Australia labour to victory against Bahrain
By Mike Tuckerman, 11 Jun 2009 Mike Tuckerman is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- ANZ stadium, David Carney, football, Football Federation Australia, Harry Kewell, Mark Schwarzer, Socceroos, World Cup
Related coverage
- Football news
- Socceroos news
- Socceroos Fixtures news
- World Cup Favourites news
- World Cup Roar of the Crowd Competition news
- Football World Cup - South Africa 2010 news
- Socceroos 2014 FIFA World Cup Qualifying news

Australia's Mile Sterjovski scissor kicks to set up Australia's 2nd goal by David Carney during their World Cup Asian qualifying match against Bahrain in Sydney on Wednesday, June 10, 2009. Australia defeated Bahrain 2-0. (AAP Image/Dean Lewins)
If the ability to grind out victories is the hallmark of a great football team, then the Socceroos should win the World Cup with ease. Once again Pim Verbeek’s team turned in a workman like performance as they laboured to a 2-0 victory on a bitterly cold evening at ANZ Stadium in Sydney overnight.
The positives just about outweighed the negatives: some decent performances from former Sydney FC duo David Carney and Mark Milligan – the latter of whom recovered from a fairly nervy start – a full length run-out for Harry Kewell and another clean sheet for stand-in captain Mark Schwarzer.
But despite the victory, Socceroos fans won’t be able to shake that nagging feeling that the team could have done so much more.
Watching Scott McDonald try and get his name on the scoresheet in the second half was like an exercise in sadomasochistic torture.
At one stage the Celtic striker appeared determined to go it alone as he embarked on a mazy run to slalom through the Bahrain defence, only for McDonald to step on the ball at the crucial moment with an unmarked Kewell to his left.
The diminutive striker had earlier missed a glorious opportunity on twenty-five minutes to open his account for the Socceroos, ballooning a volley over the crossbar when he had ample time to steady himself in front of goal.
He’d been played in by the extravagantly coiffured Brett Holman, who despite the questionable hair-do turned in one of his better performances in a Socceroos jersey.
Once again it was Mark Schwarzer who stole the headlines with another clean sheet, although Verbeek will be pleased with both Mile Sterjovski and David Carney for ultimately boosting Australia’s goal tally.
The Socceroos never really clicked into gear against a willing but technically limited opponent.
The game was played at a fairly leisurely pace throughout, and the lack of intensity wasn’t helped by the dearth of atmosphere inside the cavernous ANZ Stadium – or Stadium Australia to give it it’s FIFA-preferred moniker.
Football Federation Australia were caught between a rock and a hard place when it came to scheduling this fixture.
The Socceroos dream run through the qualifiers ensured they had already booked their place at the World Cup finals going into this match, making it a dead rubber for the home team.
While that’s a best-case scenario that the FFA will no doubt have envisaged, many fans would have missed out if the Socceroos still had something to play for and the match was scheduled at the far smaller Sydney Football Stadium.
Personally I’d have preferred to see the game played at Suncorp Stadium in Brisbane, but with the Socceroos roadshow a lucrative cash cow these days, it comes as no real surprise that the final two qualifiers were booked for the country’s largest two cities.
A big crowd is expected to turn out at the Melbourne Cricket Ground next week, and Australia can seal top spot in the group by taking a point off the Blue Samurai.
They’ll hope to take all three, of course, but a repeat of some of the individual errors that crept in at the back could see Mark Schwarzer’s long run of clean sheets broken.
Japan will be desperate to try and knock the Socceroos off the top of the standings, but their 1-1 draw at home to Qatar means they must beat Australia to do so.
Even a win over Takeshi Okada’s men may not be enough to silence Pim Verbeek’s critics – with the laconic Dutchman blasted by the tabloid press for his decision to enforce a media ban on his players.
That won’t bother the results-oriented Verbeek, and nor will his team’s performance against Bahrain following what was ultimately a comfortable win.
Socceroos fans hoping for a spectacle in Melbourne could be disappointed, however, if the performance in Sydney is anything to go by.
Recommend this story.
Follow Mike on twitter @Mike_Tuckerman

June 11th 2009 @ 11:49am
Pippinu said | June 11th 2009 @ 11:49am | Report comment
Bill
I think that is a fair enough question. There’s no doubting that blokes like Carle could have been given a longer run.
Yes, once you put the 3rd sub on, you run a very small risk of getting stuck with 10 men – but let’s be honest, in the context of last night’s game – it’s next to no risk.
June 11th 2009 @ 11:53am
Pippinu said | June 11th 2009 @ 11:53am | Report comment
sj
this is a novel argument for the Roar (and pretty much all other forums) – Holman more deserving than Carle! Defence splitting passes! He sounds like a veritable superman – how could we have been so blind?
June 11th 2009 @ 11:57am
Vicentin said | June 11th 2009 @ 11:57am | Report comment
Come on SJ – that’s gilding it a bit. Yeah, Holman is energetic. The first pass though was hardly defence splitting – the defence should have shut him down. It was a good but unremarkable pass. The second pass was better but frankly it was one of the few times he was vaguely in position. And your not going to judge Carle on his ten minutes but then you are going to find every negative too (make up your mind) – he got shut down … maybe because the opposition thought he was a threat with the ball unlike Holman. Are you related to him and is this all just family support? Very noble if that is the case.
Bill – in the case of bring Carle on with only seven minutes to go I suspect it is to wind people like me up! Cheers.
June 11th 2009 @ 12:01pm
Millster said | June 11th 2009 @ 12:01pm | Report comment
Let me just say that I made very sure that everyone in Bay 104 was left in no doubt as to my view that Holman is a complete muppet…!
June 11th 2009 @ 12:11pm
Vicentin said | June 11th 2009 @ 12:11pm | Report comment
Millster – brother I was spreading the word in Bay 128!
June 11th 2009 @ 12:11pm
Robbos said | June 11th 2009 @ 12:11pm | Report comment
Pip,
I think the general concenus, apart from SJ is;
Holman out. he is not good enough.
Give Carle a go at least see if he is good enough
June 11th 2009 @ 12:38pm
Kazama said | June 11th 2009 @ 12:38pm | Report comment
I agree with most of the above posters – Holman didn’t look that great from what I saw last night. Mike, great article as always, love your work but I disagree with you that it was one of his better performances.
Agree that Scott McDonald was trying way too hard to score. It clearly affected his performance and cost us at least two goals. The guy just has to stop listening to overly critical people who continually point out his lack of a Socceroos goal (like me) and worry about the team. Viduka has a poor record of scoring for the Roos, but his presence alone creates opportunities for others. Scott should just concentrate on his natural game and the goals will come, and regardless of whether they are scored by him or created by him he is playing his part as Viduka did.
June 11th 2009 @ 12:59pm
jimbo said | June 11th 2009 @ 12:59pm | Report comment
Holman was booed when his name was read out as they came out on to the stadium and I too was one of the ones booing – the first time ever I have heard a Socceroo get booed when their name is called out before the game.
Pimbo responded in his usual blunt, vindictive and couldn’t care less attitude, but for the 7 minutes he was on, Carle was still the best attacking midfielder on the park – being the only one in Pimbo’s squad of course.
What about Holman’s new hairdo – a cross between a French poodle and Britney Spears.
June 11th 2009 @ 1:07pm
Towser said | June 11th 2009 @ 1:07pm | Report comment
Regarding Holman apart from the usual Nick Carle one who could replace him if hes so crap. Why is Nick Carle the answer anyway. The sort of player he is according to “Carle fawners” is a creative genius isnt that it? Able to tear up defences by his ball artistry. This sort of player in my book to be effective nowadays in International football has to be playing at a high level. ie even Messi struggles at times to break down modern defences for Argentina. Carle plays at Crystal Palace.
I noticed this about Nick from wikipedia:-
“As a junior Carle won 5 national futsal titles”
So no doubt he has close ball skills developed in the small futsal arena. Now whilst there no doubt that Futsal is great for learning tight ball control youve got to know how & when to use it on the big field. Workrate comes into the equation.
Creativity is not enough on its own. Holman is not creative enough but can run all day Carle is creative but is a lazy bugar.
Now what was I saying. Stuff it I’m hungry its lunchtime.
June 11th 2009 @ 1:20pm
whiskeymac said | June 11th 2009 @ 1:20pm | Report comment
Sorry but, and as much as i wld like to see other players given a go, boo-ing him is a bit off. No one deserves that.