a start, what is the meaning of “Hemjay”? It makes me think of the word hemlock (no offence intended). Should I call you Socrates?
June 11th 2009 @ 8:41am
Hemjay said | June 11th 2009 @ 8:41am | Report comment
Spiro,
What I find so intriguing is never are New Zealoand allowed to claim underdog status even when clearly like this year they are struggling to field a full strength team.
Why Spiro / Greg, what is it that stops NZ from being the underdog?
Yes we constantly have a very good team but not always do we have the best team which on paper its very obvious to most here in NZ that this team is very green around the fringes and the public is not so confident. Yes the team will be competitive but is it capable of retaining the tropheys on offer.
Like I said in a previous post Is this an admission from Greg and now yourself that New Zealand is far superior and that we could feild two possibly three teams and still beat the Aussies?
Is it an attempt for the Aussies and their supporters to Build the ABs up so if they do win they can take more out of it than there actually is?
I’m curious as certain posters have been putting the boot in over and over again taliking about the failings of All Black rugby but come Test time the tables have turned to these same posters building them up and I find this all very intriguing.
June 11th 2009 @ 8:50am
Hemjay said | June 11th 2009 @ 8:50am | Report comment
Greg,
Well what do you need to know?
Kiwi boy of Maori / Greek and Maltese decent
I am a Taranaki lad living in Auckland after a few years in Melbourne I played footy right through Highschool and senior level for Spotswood.
Hemjay – Well my middle name is James and the Maori translation for James is Hemi. I am called Deejay by the lads and family so I just took parts of both names and there you go. Hemjay
June 11th 2009 @ 8:57am
Knives Out said | June 11th 2009 @ 8:57am | Report comment
Avec plaisir, Monsieur Russell. Now listen up.. I shall only be saying zis wence..
This is the best squad that France could send. Does that mean they will trouble the All Blacks? Probably not. Whilst various players have been selected and discarded with something approaching disregard, this squad has basically been the core group that Lievremont, N’Tamack and Retiere have been working with during the past two seasons. Injury has robbed the squad of Nallet, Bonnaire, Harinordoquy, Parra and Rougerie but surely the key issue, as always, is fatigue. The French season has been no shorter than usual and coupled with the ordinary test performances that Les Bleus has manufactured recently it is probably worth ruling out any upset.
The pack should be reasonably competitive: Servat is hefty but an erratic thrower and generally stoppably carrier; Barcella and Marconnet are v. good props, and despite his comedy Obelix-esque appearance Marconnet is a brutal scrummager; Pape and Millo-Chluski carry the element of journeyman about them but are still reasonably solid; the back row has a nice blend of cart horse (Dusautoir & Picamoles) and energy (Ouedraogo) but will lack the lineout nous of Harinordoquy.
The backs should be reasonably unpredictable: Dupuy makes his debut at 9 and will kick. He directs a pack well; Trinh-Duc is a liability (IMO I hasten to add); Traille (also a liability) and Bastareud will be physical but probably predictable; the back three have pace and are probably the focal point of the team. All three play for Toulouse and if NZ kick aimlessly they will punish them.
Like the starting xv the bench is a mixture of genuine energy and cart horse, with Szarzewski, Martin and Palisson falling into the former category, and Domingo/Mas, Chabal, Puricelli, Yachvilli and Jauzion falling into the latter category.
N.B. ‘That said, the NZ papers today are saying that two of the front-rowers from the T14 final will be in the 22 this weekend if they arrive in adequate health.’
Lievremont is yet to decide who will cover the prop position on the bench: Mas or Domingo. I suspect that Domingo will. He is versatile and is an impact player (although I am not his greatest fan).
June 11th 2009 @ 8:59am
Greg Russell said | June 11th 2009 @ 8:59am | Report comment
Hemjay – Spiro wrote “the Tri Nations side teams seem to be scrambllng to get the underdog status. The point of this always escapes me.”
I wrote “Personally I think the whole game of claiming underdog status is a bit tiresome, not to mention meaningless. I am perfectly happy for you to claim underdog status if you want to.”
I think this summarizes our attitudes.
The All Blacks are the no. 1 ranked side in the world, their trophy cabinet is full (3N, Bledisloe, grand slam, etc.). Until they actually start losing, why should one think of them as underdogs?
It’s a bit like the Australian cricket team. The core of players on which they built they no. 1 rankings are now mostly gone, but who honestly thinks of them as underdogs? And they have been losing a lot more of late than All Blacks have been!
I think you should just stop being nervous about how the ABs will perform. Granted, they are missing some big names and it is not the strongest ever team (as you keep saying). But just look at the how the new players have been performing in S14 – Ross, Messam, Read, Donald, etc. These players are not mugs – why shouldn’t they smash France and be extremely competitive (at the very least) in the 3N?
Maybe if the All Blacks lose a lot this year, as in 1998, then by the end of the year it might be reasonable to entertain the notion of them being underdogs. But until that actually happens, they ain’t no underdogs as far as I am concerned.
If you want to support the greatest team in the history of international rugby, you just have to accept that part of that territory is that it’s very difficult to be underdogs.
Anyway, this is how I see it. There are no hidden agendas in these comments, no hidden sarcasm, or anything like that.