What’s really holding “soccer” back?
By Jesse Fink, 12 Jun 2009 Jesse Fink is a Roar Guru
- Tagged:
- Australian Football, football, Pim Verbeek, Robbie Slater, Socceroos
308 Have your say
Related coverage

Australia's Scott McDonald and Iraq's Haidar Hussain during the Australian Socceroos v Iraq World Cup qualifier. AAP Image/Dave Hunt
There were many talking points to come out of Wednesday night’s Australia Vs Bahrain WCQ, a major one being the continued and inexplicable international career of Brett Holman, which I have attended to in my Friday column for The World Game. It deserves a blog on its own.
Another is Scott McDonald, who couldn’t hit a barnyard door with a cowpat and whose time as a striker for the Socceroos must surely be up.
But what I found most interesting – and there wasn’t that much to find interesting at Homebush; it was probably the most tedious thing I’ve seen since one of those interminable Andy Warhol art movies from the 1960s – was the way Sydney’s Daily Telegraph launched a blistering character attack on Pim Verbeek in the lead-up to the game, blaming his media ban on players for the poor attendance.
It continued on Thursday.
Phil Rothfield, the executive editor of the sports pages, declared: “Soccer will never make it as a major sport in this country while Pim Verbeek is in charge of our national team. Forget about the boring style of soccer, it is Pim’s petulance and disdain for Australian culture which [sic] is holding the game back.”
Coming from a paper whose golden-boy reporter Nick Walshaw calls Scott McDonald “Scotty Mitchell” and which rated Holman’s performance as “6/10” you really have to question the wisdom of listening to anything the Telegraph says.
But it’s the biggest-selling paper in Australia’s biggest city, so we need to take notice.
Now I’ve made my own criticisms of Verbeek here and on TWG while also commending him, but the Telegraph has stepped over the line. We were all disappointed by the media ban, by the withdrawal of players including Tim Cahill, by the very late substitution of Nicky Carle for Holman, but they are the prerogatives of the national-team manager, whose job is to best prepare his team for South Africa 2010 as he sees fit.
He may not be right – in regards keeping Holman on the pitch I think he made a grievous error – but they are his decisions to make and we must respect his position, his experience and his reasons for making them.
So Pim himself is not holding the game back. Frankly how that can be said about someone who has just led Australia to the World Cup really is quite perplexing.
In my view what is holding the game back is the mediocrity of the media that reports on the sport we all love, chief among them the Daily Telegraph and its satellite papers in the News Limited family.
Four years on from our second World Cup qualification, they still have no idea what they’re writing about.
It is the stubborn persisting in calling it “soccer”, even on Fox Sports, the so-called “home of football”. It is the sequestering of live coverage of qualification games on to pay TV, where only those people who can afford it are able to watch our national football team while the vast majority of people are forced to go without.
Yes, I write for SBS, and it is thankfully how I earn a living, but even if I didn’t I’d still thank God for its very existence. SBS employs people with passion, fearlessness, knowledge and a real commitment to the sport – and has demonstrated that commitment through thick and thin, even back in the days when Socceroos was a dirty word.
That much cannot be said about many other media outlets when it comes to football.
There was a moment in Fox’s coverage before the Qatar match in Doha last weekend that summed up for me the fairweather nature of so much of the Australian media’s relationship with the biggest sport in the world.
Robbie Slater, the former Socceroo, was in the midst of praising Verbeek for getting Australia to the World Cup and then made an aside about criticism of the Dutchman as having come from “the usual quarters”.
The irony of this is that Slater, “soccer’s number one analyst” according to his column byline for News Limited, was the biggest critic of Verbeek’s appointment, even before he arrived in the country.
“Underwhelming” was his choice of word to describe how he felt about Verbeek being selected over the Frenchman Philippe Troussier.
Now Verbeek, if we are to judge by the tenor of the commentary on Fox, can do no wrong. Slater, particularly, is a Verbeek cheerboy.
Football cannot be held back in this country so long as there is a vibrant, knowledgeable, independent and committed media behind it that engages people with the sincerity of its passion and the sophistication of its debate.
The sport is just too big, too beautiful to be curtailed.
SBS is leading the way. Now it’s up to the rest of the side to pick up its game.
This is my 100th blog for The Roar and I’ve had a blast getting to know a lot of you. Special thanks to The Bear, Stifler’s Mom, Vicentin, Kazama, Midfielder, Ben of Phnom Penh, Millster, Sledgeross, Dasilva, Dickroo, Dazza Japan, Koala Bear, Mick of Newie, Pippinu and even the exasperating Slippery Jim (or Contrarian, as I’ve come to know him).
Your input has been enlightening, entertaining and always challenging. This small corner of the world game is better off for your presence.
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- Australian Football, football, Pim Verbeek, Robbie Slater, Socceroos

June 12th 2009 @ 8:41am
Brett McKay said | June 12th 2009 @ 8:41am | Report comment
Robbos, you’ve just hit on something there – surely the fact that a league-focussed (some might say ‘blinkered’) “journo” like Rothfield is using his column space to bag soccer/football (I’m still in transistion here myself) is a positive for the sport. Forget what he’s saying, but essentially his criticism is football taking column inches off another sport. If any publicity is good publicity, then perhaps this is actually a good thing??
June 12th 2009 @ 8:47am
Redb said | June 12th 2009 @ 8:47am | Report comment
Jesse,
Have you ever considered that futbol’s assocation with SBS might be holding back the game in Australia? SBS was set up as a multi-cultural TV channel for ‘new’ Australians, by its very nature it is marginalised.
Perhaps it is wrong also that SBS concentrates on futbol compared to other sports? Why should it give so much coverage to the ‘world game’ which lends itself to the not ‘mainstream’ Australian label?
When soccer, futbol whatever out grows SBS it will be a watershed moment for the code in Australia.
Redb
June 12th 2009 @ 9:06am
JF said | June 12th 2009 @ 9:06am | Report comment
The short answer is ‘Nothing’ – and this kills the football crowd, there are no excuses left! Neither the media, public sentiment, racism, accessibility, nothing is holding the sport back. But it is still not the no.1 sport in the country? How can this be? I have to agree with Kurt’s comments about the football crowd trotting out the same old line, this is a tired and boring argument. Every sport in this country must deal with operating in a crowded market, why does the football community feel they are any different?
June 12th 2009 @ 9:07am
Tom said | June 12th 2009 @ 9:07am | Report comment
I doubt there’s much that can be done to bring around the people who find Phil Rothfield credible.
Although I get really frustrated at the coverage football gets in Australia, I don’t really agree that its ‘holding back’ the sport. I think there are a number of individual journalists who are genuinely afraid of football’s rise and what it means for their own beloved code, but mostly I think the media just reports on whatever it reckons it can get people interested in.
The FFA has actually gotten much better at manipulating the media, and it shows in the increased coverage.
I think we’re moving towards a better balance in sporting coverage.
June 12th 2009 @ 9:19am
Towser said | June 12th 2009 @ 9:19am | Report comment
Seen dozens of these sort of articles as a football fan in the forty years I’ve lived here. All essentially the same.
However have to agree that nothing is holding the sport back today. The FFA are slowly but surely implementing programs to grow Football, that are starting to bite. In fact neither the Telegraph articles or this article will make an iota of difference.
The FFA are doing a great job.
June 12th 2009 @ 9:26am
Albert Ross said | June 12th 2009 @ 9:26am | Report comment
I simply do not understand why anyone would read the Sydney DT (or the Melbourne Hun for that matter) with their well documented history of made up stories, lies, distortions and barracking for their own pet “causes” over the last 30 to 40 years let alone take anything written therein seriously enough to base an online article on some story it might have concocted,
As the bumper sticker says “Is that the truth or did you see it the Daily Telegraph?”.
Otherwise some good points.
June 12th 2009 @ 9:35am
keeper11 said | June 12th 2009 @ 9:35am | Report comment
onya kurt…
you and yr deluded nrl sugar daddies in news limited wish the dreaded sockah is on a downward spiral…in your dreams
as smell follows a fart…we football followers know anytimne there is a feelgood story around ‘tha sockah’.
the usual crowd in news limited will come up with a shock-horror beatup..
i wonder…is this latest dump on the dreaded sockah due to the fact that sydney HAS embraced the socceroos over that banality offered by ‘international league’
Last 3 league tests attendances in sydney;
v NZ -35000 centenary test
v NZ- 26000 league world cup
v GB 16000 “world” cup
last 3 socceroos attendances in sydney:
v china 70000 asian qulaifier
v Qatar 57000 WC
v bahrain 40000 WC
theres lies and damn lies..and ofcourse you won’t read any of this in the sydney rag..
but i giuess kurt didn’t know any of this…for him and his ilk the total sum total of all their knowledge is..
1 sydney tabloid rag….ha.
June 12th 2009 @ 9:38am
The Bear said | June 12th 2009 @ 9:38am | Report comment
Redb, who is televising the Ashes??
June 12th 2009 @ 9:38am
True Tah said | June 12th 2009 @ 9:38am | Report comment
keeper11
the Socceroos played Uzbekistan in Sydney, not Qatar.
June 12th 2009 @ 9:41am
Mick of Newie said | June 12th 2009 @ 9:41am | Report comment
This is my concession post:
I am resigned to Carle not playing a role at the world cup
I am resigned to Holman playing a role (my genuine wish for the year is that he has a breakthrough year, plays well in the ECL and shows us all what Pim sees – same goes for Djite and Spiranovic)
I am resigned to seeing us playing 4 2 3 1 (what chance if all are fully fit that the 1 is Harry which would be a 4 2 4 0)
I am amazed that I found myself agreeing with Andy Postecoglu in his criticism of the 2 holding midfielders
As for the Telegraph, its influence is overstated. It wont hold the game back, when Rupert interests are aligned it will leap on board.