Cracks are showing in the Socceroos camp
By Davidde Corran, 17 Jun 2009 Davidde Corran is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- football, Pim Verbeek, Socceroos, Tim Cahill
Related coverage
- Football news
- Socceroos news
- Socceroos Fixtures news
- Tim Cahill news
- Socceroos 2014 FIFA World Cup Qualifying news

Australia's Scott McDonald and Iraq's Haidar Hussain during the Australian Socceroos v Iraq World Cup qualifier. AAP Image/Dave Hunt
It’s been a rather curious week for Australian football. Set to the backdrop of an historic World Cup bid, there’s been equal doses of good and bad news.
A little over a week ago the Socceroos qualified for consecutive World Cups for the first time. There was no penalty shootout this time and, in truth, no fuss.
While you could be forgiven for expecting universal praise for the Socceroos after their historic achievement, it hasn’t been that way.
The criticism from some parts of the media and fans about how the national team has played, which has been prevalent throughout this campaign, has continued, many arguing that on the pitch the Socceroos have been boring.
At the very least, Australia hasn’t been convincing in many of their displays.
This criticism was then coupled with a media debacle off the pitch. The blanket media ban issued by Socceroos coach Pim Verbeek on his players in the lead up to last week’s match with Bahrain was unequivocally a mistake.
Despite these issues, the thing that’s really concerning me are the cracks that are beginning to appear in the Socceroos’ change-room.
Tim Cahill’s alleged, and that’s the key word here, misdemeanour at a Sydney nightclub has mostly flown under the radar. Unsurprisingly, my colleagues in the football media have been keen not to over play the incident, which could potentially be damaging to the game.
We don’t know what actually happened that night, and I wont speculate. Instead, I’d like to know why the players were out celebrating while in camp. There’s a difference between having a quite few in the hotel bar and going out clubbing in Kings Cross.
In truth, I’ve been worried about this for a while.
When I was in Sydney for the Socceroos game against Uzbekistan earlier this year, a source very close to the team told me of a late night sojourn three players took in the lead up to that match. Apparently they arrived back at the hotel in the very early hours of the morning to a very unhappy coach.
No suspensions or public punishment, though.
On top of that, did anyone else find the bushfire fund raising dinner ‘hosted’ by just three members of the national team curious?
If you didn’t, then I’ll tell you who did: the other members of that squad who weren’t invited and then had to pay for their own seats. Football Federation Australia had to pick up the tab and it was messy situation for all involved.
It doesn’t seem like the sort of incident that helps unify a team does it?
At the time, it was mentioned to me that while the team keeps winning, these internal problems will remain in-house. Well, they’re starting to leak.
Personally, Lucas Neill’s decision to select the team himself by picking up a yellow card against Qatar was even more revealing.
In the days after the Qatar match, Verbeek revealed that he hadn’t known Neill was planning such an action. That set alarm bells ringing in my head.
As Craig Foster eloquently explained last week, Guss Hiddink wouldn’t have let that fly. Not only was Neill’s behaviour unbecoming of the captain of a national team, I think it undermined Verbeek’s leadership.
So, Socceroos out late at night when in camp, innuendo that this isn’t the first time, and players making decisions themselves on when they’ll play.
It doesn’t look good.
Don’t get me wrong, I’m a supporter of Pim Verbeek, and while, like many, I have concerns about how the Socceroos will fare next year at the World Cup, I think Verbeek’s earned the right to lead us to South Africa.
The respect he showed the Japanese media at his pre-match press conference yesterday also reiterated the good will he’s helped to build in the region for us.
But I’m still worried.
When a car windscreen gets a crack, it’s already in trouble. Eventually the bumps and shocks as the car drives along the road causes the crack to grow until eventually the window shatters or the windscreen is replaced.
The road to South Africa has already been a long and windy one. Let’s hope the rest of the way isn’t too bumpy.
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- football, Pim Verbeek, Socceroos, Tim Cahill

June 17th 2009 @ 9:22am
GeneralAshnak said | June 17th 2009 @ 9:22am | Report comment
Sorry forgot to comment on the media ban; this ban resembles the media ban that basically every major sporting team imposes on its players in the lead up to a match in order to minimise the distraction from the game they are going to play. In the modern environment where the team is a product in and of its self media statements are usually extremely regulated and are determined by the marketing department whose job it is to ensure that any media coverage is flattering and presents the product (team) in the best possible light for the most possible exposure to their target market. Thinking differently is naive.
June 17th 2009 @ 9:25am
Towser said | June 17th 2009 @ 9:25am | Report comment
Tom said
“This is a collection of rumours and half-truths spun into an article.”
I go even further & call it bullshit.
June 17th 2009 @ 9:26am
Brett McKay said | June 17th 2009 @ 9:26am | Report comment
Robbos, I absolutely agree with you. My point was that the football media saw it for what it was (or wasn’t), reported it accordingly, and the story died. But we all know that there’ve been many similarly-themed AFL or NRL player “incidents” that have also turned out to be nothing, but have still been stretched out as a “story” for several days.
In the Cahill case, it’s actually a credit to the football media for not making something out of nothing, and it’s refreshing..
June 17th 2009 @ 9:39am
Janex said | June 17th 2009 @ 9:39am | Report comment
Don’t like this articles presumption and assumptions. I would find it incredibly very unlikley that Neill and Pim hadn’t touched the yellow card situation. Pim certainly can not publicly support Neills’s actions, but behind closed doors it’s is completly different. Was it in the team best interest’s , possibly yes, only if Neill doesn’t receive a red tonight! As for Chaill’s indiscrestion, ask the question, where did this come from? Could it possibly be someone that is jaded media person, even from the DT! Who knows, but the source hasn’t come forward and not a woft of smoke to be found really. The media ban, remember Pim did this for the Uzbek game in Sydney also. Pim is educating the media on what he expects from the relationship, limited access at times, please respect, and open access at other times, again please respect. I personally appreciate his professionalism and strong personna, whilst being very calm. How would a GA and FF have reacted to the same commentary at present that is being levelled at the current Australian coach if they were in his shoes, the media would be rubbing their hands together, unfortunatly it is simply content to get the thier story in lights, not in anyones best intended interests. And for me as this article is too, knowone should be surprised if the Australian Football team members, especially those who are the foundation of the team start to openly express their displeasue of this childish media behaviour…or is that the purpose, to bring them down to the Cricket and NRL level!!
June 17th 2009 @ 9:50am
Pippinu said | June 17th 2009 @ 9:50am | Report comment
I was pretty much nonplussed when I heard about the Cahill “incident” – and I remain nonplussed.
Or am I plussed?
Actually, I’m not sure what the hell I am.
What are we talking about anyway??
June 17th 2009 @ 10:10am
mahony said | June 17th 2009 @ 10:10am | Report comment
Toim / Towser / Robbos – nail – head!
Davidde – fail!
June 17th 2009 @ 10:28am
keeper11 said | June 17th 2009 @ 10:28am | Report comment
‘had it been an afl/nrl player….hint hint ‘
what a crock of utter B.S…!!
had the australian league team qualified for the worlds biggest sporting event ..
with the feelgood factor and massive cudos to come for the game both profile and financial wise..
and returned home to play on a freezing eveing a noname team infront 4000 in sydney
then 7000 plus in melbourne…
they would have been front/back/ xx middle pages inbetween ..
with a conga line of league propogandists trumpeting leagues unrivalled successes nationally and internationally..
no..its ‘tha bl*dy sockah’ and since the team returned its been ..’beat ups on..
‘killing soccer’
‘sydney shuns socceroos’
‘shock horror hightclub ‘incident’
‘is this team boring’.
so nothing but an obvious instigated hate campaign by the usual agenda driven to undermine the feelgood factor and everything about the game and the team ..
June 17th 2009 @ 10:30am
Koala Bear said | June 17th 2009 @ 10:30am | Report comment
The Bear,
thanks for the Allen Jones, radio audio transcript.. it showed what irresponsible journalism can do to an innocent family of the likes of Timmy Cahill’s .. Yes we had a simular one with Frank Lampard of Chelsea … This sort of journalism at the expense of football’s most talented performers has to stop.. For those who have not heard Allen Jones’s rant on the matter you can hear it on Jesse’s blog ..
~~~~~~~
KB
June 17th 2009 @ 10:34am
Slippery Jim said | June 17th 2009 @ 10:34am | Report comment
Neill deliberately fouled a player in a tackle from behind to earn that yellow (pretty disgusting, particularly as he has broken players legs before with his tackles), the “strategy” behind it was, as Neill himself said afterwards:
“It was probably a borderline orange, but I want to play the Japan game and the only way to do that was to make sure I miss the Bahrain game.”
The fact that Lucas Neill could easily have injured the player for a cynical strategic benefit is a disgrace – he once shattered Jamie Carraghers leg in a horrendous tackle, for example. That tackle was called ‘cowardly’ by Graeme Sounness.
What is interesting is that he claimed after breaking Carraghers leg that “I also play it [the game of football] fairly”. It seems he has thrown that fine attitude towards fair pklay out of the window in seeking a benefit by deliberately fouling another player. It was the cowards way out to take a yellow rather than play the game professionally and skillfully to avoid a yellow card in subsequent matches.
June 17th 2009 @ 10:35am
Pippinu said | June 17th 2009 @ 10:35am | Report comment
I go by one maxim in life, one only (in what has been a very successful life I might add).
So listen up.
Treat with the utmost suspicion anyone who spells David with a double “d”, and a superfluous vowel, and wears facial hair to boot.